Session 2010 - 12
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament

Charities Bill [HL]


Charities Bill [HL]
Part 11 — Charitable incorporated organisations (CIOs)
Chapter 1 — General

108

 

Name and status

211     

Name

(1)   

The name of a CIO must appear in legible characters—

(a)   

in every location, and in every description of document or

communication, in which a charitable company would be required by

5

regulations under section 82 of the Companies Act 2006 to state its

registered name, and

(b)   

in all conveyances purporting to be executed by the CIO.

(2)   

In subsection (1)(b), “conveyance” means any instrument creating,

transferring, varying or extinguishing an interest in land.

10

212     

Status

(1)   

Subsection (3) applies if the name of a CIO does not include—

(a)   

“charitable incorporated organisation”,

(b)   

“CIO”, with or without full stops after each letter, or

(c)   

a Welsh equivalent mentioned in subsection (2) (but this option applies

15

only if the CIO’s constitution is in Welsh),

   

and it is irrelevant, in any such case, whether or not capital letters are used.

(2)   

The Welsh equivalents referred to in subsection (1)(c) are—

(a)   

“sefydliad elusennol corfforedig”, or

(b)   

“SEC”, with or without full stops after each letter.

20

(3)   

If this subsection applies, the fact that a CIO is a CIO must be stated in legible

characters in all the locations, documents, communications and conveyances

mentioned in section 211(1).

(4)   

The statement required by subsection (3) must be in English, except that in the

case of a document which is otherwise wholly in Welsh, the statement may be

25

in Welsh.

213     

Civil consequences of failure to disclose name or status

(1)   

This section applies to any legal proceedings brought by a CIO to enforce a

right arising out of a contract or conveyance in connection with which there

was a failure to comply with section 211 or 212.

30

(2)   

The proceedings must be dismissed if it is shown that the defendant to the

proceedings—

(a)   

has a claim against the CIO arising out of the contract or conveyance

that the defendant has been unable to pursue because of the failure to

comply with section 211 or 212, or

35

(b)   

has suffered some financial loss in connection with the contract or

conveyance because of the failure to comply with section 211 or 212,

   

unless the court before which the proceedings are brought is satisfied that it is

just and equitable to permit the proceedings to continue.

(3)   

This section does not affect the right of any person to enforce such rights as that

40

person may have against another in any proceedings brought by the other.

 
 

Charities Bill [HL]
Part 11 — Charitable incorporated organisations (CIOs)
Chapter 2 — Powers, capacity and procedure etc.

109

 

214     

 Offence of failing to disclose name or status

(1)   

In the case of failure, without reasonable excuse, to comply with section 211 or

212 an offence is committed by—

(a)   

every charity trustee of the CIO who is in default, and

(b)   

any other person who on the CIO’s behalf—

5

(i)   

signs or authorises the signing of the offending document,

communication or conveyance, or

(ii)   

otherwise commits or authorises the offending act or omission.

(2)   

A person guilty of an offence under subsection (1) is liable on summary

conviction to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale and, for

10

continued contravention, a daily default fine not exceeding 10% of level 3 on

the standard scale.

(3)   

The reference in subsection (1) to a charity trustee being in default, and the

reference in subsection (2) to a daily default fine, have the same meaning as in

the Companies Acts (see sections 1121 to 1123 and 1125 of the Companies Act

15

2006).

215     

 Offence of holding out that a body is a CIO

(1)   

It is an offence for a person (in whatever way) to hold any body out as being a

CIO when it is not.

(2)   

It is a defence where a person is charged with an offence under subsection (1)

20

to prove that the person believed on reasonable grounds that the body was a

CIO.

(3)   

A person guilty of an offence under subsection (1) is liable on summary

conviction to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale.

Chapter 2

25

Powers, capacity and procedure etc.

216     

Powers of CIO

(1)   

Subject to anything in its constitution, a CIO may do anything which is

calculated to further its purposes or is conducive or incidental to doing so.

(2)   

The CIO’s charity trustees are to manage the affairs of the CIO and may for that

30

purpose exercise all the powers of the CIO.

217     

Constitutional requirements

(1)   

A CIO must use and apply its property in furtherance of its purposes and in

accordance with its constitution.

(2)   

If the CIO is one whose members are liable to contribute to its assets if it is

35

wound up, its constitution binds the CIO and its members for the time being to

the same extent as if its provisions were contained in a contract—

(a)   

to which the CIO and each of its members was a party, and

(b)   

which contained obligations on the part of the CIO and each member to

observe all the provisions of the constitution.

40

 
 

Charities Bill [HL]
Part 11 — Charitable incorporated organisations (CIOs)
Chapter 2 — Powers, capacity and procedure etc.

