| Previous Section | Home Page |
Column 161
Paliamentary constituencies with a fall in unemployment of
more than 40 per cent. between August 1984 and August 1988
Unemployed
claimants
---------------------------------------------------------------
Wantage |2,391 |949 |-1,442|-60.3
Horsham |2,180 |881 |-1,299|-59.6
Henley |2,020 |819 |-1,201|-59.5
Corby |5,914 |2,444 |-3,470|-58.7
Basingstoke |3,250 |1,369 |-1,881|-57.9
Tunbridge Wells |2,519 |1,069 |-1,450|-57.6
Witney |2,646 |1,126 |-1,520|-57.5
North West Hampshire |2,361 |1,046 |-1,315|-55.7
Reading West |3,334 |1,496 |-1,838|-55.1
North West Surrey |2,356 |1,058 |-1,298|-55.1
Aylesbury |2,741 |1,248 |-1,493|-54.5
Reigate |2,023 |927 |-1,096|-54.2
Chertsey and Walton |2,099 |963 |-1,136|-54.1
Mole Valley |1,726 |796 |-930 |-53.9
West Hertfordshire |3,594 |1,670 |-1,924|-53.5
Stevenage |4,059 |1,896 |-2,163|-53.3
Saffron Walden |2,382 |1,116 |-1,266|-53.2
Gillingham |5,479 |2,568 |-2,911|-53.1
Mid Sussex |1,991 |941 |-1,050|-52.7
Newbury |2,650 |1,257 |-1,393|-52.6
Castle Point |3,430 |1,630 |-1,800|-52.5
Wealden |1,907 |908 |-999 |-52.4
South West Bedfordshire |3,766 |1,795 |-1,971|-52.3
Medway |5,264 |2,517 |-2,747|-52.2
Guildford |2,097 |1,008 |-1,089|-51.9
Spelthorne |2,328 |1,121 |-1,207|-51.9
Brentwood and Ongar |2,438 |1,175 |-1,263|-51.8
Braintree |3,283 |1,583 |-1,700|-51.8
South West Surrey |1,661 |804 |-857 |-51.6
Crawley |2,485 |1,207 |-1,278|-51.4
Chichester |2,278 |1,107 |-1,171|-51.4
Reading East |3,923 |1,908 |-2,015|-51.4
East Surrey |1,625 |791 |-834 |-51.3
Maidstone |3,525 |1,731 |-1,794|-50.9
Tonbridge and Malling |2,678 |1,318 |-1,360|-50.8
Mid Kent |4,837 |2,391 |-2,446|-50.6
Esher |1,563 |774 |-789 |-50.5
Chesham and Amersham |1,742 |868 |-874 |-50.2
Rochford |2,828 |1,413 |-1,415|-50.0
Billericay |3,882 |1,941 |-1,941|-50.0
Oxford West and Abingdon |3,152 |1,580 |-1,572|-49.9
North Hertfordshire |3,573 |1,792 |-1,781|-49.9
Milton Keynes |6,750 |3,423 |-3,327|-49.3
Southend West |3,590 |1,823 |-1,767|-49.2
South West Hertfordshire |2,530 |1,285 |-1,245|49.2
Woking |2,387 |1,213 |-1,174|-49.2
Windsor and Maidenhead |2,612 |1,330 |-1,282|-49.1
Welwyn Hatfield |3,123 |1,595 |-1,528|-48.9
Banbury |3,263 |1,668 |-1,595|-48.9
Sevenoaks |2,416 |1,241 |-1,175|-48.6
Basildon |6,712 |3,453 |-3,259|-48.6
Wokingham |1,970 |1,025 |-945 |48.0
Harlow |4,426 |2,304 |-2,122|-47.9
East Berkshire |3,196 |1,666 |-1,530|-47.9
South Colchester and Maldon |4,240 |2,214 |-2,026|-47.8
Hornchurch |3,047 |1,592 |-1,455|-47.8
Aldershot |2,971 |1,571 |-1,400|-47.1
Hertford and Stortford |2,093 |1,111 |-982 |-46.9
Christchurch |2,254 |1,197 |-1,057|-46.9
Kettering |3,308 |1,759 |-1,549|-46.8
Arundel |2,786 |1,488 |-1,298|-46.6
Dagenham |4,311 |2,305 |-2,006|-46.5
Buckingham |2,561 |1,375 |-1,186|-46.3
Surbiton |1,554 |840 |-714 |-46.0
Wycombe |2,932 |1,586 |-1,346|-45.9
Mid Norfolk |2,989 |1,622 |-1,367|-45.7
Ruislip-Norwood |1,779 |966 |-813 |-45.7
Poole |3,702 |2,011 |-1,691|-45.7
Northampton North |4,789 |2,609 |-2,180|-45.5
South East Cambridgeshire |1,892 |1,032 |-860 |-45.5
Harborough |2,566 |1,404 |-1,162|-45.3
