Session 2014 - 15
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament


 
 

73

 

House of Commons

 
 

Thursday 15 January 2015

 

Public Bill Committee

 

New Amendments handed in are marked thus Parliamentary Star

 

Parliamentary Star - whiteAmendments which will comply with the required notice period at their next appearance

 

Serious Crime Bill [Lords]


 

Note

 

The Amendments have been arranged in accordance with the Order of the

 

Committee [13 January 2015].

 


 

Mr Elfyn Llwyd

 

37

 

Clause  50,  page  43,  line  35,  leave out “on the balance of probabilities” and insert

 

“beyond reasonable doubt”.

 

Mr Elfyn Llwyd

 

38

 

Clause  50,  page  44,  line  5,  leave out “doing anything described in the injunction”

 

and insert “engaging in, or encouraging or assisting, gang-related violence or gang-related

 

drug-dealing activity;”.

 

Mr Elfyn Llwyd

 

39

 

Clause  50,  page  44,  line  7,  leave out “described in the injunction” and insert

 

“which will protect the respondent from gang-related violence or gang-related drug

 

dealing activity”.

 



 
 

Public Bill Committee: 15 January 2015                  

74

 

Serious Crime Bill-[ [], continued

 
 

Mr Elfyn Llwyd

 

40

 

Clause  65,  page  53,  line  6,  at end insert—

 

“( )    

In that subsection, for “under that age” substitute “under 18””.

 


 

New Clauses

 

Karen Bradley

 

NC7

 

To move the following Clause

 

         

“Exemption from civil liability for money-laundering disclosures

 

In section 338 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (money laundering: authorised

 

disclosures), after subsection (4) insert—

 

“(4A)    

Where an authorised disclosure is made in good faith, no civil liability

 

arises in respect of the disclosure on the part of the person by or on whose

 

behalf it is made.””

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

This New Clause makes express statutory provision to protect persons (for example, financial

 

institutions and lawyers) who report in good faith their suspicion that another person is engaged

 

in money laundering activity (in accordance with Part 7 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002) from

 

incurring civil liability for doing so.

 


 

Karen Bradley

 

NC8

 

To move the following Clause

 

         

“Sexual communication with a child

 

After section 15 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 insert—

 

“15A  

Sexual communication with a child

 

(1)    

A person aged 18 or over (A) commits an offence if—

 

(a)    

for the purpose of obtaining sexual gratification, A intentionally

 

communicates with another person (B),

 

(b)    

the communication is sexual or is intended to encourage B to

 

make (whether to A or to another) a communication that is

 

sexual, and

 

(c)    

B is under 16 and A does not reasonably believe that B is 16 or

 

over.

 

(2)    

For the purposes of this section, a communication is sexual if—

 

(a)    

any part of it relates to sexual activity, or


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 15 January 2015                  

75

 

Serious Crime Bill-[ [], continued

 
 

(b)    

a reasonable person would, in all the circumstances but

 

regardless of any person’s purpose, consider any part of the

 

communication to be sexual;

 

    

and in paragraph (a) “sexual activity” means an activity that a reasonable

 

person would, in all the circumstances but regardless of any person’s

 

purpose, consider to be sexual.

 

(3)    

A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable—

 

(a)    

on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not

 

exceeding 12 months or a fine or both;

 

(b)    

on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not

 

exceeding 2 years.””

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

This New Clause provides for a new offence where an adult communicates with a child under 16

 

for the purpose of obtaining sexual gratification and the communication is sexual or intended to

 

encourage a sexual response. The offence would be triable either way with a maximum penalty (on

 

conviction on indictment) of two years’ imprisonment.

 


 

Karen Bradley

 

NC9

 

To move the following Clause

 

         

“Controlling or coercive behaviour in an intimate or family relationship

 

(1)    

A person (A) commits an offence if—

 

(a)    

A repeatedly or continuously engages in behaviour towards another

 

person (B) that is controlling or coercive,

 

(b)    

at the time of the behaviour, A and B are personally connected,

 

(c)    

the behaviour has a serious effect on B, and

 

(d)    

A knows or ought to know that the behaviour will have a serious effect

 

on B.

 

(2)    

A and B are “personally connected” if—

 

(a)    

A is in an intimate personal relationship with B, or

 

(b)    

A and B live together and—

 

(i)    

they are members of the same family, or

 

(ii)    

they have previously been in an intimate personal relationship

 

with each other.

 

(3)    

But A does not commit an offence under this section if at the time of the

 

behaviour in question—

 

(a)    

A has responsibility for B, for the purposes of Part 1 of the Children and

 

Young Persons Act 1933 (see section 17 of that Act), and

 

(b)    

B is under 16.

 

(4)    

A’s behaviour has a “serious effect” on B if—

 

(a)    

it causes B to fear, on at least two occasions, that violence will be used

 

against B, or

 

(b)    

it causes B serious alarm or distress which has a substantial adverse effect

 

on B’s usual day-to-day activities.

 

(5)    

For the purposes of subsection (1)(d) A “ought to know” that which a reasonable

 

person in possession of the same information would know.


