Session 2012 - 13
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament


 
 

305

 

SUPPLEMENT TO THE VOTES AND PROCEEDINGS

 
 

Monday 18 March 2013

 

Report Stage Proceedings

 

Crime and Courts Bill [Lords], As Amended


 

[SECOND DAY]


 

New Clauses and New Schedules standing in the name of the Prime Minister

 

and relating to press conduct

 

Awards of exemplary damages

 

The Prime Minister

 

Secretary Theresa May

 

The Deputy Prime Minister

 

Edward Miliband

 

Agreed to on division  NC21A

 

Parliamentary Star    

To move the following Clause:—

 

‘(1)    

This section applies where—

 

(a)    

a relevant claim is made against a person (“the defendant”),

 

(b)    

the defendant was a relevant publisher at the material time,

 

(c)    

the claim is related to the publication of news-related material, and

 

(d)    

the defendant is found liable in respect of the claim.

 

(2)    

Exemplary damages may not be awarded against the defendant in respect of the

 

claim if the defendant was a member of an approved regulator at the material

 

time.

 

(3)    

But the court may disregard subsection (2) if—

 

(a)    

the approved regulator imposed a penalty on the defendant in respect of

 

the defendant’s conduct or decided not to do so,

 

(b)    

the court considers, in light of the information available to the approved

 

regulator when imposing the penalty or deciding not to impose one, that

 

the regulator was manifestly irrational in imposing the penalty or

 

deciding not to impose one, and

 

(c)    

the court is satisfied that, but for subsection (2), it would have made an

 

award of exemplary damages under this section against the defendant.

 

(4)    

Where the court is not prevented from making an award of exemplary damages

 

by subsection (2) (whether because that subsection does not apply or the court is

 

permitted to disregard that subsection as a result of subsection (3)), the court—

 

(a)    

may make an award of exemplary damages if it considers it appropriate

 

to do so in all the circumstances of the case, but

 

(b)    

may do so only under this section.

 

(5)    

Exemplary damages may be awarded under this section only if they are claimed.


 
 

Report Stage Proceedings: 18 March 2013                  

306

 

Crime and Courts Bill[Lords], continued

 
 

(6)    

Exemplary damages may be awarded under this section only if the court is

 

satisfied that—

 

(a)    

the defendant’s conduct has shown a deliberate or reckless disregard of

 

an outrageous nature for the claimant’s rights,

 

(b)    

the conduct is such that the court should punish the defendant for it, and

 

(c)    

other remedies would not be adequate to punish that conduct.

 

(7)    

Exemplary damages may be awarded under this section whether or not another

 

remedy is granted.

 

(8)    

The decision on the question of—

 

(a)    

whether exemplary damages are to be awarded under this section, or

 

(b)    

the amount of such damages,

 

    

must not be left to a jury.’.

 


 

Awards of exemplary damages

 

The Prime Minister

 

Secretary Theresa May

 

Secretary William Hague

 

Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer

 

Secretary Chris Grayling

 

Secretary Maria Miller

 

Not selected  NC21

 

To move the following Clause:—

 

‘(1)    

This section applies where—

 

(a)    

a relevant claim is made against a person (“the defendant”),

 

(b)    

the defendant was a relevant publisher at the material time,

 

(c)    

the claim is related to the publication of news-related material, and

 

(d)    

the defendant is found liable in respect of the claim.

 

(2)    

Exemplary damages may not be awarded against the defendant in respect of the

 

claim if the defendant was a member of an approved regulator at the material

 

time.

 

(3)    

Where the court is not prevented from making an award of exemplary damages

 

by subsection (2), the court—

 

(a)    

may make an award of exemplary damages if it considers it appropriate

 

to do so in all the circumstances of the case, but

 

(b)    

may do so only under this section.

 

(4)    

Exemplary damages may be awarded under this section only if they are claimed.

 

(5)    

Exemplary damages may be awarded under this section only if the court is

 

satisfied that—

 

(a)    

the defendant’s conduct has shown a deliberate or reckless disregard of

 

an outrageous nature for the claimant’s rights,

 

(b)    

the conduct is such that the court should punish the defendant for it, and

 

(c)    

other remedies would not be adequate to punish that conduct.

 

(6)    

Exemplary damages may be awarded under this section whether or not another

 

remedy is granted.

 

(7)    

The decision on the question of—

 

(a)    

whether exemplary damages are to be awarded under this section, or


 
 

Report Stage Proceedings: 18 March 2013                  

307

 

Crime and Courts Bill[Lords], continued

 
 

(b)    

the amount of such damages,

 

    

must not be left to a jury.’.

 


 

Relevant considerations

 

The Prime Minister

 

Secretary Theresa May

 

Secretary William Hague

 

Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer

 

Secretary Chris Grayling

 

Secretary Maria Miller

 

Agreed to  NC22

 

To move the following Clause:—

 

‘(1)    

This section applies where the court is deciding whether the circumstances of the

 

case make it appropriate for exemplary damages to be awarded under section

 

[Awards of exemplary damages].

