Session 2012 - 13
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament


 
 

63

 

House of Commons

 
 

Thursday 28 February 2013

 

Public Bill Committee

 

New Amendments handed in are marked thus Parliamentary Star

 

Parliamentary Star - whiteAmendments which will comply with the required notice period at their next appearance

 

Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill


 

Note

 

The Amendments have been arranged in accordance with the Order of the

 

Committee [12 February].

 


 

Kate Green

 

Chris Bryant

 

9

 

Clause  2,  page  2,  line  9,  after ‘compelled’, insert ‘by a couple who wish to be

 

married’.

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Tim Loughton

 

Jim Shannon

 

34

 

Clause  2,  page  2,  line  22,  at end insert—

 

‘(3A)    

No person shall be subject to discrimination or other unfavourable action in the

 

course of employment or in the provision of goods or services for stating or

 

teaching that a same sex marriage is not morally equivalent to a marriage between

 

a man and a woman.

 

(3B)    

Where a person alleges in any proceedings that there has been discrimination or

 

other unfavourable action against him for reasons which include that he has stated

 

or taught that a same sex marriage is not morally equivalent to a marriage between

 

a man and a woman, it shall be for the person against whom those proceedings

 

are brought to prove that the reasons for the action constituting the alleged

 

discrimination or other unfavourable treatment did not include those statements

 

or teaching regarding same sex marriage.

 

(3C)    

The reference in subsection (3A) above to discrimination or other unfavourable

 

action in the course of employment or in the provision of goods or service

 

includes—


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 28 February 2013                  

64

 

Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill, continued

 
 

(a)    

discriminating by not concluding a contract of employment with the

 

person stating or teaching that a same sex marriage is not morally

 

equivalent to a marriage between a man and a woman,

 

(b)    

discriminating by not concluding a contract for the provision of goods or

 

services with the person stating or teaching that a same sex marriage is

 

not morally equivalent to a marriage between a man and a woman,

 

(c)    

not offering a benefit, whether financial or not, to the person stating or

 

teaching that a same sex marriage is not morally equivalent to a marriage

 

between a man and a woman that is or would be offered to a person

 

stating or teaching that a same sex marriage is morally equivalent to a

 

marriage between a man and a woman.’.

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Tim Loughton

 

Jim Shannon

 

24

 

Clause  2,  page  3,  line  16,  at end insert—

 

‘“compelled” includes, but is not limited to, the following activities:

 

(a)    

the imposition of any penalties (whether civil or criminal),

 

(b)    

the less favourable treatment of a person by a public authority,

 

and

 

(c)    

the intitiation of any legal action by way of a review,

 

 in each case as a result of the exercise by a relevant governing or relevant

 

religious organisation of functions relating to giving any consent or to

 

refusing to give any consent provided for in sections 2, 4, 5, or 7 of this

 

Act.’.

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Tim Loughton

 

Jim Shannon

 

25

 

Clause  2,  page  3,  line  21,  leave out subsection (b).

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Tim Loughton

 

Jim Shannon

 

26

 

Clause  2,  page  4,  line  13,  at end insert—

 

“Marriage counselling etc.

 

25B(1)  

A person does not contravene section 29 only because the person conducts—

 

(a)    

a marriage preparation course,

 

(b)    

a marriage counselling or guidance service, or

 

(c)    

an agency to help people find a spouse,

 

            

and does not extend those services to marriages of same-sex couples.’.


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 28 February 2013                  

65

 

Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill, continued

 
 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Tim Loughton

 

Jim Shannon

 

27

 

Clause  2,  page  4,  line  13,  at end insert—

 

‘Marriage according to religious rites: Opt-in and opt-out activity

 

25B(1)  

A person does not contravene section 29 only because the person—

 

(a)    

refrains from undertaking an opt-in activity, or

 

(b)    

undertakes an opt-out activity.

 

      (2)  

Expressions used in this paragraph and in section 2 of the Marriage (Same Sex

 

Couples) Act 2013 have the same meaning in this paragraph as in that

 

section.’.

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Tim Loughton

 

Jim Shannon

 

28

 

Clause  2,  page  4,  line  13,  at end insert—

 

‘Religious premises: Trustees

 

25B(1)  

A person who is the trustee of a trust for the advancement of religion does not

 

contravene section 29 only because he refuses to consent to premises owned or

 

controlled by the trust being used for marriages of same sex couples.’.

