|
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
| New Amendments handed in are marked thus  |
|
| Amendments which will comply with the required notice period at their next appearance
|
|
| Armed Forces (Service Complaints and Financial Assistance) Bill
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
| Clause 1, page 1, line 9, leave out “is” |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
| Clause 1, page 1, leave out line 10 and insert— |
|
| | “(a) | has been a member of the regular or reserve forces in the last five years |
|
| | ending with the day on which the appointment is to take effect, or” |
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
| Clause 1, page 1, line 11, after “(b)”, insert “is” |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
| Clause 1, page 1, line 13, at end add— |
|
| | (a) | The period for which a person is appointed shall be not less than five |
|
| | years and not more than seven years. |
|
| | (b) | A person who has been appointed as Ombudsman may not be re- |
|
| | appointed to the office.” |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
| Clause 2, page 3, line 15, at end insert— |
|
| | “(5A) | Before making regulations under this section the Defence Council must consult |
|
| | the Service Complaints Ombudsman.” |
|
| |
| Clause 2, page 5, line 15, at end insert— |
|
| | “(2A) | Regulations made under section 340E(1)(b) must specify that in relation to any |
|
| | service complaint which includes allegations of discrimination, harassment, or of |
|
| | being victimised as a result of making such allegations— |
|
| | (a) | where a person is appointed by the Defence Council for the purposes of |
|
| | section 340C(1)(a) or 340D(2)(d) that person must have a proven |
|
| | understanding of discrimination and harassment; |
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
| | (b) | where a panel is appointed by the Defence Council for the purposes of |
|
| | section 340C(1)(a) or 340D(2)(d) at least one member of the panel must |
|
| | have a proven understanding of discrimination and harassment.” |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment would require that any regulations made by the Secretary of State must specify |
|
| | that the person, or at least one of the panel members, involved in dealing with Service complaints |
|
| | involving allegations of discrimination or harassment should have a proven understanding of |
|
| | discrimination and harassment. |
|
| |
| Clause 2, page 6, line 28, after “may”, insert “, on an application to the |
|
| Ombudsman by a person within subsection (1A),” |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment clarifies the provision made in new section 340H(1) of the Armed Forces Act |
|
| | 2006 (inserted by clause 2 of the Bill) about the making of applications to the Service Complaints |
|
| | Ombudsman. See also amendment 5. |
|
| |
| Clause 2, page 6, line 29, after “complaint”, insert “, where the Ombudsman is |
|
| satisfied that the complaint has been finally determined” |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment makes a drafting change in consequence of amendment 9. It clarifies that the |
|
| | Service Complaints Ombudsman may not investigate a service complaint unless satisfied that the |
|
| | complaint has been finally determined. |
|
| |
| Clause 2, page 6, line 31, leave out from “complaint” to end of line 32 and insert |
|
| “(including an allegation of undue delay), where the Ombudsman is satisfied that the |
|
| complaint has been finally determined;” |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment makes minor drafting changes, including a change in consequence of amendment |
|
| | 9. It clarifies that the Service Complaints Ombudsman may not investigate an allegation of |
|
| | maladministration unless satisfied that the service complaint to which the allegation relates has |
|
| | |
| |
| Clause 2, page 6, leave out lines 33 to 37 and insert— |
|
| | “(c) | an allegation of undue delay in the handling of a service complaint which |
|
| | has not been finally determined; |
|
| | (d) | an allegation of undue delay in the handling of a relevant service matter.” |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment clarifies when the Service Complaints Ombudsman may investigate an allegation |
|
| | of undue delay in the handling of a service complaint or a relevant service matter (as to which, see |
|
| | |
|
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| Clause 2, page 6, line 37, at end insert— |
|
| | “(1A) | The following persons are within this subsection— |
|
| | (a) | in a case relating to a service complaint, the complainant; |
|
| | (b) | in a case relating to a matter in respect of which a service complaint has |
|
| | not been made, the person who raised the matter, |
|
| | | and, in relation to a case mentioned in paragraph (b), references in the remainder |
|
| | of this Part to the complainant and to a service complaint are to be read |
|
| | respectively as references to the person and the matter mentioned in that |
|
| | |
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment makes provision about who may make an application to the Service Complaints |
|
| | Ombudsman for an investigation under new section 340H(1) of the Armed Forces Act 2006. |
|
| |
| Clause 2, page 6, line 37, at end insert— |
|
| | “( ) | For the purposes of subsection (1)(d)— |
|
| | (a) | “relevant service matter” means a matter of a kind about which a service |
|
| | |
| | (i) | may be made, whether or not at the time of the application to the |
|
| | Ombudsman such a complaint has been made, or |
|
| | (ii) | could have been made (but for provision made by virtue of |
|
| | |
| | (b) | the reference to the handling of a matter is to its handling before the |
|
| | making of a service complaint (if any) about the matter.” |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment defines “relevant service matter” for the purposes of paragraph (d) of new |
|
| | section 340H(1) of the Armed Forces Act 2006 (see amendment 4) and makes provision about the |
|
| | reference to the handling of such a matter. |
|
| |
| Clause 2, page 6, line 37, at end insert— |
|