West Gloucestershire |4,609 |2,531 |-2,078|-45.1
Slough |4,629 |2,544 |-2,085|-45.0
North Dorset |2,181 |1,199 |-982 |-45.0
North Bedfordshire |4,573 |2,515 |-2,058|-45.0
Huntingdon |3,511 |1,938 |-1,573|-44.8
Southend East |4,675 |2,586 |-2,089|-44.7
Upminster |3,029 |1,678 |-1,351|-44.6
Hastings and Rye |4,259 |2,361 |-1,898|-44.6
St. Albans |2,462 |1,368 |-1,094|-44.4
Stratford-on-Avon |3,314 |1,844 |-1,470|-44.4
Mid Bedfordshire |2,756 |1,536 |-1,220|-44.3
Ludlow |3,722 |2,076 |-1,646|-44.2
Bosworth |3,557 |1,987 |-1,570|-44.1
South West Cambridgeshire |2,500 |1,397 |-1,103|-44.1
Beaconsfield |1,700 |951 |-749 |-44.1
Cirencester and Tewkesbury |2,976 |1,666 |-1,310|-44.0
Wimbledon |2,894 |1,622 |-1,272|-44.0
Bournemouth East |4,951 |2,784 |-2,167|-43.8
Epsom and Ewell |1,901 |1,071 |-830 |-43.7
South Suffolk |3,281 |1,850 |-1,431|-43.6
Bournemouth West |3,896 |2,197 |-1,699|-43.6
Stamford and Spalding |3,325 |1,878 |-1,447|-43.5
Oxford East |4,025 |2,282 |-1,743|-43.3
Blaby |2,915 |1,653 |-1,262|-43.3
North Colchester |4,129 |2,345 |-1,784|-43.2
Uxbridge |2,625 |1,494 |-1,131|-43.1
Leominster |3,192 |1,817 |-1,375|-43.1
Thurrock |5,822 |3,343 |-2,479|-42.6
Carshalton and Wallington |2,899 |1,665 |-1,234|-42.6
The City of London and West |5,423 |3,120 |-2,303|-42.5
Worcester |5,030 |2,894 |-2,136|-42.5
Wellingborough |4,111 |2,369 |-1,742|-42.4
Worthing |2,539 |1,469 |-1,070|-42.1
Hertsmere |2,595 |1,502 |-1,093|-42.1
Croydon Central |3,609 |2,091 |-1,518|-42.1
Devizes |3,310 |1,921 |-1,389|-42.0
Rutland and Melton |3,473 |2,016 |-1,457|-42.0
Central Suffolk |3,097 |1,798 |-1,299|-41.9
Salisbury |3,208 |1,865 |-1,343|-41.9
Cambridge |3,554 |2,067 |-1,487|-41.8
Winchester |2,057 |1,197 |-860 |-41.8
Daventry |2,713 |1,579 |-1,134|-41.8
Sutton and Cheam |2,029 |1,183 |-846 |-41.7
Aberavon |4,762 |2,780 |-1,982|-41.6
Cheadle |2,921 |1,707 |-1,214|-41.6
Romford |2,776 |1,623 |-1,153|-41.5
Shoreham |2,053 |1,202 |-851 |-41.5
Suffolk Coastal |2,452 |1,437 |-1,015|-41.4
Staffordshire Moorlands |3,608 |2,116 |-1,492|-41.4
South West Norfolk |3,844 |2,259 |-1,585|-41.2
Ashford |3,396 |1,996 |-1,400|-41.2
Chelmsford |3,035 |1,786 |-1,249|-41.2
North Luton |4,332 |2,558 |-1,774|-41.0
Watford |3,235 |1,911 |-1,324|-40.9
Croydon South |2,023 |1,197 |-826 |-40.8
Congleton |3,322 |1,968 |-1,354|-40.8
Stroud |3,743 |2,223 |-1,520|-40.6
Havant |4,918 |2,928 |-1,990|-40.5
Bexhill and Battle |1,774 |1,057 |-717 |-40.4
The Wrekin |9,589 |5,724 |-3,865|-40.3
Gravesham |4,984 |2,976 |-2,008|-40.3
Wyre Forest |5,135 |3,067 |-2,068|-40.3
Alyn and Deeside |4,694 |2,811 |-1,883|-40.1
East Hampshire |2,419 |1,449 |-970 |-40.1
Bishop Auckland |7,166 |4,299 |-2,867|-40.0
Table file CO881206.001 not available
Table file CO881206.002 not available
Employment Service
10. Mr. Ian Bruce : To ask the Secretary of State for Employment if he will make a statement on the development of the employment service.
