House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2013 - 14
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament

Lords Amendments to the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Bill


 
 

52

102

Insert the following new Clause—

 

“Appeals in relation to penalties

 

(1)    

This section applies where a person is appealing to the Competition Appeal

 

Tribunal (“the Tribunal”) against a decision to impose a penalty under

 

section (Penalties).

 

(2)    

The person may appeal against—

 

(a)    

the imposition of the penalty,

 

(b)    

the amount of the penalty, or

 

(c)    

any date by which the penalty, or any part of it, is required to be

 

paid.

 

(3)    

The means of making an appeal is by sending the Tribunal a notice of

 

appeal in accordance with Tribunal rules.

 

(4)    

The notice of appeal must be sent within the period specified, in relation to

 

the decision appealed against, in those rules.

 

(5)    

The Tribunal may do any of the following—

 

(a)    

uphold the penalty;

 

(b)    

set aside the penalty;

 

(c)    

substitute for the penalty a penalty of an amount decided by the

 

Tribunal;

 

(d)    

vary any date by which the penalty, or any part of it, is required to

 

be paid.

 

(6)    

If an appeal is made in accordance with this section, the penalty is not

 

required to be paid until the appeal has been determined.

 

(7)    

Subsections (2), (5) and (6) do not restrict the power to make Tribunal rules;

 

and those subsections are subject to Tribunal rules.

 

(8)    

Except as provided by this section, the validity of the penalty may not be

 

questioned by any legal proceedings whatever.

 

(9)    

In the case of an appeal made in accordance with this section, a decision of

 

the Tribunal has the same effect as, and may be enforced in the same

 

manner as, a decision of the Payment Systems Regulator.”

103

Insert the following new Clause—

 

“Appeals to Competition and Markets Authority

 

(1)    

This section applies where a person is appealing to the Competition and

 

Markets Authority (“the CMA”) against a CMA-appealable decision.

 

(2)    

In determining the appeal the CMA must have regard, to the same extent

 

as is required of the Payment Systems Regulator, to the matters to which

 

the Payment Systems Regulator must have regard in discharging its

 

functions under this Part.

 

(3)    

In determining the appeal the CMA—

 

(a)    

may have regard to any matter to which the Payment Systems

 

Regulator was not able to have regard in relation to the decision,

 

but


 
 

53

 
 

(b)    

must not, in the exercise of that power, have regard to any matter to

 

which the Payment Systems Regulator would not have been

 

entitled to have regard in reaching its decision had it had the

 

opportunity of doing so.

 

(4)    

The CMA must either—

 

(a)    

dismiss the appeal, or

 

(b)    

quash the whole or part of the decision to which the appeal relates.

 

(5)    

The CMA may act as mentioned in subsection (4)(b) only to the extent that

 

it is satisfied that the decision was wrong on one or more of the following

 

grounds—

 

(a)    

that the Payment Systems Regulator failed properly to have regard

 

to any matter mentioned in subsection (2);

 

(b)    

that the Payment Systems Regulator failed to give the appropriate

 

weight to any matter mentioned in subsection (2);

 

(c)    

that the decision was based, wholly or partly, on an error of fact;

 

(d)    

that the decision was wrong in law.

 

(6)    

If the CMA quashes the whole or part of a decision, it may either—

 

(a)    

refer the matter back to the Payment Systems Regulator with a

 

direction to reconsider and make a new decision in accordance with

 

its ruling, or

 

(b)    

substitute its own decision for that of the Payment Systems

 

Regulator.

 

(7)    

The CMA may not direct the Payment Systems Regulator to take any action

 

which it would not otherwise have the power to take in relation to the

 

decision.

 

(8)    

Schedule (Procedure for appeals to the CMA) contains further provision about

 

the making of appeals in accordance with this section.”

104

Insert the following new Clause—

 

         

“Enforcement of requirement to dispose of interest in payment system

 

(1)    

A requirement imposed under section (Power to require disposal of interest in

 

payment system) is enforceable by civil proceedings brought by the Payment

 

Systems Regulator for an injunction or for interdict or for any other

 

appropriate relief or remedy.

