A
BILL
TO
Make provision about service complaints; about financial assistance for the
armed forces community; and for connected purposes.
Be it enacted by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and
consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present
Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:—
(1) After section 365A of the Armed Forces Act 2006 insert—
(1) The office of Service Complaints Ombudsman is established.
(2)
The Ombudsman is to be appointed by Her Majesty on the
recommendation of the Secretary of State.
(3) A person may not be appointed as the Ombudsman if the person is—
(a) 10a member of the regular or reserve forces, or
(b) employed in the civil service of the State.
(4)
The Ombudsman holds and vacates office in accordance with the terms
of his or her appointment.
(5)
The Ombudsman may authorise a person working for the Ombudsman
15to exercise any function of the Ombudsman on his or her behalf.
(6) The Ombudsman is not to be regarded—
(a) as the servant or agent of the Crown, or
(b) as enjoying any status, immunity or privilege of the Crown.”
(2) The office of Service Complaints Commissioner is abolished.
Armed Forces (Service Complaints and Financial Assistance) BillPage 2
(3)
Accordingly, in the Armed Forces Act 2006, omit section 366 and the italic
cross-heading immediately preceding it.
(1) After section 340 of the Armed Forces Act 2006 insert—
(1)
If a person subject to service law thinks himself or herself wronged in
10any matter relating to his or her service, the person may make a
complaint about the matter.
(2)
If a person who has ceased to be subject to service law thinks himself or
herself wronged in any matter relating to his or her service which
occurred while he or she was so subject, the person may make a
15complaint about the matter.
(3)
In this Part, “service complaint” means a complaint made under
subsection (1) or (2).
(4)
A person may not make a service complaint about a matter of a
description specified in regulations made by the Secretary of State.
(1)
The Defence Council may make regulations (referred to in this Part as
“service complaints regulations”) about the procedure for making and
dealing with a service complaint.
(2) Service complaints regulations must make provision—
(a)
25for a service complaint to be made to an officer of a specified
description;
(b)
about the way in which a service complaint is to be made
(including about the information to be provided by the
complainant);
(c)
30that a service complaint may not be made, except in specified
circumstances, after the end of the specified period.
“Specified” means specified in the regulations.
(3)
The period referred to in subsection (2)(c) must be at least three months
beginning with the day on which the matter complained of occurred.
(4) 35Service complaints regulations must make provision—
(a)
for the officer to whom a service complaint is made to decide
whether the complaint is admissible and to notify the
complainant of that decision;
(b)
for the Service Complaints Ombudsman, on an application by
40the complainant, to review a decision by the officer to whom a
service complaint is made that the complaint is not admissible;
Armed Forces (Service Complaints and Financial Assistance) BillPage 3
(c)
for securing that the Ombudsman’s decision in relation to
admissibility, on such a review, is binding on the complainant
and the officer to whom the complaint was made.
(5)
For the purposes of subsection (4), a service complaint is not admissible
5if—
(a)
the complaint is about a matter of a description specified in
regulations made under section 340A(4),
(b)
the complaint is made after the end of the period referred to in
subsection (2)(c) and the case is not one in which circumstances
10referred to in that provision apply, or
(c)
the complaint is not admissible on any other ground specified
in service complaints regulations.
(6)
Nothing in this Part with respect to the provision that must or may be
made by service complaints regulations is to be taken as limiting the
15generality of subsection (1).
(1)
Service complaints regulations must provide for the Defence Council to
decide, in the case of a service complaint that is found to be admissible,
20whether the complaint is to be dealt with—
(a) by a person or panel of persons appointed by the Council, or
(b) by the Council themselves.
(2)
The regulations must provide for the person or panel appointed to deal
with the complaint or (in a subsection (1)(b) case) the Defence
25Council—
(a) to decide whether the complaint is well-founded, and
(b) if the decision is that the complaint is well-founded—
(i)
to decide what redress (if any), within the authority of
(as the case may be) the person, the persons on the panel
30or the Defence Council would be appropriate, and
(ii) to grant any such redress.
(3)
The Defence Council must not appoint a person or panel to deal with a
service complaint unless—
(a)
the person is, or all the persons on the panel are, authorised by
35the Council to decide the matters mentioned in subsection (2)
and to grant appropriate redress, or
(b)
the Council propose to authorise that person or those persons
for those purposes.
