House of Lords portcullis
House of Lords
Session 2013 - 14
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament

Finance Bill


Finance Bill
Part 1 — Income Tax, Corporation Tax and Capital Gains Tax
Chapter 5 — Other provisions

40

 

77      

Manufactured payments: general

Schedule 29 contains provision for, and in connection with, the application of

the Tax Acts to manufactured payment relationships and payments

representative of dividends and interest.

78      

Relationship between rules prohibiting and allowing deductions

5

(1)   

In section 31 of ITTOIA 2005 (trade profits: relationship between rules

prohibiting and allowing deductions)—

(a)   

after subsection (1) insert—

“(1A)   

But, if the relevant permissive rule would allow a deduction in

calculating the profits of a trade in respect of an amount which

10

arises directly or indirectly in consequence of, or otherwise in

connection with, relevant tax avoidance arrangements, that

rule—

(a)   

does not have priority under subsection (1)(a), and

(b)   

is subject to any relevant prohibitive rule in this Part

15

(and to the provisions mentioned in subsection (1)(b)).”,

and

(b)   

after subsection (3) insert—

“(4)   

In this section “relevant tax avoidance arrangements” means

arrangements—

20

(a)   

to which the person carrying on the trade is a party, and

(b)   

the main purpose, or one of the main purposes, of which

is the obtaining of a tax advantage (within the meaning

of section 1139 of CTA 2010).

   

“Arrangements” includes any agreement, understanding,

25

scheme, transaction or series of transactions (whether or not

legally enforceable).”

(2)   

In section 274 of ITTOIA 2005 (property businesses: relationship between rules

prohibiting and allowing deductions)—

(a)   

after subsection (1) insert—

30

“(1A)   

But, if the relevant permissive rule would allow a deduction in

calculating the profits of a property business in respect of an

amount which arises directly or indirectly in consequence of, or

otherwise in connection with, relevant tax avoidance

arrangements, that rule—

35

(a)   

does not have priority under subsection (1)(a), and

(b)   

is subject to any relevant prohibitive rule in this Part

(and to the provisions mentioned in subsection (1)(b)).”,

and

(b)   

after subsection (3) insert—

40

“(3A)   

In this section “relevant tax avoidance arrangements” means

arrangements—

(a)   

to which the person carrying on the property business is

a party, and

(b)   

the main purpose, or one of the main purposes, of which

45

is the obtaining of a tax advantage (within the meaning

of section 1139 of CTA 2010).

 
 

Finance Bill
Part 1 — Income Tax, Corporation Tax and Capital Gains Tax
Chapter 5 — Other provisions

41

 

   

“Arrangements” includes any agreement, understanding,

scheme, transaction or series of transactions (whether or not

legally enforceable).”

(3)   

In section 51 of CTA 2009 (trade profits: relationship between rules prohibiting

and allowing deductions)—

5

(a)   

after subsection (1) insert—

“(1A)   

But, if the relevant permissive rule would allow a deduction in

calculating the profits of a trade in respect of an amount which

arises directly or indirectly in consequence of, or otherwise in

connection with, relevant tax avoidance arrangements, that

10

rule—

(a)   

does not have priority under subsection (1)(a), and

(b)   

is subject to any relevant prohibitive rule (and to the

provisions mentioned in subsection (1)(b)).”, and

(b)   

after subsection (3) insert—

15

“(4)   

In this section “relevant tax avoidance arrangements” means

arrangements—

(a)   

to which the company carrying on the trade is a party,

and

(b)   

the main purpose, or one of the main purposes, of which

20

is the obtaining of a tax advantage (within the meaning

of section 1139 of CTA 2010).

   

“Arrangements” includes any agreement, understanding,

scheme, transaction or series of transactions (whether or not

legally enforceable).”