 

(2)    

Civil proceedings may not be brought to enforce a requirement imposed

 

under that section unless—

 

(a)    

the time for bringing an appeal against the decision to impose the

 

requirement has expired and no appeal has been brought within

 

that time, or

 

(b)    

the person on whom the requirement was imposed has within that

 

time brought such an appeal and the appeal has been dismissed or

 

withdrawn.”

105

Insert the following new Clause—


 
 

54

 
 

“Information and investigation powers

 

Power to obtain information or documents

 

(1)    

The Payment Systems Regulator may by notice in writing require a person

 

to provide information or documents—

 

(a)    

which the Payment Systems Regulator thinks will help the

 

Treasury in determining whether to make a designation order, or

 

(b)    

which the Payment Systems Regulator otherwise requires in

 

connection with its functions under this Part.

 

(2)    

In particular, a notice under subsection (1) may require a participant in a

 

regulated payment system to notify the Payment Systems Regulator if

 

events of a specified kind occur.

 

(3)    

A notice under subsection (1) may require information or documents to be

 

provided—

 

(a)    

in a specified form or manner;

 

(b)    

at a specified time;

 

(c)    

in respect of a specified period.”

106

Insert the following new Clause—

 

“Reports by skilled persons

 

(1)    

The Payment Systems Regulator may—

 

(a)    

require a person who is a participant in a regulated payment system

 

to provide the Payment Systems Regulator with a report on any

 

matter relating to the person’s participation in the system (“the

 

matter concerned”), or

 

(b)    

appoint a person to provide the Payment Systems Regulator with a

 

report on the matter concerned.

 

    

The person whose participation in the payment system is to be the subject

 

of the report is referred to in this section as “the relevant participant”.

 

(2)    

The power conferred by subsection (1)(a) is exercisable by giving the

 

relevant participant a notice in writing.

 

(3)    

When acting under subsection (1)(a), the Payment Systems Regulator may

 

require the report to be in a form specified in the notice.

 

(4)    

The Payment Systems Regulator must give written notice of an

 

appointment under subsection (1)(b) to the relevant participant.

 

(5)    

A person appointed to make a report under this section—

 

(a)    

must be a person appearing to the Payment Systems Regulator to

 

have the skills necessary to make a report on the matter concerned,

 

and

 

(b)    

where the appointment is to be made by the relevant participant,

 

must be a person nominated or approved by the Payment Systems

 

Regulator.

 

(6)    

It is the duty of—

 

(a)    

the relevant participant, and


 
 

55

 
 

(b)    

any person who is providing (or who has at any time provided)

 

services to the relevant participant in relation to the matter

 

concerned,

 

    

to give the person appointed to prepare a report all such assistance as the

 

appointed person may reasonably require.

 

(7)    

The obligation imposed by subsection (6) is enforceable, on the application

 

of the Payment Systems Regulator, by an injunction or, in Scotland, by an

 

order for specific performance under section 45 of the Court of Session Act

 

1988.

 

(8)    

The Payment Systems Regulator may direct the relevant participant to pay

 

any expenses incurred by the Payment Systems Regulator in relation to an

 

appointment under subsection (1)(b).”

107

Insert the following new Clause—

 

“Appointment of persons to conduct investigations

 

(1)    

If it considers that it is desirable to do so in order to advance any of its

 

payment systems objectives, the Payment Systems Regulator may appoint

 

one or more competent persons to conduct an investigation on its behalf

 

into the nature, conduct or state of the business of any participant in a

 

regulated payment system.

 

(2)    

If it appears to the Payment Systems Regulator that there are circumstances

 

suggesting that there may have been a compliance failure, the Payment

 

Systems Regulator may appoint one or more competent persons to conduct

 

an investigation on its behalf.”