(4)
Provision made by virtue of subsection (1) is subject to regulations
40made under section 340E(1) (eligibility for appointment, requirements
relating to independent decision-making, etc).
(1)
Service complaints regulations must make provision enabling the
complainant in relation to a service complaint to appeal to the Defence
45Council against a decision on the complaint, where the decision was
taken by a person or panel appointed by virtue of section 340C(1)(a).
Armed Forces (Service Complaints and Financial Assistance) BillPage 4
(2) The regulations may make provision—
(a)
about the way in which an appeal is to be brought (including
about the information to be provided by the complainant);
(b)
that an appeal may not be brought, except in circumstances
5specified in the regulations, after the end of the period so
specified;
(c)
requiring the Defence Council to decide any question relating to
whether an appeal has been brought before the end of the
period referred to in paragraph (b) or (if not) whether
10circumstances referred to in that paragraph apply;
(d)
requiring the Defence Council to decide whether an appeal is to
be determined—
(i)
by a person or panel of persons appointed by the
Council, or
(ii) 15by the Council themselves.
(3)
The period referred to in subsection (2)(b) must be at least six weeks
beginning with the day on which the complainant received notification
of the decision appealed against.
(4)
The Defence Council must not appoint a person or panel to determine
20an appeal unless—
(a)
the person is, or all the persons on the panel are, authorised by
the Council to determine the appeal and to grant appropriate
redress, or
(b)
the Council propose to authorise that person or those persons
25for those purposes.
(5)
Provision made by virtue of subsection (2)(d) is subject to regulations
made under section 340E(1) (eligibility for appointment, requirements
relating to independent decision-making, etc).
(6) Service complaints regulations must make provision—
(a)
30for the Service Complaints Ombudsman, on an application by
the complainant, to review a decision by the Defence Council
that an appeal cannot be proceeded with because—
(i)
it was not brought before the end of the period referred
to in subsection (2)(b), and
(ii)
35the case is not one in which circumstances referred to in
that provision apply;
(b)
for securing that the decision of the Ombudsman, on such a
review, is binding on the complainant and the Defence Council.
(1) The Secretary of State may by regulations—
(a)
provide that persons of a specified description may not be
appointed by virtue of section 340C(1)(a) or 340D(2)(d)
(whether or not as part of a panel);
(b)
45require the Defence Council, in relation to any service
complaint of a specified description, to act by virtue of section
340C(1)(a) or 340D(2)(d) so as to appoint—
(i)
a person who is independent, or of a specified
description, or both;
Armed Forces (Service Complaints and Financial Assistance) BillPage 5
(ii)
a panel that satisfies one or more of the requirements
listed in subsection (2).
(2) Those requirements are—
(a) all of the members of the panel must be independent;
(b)
5the panel must include at least a specified number or proportion
of independent members;
(c) the panel must include a person of a specified description.
(3)
Where a requirement within subsection (2)(b) has effect, the regulations
may also require specified functions of the panel to be exercised by the
10independent members of the panel.
(4)
For the purposes of this section, a person (including a member of a
panel) is independent if the person—
(a)
is not a member of the regular or reserve forces or employed in
the civil service of the State, and
(b)
15is included in a list maintained for the purposes of this section
by the Secretary of State.
(5) In this section, “specified” means specified in the regulations.
(1)
The Defence Council may authorise a person to investigate a particular
service complaint—
(a) on the Council’s behalf, or
(b)
on behalf of a person or panel of persons appointed to deal with
25a service complaint or to determine an appeal relating to a
service complaint.
(2)
Service complaints regulations may authorise the Defence Council to
delegate to any person, to such extent and subject to such conditions as
the Council consider appropriate, any of the Council’s functions under
30the preceding provisions of this Part.
(3) Subsection (2) does not apply to—
(a)
the Defence Council’s function of making service complaints
regulations,
(b)
the Council’s function of dealing with a service complaint or
35determining an appeal, or
(c)
any function of the Council by virtue of section 340C(3)(b) or
340D(4)(b) in connection with authorising a person to make
decisions or determinations and to grant redress.