 

(2)    

The court must have regard to the principle that exemplary damages must not

 

usually be awarded if, at any time before the decision comes to be made, the

 

defendant has been convicted of an offence involving the conduct complained of.

 

(3)    

The court must take account of the following—

 

(a)    

whether membership of an approved regulator was available to the

 

defendant at the material time;

 

(b)    

if such membership was available, the reasons for the defendant not

 

being a member;

 

(c)    

so far as relevant in the case of the conduct complained of, whether

 

internal compliance procedures of a satisfactory nature were in place and,

 

if so, the extent to which they were adhered to in that case.

 

(4)    

The reference in subsection (3)(c) to “internal compliance procedures” being in

 

place is a reference to any procedures put in place by the defendant for the

 

purpose of ensuring that—

 

(a)    

material is not obtained by or on behalf of the defendant in an

 

inappropriate way, and

 

(b)    

material is not published by the defendant in inappropriate

 

circumstances.

 

(5)    

The court may regard deterring the defendant and others from similar conduct as

 

an object of punishment.

 

(6)    

This section is not to be read as limiting the power of the court to take account of

 

any other matters it considers relevant to its decision.’.

 



 
 

Report Stage Proceedings: 18 March 2013                  

308

 

Crime and Courts Bill[Lords], continued

 
 

Amount of exemplary damages

 

The Prime Minister

 

Secretary Theresa May

 

Secretary William Hague

 

Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer

 

Secretary Chris Grayling

 

Secretary Maria Miller

 

Agreed to  NC23

 

To move the following Clause:—

 

‘(1)    

This section applies where the court decides to award exemplary damages under

 

section [Awards of exemplary damages].

 

(2)    

The court must have regard to these principles in determining the amount of

 

exemplary damages—

 

(a)    

the amount must not be more than the minimum needed to punish the

 

defendant for the conduct complained of;

 

(b)    

the amount must be proportionate to the seriousness of the conduct.

 

(3)    

The court must take account of these matters in determining the amount of

 

exemplary damages—

 

(a)    

the nature and extent of any loss or harm caused, or intended to be caused,

 

by the defendant’s conduct;

 

(b)    

the nature and extent of any benefit the defendant derived or intended to

 

derive from such conduct.

 

(4)    

The court may regard deterring the defendant and others from similar conduct as

 

an object of punishment.

 

(5)    

This section is not to be read as limiting the power of the court to take account of

 

any other matters it considers relevant to its decision.’.

 


 

Multiple claimants

 

The Prime Minister

 

Secretary Theresa May

 

Secretary William Hague

 

Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer

 

Secretary Chris Grayling

 

Secretary Maria Miller

 

Agreed to  NC24

 

To move the following Clause:—

 

‘(1)    

This section applies where a relevant publisher—

 

(a)    

is a defendant to a relevant claim, and

 

(b)    

is found liable to two or more persons in respect of the claim (“the

 

persons affected”).

 

(2)    

In deciding whether to award exemplary damages under section [Awards of

 

exemplary damages] or the amount of such damages to award (whether to one or

 

more of the persons affected), the court must take account of any settlement or

 

compromise by any persons of a claim in respect of the conduct.

 

(3)    

But the court may take account of any such settlement or compromise only if the

 

defendant agrees.


 
 

Report Stage Proceedings: 18 March 2013                  

309

 

Crime and Courts Bill[Lords], continued

 
 

(4)    

If the court awards exemplary damages under section [Awards of exemplary

 

damages] to two or more of the persons affected, the total amount awarded must

 

be such that it does not punish the defendant excessively.

 

(5)    

If the court awards exemplary damages under section [Awards of exemplary

 

damages] to one or more of the persons affected, no later claim may be made for

 

exemplary damages as regards the conduct.’.

 


 

Multiple defendants

 

The Prime Minister

 

Secretary Theresa May

 

Secretary William Hague

 

Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer

 

Secretary Chris Grayling

 

Secretary Maria Miller

 

Agreed to  NC25

 

To move the following Clause:—

 

‘(1)    

Any liability of two or more persons for exemplary damages awarded under

 

section [Awards of exemplary damages] is several (and not joint or joint and

 

several).

 

(2)    

Subsection (1) has effect subject to the law relating to the liability of a partner for

 

the conduct of another partner.

 

(3)    

Where the liability of two or more persons for exemplary damages is several, no

 

contribution in respect of the damages may be recovered by any of them under

 

section 1 of the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978.’.

 


 

Awards of aggravated damages

 

The Prime Minister

 

Secretary Theresa May

 

Secretary William Hague

 

Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer

 

Secretary Chris Grayling

 

Secretary Maria Miller

 

Agreed to  NC26

 

To move the following Clause:—

 

‘(1)    

This section applies where—

 

(a)    

a relevant claim is made against a person (“the defendant”),

 

(b)    

the defendant was a relevant publisher at the material time,

 

(c)    

the claim is related to the publication of news-related material, and

 

(d)    

the defendant is found liable in respect of the claim.