108

Insert the following new Clause—

 

         

“Investigations: general

 

(1)    

This section applies if the Payment Systems Regulator appoints one or

 

more competent persons (“investigators”) under section (Appointment of

 

persons to conduct investigations) to conduct an investigation on its behalf.

 

(2)    

The Payment Systems Regulator must give written notice of the

 

appointment of an investigator to the person who is the subject of the

 

investigation.

 

(3)    

Subsections (2) and (9) do not apply if—

 

(a)    

the Payment Systems Regulator believes that the notice required by

 

subsection (2) or (9) would be likely to result in the investigation

 

being frustrated, or

 

(b)    

the investigator is appointed under subsection (2) of section

 

(Appointment of persons to conduct investigations).

 

(4)    

A notice under subsection (2) must—

 

(a)    

specify the provision under which the investigator was appointed,

 

and

 

(b)    

state the reason for the appointment.

 

(5)    

Nothing prevents the Payment Systems Regulator from appointing as an

 

investigator—

 

(a)    

a member of its staff, or

 

(b)    

a member of staff of the FCA.


 
 

56

 
 

(6)    

An investigator who conducts an investigation must make a report of the

 

investigation to the Payment Systems Regulator.

 

(7)    

The Payment Systems Regulator may, by a direction to an investigator,

 

control—

 

(a)    

the scope of the investigation,

 

(b)    

the period during which the investigation is to be conducted,

 

(c)    

the conduct of the investigation, and

 

(d)    

the reporting of the investigation.

 

(8)    

A direction may, in particular—

 

(a)    

confine the investigation to particular matters;

 

(b)    

extend the investigation to additional matters;

 

(c)    

require the investigator to discontinue the investigation or to take

 

only those steps that are specified in the direction;

 

(d)    

require the investigator to make such interim reports as are so

 

specified.

 

(9)    

If there is a change in the scope or conduct of the investigation and, in the

 

opinion of the Payment Systems Regulator, the person who is the subject of

 

the investigation is likely to be significantly prejudiced by not being made

 

aware of it, that person must be given written notice of the change.”

109

Insert the following new Clause—

 

         

“Powers of persons appointed under section (Appointment of persons to

 

conduct investigations)

 

(1)    

An investigator may require any person within subsection (2)—

 

(a)    

to attend before the investigator at a specified time and place and

 

answer questions, or

 

(b)    

otherwise to provide any information which the investigator

 

requires.

 

(2)    

The persons referred to in subsection (1) are—

 

(a)    

the person who is the subject of the investigation (“the person under

 

investigation”);

 

(b)    

any person connected with the person under investigation;

 

(c)    

in the case of an investigation into whether there has been a

 

compliance failure, any person who in the investigator’s opinion is

 

or may be able to give information which is or may be relevant to

 

the investigation.

 

(3)    

An investigator may also require any person to produce at a specified time

 

and place any specified documents or documents of a specified

 

description.

 

(4)    

A requirement under subsection (1) or (3) may be imposed only so far as

 

the investigator concerned reasonably considers the question, provision of

 

information or production of the document to be relevant to the purposes

 

of the investigation.

 

(5)    

In the case of an investigation into whether there has been a compliance

 

failure, the investigator may also require any person falling within

 

subsection (2)(c) to give the investigator all assistance in connection with

 

the investigation which the person is reasonably able to give.


 
 

57

 
 

(6)    

For the purposes of this section, a person is connected with the person

 

under investigation (“A”) if the person is or has at any relevant time been—

 

(a)    

a member of A’s group,

 

(b)    

a controller of A, or

 

(c)    

a partnership of which A is a member.

 

(7)    

In this section—

 

“controller” has the same meaning as in FSMA 2000 (see section 422 of

 

that Act);

 

“group” has the same meaning as in FSMA 2000 (see section 421 of

 

that Act);

 

“investigator” means a person conducting an investigation under

 

section (Appointment of persons to conduct investigations);

 

“specified” means specified in a notice in writing.”