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Tim Loughton

 

Jim Shannon

 

29

 

Clause  2,  page  4,  line  13,  at end insert—

 

‘(6)    

For the purposes of section 149 of the Equality Act 2010, no regard may be had

 

by any public authority to any decision by a relevant governing authority or

 

relevant religious organisation to give any consent or to refuse to give any consent

 

provided for in sections 2, 4, 5, or 7 of this Act’.

 


 

Chris Bryant

 

43

 

Parliamentary Star - white    

Schedule  1,  page  18,  line  7,  leave out from beginning to end of line 12.

 


 

Kate Green

 

Chris Bryant

 

Stephen Williams

 

Stephen Doughty

 

2

 

Clause  8,  page  8,  line  17,  leave out ‘may’ and insert ‘shall’.


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 28 February 2013                  

66

 

Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill, continued

 
 

Kate Green

 

Chris Bryant

 

Stephen Williams

 

Stephen Doughty

 

3

 

Clause  8,  page  8,  line  20,  leave out ‘may’ and insert ‘shall’.

 


 

Dr Julian Huppert

 

7

 

Clause  9,  page  10,  line  24,  at end insert—

 

‘(9)    

Where a civil partnership formed under part 1, section 96 of the Civil Partnership

 

Act (Civil Partnership with former spouse) is converted into a marriage under this

 

section—

 

(a)    

the civil partnership ends on the conversion, and

 

(b)    

if both partners so elect, the resulting marriage is to be treated as having

 

subsisted since the marriage dissolved under Schedule 2 of the Gender

 

Recognition Act 2004 was formed.’.

 


 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Jim Shannon

 

Tim Loughton

 

41

 

Parliamentary Star - white    

Schedule  2,  page  21,  line  29,  leave out paragraph 2.

 


 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Jim Shannon

 

Tim Loughton

 

39

 

Parliamentary Star - white    

Clause  11,  page  10,  line  41,  leave out subsections (1) and (2).

 


 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Jim Shannon

 

Tim Loughton

 

42

 

Parliamentary Star - white    

Schedule  4,  page  26,  line  9,  leave out paragraphs 3 and 4.

 

Mr Rob Wilson

 

37

 

Parliamentary Star - white    

Schedule  4,  page  26,  line  14,  leave out sub-paragraph (2).


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 28 February 2013                  

67

 

Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill, continued

 
 

Mr Rob Wilson

 

38

 

Parliamentary Star - white    

Schedule  4,  page  26,  line  21,  leave out sub-paragraph (3).

 


 

Dr Julian Huppert

 

5

 

Schedule  5,  page  36,  leave out lines 10 to 37 and insert—

 

            

‘Section 4 (successful applications): for subsections (2) and (3) substitute—

 

  “(2)  

The certificate is to be a full gender recognition certificate if—

 

(a)    

the applicant is not a civil partner and does not request an

 

interim gender recognition certificate,

 

(b)    

or the applicant is a civil partner who does not request an

 

interim gender recognition certificate and the Panel has

 

decided to issue a full gender recognition certificate to the

 

other party to the civil partnership.

 

      (3)  

The certificate is to be an interim gender recognition certificate if

 

either—

 

(a)    

the applicant is a party to a protected civil partnership and

 

the other party to the civil partnership has not made an

 

application under section 1(1),

 

(b)    

the applicant is a party to a protected civil partnership and

 

the Panel has decided not to issue a full gender recognition

 

certificate to the other party to the civil partnership,

 

(c)    

or the applicant is party to a protected marriage, requests an

 

interim gender recognition certificate and the application

 

includes a statutory declaration of consent from the

 

applicant’s spouse.

 

    (3A)  

If a gender recognition panel issues a full gender recognition

 

certificate under this section to an applicant who is a party to a

 

marriage or civil partnership, the panel must give the applicant’s

 

spouse notice of the issue of the certificate.”.’.

 

Dr Julian Huppert

 

6

 

Schedule  5,  page  39,  line  39,  leave out ‘(by virtue of section 4(2)(b) or 4A)’.

 

Hugh Bayley

 

13

 

Schedule  5,  page  40,  line  18,  at end insert—

 

‘Reinstatement of marriages annulled to permit a person to obtain a gender recognition

 

certificate

 

9A         

Schedule 4 (Effect on Marriage) at beginning insert:

 

      (1)  

This section applies to a formerly married couple whose marriage was

 

annulled in order to permit one or both partners to that marriage to obtain a full

 

gender recognition certificate provided that:

 

(a)    

the marriage was annulled following the coming into force of the

 

Gender Recognition Act 2004, and


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 28 February 2013                  

68

 

Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill, continued

 
 

(b)    

the formerly married couple either:

 

(i)    

formed a civil partnership with each other within six months

 

of the annulment of their marriage, and continue to maintain

 

their civil partnership, or

 

(ii)    

have continued to live together in the same household since

 

the annulment of their marriage, and

 

(iii)    

both partners to the former marriage give notice that they wish

 

their marriage to be reinstated - with effect from the date that

 

it was annulled.