25

(4)   

In section 214 of CTA 2009 (property businesses: relationship between rules

prohibiting and allowing deductions)—

(a)   

after subsection (1) insert—

“(1A)   

But, if the relevant permissive rule would allow a deduction in

calculating the profits of a property business in respect of an

30

amount which arises directly or indirectly in consequence of, or

otherwise in connection with, relevant tax avoidance

arrangements, that rule—

(a)   

does not have priority under subsection (1)(a), and

(b)   

is subject to any relevant prohibitive rule (and to the

35

provisions mentioned in subsection (1)(b)).”, and

(b)   

after subsection (3) insert—

“(3A)   

In this section “relevant tax avoidance arrangements” means

arrangements—

(a)   

to which the company carrying on the property business

40

is a party, and

(b)   

the main purpose, or one of the main purposes, of which

is the obtaining of a tax advantage (within the meaning

of section 1139 of CTA 2010).

   

“Arrangements” includes any agreement, understanding,

45

scheme, transaction or series of transactions (whether or not

legally enforceable).”

 
 

Finance Bill
Part 2 — Oil

42

 

(5)   

The amendments made by this section have effect in relation to deductions in

respect of amounts which arise directly or indirectly in consequence of, or

otherwise in connection with—

(a)   

arrangements which are entered into on or after 21 December 2012, or

(b)   

any transaction forming part of arrangements which is entered into on

5

or after that date.

(6)   

But those amendments do not have effect where the arrangements are, or any

such transaction is, entered into pursuant to an unconditional obligation in a

contract made before that date.

(7)   

“An unconditional obligation” means an obligation which may not be varied

10

or extinguished by the exercise of a right (whether under the contract or

otherwise).

79      

Close companies

Schedule 30 (which makes provision about close companies) has effect.

Part 2

15

Oil

Decommissioning relief agreements

80      

Decommissioning relief agreements

(1)   

There are to be paid out of money provided by Parliament any sums which a

Minister of the Crown is liable to pay under a decommissioning relief

20

agreement.

(2)   

A “decommissioning relief agreement” is an agreement which—

(a)   

is made between a Minister of the Crown and a qualifying company,

and

(b)   

provides that, in such circumstances as are specified in the agreement,

25

if the amount of tax relief in respect of any decommissioning

expenditure incurred by that or another qualifying company is less

than an amount determined in accordance with the agreement (“the

reference amount”), the difference is payable to the company that

incurred the expenditure.

30

(3)   

“Qualifying company” means—

(a)   

any company that has at any time carried on a ring fence trade,

(b)   

any company that is associated with a company carrying on a ring fence

trade,

(c)   

any company that has at any time been associated with a company that

35

was carrying on a ring fence trade at that time, and

(d)   

in the case of decommissioning expenditure incurred in connection

with any plant or machinery, or any land, situated in the UK sector of a

cross-boundary field, any company that is a party to a joint operating

agreement or unitisation agreement in relation to that field.

40

(4)   

For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) the amount of tax relief in respect of any

decommissioning expenditure is to be determined in accordance with the

agreement; and in making such a determination tax relief in respect of

 
 

Finance Bill
Part 2 — Oil

43

 

expenditure incurred by the qualifying company that is not decommissioning

expenditure may, in such circumstances as are specified in the agreement, be

treated as if it were tax relief in respect of decommissioning expenditure.

(5)   

A payment made to a company under a decommissioning relief agreement is

not to be regarded as income or a gain of the company for any purpose of the

5

Tax Acts.

(6)   

Section 18(1) of CRCA 2005 (restriction on disclosure by Revenue and Customs

officials) does not prevent—

(a)   

disclosure to a Minister of the Crown for the purpose of enabling the

Minister of the Crown to determine the extent of any liability under a

10

decommissioning relief agreement, or

(b)   

disclosure to a company that has rights under a decommissioning relief

agreement for the purpose of enabling the company to determine the

reference amount.

(7)   

In this section—

15

“company” has the meaning given by section 1121 of CTA 2010,

“cross-boundary field” has the meaning given by section 10(9) of the

Petroleum Act 1998,

“decommissioning expenditure” has the meaning given by section 81,

“Minister of the Crown” includes the Treasury,

20

“ring fence trade” has the same meaning as in Part 8 of CTA 2010 (see

section 277 of that Act),

“the UK sector of a cross-boundary field” means that part of a cross-

boundary field lying within the UK marine area (as defined by section

42 of the Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009), and

25

“unitisation agreement” has the meaning given by paragraph 1(2) of

Schedule 17 to FA 1980.