110

Insert the following new Clause—

 

         

“Information and documents: supplemental provisions

 

(1)    

In this section “relevant document” means a document produced in

 

response to a requirement imposed under section (Power to obtain

 

information or documents) or (Powers of persons appointed under section

 

(Appointment of persons to conduct investigations)).

 

(2)    

In a case where—

 

(a)    

the Payment Systems Regulator has power under section (Power to

 

obtain information or documents), or an investigator has power under

 

section (Powers of persons appointed under section (Appointment of

 

persons to conduct investigations)), to require a person to produce a

 

document, but

 

(b)    

it appears that the document is in the possession of another person,

 

    

the power may be exercised in relation to that other person.

 

(3)    

Any person to whom a relevant document is produced may—

 

(a)    

take copies or extracts from the document, or

 

(b)    

require the person producing the document, or any relevant person

 

(see subsection (4)), to provide an explanation of the document.

 

(4)    

“Relevant person”, in relation to a person who is required to produce a

 

document, means a person who—

 

(a)    

has been or is or is proposed to be a director or controller of that

 

person,

 

(b)    

has been or is an auditor of that person,

 

(c)    

has been or is an actuary, accountant or lawyer appointed or

 

instructed by that person, or

 

(d)    

has been or is an employee of that person.

 

(5)    

A relevant document may be retained for so long as the person to whom it

 

is produced considers that it is necessary to retain it (rather than copies of

 

it) for the purposes for which the document was requested.

 

(6)    

If the person to whom a relevant document is produced has reasonable

 

grounds for believing—

 

(a)    

that the document may have to be produced for the purposes of any

 

legal proceedings, and


 
 

58

 
 

(b)    

that it might otherwise be unavailable for those purposes,

 

    

it may be retained until the proceedings are concluded.

 

(7)    

If a person who is required under section (Power to obtain information or

 

documents) or (Powers of persons appointed under section (Appointment of

 

persons to conduct investigations)) to produce a document fails to do so, the

 

Payment Systems Regulator or an investigator may require the person to

 

state, to the best of the person’s knowledge and belief, where the document

 

is.

 

(8)    

A lawyer may be required under section (Power to obtain information or

 

documents) or (Powers of persons appointed under section (Appointment of

 

persons to conduct investigations)) or this section to provide the name and

 

address of a client.

 

(9)    

A person may not be required under section (Power to obtain information or

 

documents) or (Powers of persons appointed under section (Appointment of

 

persons to conduct investigations)) or this section to disclose information or

 

produce a document in respect of which the person owes an obligation of

 

confidence as a result of carrying on the business of banking unless—

 

(a)    

the person is the person under investigation or a member of that

 

person’s group,

 

(b)    

the person to whom the obligation of confidence is owed is the

 

person under investigation or a member of that person’s group,

 

(c)    

the person to whom the obligation of confidence is owed consents

 

to the disclosure or production, or

 

(d)    

the imposing on the person of a requirement with respect to such

 

information or document has been specifically authorised by the

 

Payment Systems Regulator.

 

(10)    

If a person claims a lien on a document, its production under section (Power

 

to obtain information or documents) or (Powers of persons appointed under

 

section (Appointment of persons to conduct investigations)) does not affect the

 

lien.

 

(11)    

In this section—

 

“controller” has the same meaning as in FSMA 2000 (see section 422 of

 

that Act);

 

“group” has the same meaning as in FSMA 2000 (see section 421 of

 

that Act);

 

“investigator” means a person appointed under section (Appointment

 

of persons to conduct investigations).”

111

Insert the following new Clause—

 

         

“Admissibility of statements made to investigators

 

(1)    

A statement made to an investigator by a person in compliance with an

 

information requirement is admissible in evidence in any proceedings, so

 

long as it also complies with any requirements governing the admissibility

 

of evidence in the circumstances in question.

 

(2)    

But in criminal proceedings in which that person is charged with an offence

 

to which this subsection applies—

 

(a)    

no evidence relating to the statement may be adduced by or on

 

behalf of the prosecution, and


 
previous section contents continue
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2013
Revised 10 December 2013