 

      (2)  

When notice is given under section (1)(b)(iii), the marriage shall be reinstated

 

with effect from the date it was annulled.

 

      (3)  

In such circumstances the continuity of the marriage shall not be affected in

 

any way and all legal rights that accrued to either party to that marriage will be

 

reinstated - including the right to pensions, tax status in the UK, rights to

 

property and inheritance.

 

      (4)  

In those cases where the couple subsequently formed a civil partnership, the

 

civil partnership shall be set aside.

 

      (5)  

The couple whose marriage is reinstated shall be compensated from public

 

funds for the costs they incurred in annulling the marriage, seperating their

 

financial affairs, forming a civil parthership and in respect of their costs

 

incurred in the UK or abroad as a result of the annulmen tof their marriage.”.’.

 

Dr Julian Huppert

 

8

 

Schedule  5,  page  40,  leave out lines 30 to 31 and insert—

 

‘(a)    

the registration of qualifying marriages,

 

(b)    

the registration of qualifying civil partnerships,

 

(c)    

the issue of replacement marriage certificates displaying the new

 

details of the parties to the marriage but maintaining the original date,

 

(d)    

the issue of replacement birth certificates where the application is

 

shown on the certificate, with the consent of the other parent named

 

and—

 

(i)    

where the child has reached 16 years of age, the consent of the

 

child to whom the birth certificate relates,

 

(ii)    

where the child has not yet reached the age of 16 years, the

 

consent of the other parent named on the birth certificate,

 

where present.’.

 

Hugh Bayley

 

14

 

Schedule  5,  page  41,  line  5,  after ‘to’, insert ‘one or’.

 


 

Dr Julian Huppert

 

4

 

Schedule  7,  page  50,  line  37,  at end insert—

 

‘(24A)  

Section 12 (grounds on which a marriage is voidable): omit paragraph (h).’.


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 28 February 2013                  

69

 

Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill, continued

 
 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Tim Loughton

 

Jim Shannon

 

30

 

Schedule  7,  page  52,  line  26,  at end insert—

 

‘Human Rights Act 1998. (c.42)

 

42         

The Human Rights Act 1998 is amended as follows.

 

43         

Section 6: after subsection 3 insert—

 

“(3A)    

A “public authority” for the purposes of this section does not include

 

a relevant governing authority or relevant religious organisation in

 

respect of functions relating to giving any consent or to refusing to

 

give any consent provided for in sections 2, 4, 5, or 7 of the [Marriage

 

(Same Sex Couples)] Act 2013.”.’.

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Tim Loughton

 

Jim Shannon

 

31

 

Schedule  7,  page  52,  line  26,  at end insert—

 

‘42      

The Education Act 1996 is amended as follows.

 

43         

Section 403 (sex education: manner of provision), after subsection (1D)

 

insert—

 

“(1E)    

For the purposes of subsection (1A), no school shall be under any duty

 

as a result of guidance issued, to promote or endorse any

 

understanding of the nature of marriage that is contrary to the

 

character and designation of the school.”.’.

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Tim Loughton

 

Jim Shannon

 

32

 

Schedule  7,  page  52,  line  26,  at end insert—

 

‘Public Order Act 1986

 

42  (1)  

Section 29JA is amended as follows.

 

43  (2)  

For section 29JA there shall be subsituted the following—

 

“29JA    

Protection of freedom of expression (sexual orientation)

 

            

In this Part, for the avoidance of doubt, the discussion or criticism

 

of sexual conduct or practices or the urging of persons to refrain

 

from or modify such conduct or practices or the discussion or

 

criticism of same-sex marriage shall not be taken of itself to be

 

threatening or intend to stir up hatred.”.’.

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Tim Loughton

 

Jim Shannon

 

33

 

Schedule  7,  page  52,  line  26,  at end insert—

 

‘42(1)  

Section 89 (interpretation and exceptions): After subsection (1) insert—


 
contents continue
 

© Parliamentary copyright
Revised 28 February 2013