(8)   

Subsections (8) to (9) of section 30 of the Petroleum Act 1998 (which specifies

when one body corporate is associated with another) apply for the purposes of

this section as they apply for the purposes of that section.

30

81      

Meaning of “decommissioning expenditure”

(1)   

In section 80 “decommissioning expenditure” means expenditure incurred in

connection with—

(a)   

demolishing any plant or machinery,

(b)   

preserving any plant or machinery pending its reuse or demolition,

35

(c)   

preparing any plant or machinery for reuse,

(d)   

arranging for the reuse of any plant or machinery, or

(e)   

the restoration of any land.

(2)   

It is immaterial for the purposes of subsection (1)(b) whether the plant or

machinery is reused, is demolished or is partly reused and partly demolished.

40

(3)   

It is immaterial for the purposes of subsection (1)(c) and (d) whether the plant

or machinery is in fact reused.

(4)   

In subsection (1)(e) “restoration” includes landscaping.

(5)   

The Treasury may by order amend this section.

(6)   

An order under subsection (5) may include transitional provision and savings.

45

 
 

Finance Bill
Part 2 — Oil

44

 

(7)   

The power to make an order under subsection (5) is exercisable by statutory

instrument.

(8)   

A statutory instrument containing an order under subsection (5) is subject to

annulment in pursuance of a resolution of the House of Commons.

82      

Annual report

5

(1)   

For each financial year the Treasury must prepare a report containing the

information in subsection (2).

(2)   

The information is—

(a)   

the number of decommissioning relief agreements entered into in that

year,

10

(b)   

the total number of decommissioning relief agreements in force at the

end of that year,

(c)   

the number of payments made under any decommissioning relief

agreements during that year, and the amount of each payment,

(d)   

the total number of payments that have been made under any

15

decommissioning relief agreements as at the end of that year, and the

total amount of those payments, and

(e)   

an estimate of the maximum amount liable to be paid under any

decommissioning relief agreements.

(3)   

The report for a financial year must be laid before the House of Commons as

20

soon as is reasonably practicable after the end of that year.

(4)   

In this section “decommissioning relief agreement” has the same meaning as in

section 80.

(5)   

This section has effect in relation to financial years ending on or after 31 March

2014.

25

83      

Effect of claim on PRT

(1)   

This section applies where a sum is payable to a company (“the claimant”)

under a decommissioning relief agreement.

(2)   

Subsection (3) applies where the reference amount is calculated by reference to

what the claimant’s assessable profit in any chargeable period would be if any

30

expenditure incurred by it were used to reduce its profit in a particular way

(rather than in any way that it has in fact been used).

(3)   

For the purposes of petroleum revenue tax—

(a)   

the expenditure is treated as having been used to reduce the claimant’s

profit in that way (rather than in any way that it has in fact been used),

35

and

(b)   

the claimant is treated as if it had received the tax relief it would receive

if its profit were reduced in that way (so no repayment of tax is to be

made by virtue of this subsection).

(4)   

Subsection (5) applies where the reference amount is calculated by reference to

40

what any other company’s assessable profit in any chargeable period would be

if any expenditure incurred by the claimant—

(a)   

had been incurred by the other company, and

(b)   

were used to reduce the other company’s profit in a particular way.

 
 

Finance Bill
Part 2 — Oil

45

 

(5)   

For the purposes of petroleum revenue tax—

(a)   

the expenditure is treated as incurred by the other company (and not

the claimant),

(b)   

the expenditure is treated as having been used by the other company to

reduce its profit in that way, and

5

(c)   

the other company is treated as if it had received the tax relief it would

receive if its profit were reduced in that way (so no repayment of tax is

to be made by virtue of this subsection).