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 15 January 2015                  

76

 

Serious Crime Bill-[ [], continued

 
 

(6)    

For the purposes of subsection (2)(b)(i) A and B are members of the same family

 

if—

 

(a)    

they are, or have been, married to each other;

 

(b)    

they are, or have been, civil partners of each other;

 

(c)    

they are relatives;

 

(d)    

they have agreed to marry one another (whether or not the agreement has

 

been terminated);

 

(e)    

they have entered into a civil partnership agreement (whether or not the

 

agreement has been terminated);

 

(f)    

they are both parents of the same child;

 

(g)    

they have, or have had, parental responsibility for the same child.

 

(7)    

In subsection (6)—

 

“civil partnership agreement” has the meaning given by section 73 of the

 

Civil Partnership Act 2004;

 

“child” means a person under the age of 18 years;

 

“parental responsibility” has the same meaning as in the Children Act 1989;

 

“relative” has the meaning given by section 63(1) of the Family Law Act

 

1996.

 

(8)    

In proceedings for an offence under this section it is a defence for A to show

 

that—

 

(a)    

in engaging in the behaviour in question, A believed that he or she was

 

acting in B’s best interests, and

 

(b)    

the behaviour was in all the circumstances reasonable.

 

(9)    

A is to be taken to have shown the facts mentioned in subsection (8) if—

 

(a)    

sufficient evidence of the facts is adduced to raise an issue with respect

 

to them, and

 

(b)    

the contrary is not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

 

(10)    

The defence in subsection (8) is not available to A in relation to behaviour that

 

causes B to fear that violence will be used against B.

 

(11)    

A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable—

 

(a)    

on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding

 

five years, or a fine, or both;

 

(b)    

on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12

 

months, or a fine, or both.”

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

This New Clause provides for a new offence criminalising controlling or coercive behaviour in an

 

intimate or family relationship. The new offence would be triable either way with a maximum

 

penalty (on conviction on indictment) of five years’ imprisonment.

 


 

Karen Bradley

 

NC10

 

To move the following Clause

 

         

“Guidance

 

(1)    

The Secretary of State may issue guidance about the investigation of offences

 

under section (Controlling or coercive behaviour in an intimate or family

 

relationship) to whatever persons the Secretary of State considers appropriate.


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 15 January 2015                  

77

 

Serious Crime Bill-[ [], continued

 
 

(2)    

The Secretary of State may revise any guidance issued under this section.

 

(3)    

The Secretary of State must arrange for any guidance issued or revised under this

 

section to be published.”

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

This New Clause confers a power on the Secretary of State to issue guidance about the

 

investigation of offences under New Clause (NC9) [Controlling or coercive behaviour in an

 

intimate or family relationship].

 


 

Karen Bradley

 

NC11

 

To move the following Clause

 

         

“Prevention or restriction of use of communication devices by prisoners etc

 

(1)    

Regulations may make provision conferring power on a court to make a

 

telecommunications restriction order.

 

(2)    

“Telecommunications restriction order” means an order requiring a

 

communications provider to take whatever action the order specifies for the

 

purpose of preventing or restricting the use of communication devices by persons

 

detained in custodial institutions.

 

(3)    

Regulations under this section must—

 

(a)    

specify who may apply for telecommunications restriction orders;

 

(b)    

make provision about giving notice of applications;

 

(c)    

make provision conferring rights on persons to make representations;

 

(d)    

specify the matters about which the court must be satisfied if it is to make

 

an order;

 

(e)    

make provision about the duration of orders (which may include

 

provision for orders of indefinite duration);

 

(f)    

make provision about variation (including extension) and discharge of

 

orders;

 

(g)    

make provision about appeals.

 

(4)    

Regulations under this section may—

 

(a)    

make provision for a telecommunications restriction order to specify that

 

a requirement of the order is not to apply in particular circumstances;

 

(b)    

make provision authorising a court to include in an order a requirement

 

for the person applying for the order to pay any or all of the costs of

 

complying with it;

 

(c)    

make provision about time limits for complying with orders;

 

(d)    

make provision about enforcement of orders (which may include

 

provision creating offences);

 

(e)    

make provision about costs (or, in Scotland, expenses) in respect of legal

 

proceedings;

 

(f)    

make different provision for different purposes;

 

(g)    

make incidental, consequential, supplementary or transitional provision,

 

including provision applying any enactment (with or without

 

modifications).

 

(5)    

The power to make regulations under this section is exercisable—

 

(a)    

in relation to England and Wales, by statutory instrument made by the

 

Secretary of State;


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 15 January 2015                  

78

 

Serious Crime Bill-[ [], continued

 
 

(b)    

in relation to Scotland, by the Scottish Ministers.

 

(6)    

A statutory instrument (other than a Scottish statutory instrument) containing

 

regulations under this section is not to be made unless a draft of the instrument

 

has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament.

 

(7)    

Regulations made by the Scottish Ministers under this section are subject to the

 

affirmative procedure.