Mr. Fowler : In the six months since April the employment service placed over 75,000 unemployed people in jobs, including over 120,000 long- term unemployed. It has also introduced new procedures, such as more effective interviews with those making new claims for benefit. Since last October, when we established the employment service, unemployment has fallen by 504,000 overall, with particularly steep falls in long-term unemployment.
Mr. Bruce : I thank my right hon. Friend for his wonderful reply. I hope that he will express the House's appreciation of the work done by civil servants in the Department. I wonder whether he is progressing well with obtaining agency status for the employment service? Are there plans for the re-amalgamation of the benefit service and the employment service, as is happening in Weymouth at the moment? Are there also plans to amalgamate the Department of Social Security offices and possibly, at long last, to transfer many of these services to the private sector?
Mr. Fowler : The plan on which we are working is aimed at improving even further the management effectiveness of the employment service. To that effect, we are considering creating one of the new agencies.
Mr. Nellist : How will the development of the employment service be aided by the attacks on the rights of 16 to 18-year-old workers? Having seen the abolition of the wages councils two years ago reduce the level of wages for that group, but not produce the 50,000 to 100, 000 new jobs that the Government promised in July 1985, is not the single purpose of the provisions announced by the Secretary of State to increase the exploitation of school leavers, which will inevitably lead to an increase in injuries and deaths? If the Secretary of State is really concerned-- [Interruption.]
Mr. Speaker : Order. The hon. Gentleman is asking many questions at great length.
Mr. Nellist : Why has the Secretary of State never signed the Employment of Children Act 1973?
Mr. Fowler : The purpose of our policies and of what we announced yesterday is to increase the employment prospects of young people. We want to reduce unemployment. I should have thought that the hon. Gentleman would welcome the fact that between 1986 and
Column 166
this year unemployment for 16 to 19-year- olds has fallen by no less than 62 per cent. That is the record of the Government.Enterprise Allowance Scheme
11. Mr. Burt : To ask the Secretary of State for Employment how many people are currently participating in the enterprise allowance scheme ; and if he will make a statement.
Mr. Cope : At the end of October, 91,856 people were participating on the enterprise allowance scheme.
Mr. Burt : Is my right hon. Friend aware that there are 400 people on the scheme in Bury and that that is a tribute to their initiative and enterprise and to the skills of those who are advising them, to whom we should pay tribute? How many people are on the scheme throughout the north- west, and what is the success rate for the new businesses so created?
Mr. Cope : About 14,000 people are on the enterprise allowance scheme in the north-west region. The success rate can be measured in terms of jobs. For every 100 people who start a business on the enterprise allowance scheme, about 120 people are working for those firms three years later.