110

 

(3)   

Money payable by a member to the CIO under the constitution is a debt due

from that member to the CIO, and is of the nature of an ordinary contract debt.

218     

Third parties

(1)   

Subject to subsection (3), the validity of an act done (or purportedly done) by a

CIO is not to be called into question on the ground that the CIO lacked

5

constitutional capacity.

(2)   

Subject to subsection (3), the power of the charity trustees of a CIO to act so as

to bind the CIO (or authorise others to do so) is not to be called into question

on the ground of any constitutional limitations on their powers.

(3)   

Subsections (1) and (2) apply only in favour of a person who gives full

10

consideration in money or money’s worth in relation to the act in question, and

does not know—

(a)   

in a subsection (1) case, that the act is beyond the CIO’s constitutional

capacity, or

(b)   

in a subsection (2) case, that the act is beyond the constitutional powers

15

of its charity trustees,

   

and (in addition) subsection (2) applies only if the person dealt with the CIO in

good faith (which the person is presumed to have done unless the contrary is

proved).

(4)   

A party to an arrangement or transaction with a CIO is not bound to inquire—

20

(a)   

whether it is within the CIO’s constitutional capacity, or

(b)   

as to any constitutional limitations on the powers of its charity trustees

to bind the CIO or authorise others to do so.

(5)   

If a CIO purports to transfer or grant an interest in property, the fact—

(a)   

that the act was beyond its constitutional capacity, or

25

(b)   

that its charity trustees in connection with the act exceeded their

constitutional powers,

   

does not affect the title of a person who subsequently acquires the property or

any interest in it for full consideration without actual notice of any such

circumstances affecting the validity of the CIO’s act.

30

(6)   

In any proceedings arising out of subsections (1) to (3), the burden of proving

that a person knew that an act—

(a)   

was beyond the CIO’s constitutional capacity, or

(b)   

was beyond the constitutional powers of its charity trustees,

   

lies on the person making that allegation.

35

(7)   

In this section and section 219

(a)   

references to a CIO’s lack of constitutional capacity are to lack of

capacity because of anything in its constitution, and

(b)   

references to constitutional limitations on the powers of a CIO’s charity

trustees are to limitations on their powers under its constitution,

40

including limitations deriving from a resolution of the CIO in general

meeting, or from an agreement between the CIO’s members, and the

references to constitutional powers are to be read accordingly.

 
 

Charities Bill [HL]
Part 11 — Charitable incorporated organisations (CIOs)
Chapter 2 — Powers, capacity and procedure etc.

111

 

219     

Limits to s.218

(1)   

Nothing in section 218 prevents a person from bringing proceedings to restrain

the doing of an act which would be—

(a)   

beyond the CIO’s constitutional capacity, or

(b)   

beyond the constitutional powers of the CIO’s charity trustees.

5

(2)   

But no such proceedings may be brought in respect of an act to be done in

fulfilment of a legal obligation arising from a previous act of the CIO.

(3)   

Subsection (2) does not prevent the Commission from exercising any of its

powers.

(4)   

Nothing in section 218(2) affects any liability incurred by the CIO’s charity

10

trustees (or any one of them) for acting beyond their (or that charity trustee’s)

constitutional powers.

(5)   

Nothing in section 218 absolves the CIO’s charity trustees from their duty to

act within the CIO’s constitution and in accordance with any constitutional

limitations on their powers.

15

220     

Duty of CIO members

Each member of a CIO must exercise the powers that the member has in that

capacity in the way that the member decides, in good faith, would be most

likely to further the purposes of the CIO.

221     

Duties of charity trustees

20

(1)   

Each charity trustee of a CIO must exercise the powers and perform the

functions that the charity trustee has in that capacity in the way that the charity

trustee decides, in good faith, would be most likely to further the purposes of

the CIO.

(2)   

Each charity trustee of a CIO must in the performance of functions in that

25

capacity exercise such care and skill as is reasonable in the circumstances,

having regard in particular—

(a)   

to any special knowledge or experience that the charity trustee has or

purports to have, and

(b)   

if the charity trustee acts as such in the course of a business or

30

profession, to any special knowledge or experience that it is reasonable

to expect of a person acting in the course of that kind of business or

profession.

   

But this is subject to any provision of a CIO’s constitution permitted by virtue

of regulations made under subsection (3).

35

(3)   

CIO regulations may permit a CIO’s constitution to provide that the duty in

subsection (2)—

(a)   

does not apply, or

(b)   

does not apply in so far as is specified in the constitution.

(4)   

Regulations under subsection (3) may provide for limits on the extent to which,

40

or the cases in which, a CIO’s constitution may disapply the duty in subsection

(2).

 
 

 
previous section contents continue
 

© Parliamentary copyright
Revised 28 June 2011