(6)   

In this section—

“assessable profit” and “chargeable period” have the same meaning as in

10

Part 1 of OTA 1975,

“company” has the meaning given by section 1121 of CTA 2010,

“decommissioning relief agreement” has the same meaning as in section

80, and

“the reference amount” means the reference amount (within the meaning

15

of that section) that relates to the sum mentioned in subsection (1).

84      

Terminal losses accruing by virtue of another’s default

(1)   

This section applies where—

(a)   

a company defaults on a liability under—

(i)   

a relevant agreement, or

20

(ii)   

an abandonment programme,

   

to make a payment towards decommissioning expenditure in respect

of an oil field,

(b)   

in consequence of the default, another company (“the other company”)

that has rights under a decommissioning relief agreement at the time of

25

the default incurs decommissioning expenditure in respect of that oil

field, and

(c)   

but for paragraph 15 of Schedule 17 to FA 1980 (terminal losses), a sum

(or a sum of a greater amount) would be payable to the other company

under the decommissioning relief agreement.

30

(2)   

Paragraph 15 of Schedule 17 to FA 1980 does not apply in relation to any

allowable loss accruing to the other company from that oil field.

(3)   

Any allowable unrelievable field loss (within the meaning of section 6 of OTA

1975) that—

(a)   

consists of the unrelieved portion of an allowable loss within

35

subsection (2), and

(b)   

would (in the absence of this subsection) arise as a result of subsection

(2),

   

is not to be regarded as arising.

(4)   

Nothing in this section affects the operation of section 83(3) or (5).

40

(5)   

In this section—

“abandonment programme” means an abandonment programme

approved under Part 4 of the Petroleum Act 1998 (including such a

programme as revised),

“company” has the meaning given by section 1121 of CTA 2010,

45

“decommissioning expenditure” has the same meaning as in section 80,

 
 

Finance Bill
Part 2 — Oil

46

 

“decommissioning relief agreement” has the same meaning as in that

section,

“oil field” has the same meaning as in OTA 1975,

“relevant agreement” has the meaning given by section 104(5)(a) of FA

1991, and

5

“unrelieved portion”, in relation to an allowable loss, is to be read in

accordance with section 6 of OTA 1975.

85      

Claims under agreement not to affect oil allowance

(1)   

This section applies where—

(a)   

a company defaults on a liability under—

10

(i)   

a relevant agreement, or

(ii)   

an abandonment programme,

   

to make a payment towards decommissioning expenditure in respect

of an oil field,

(b)   

in consequence of the default, another company that has rights under a

15

decommissioning relief agreement at the time of the default incurs

decommissioning expenditure in respect of that oil field, and

(c)   

by virtue of section 83, any expenditure incurred by that company

(whether or not that decommissioning expenditure) is treated as

having been used by that company or any other company (“the affected

20

company”) to reduce its assessable profit in a chargeable period in a

particular way.

(2)   

If, in the absence of section 83, the assessable profit accruing to the affected

company from an oil field in that chargeable period would be reduced under

section 8(1) of OTA 1975, the amount of the oil allowance for the oil field

25

utilised by the affected company in that chargeable period for the purposes of

section 8 of that Act is to be determined as if section 83 did not apply.

(3)   

In this section—

“abandonment programme” means an abandonment programme

approved under Part 4 of the Petroleum Act 1998 (including such a

30

programme as revised),

“company” has the meaning given by section 1121 of CTA 2010,

“decommissioning expenditure” has the same meaning as in section 80,

“decommissioning relief agreement” has the same meaning as in that

section,

35

“oil field” has the same meaning as in OTA 1975, and

“relevant agreement” has the meaning given by section 104(5)(a) of FA

1991.

Decommissioning security settlements

86      

Removal of IHT charges in respect of decommissioning security settlements

40

(1)   

In Chapter 3 of Part 3 of IHTA 1984 (settled property: settlements without

interests in possession etc), section 58 (relevant property) is amended as

follows.

(2)   

In subsection (1), omit the “and” at the end of paragraph (ea) and before

 
 

 
previous section contents continue
 
House of Lords home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Commons home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2013
Revised 4 July 2013