(4)
Subsection (2) does not affect the application of section 1(5) or (7) of the
40Defence (Transfer of Functions) Act 1964 (discharge by Service Boards
of Defence Council functions) in relation to the Defence Council’s
functions under the preceding provisions of this Part.
(1) Service complaints regulations may—
Armed Forces (Service Complaints and Financial Assistance) BillPage 6
(a)
impose time limits for taking any step (in addition to any time
limit for which this Part provides);
(b) specify circumstances in which a time limit does not apply;
(c)
make provision about the consequences of not taking a step
5within a time limit.
(2)
The provision that may be made by virtue of subsection (1)(c) in
relation to a particular time limit includes provision authorising a
person specified in the regulations to decide that a service complaint,
or an appeal against a decision on a service complaint, cannot be
10proceeded with because of a failure to take a step within that time limit.
(3)
Where service complaints regulations make provision referred to in
subsection (2), the regulations may also make provision—
(a)
for the Service Complaints Ombudsman, on an application by
the complainant, to review a decision that a service complaint
15or an appeal cannot be proceeded with because of the failure to
take the step within the time limit;
(b)
for securing that the Ombudsman’s decision on such a review
is binding on the complainant and the person who made the
decision to which the review relates.
(1)
The Service Complaints Ombudsman may investigate an allegation of
maladministration in connection with the handling of a service
complaint where the complainant makes an application to the
25Ombudsman.
(2) An application to the Ombudsman—
(a) must be made in writing, and
(b)
must contain the information specified in regulations made by
the Secretary of State.
(3)
30The Ombudsman may not investigate an allegation unless the
Ombudsman is satisfied—
(a)
that a decision has been made, in accordance with service
complaints regulations made by virtue of section 340C, on the
complaint to which the allegation relates, and
(b)
35if the decision is one in respect of which service complaints
regulations made by virtue of section 340D enable an appeal to
be made, that an appeal against the decision has been made and
determined.
(4) The purpose of an investigation is to decide—
(a) 40whether the alleged maladministration has occurred, and
(b)
if so, whether it has or could have resulted in injustice being
sustained by the complainant.
(5)
The Secretary of State may by regulations provide that an application
may not be made to the Ombudsman, except in circumstances specified
45in the regulations, after the end of the period specified in the
regulations.
Armed Forces (Service Complaints and Financial Assistance) BillPage 7
(6)
The period referred to in subsection (5) must be at least six weeks
beginning with the date on which the complainant is notified—
(a)
of the determination of an appeal against the decision on the
complaint, or
(b)
5if the decision on the complaint is not one in respect of which
service complaints regulations made by virtue of section 340D
enable an appeal to be made, of that decision.
(7)
It is for the Ombudsman to determine whether an application has been
made in accordance with this section.
(8)
10Where the Ombudsman has investigated an application relating to a
service complaint, the Ombudsman may not investigate a subsequent
application relating to the same complaint except in circumstances
specified in regulations made by the Secretary of State.
(1)
15It is for the Service Complaints Ombudsman to determine whether to
begin, continue or discontinue an investigation.
(2)
The Secretary of State may make regulations about the procedure to be
followed in an investigation.
(3)
Subject to subsection (2), the procedure for carrying out an
20investigation is to be such as the Ombudsman considers appropriate in
the circumstances.
(4)
In particular, the Ombudsman may make such inquiries as the
Ombudsman considers appropriate.
(5) The Secretary of State may by regulations—
(a)
25impose time limits for the taking by the Ombudsman or the
complainant of any step specified in the regulations;
(b) specify circumstances in which a time limit does not apply.
(6) Where—
(a)
the Ombudsman carries out an investigation in connection with
30the handling of a service complaint, and
(b)
before the complaint was made, the matter to which it relates
was considered in accordance with a process for dealing with
matters of that kind,
the Ombudsman may for the purposes of the investigation consider
35any alleged maladministration in connection with that process.
(1)
The Service Complaints Ombudsman may, for the purposes of an
investigation, require a person to provide—
(a) documents in the person’s possession or control, or
(b) 40other information in the person’s possession or control.