 

(2)    

Aggravated damages may be awarded against the defendant only to compensate

 

for mental distress and not for purposes of punishment.


 
 

Report Stage Proceedings: 18 March 2013                  

310

 

Crime and Courts Bill[Lords], continued

 
 

(3)    

In this section, “aggravated damages” means damages that were commonly called

 

aggravated before the passing of this Act and which—

 

(a)    

are awarded against a person in respect of the person’s motive or

 

exceptional conduct, but

 

(b)    

are not exemplary damages or restitutionary damages.

 

(4)    

Nothing in this section is to be read as implying that, in cases where this section

 

does not apply, aggravated damages may be awarded for purposes of

 

punishment.’.

 


 

Awards of costs

 

The Prime Minister

 

Secretary Theresa May

 

The Deputy Prime Minister

 

Edward Miliband

 

Agreed to  NC27A

 

Parliamentary Star    

To move the following Clause:—

 

‘(1)    

This section applies where—

 

(a)    

a relevant claim is made against a person (“the defendant”),

 

(b)    

the defendant was a relevant publisher at the material time, and

 

(c)    

the claim is related to the publication of news-related material.

 

(2)    

If the defendant was a member of an approved regulator at the time when the

 

claim was commenced (or was unable to be a member at that time for reasons

 

beyond the defendant’s control or it would have been unreasonable in the

 

circumstances for the defendant to have been a member at that time), the court

 

must not award costs against the defendant unless satisfied that—

 

(a)    

the issues raised by the claim could have been resolved by using an

 

arbitration scheme of the approved regulator, or

 

(b)    

it is just and equitable in all the circumstances of the case to award costs

 

against the defendant.

 

(3)    

If the defendant was not a member of an approved regulator at the time when the

 

claim was commenced (but would have been able to be a member at that time and

 

it would have been reasonable in the circumstances for the defendant to have been

 

a member at that time), the court must award costs against the defendant unless

 

satisfied that—

 

(a)    

the issues raised by the claim could not have been resolved by using an

 

arbitration scheme of the approved regulator (had the defendant been a

 

member), or

 

(b)    

it is just and equitable in all the circumstances of the case to make a

 

different award of costs or make no award of costs.

 

(4)    

For the purposes of subsections (2) and (3), a claim could have been resolved by

 

using an arbitration scheme of an approved regulator if, at the time when the

 

claim was commenced, the approved regulator had arrangements in place for an

 

arbitration scheme under which the claim could have been referred for

 

determination by an arbitrator appointed under the scheme.

 

(5)    

The Secretary of State must take steps to put in place arrangements for protecting

 

the position in costs of parties to relevant claims who have entered into

 

agreements under section 58 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990.

 

(6)    

This section is not to be read as limiting any power to make rules of court.


 
 

Report Stage Proceedings: 18 March 2013                  

311

 

Crime and Courts Bill[Lords], continued

 
 

(7)    

This section does not apply until such time as a body is first recognised as an

 

approved regulator.’.

 


 

Awards of costs

 

The Prime Minister

 

Secretary Theresa May

 

Secretary William Hague

 

Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer

 

Secretary Chris Grayling

 

Secretary Maria Miller

 

Not selected  NC27

 

To move the following Clause:—

 

‘(1)    

This section applies where—

 

(a)    

a relevant claim is made against a person (“the defendant”),

 

(b)    

the defendant was a relevant publisher at the material time, and

 

(c)    

the claim is related to the publication of news-related material.

 

(2)    

The court may take account of these matters in deciding any question relating to

 

an award of costs in the proceedings—

 

(a)    

if membership of an approved regulator was available to the defendant at

 

the time when the claim was commenced, whether the defendant was a

 

member at that time;

 

(b)    

if the defendant was a member at that time, whether a party to the

 

proceedings refused to make use of an arbitration scheme of the approved

 

regulator;

 

(c)    

if the defendant was not a member at that time, the reasons for the

 

defendant not being a member.

 

(3)    

For the purposes of subsection (2)(b), a party refuses to make use of an arbitration

 

scheme of an approved regulator if—

 

(a)    

at the time when the claim was commenced, the approved regulator had

 

arrangements in place for an arbitration scheme under which the claim

 

could have been referred for determination by an arbitrator appointed

 

under the scheme, but

 

(b)    

the party refused to agree to the claim being so referred.

 

(4)    

If the court takes account of the matter mentioned in subsection (2)(b), the court

 

must give the party concerned an opportunity to be heard about the reasons for

 

the refusal.

 

(5)    

This section is not to be read as limiting any power to make rules of court.’.

 



 
contents continue
 

© Parliamentary copyright
Revised 19 March 2013