 

(8)    

In this section—

 

“communication device” means an item specified in section 1(3) of the

 

Prisons (Interference with Wireless Telegraphy) Act 2012 (mobile

 

telephones etc);

 

“communications provider” means a person providing a service that

 

consists in the provision of access to, and of facilities for making use of,

 

any telecommunication system (whether or not one provided by that

 

person);

 

“court” means—

 

(a)    

in relation to England and Wales, the county court;

 

(b)    

in relation to Scotland, the sheriff;

 

“custodial institution” means—

 

(c)    

in relation to England and Wales, a prison, young offender

 

institution, secure training centre or secure college;

 

(d)    

in relation to Scotland, a prison or young offenders institution;

 

“enactment” includes—

 

(e)    

an enactment contained in subordinate legislation within the

 

meaning of the Interpretation Act 1978;

 

(f)    

an enactment contained in, or in an instrument made under, an

 

Act of the Scottish Parliament;

 

“telecommunication system” means any system (including the apparatus

 

comprised in it) that exists (whether wholly or partly in the United

 

Kingdom or elsewhere) for the purpose of facilitating the transmission of

 

communications by any means involving the use of electrical or electro-

 

magnetic energy.”

 

Member’s explanatory statement

 

This New Cause enables the Secretary of State and the Scottish Ministers to make regulations,

 

subject to the affirmative procedure, conferring power on the civil courts to make an order

 

requiring a communications provider to take action to prevent or restrict the use of unauthorised

 

mobile telephones etc by prisoners.

 


 

Ann Coffey

 

Sarah Champion

 

NC1

 

To move the following Clause

 

         

“Child Sexual Exploitation

 

(1)    

The Sexual Offences Act 1956 is amended as follows.

 

(2)    

In section 28 (Causing or encouraging prostitution of, intercourse with, or

 

indecent assault on, girls under sixteen)—

 

(a)    

in the title of the section, for “prostitution” substitute “the sexual

 

exploitation”;

 

(b)    

in subsection (1), for “prostitution” substitute “sexual exploitation”; and


 
 

Public Bill Committee: 15 January 2015                  

79

 

Serious Crime Bill-[ [], continued

 
 

(c)    

in subsection (2), for “become a prostitute” substitute “been sexually

 

exploited”.

 

(3)    

In section 29 (Causing or encouraging prostitution of defective), in subsection

 

(1), after “woman”, insert “, aged 18 or over,”.

 

(4)    

In section 1(1) of the Street Offence Offences Act 1959 (Loitering or soliciting

 

for purposes of prostitution), after “female)”, insert “, aged 18 or over,”.

 

(5)    

The Sexual Offences Act 2003 is amended as follows.

 

(6)    

In section 48 (Causing or inciting child prostitution or pornography)—

 

(a)    

in the title of the section, for “prostitution” substitute “sexual

 

exploitation”; and

 

(b)    

in subsection (1)(a), for “become a prostitute” substitute “be sexually

 

exploited”.

 

(7)    

In section 49 (Controlling a child prostitute or a child involved in pornography)—

 

(a)    

in the title of the section, for “prostitute” substitute “sexually exploited

 

child”; and

 

(b)    

in subsection (1)(a), for “prostitution” substitute “sexual exploitation”.

 

(8)    

In section 50 (Arranging or facilitating child prostitution or pornography)—

 

(a)    

in the title of the section, for “child prostitution or pornography”

 

substitute “the sexual exploitation of a child or child pornography”; and

 

(b)    

in subsection (1)(a), for “prostitution” substitute “sexual exploitation”.

 

(9)    

In section 51 (Sections 48 to 50: interpretation), in subsection (2), for “prostitute”

 

substitute “sexual exploitation”; for “prostitution” substitute “sexually

 

exploited”.

 

(10)    

All reference in other legislation to the above sections and titles should be treated

 

as referring to the amended titles above.”

 


 

Ann Coffey

 

Sarah Champion

 

NC2

 

To move the following Clause

 

         

“Child Sexual Exploitation: Consent

 

(1)    

The Sexual Offences Act 2003 is amended as follows.

 

(2)    

In section 9 (Sexual activity with a child), after subsection (3), insert—

 

“(4)    

A Court shall presume that a defendant, A, does not believe that B is aged

 

16 or over if there is evidence to suggest that B is a victim of child sexual

 

exploitation in which A is involved; unless A adduces evidence which

 

raises an issue as to his reasonable belief in whether B was aged 16 or

 

over at the time or immediately before the offence.

 

(5)    

Child sexual exploitation is any scheme or offence which is calculated or

 

designed to create a position whereby B can be exploited so that B is or

 

might be the subject of a sexual offence.”

 

(3)    

In section 75 (Evidential presumptions about consent), afer subsection (2)(f),

 

insert—

 

“(g)    

the complainant was a victim of child sexual exploitation: or

 

(h)    

the defendant can be shown to have been directly involved in

 

child sexual exploitation.


 
contents continue
 

© Parliamentary copyright
Revised 15 January 2015