(2)
The Ombudsman has the same powers as the High Court (or, in
Scotland, the Court of Session), for the purposes of an investigation, in
respect of—
(a)
the attendance and examination of witnesses (including the
45examination of witnesses abroad), and
Armed Forces (Service Complaints and Financial Assistance) BillPage 8
(b) the production of documents.
(3)
A person may not be required under this section to do anything that the
person could not be compelled to do in civil proceedings before the
High Court (or, in Scotland, the Court of Session).
(1) This section applies if a person—
(a)
without lawful excuse, obstructs the discharge of any of the
Service Complaints Ombudsman’s functions relating to an
investigation, or
(b)
10does any act in relation to an investigation that would constitute
contempt of court if the investigation were proceedings in the
High Court (or, in Scotland, the Court of Session).
(2)
The Ombudsman may certify the obstruction or act to the High Court
(or, in Scotland, the Court of Session).
(3) 15The court may inquire into the certified obstruction or act.
(4)
If the court, having heard any witness on behalf of or against the person
and any statement in the person’s defence, is satisfied that the person—
(a)
without lawful excuse, obstructed the discharge of any of the
Ombudsman’s functions relating to the investigation, or
(b) 20did the act referred to in subsection (1)(b),
it may deal with the person in any way in which it could deal with the
person if he or she had committed contempt in relation to the court.
(5)
In this section, “act” includes an omission and references to the doing
of an act are to be read accordingly.
(1)
The Service Complaints Ombudsman must, after carrying out an
investigation, prepare a report setting out the Ombudsman’s findings.
(2)
Where the Ombudsman finds maladministration in connection with
30the handling of the service complaint to which the investigation relates,
the report must also set out the Ombudsman’s recommendations (if
any) as a result of that finding.
(3)
The Ombudsman may for the purposes of subsection (2) make any
recommendations that the Ombudsman considers appropriate,
35including recommendations for the purpose of remedying—
(a) the maladministration, and
(b)
any injustice that the Ombudsman considers has or could have
been sustained, in consequence of the maladministration, by the
complainant.
(4)
40The report must include the Ombudsman’s reasons for each of the
findings and recommendations.
(5) The Ombudsman must send a copy of the report to—
(a) the Defence Council,
Armed Forces (Service Complaints and Financial Assistance) BillPage 9
(b) the complainant, and
(c)
any other persons specified, or of a description specified, in
regulations made by the Secretary of State.
(6)
The Ombudsman may send a copy of the report to any other persons
5the Ombudsman considers appropriate.
(7)
The Secretary of State may make regulations with respect to reports
under this section; and the regulations may in particular include—
(a) further provision about the preparation of reports;
(b) provision for the correction of accidental errors in reports;
(c)
10provision about obligations (including obligations of
confidentiality) that may be imposed on persons to whom
reports are sent.
(1) The Defence Council must—
(a) 15consider a report under section 340L,
(b)
notify the Service Complaints Ombudsman and the
complainant, giving reasons in writing, of the action (if any) the
Council decide to take in response to the findings and any
recommendations contained in the report, and
(c)
20where the Council decide to reject a recommendation, notify the
Ombudsman and the complainant, giving reasons in writing for
the rejection.
(2)
Where the Defence Council decide that a service complaint should be
reconsidered to any extent, they must decide whether the
25reconsideration is to be carried out—
(a) by a person or panel of persons appointed by the Council, or
(b) by the Council themselves;
but this is subject to any provision made by virtue of subsection (6).
(3)
The Defence Council must not appoint a person or panel to reconsider
30a service complaint unless—
(a)
the person is, or all the persons on the panel are, authorised by
the Council to make the decisions required in connection with
the reconsideration and to grant any appropriate redress, or
(b)
the Council propose to authorise that person or those persons
35for those purposes.
(4)
The Defence Council may give such directions as they consider
appropriate in connection with the reconsideration of a service
complaint by a person or panel appointed under subsection (2)(a).
(5)
The power of the Defence Council under subsection (4) is subject to any
40provision made in service complaints regulations about—
(a)
the procedure to be followed in connection with the
reconsideration of a service complaint;
(b) the persons to be notified of the decision on reconsideration.
(6)
The power of the Secretary of State to make regulations under section
45340E(1) includes power—