Session 2014 - 15
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament


 
 

339

 

SUPPLEMENT TO THE VOTES AND PROCEEDINGS

 
 

Monday 1 December 2014

 

Proceedings

 

on Consideration of Lords Amendments

 

Criminal Justice and Courts Bill


 

On Consideration of Lords Amendments to the Criminal Justice and Courts Bill

 

Lords Amendment No. 97

 

Secretary Chris Grayling                                                                                  

Agreed to on division

 

To move, That this House disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment.

 

 

Lords Amendment accordingly disagreed to.

 

Lords Amendment No. 98

 

Secretary Chris Grayling                                                                                  

Agreed to

 

To move, That this House disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment.

 

 

Lords Amendment accordingly disagreed to.


 
 

:                                             

340

 

, continued

 
 

Lords Amendment No. 99

 

Secretary Chris Grayling                                                                                  

Agreed to

 

To move, That this House disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment.

 

 

Lords Amendment accordingly disagreed to.

 

Lords Amendment No. 100

 

Secretary Chris Grayling                                                                                  

Agreed to

 

To move, That this House disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment.

 

 

Lords Amendment accordingly disagreed to.

 

Lords Amendment No. 101

 

Secretary Chris Grayling                                                                                  

Agreed to

 

To move, That this House disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment.

 

 

Lords Amendment accordingly disagreed to.

 

Lords Amendment No. 102

 

Secretary Chris Grayling                                                                                  

Agreed to

 

To move, That this House disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment.

 

 

Lords Amendment accordingly disagreed to.


 
 

:                                             

341

 

, continued

 
 

Lords Amendment No. 103

 

Secretary Chris Grayling                                                                                  

Agreed to on division

 

To move, That this House disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment.

 

 

Lords Amendment accordingly disagreed to.

 

Lords Amendment No. 104

 

Secretary Chris Grayling                                                                                  

Agreed to

 

To move, That this House disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment.

 

 

Lords Amendment accordingly disagreed to.

 

Lords Amendment No. 105

 

Secretary Chris Grayling                                                                                  

Agreed to

 

To move, That this House disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment.

 

 

Lords Amendment accordingly disagreed to.

 

Lords Amendment No. 106

 

Secretary Chris Grayling                                                                                  

Agreed to

 

To move, That this House disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment.

 

 

Lords Amendment accordingly disagreed to.


 
 

:                                             

342

 

, continued

 
 

Lords Amendment No. 107

 

Secretary Chris Grayling                                                                                  

Agreed to on division

 

To move, That this House disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment.

 

Lords Amendment accordingly disagreed to.

 

Secretary Chris Grayling

 

To move the following Amendment to the Bill in lieu of the Lords Amendment:—

 

Secretary Chris Grayling

 

Agreed to on division  (a)

 

Page  67,  line  22,  leave out subsection (1) and insert——

 

“(1)    

This section applies where—

 

(a)    

a person is granted permission to file evidence or make representations in

 

judicial review proceedings, and

 

(b)    

at that time, the person is not a relevant party to the proceedings.

 

(1A)    

That person is referred to in this section as an “intervener”.”

 

Secretary Chris Grayling

 

Agreed to on division  (b)

 

Page  67,  line  30,  leave out subsection (4) and insert—

 

“(4)    

On an application to the High Court or the Court of Appeal by a relevant party to

 

the proceedings, if the court is satisfied that a condition described in subsection

 

(4A) is met in a stage of the proceedings that the court deals with, the court must

 

order the intervener to pay any costs specified in the application that the court

 

considers have been incurred by the relevant party as a result of the intervener’s

 

involvement in that stage of the proceedings.

 

(4A)    

Those conditions are that—

 

(a)    

the intervener has acted, in substance, as the sole or principal applicant,

 

defendant, appellant or respondent;

 

(b)    

the intervener’s evidence and representations, taken as a whole, have not

 

been of significant assistance to the court;

 

(c)    

a significant part of the intervener’s evidence and representations relates

 

to matters that it is not necessary for the court to consider in order to

 

resolve the issues that are the subject of the stage in the proceedings;

 

(d)    

the intervener has behaved unreasonably.”

 

Secretary Chris Grayling

 

Agreed to on division  (c)

 

Page  67,  line  44,  at end insert—

 

    

“and the proceedings described in paragraphs (a) to (d) are “stages” of judicial

 

review proceedings.”

 

Secretary Chris Grayling

 

Agreed to on division  (d)

 

Page  68,  line  3,  leave out from beginning to “directly” in line 6 and insert—

 

“(a)    

a person who is or has been an applicant or defendant in the proceedings

 

described in subsection (7)(a), (b) or (c);


 
 

:                                             

343

 

, continued

 
 

(b)    

a person who is or has been an appellant or respondent in the proceedings

 

described in subsection (7)(d);

 

(c)    

any other person who is or has been”

 

Secretary Chris Grayling

 

Agreed to on division  (e)

 

Page  68,  line  8,  at end insert—

 

“( )    

If a person who is an intervener in judicial review proceedings becomes a relevant

 

party to the proceedings, the person is to be treated for the purposes of subsections

 

(2) and (4) as having been a relevant party, rather than an intervener, at all times

 

when involved in the proceedings.”

 

 

Lords Amendment No. 74

 

Secretary Chris Grayling                                                                                  

Agreed to on division

 

To move, That this House disagrees with the Lords in their Amendment.

 

 

Lords Amendment accordingly disagreed to.

 

Lords Amendments 127 to 131 Agreed to.

 

Lords Amendments 1 to 73, 75 to 96 , 108 to 126 and 132 to 143 Agreed to.


 
contents
 

© Parliamentary copyright
Revised 2 December 2014