|
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| given up to and including |
|
| |
| New Amendments handed in are marked thus  |
|
| Amendments which will comply with the required notice period at their next appearance
|
|
| Amendments tabled since the last publication: 24 to 27, NC3 to NC8 and NS1 |
|
| |
| Neighbourhood Planning Bill
|
|
| |
| | This document includes all amendments remaining before the Committee and |
|
| | includes any withdrawn amendments at the end. The amendments have been |
|
| | arranged in accordance with the Order of the Committee [18 October 2016].
|
|
| | |
| |
| Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods |
|
| |
| |
| | |
|
| Clause 1, page 1, line 11, at end insert “and insofar as it is consistent with the |
|
| |
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment ensures that neighbourhood plans are not considered if they are inconsistent with |
|
| | |
|
|
| |
| |
|
| Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods |
|
| |
| |
| | |
|
| Clause 1, page 1, line 11, at end insert “and insofar as it is consistent with the |
|
| National Planning Policy Framework and the National Planning Practice Guidance.” |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment ensures that neighbourhood plans are not considered if they are incompatible |
|
| | with the National Planning Policy Framework or the National Planning Practice Guidance. |
|
| Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods |
|
| |
| |
| | |
|
| Clause 1, page 1, line 22, at end insert— |
|
| | “(c) | if it has been examined by an independent examiner who is registered |
|
| | with the Royal Town Planning Institute.” |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment ensures that the examination of a neighbourhood plan is conducted by an RTPI |
|
| | |
| |
| Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods |
|
| |
| |
| | |
|
| Clause 2, page 2, line 16, at the end insert— |
|
| | “(3A) | To support Neighbourhood Plans, the Secretary of State should set out the weight |
|
| | that should be given to approved development plans at key stages in the planning |
|
| | |
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment gives weight to Neighbourhood Plans at key stages along the process and not just |
|
| | at the post- referendum stage. |
|
| |
| Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods |
|
| |
| |
| | |
|
| Clause 3, page 2, line 25, at end insert “after consultation with the local area |
|
| |
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment ensures that any changes to a neighbourhood development order or plan are first |
|
| | subject to consultation with the local area involved. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
| |
|
| Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods |
|
| |
| |
| | |
|
| Clause 4, page 4, line 3, at end insert “providing the subsequent area is not smaller |
|
| than a parish or town council area or local authority ward.” |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment ensures that the size of a neighbourhood area is not smaller than a parish or town |
|
| | council area or local authority ward. |
|
| Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods |
|
| |
| |
| | |
|
| Clause 4, page 4, line 11, at end insert— |
|
| | “(6E) | Modifications made to a neighbourhood area must be subject to consultation with |
|
| | |
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment ensures that neighbourhood areas are only changed after the consultation with |
|
| | local community and that changes are driven by what the community wants. |
|
| |
| |
| | |
|
| Clause 5, page 4, line 40, leave out “as follows” and insert “in accordance with |
|
| |
| Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods |
|
| |
| |
| | |
|
| Clause 5, page 5, line 6, at end insert— |
|
| | “(2BA) | Such statements of community involvement must include a right for members of |
|
| | the community to be heard.” |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment would give local people and communities a statutory right to be heard. |
|
| Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods |
|
| |
| |
| | |
|
| Clause 5, page 5, line 6, at end insert— |
|
| | “(2BA) | Such statements of community involvement shall include measures to enable |
|
| | local parish councils to be set up in a streamlined and speedy manner.” |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment would make it easier for new parish and town councils to be formed. |
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
| Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods |
|
| |
| |
| | |
|
| Clause 5, page 5, line 9, at end insert— |
|
| | “(c) | reasonable payments made by local authorities for the purpose set out in |
|
| | paragraph (a) and (b) shall be recovered from the Secretary of State’s |
|
| | |
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment allows for the full recovery of costs of assisting with the development of a |
|
| | neighbourhood plan to be recovered to the local authority. |
|
| |
| | |
|
| Clause 5, page 5, line 19, after subsection (3) insert— |
|
| | “(4) | Section 120 of the Localism Act 2011 (Financial assistance in relation to |
|
| | neighbourhood planning) is amended as follows— |
|
| | (a) | at the end of subsection (2)(a) leave out “, and” and insert “subject to the |
|
| | condition that such assistance is prioritised for bodies or persons in |
|
| | deprived communities, and”, |
|
| | (b) | after subsection (3)(b), insert— |
|
| | “(ba) | a deprived community is defined as being any area |
|
| | which is among the 20 per cent most deprived Lower |
|
| | Layer Super Output Areas according to the most |
|
| | recently published English Indices of Deprivation, |
|
| | (bb) | prioritised financial assistance is defined to mean that no |
|
| | less than 50 per cent of the total value of the financial |
|
| | assistance provided under this section is provided to |
|
| | |
| Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods |
|
| |
| |
| | |
|
| Clause 5, page 5, line 19, at the end insert— |
|