Mr. Wigley : Does the Minister accept that many new enterprises will expect to make a loss not only during their first year but may make a loss well into their second year? In those circumstances, is there not a good case for enterprise allowance to be allowable at say 50 per cent. of the first year rate, so as to safeguard against that and to help people setting up enterprises who fear such circumstances?
Mr. Cope : We can certainly consider that suggestion. However, the enterprise allowance is intended, not to subsidise new firms against losses but to replace the benefit of those who are on unemployment benefit when they start the business.
Training
12. Mr. Patnick : To ask the Secretary of State for Employment if he has any plans to meet the general secretary of the Trades Union Congress to discuss the employment training scheme.
25. Mr. Janman : To ask the Secretary of State for Employment if he has any plans to meet the general secretary of The transport and General Workers Union to discuss the employment training scheme ; and if he will make a statement.
Column 167
Mr. Fowler : I have not received any such request but if the recent decision by the Trades Union Congress general council leads to further positive co-operation by individual trade unions, that is to be welcomed.
Mr. Patnick : Does my right hon. Friend agree with the recent letter by the president of the Confederation of British Industry, published in the Financial Times , which says that skill shortages cause high wages and inflation? Will he press that upon the general secretary of the TUC and ensure that he supports employment training, which will make Britain more competitive, bring down inflation and reduce skill shortages?
Mr. Fowler : I entirely accept what my hon. Friend says. Of course, the employment training programme is taking place in the context of a very high number of vacancies in the economy. That is why we want the support of local authorities and trade unions for that programme, which can bring down unemployment further.
Mr. Janman : Does my right hon. Friend agree that the current general secretary of the Transport and General Workers Union is the most destructive, irresponsible and Luddite general secretary that it has had the misfortune to have for many decades? What advice can my right hon. Friend give as to how the Transport and General Workers Union can make a more positive contribution to solving the current skill shortage, which is resulting in bricklayers earning £175 a day in docklands?
Mr. Fowler : I very much hope that the Transport and General Workers Union will change its views on the employment training programme. Up to now, on Dundee and on employment training, the Transport and General Workers Union has turned its back on the interests of unemployed people in Britain. The most deplorable thing is that that has never been condemned by the right hon. Gentleman the Leader of the Opposition.
PRIME MINISTER
Engagements
Q1. Mr. Bradley : To ask the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 6 December.
The Prime Minister (Mrs. Margaret Thatcher) : This morning I had meetings with ministerial colleagues and others. In addition to my duties in the House I shall be having further meetings later today, including one with the Prime Minister of Iceland. This evening I hope to have an audience of Her Majesty The Queen.
Mr. Bradley : In the light of the evidence published today by Barnardo's that children leaving local authority care face abject poverty because of the cuts in their benefits, what advice would the Prime Minister give to a 16-year-old living in my constituency who is trying to survive independently on less than £20 a week? In this season of good will, will the Prime Minister support the introduction of a special benefit allowance for teenagers leaving local authority care, as recommended by Barnardo's?
The Prime Minister : We have only just received the report and the Secretary of State for Social Security will study it carefully. Ministers have given assurances that the reformed benefit will be monitored in detail. This
Column 168
monitoring will include all income support recipients, including the young people covered by the report. Once that exercise has been completed we shall consider what, if anything, needs to be done. About 80 per cent. of 16 to 18-year-olds live with a family and they will have seen a real increase in their benefit, so we are talking about a small minority of young people who are living independently. It must be emphasised that they receive maximum help with rent and rates.Mr. Nicholas Bennett : Is my right hon. Friend aware that the accidental discharge of 100 tonnes of crude oil into Milford Haven in my constituency has seriously polluted the area? Will she join me in congratulating the staff of local agencies and volunteers who have been tackling the disaster? Will she arrange for the Department of Transport to investigate the matter?
The Prime Minister : I understand that the harbour authority, Texaco and the local authorities are working together effectively to deal with the problem. The situation is being closely monitored by the Department of Transport and an officer of that Department's marine pollution control unit is at the Haven today, carrying out an on-site survey. The district inspector of fisheries is also keeping a close watch on the effect on fisheries, particularly fish farms. I gladly join my hon. Friend in thanking the staff of local agencies and the volunteers for tackling this disaster.
