Session 2012 - 13
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament
| Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill
|
|
| |
| | |
| |
Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill |
|
LORDS INSISTENCE AND REASONS |
|
[The page and line references are to HL Bill 45, the bill as first printed for the Lords.] |
|
|
|
35 | Page 54, line 40, leave out paragraph (a) |
|
| | COMMONS DISAGREEMENT AND REASON |
|
| | The Commons disagree to Lords Amendment No. 35 for the following Reason— |
|
35A | Because it is appropriate for section 3 of the Equality Act 2006 to be repealed. |
|
| | LORDS INSISTENCE AND REASON |
|
| | The Lords insist on their Amendment No. 35 for the following Reason— |
|
35B | Because repealing section 3 would undermine the EHRC’s duty to promote social change |
|
| | through its human rights and equality duties; compromise its independence as an |
|
| | accredited national human rights body; and prevent it from complying with its monitoring |
|
| | requirements in that capacity and as Britain’s national equality body. |
|
|
36 | Page 55, line 8, leave out subsection (6) |
|
| | COMMONS DISAGREEMENT AND REASON |
|
| | The Commons disagree to Lords Amendment No. 36 for the following Reason— |
|
36A | Because it is more appropriate for the Commission for Equality and Human Rights to |
|
| | monitor progress by reference to its duties under sections 8 and 9 of the Equality Act 2006. |
|
| |
| | |
|
| |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | LORDS INSISTENCE AND REASON |
|
| | The Lords insist on their Amendment No. 36 for the following Reason— |
|
36B | Because monitoring progress by reference to the EHRC’s duties under sections 8 and 9, |
|
| | rather than section 3, would prevent the Commission from complying with the monitoring |
|
| | requirements relating to equality and human rights bodies, and would jeopardise the |
|
| | EHRC’s accredited status. |
|
|
37 | Insert the following new Clause— |
|
| | “Equality Act 2010: caste discrimination |
|
| | (1) | The Equality Act 2010 is amended as follows. |
|
| | (2) | After section 9(1)(c) (race) insert— |
|
| | |
| | COMMONS DISAGREEMENT AND REASON |
|
| | The Commons disagree to Lords Amendment No. 37 for the following Reason— |
|
37A | Because it is inappropriate to provide for caste to be an aspect of race for the purposes of the |
|
| | Equality Act 2010 without further consultation. |
|
| | LORDS INSISTENCE AND REASON |
|
| | The Lords insist on their Amendment No. 37 for the following Reason— |
|
37B | Because it is appropriate to provide for caste to be an aspect of race for the purposes of the |
|
| | |
| |
| | |
|