| | “(4) | To support Neighbourhood Plans, all councils should have a Local Development |
|
| | Plan in place by December 2017.” |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment ensures that Local Plans are in place so Neighbourhood Plans can be made in |
|
| | line with the strategic aims of Local Plans. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
| |
|
| Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods |
|
| |
| |
| | |
|
| Clause 6, page 5, line 27, at end insert “in cases where the local authorities’ |
|
| statement of community involvement was regarded as inadequate.” |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment allows the Secretary of State only to require planning authorities to review their |
|
| | statement of community involvement if they have failed to produce one. |
|
| |
| Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods |
|
| |
| |
| | |
|
| Clause 7, page 6, line 7, at end insert— |
|
| | “(1A) | Regulations made under subsection (1) must make provisions for local planning |
|
| | authorities to make exceptions to conditions relating to matters set out in |
|
| | paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of subsection (1).” |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment would ensure that there is a local voice and judgement taking into account local |
|
| | circumstances and impact. |
|
| Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods |
|
| |
| |
| | |
|
| Clause 7, page 6, line 12, leave out subsection (2)(a) |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment would ensure that “acceptable in planning terms” does not mean that conditions |
|
| | can be overlooked because they are unacceptable for other reasons. |
|
| Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods |
|
| |
| |
| | |
|
| Clause 7, page 6, line 18, at end insert— |
|
| | “including in terms of sustainable development and public interest.” |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment would ensure that there is a sustainable development test in conditions and that |
|
| | they are acceptable to local people. |
|
| Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods |
|
| |
| |
| | |
|
| Clause 7, page 6, line 20, at end insert “which must include consultation with local |
|
| |
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment would ensure that local authorities are consulted on the draft regulations. |
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
| Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods |
|
| |
| |
| | |
|
| Clause 7, page 6, line 20, at end insert— |
|
| | “(1A) | Regulations made under subsection (1) must make provision for an appeal |
|
| | |
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment would ensure that provision is made for an appeals process. |
|
| Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods |
|
| |
| |
| | |
|
| Clause 7, page 6, line 23, leave out subsection (5) |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment would ensure that local authorities are still able to make necessary pre- |
|
| | commencement conditions on developers. |
|
| Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods |
|
| |
| |
| | |
|
| Clause 7, page 6, line 24, at end insert— |
|
| | “where agreement cannot be reached a mediation system should be |
|
| | |
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment would allow for there to be a mechanism to resolve disputes. |
|
| Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods |
|
| |
| |
| | |
|
| Clause 7, page 6, line 26, at end insert— |
|
| | “(5A) | The Secretary of State should provide guidance for appeal routes where an |
|
| | agreement cannot be reached on pre-commencement conditions, along with |
|
| | guidance on pre-completion and pre-occupation conditions.” |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment would ensure that there is clarity on appeal routes, pre-completion and pre- |
|
| | |
| Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods |
|
| |
| |
| | |
|
| Page 5, line 35, leave out Clause 7 |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment would remove from the Bill completely the changes to planning conditions. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| | |
|
| Clause 34, page 26, line 38, leave out “subsections (2) and” and insert “subsection” |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | This amendment and amendment 25 provide for the repeal of section 141(5A) of the Local |
|
| | Government, Planning and Land Act 1980 in clause 23(3) to extend to England and Wales only. |
|
| | Although section 141 generally extends to Scotland, subsection (5A) only extends to England and |
|
| | Wales, so its repeal should only extend there. |
|
| |
| | |
|
| Clause 34, page 26, line 39, leave out subsection (2) |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | See the explanatory statement for amendment 24. |
|
| |
| |
| | |
|
| Clause 35, page 27, line 8, after “3”, insert “, (Power to direct preparation of joint |
|
| local development documents)” |
|
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | The amendment provides for the regulation-making powers conferred by NC4 to come into force |
|
| | on the passing of the Act resulting from the Bill. |
|
| |
| | |
|
| Clause 35, page 27, line 8, after “3”, insert “, (Review of local development |
|
| |
| | Member’s explanatory statement
|
|
| | The amendment provides for the regulation-making powers conferred by NC7 to come into force |
|
| | on the passing of the Act resulting from the Bill. |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
| To move the following Clause— |
|
| | | “Content of development plan documents |
|
| | (1) | In section 19 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (preparation of |
|
| | local development documents) after subsection (1A) insert— |
|
| | “(1B) | Each local planning authority must identify the strategic priorities for the |
|
| | development and use of land in the authority’s area. |
|
| | (1C) | Policies to address those priorities must be set out in the local planning |
|
| | authority’s development plan documents (taken as a whole). |
|
|