Mr. Kinnock : On another subject affecting young people, has the Prime Minister seen the official figures showing that the Government have allowed teacher shortages of 20 per cent. in mathematics, 17 per cent. in physics and 23 per cent. in technology, with worse to come in future? Does she think that this is the way to prepare Britain's young people for the economic and social challenges of the 1990s?
The Prime Minister : We shall have enough secondary teachers overall, but we shall need more teachers in some subjects, including technology, science subjects and modern languages and fewer in some other subjects. The Government plan to build on our successful campaign to recruit teachers in the shortage subjects. They can do that because of the change of structure in teachers' pay to ensure that schools have the teachers that they need to deliver the national curriculum.
Mr. Kinnock : As it is obvious, even from the Department of Education and Science figures, that shortages will remain, and will intensify in the 1990s, is it not clear that, rather than taking effective action to make up shortages, the Government are trying to shift the curriculum so that fewer young people will have the opportunity to study science? Would the Prime Minister put up with that for her own children?
The Prime Minister : Because of the changing structure of teachers' pay, we are able to offer teachers in shortage subjects more than we would otherwise have done. We are way ahead with the problem. On the science curriculum, it is possible that children can take the double curriculum, or we have been asked if they could take the single one. My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Education and Science is looking at that.
Mr. Maxwell-Hyslop : Is my right hon. Friend aware of the devastation caused to the livelihoods of many people in the poultry industry by the reckless and uninformed
Column 169
statement by a junior Minister with an uncontrollable tongue and an insatiable desire for self-advertisement? As my right hon. Friend is responsible for the composition of her Government, what action does she intend to take about it?The Prime Minister : I understand my hon. Friend's concern, but the answer to his question is no, Sir. I read very carefully the statements by the chief medical officer, first, on 21 November and, secondly, on 5 December. Having read them carefully, I decided to have scrambled egg on toast for lunch, and I enjoyed it.
Q2. Ms. Walley : To ask the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 6 December.
The Prime Minister : I refer the hon. Lady to the reply that I gave some moments ago.
Ms. Walley : In the course of her busy day, will the Prime Minister find time to meet the nurses who have come to lobby Parliament today and who are concerned about the long-term future of the National Health Service? Does she agree that nurses are being downgraded? Will she take the initiative to comply with their request for binding independent arbitration within the National Health Service?
The Prime Minister : No. It is under the Labour Government that nurses were downgraded, and downgraded very much indeed. They were not merely downgraded, but their pay was severely cut. It is under this Government that they have been upgraded, and it is under this Government that they have had a 46 per cent. increase in real pay, due to the excellent record of the Royal College of Nursing in always putting the patient first.
Mr. Dunn : Is my right hon. Friend aware that her comment in the House on 1 November that we do not have the same need for a Channel tunnel fast rail link will bring much comfort to many thousands of Kentish men and women who oppose the four options as proposed by British Rail? If my right hon. Friend is so against it, and so am I, why are we proceeding with that ghastly and unnecessary scheme?
The Prime Minister : Those comments caused joy in some areas and less joy in others. British Rail is considering taking a long-term view, but there are no immediate plans for that development.
3. Mr. Matthew Taylor : To ask the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 6 December.
The Prime Minister : I refer the hon. Gentleman to the reply that I gave some moments ago.
Mr. Taylor : Is the Prime Minister aware that Torbay council is presently engaged in selling off its entire housing stock, despite a petition signed by more than half its tenants, objecting to the plan and calling on the House to ask the Secretary of State not to allow the sales to go ahead? Will she offer any advice and comfort to those tenants to the effect that their wishes will be respected?
The Prime Minister : I believe that that proposal is at present before my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for the Environment, who will consider all matters before making a decision.
Column 170
Q4. Mr. Baldry : To ask the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 6 December.
The Prime Minister : I refer my hon. Friend to the reply that I gave some moments ago.