| | “( ) | for the purposes of subsection (1)(c)— |
|
| | “Undue delay” should be considered any length of time longer than |
|
| | one calendar year, or a length of time that the Ombudsman |
|
| | determines constitutes an undue delay in relation to a given |
|
| | |
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment defines “undue delay” for the purposes of paragraph (c) of new section 340H(1) |
|
| | of the Armed Forces Act 2006 (see Government amendment 4). |
|
| |
| Clause 2, page 6, line 39, after “writing,”, insert— |
|
| | “( ) | must specify the kind (or kinds) of investigation which the complainant |
|
| | wishes the Ombudsman to carry out (an investigation under a particular |
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
| | paragraph of subsection (1) being a “kind” of investigation for this |
|
| | |
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment provides that an application to the Service Complaints Ombudsman must specify |
|
| | which type or types of investigation the applicant wants the Ombudsman to carry out. |
|
| |
| Clause 2, page 6, line 40, leave out “the” and insert “any other” |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment is consequential on amendment 7. |
|
| |
| Clause 2, page 6, line 42, leave out from beginning to “a” in line 44 and insert— |
|
| | “( ) | For the purposes of this section, a service complaint has been finally determined |
|
| | |
| | |
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment converts new section 340H(3) for the Armed Forces Act 2006 into a general |
|
| | proposition about when a service complaint is to be treated for the purposes of new section 340H |
|
| | as having been finally determined. |
|
| |
| Clause 2, page 7, line 5, leave out “that” |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment is consequential on amendment 9. |
|
| |
| Clause 2, page 7, leave out lines 7 to 11 and insert— |
|
| | “( ) | The purpose of an investigation is— |
|
| | (a) | in the case of an investigation under subsection (1)(a), to decide whether |
|
| | the complaint is well-founded and, if so, to consider what redress (if any) |
|
| | |
| | (b) | in the case of an investigation under subsection (1)(b), (c) or (d), to |
|
| | |
| | (i) | whether the allegation is well-founded, and |
|
| | (ii) | if so, whether the maladministration or undue delay to which the |
|
| | allegation relates has or could have resulted in injustice being |
|
| | sustained by the complainant.” |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment clarifies the purpose of an investigation under each paragraph of new section |
|
| | 340H(1) for the Armed Forces Act 2006. |
|
| |
| Clause 2, page 7, line 11, at end insert— |
|
| | “(4A) | The power to carry out an investigation under subsection (1)(a) or (b) includes |
|
| | power to investigate any maladministration in the handling of the service |
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
| | complaint where it becomes apparent to the Ombudsman during the course of an |
|
| | investigation that any such maladministration may have occurred.” |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment provides for the circumstances in which the Service Complaints Ombudsman has |
|
| | power to investigate maladministration in the handling of a service complaint (other than any |
|
| | maladministration that the complainant has specifically alleged). |
|
| |
| Clause 2, page 7, line 12, after “application”, insert “in respect of a service |
|
| complaint that has been finally determined” |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment is consequential on the amendments to new section 340H(1) for the Armed Forces |
|
| | Act 2006 (in particular amendments 2 to 4). |
|
| |
| Clause 2, page 7, line 25, leave out “investigated an application relating to” and |
|
| insert “carried out an investigation under subsection (1)(a) or (b) in relation to” |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment confines new section 340H(8), which prevents the Service Complaints |
|
| | Ombudsman from investigating subsequent applications relating to a service complaint that the |
|
| | Ombudsman has already investigated, to cases where the Ombudsman has carried out an |
|
| | investigation under new section 340H(1)(a) or (b) in relation to the complaint. |
|
| |
| Clause 2, page 7, line 31, at end insert “; |
|
| | (b) | whether to investigate a service complaint, or an allegation, as a whole or |
|
| | only in particular respects.” |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment provides that the Service Complaints Ombudsman may investigate a service |
|
| | complaint, or an allegation, in whole or in part. |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
| Clause 2, page 7, line 32, leave out subsection (2). |
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
| Clause 2, page 7, line 34, leave out from “subject to subsection (2),” |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
| Clause 2, page 7, line 39, leave out subsection (5). |
|
| |
| Clause 2, page 7, line 44, after “investigation”, insert “under section 340H(1)(b)” |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment is consequential on amendments to new section 340H(1) of the Armed Forces Act |
|
| | |
| |
| Clause 2, page 8, line 43, at end insert “, and |
|
| | (b) | any recommendations referred to in subsection (2A).” |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment requires the Service Complaints Ombudsman to include, in a report under new |
|
| | section 340L, any recommendations required by subsection (2A) (see amendment 18). |
|
| |
| Clause 2, page 9, leave out lines 1 to 4 and insert— |
|
| | “(2A) | Those recommendations are— |
|
| | (a) | on an investigation under section 340H(1)(a) where the Ombudsman |
|
| | finds that the service complaint to which the investigation relates is well- |
|
| | founded, the Ombudsman’s recommendations (if any) on what redress |
|
| | |
| | (b) | on an investigation under section 340H(1)(b), (c) or (d) where the |
|
| | Ombudsman finds that the allegation to which the investigation relates is |
|
| | well-founded, the Ombudsman’s recommendations (if any) as a result of |
|
| | |
|