Mr. Baldry : Will not the reeds rustle at Runnymede if we as a House do not take every action to uphold the rule of law and defeat terrorism? To that end, will my hon. Friend ensure that Hansard is more widely available so that the whole nation can see the names of those Members who last night voted against the declaration against terrorism and who tonight may vote against the Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Bill? By their actions do they not unwittingly assist the IRA and give comfort to terrorists?
The Prime Minister : I recognise my hon. Friend's quotation from Kipling and I agree with him that people will believe that everyone is serious about fighting terrorism only when the Opposition Benches join this side in voting for the Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Bill.
Mr. Wilson : Does the Prime Minister accept that her reply to the question about the Barnardo report is hypocritical and unconvincing? Far from being a novelty of information to her, the precise consequences wrapped up in that report were inevitable as a result of the decision by her Government to withdraw all benefit from 16 and 17-year-olds. Does she accept that the "guarantee" of YTS places, on which the withdrawal of all benefits to 16 and 17-year olds was based, was and is a lie? [Interruption.] I am quoting from the press release issued by the Department of Employment, which used the word "guarantee". On the basis of that lie in the Department of Employment press release, every penny of legal income has been removed from at least 20,000 young people. Does the Prime Minister accept personal, moral responsibility for the fate of those 20,000 youngsters?
The Prime Minister : The YTS guarantee is being met
[Interruption.] There are many more YTS places than young people applying for them in all regions. On 31 October, the latest figure available, there were 120,000 unfilled YTS places. Those not capable of YTS are entitled to income support at all times. Others guaranteed an offer of a YTS place if living away from parents after leaving care will be entitled to income support for a short period while awaiting a YTS offer. If living in board-and-lodging accommodation or a hostel they will normally be entitled to income support while on YTS.
Q6. Mr. Knapman : To ask the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 6 December.
The Prime Minister : I refer my hon. Friend to the reply that I gave some moments ago.
Mr. Knapman : In the course of her busy day, will my right hon. Friend consider a recent report that appeared in Pravda and was reprinted this morning in the Financial Times , which states that over the past nine years my right hon. Friend has lifted the country out of its depressed state, privatised ailing industries and sacked incompetent people? Does she agree that the journalists of Pravda are more likely to grasp reality than Members of the Opposition parties in this House?
Column 171
The Prime Minister : I am grateful to my hon. Friend. All round the world Socialists are abandoning their dogma because they know that it does not work and brings neither prosperity nor dignity. The only Socialist party that is to the far Left of the Communist party is the one that sits opposite.
Mrs. Margaret Ewing : Has the Prime Minister today had an opportunity to look at the opinion polls in Scotland and to consider their implications? Against that background, can she tell us at what stage, either in the percentage recorded in opinion polls, votes cast at a general election or seats lost at a general election, she will decide that she has no legitimacy whatever to implement her policies in Scotland?
The Prime Minister : I note, as I have noted before, that the people of Scotland are doing far better under this Government than under any previous Government and we shall continue with the same policies. I hope that most of us in the House still believe in the United Kingdom, and it is the majority of the United Kingdom that forms the Government. I also point out, as I have done before, that there have been times when the Labour party has not had a majority in England, but because it has in the United Kingdom we have abided by that result.
Column 172
Q7. Miss Emma Nicholson : To ask the Prime Minister if she will list her official engagements for Tuesday 6 December.
The Prime Minister : I refer my hon. Friend to the reply that I gave some moments ago.
Miss Nicholson : Has my right hon. Friend had time to note the Western Morning News report of yesterday that the Royal College of Nursing- -[ Hon. Members :-- "Reading."]--is now recruiting at five times its normal membership rate and it is not in the lobby today? Does my right hon. Friend agree that that reflects the RCN's regrading policy of using the appeals procedure in cases of dispute rather than working to grade, which can harm patient care?
The Prime Minister : Yes, the appeals procedure is there should there be any dispute, and it should be used. I entirely agree with my hon. Friend that we owe much to the Royal College of Nursing. It was the devotion of its members to patients and the fact that they have never gone on strike that led us to set up a pay review body. It is due to the nurses' devotion that they now have a bigger pay award than they have ever had before. I am delighted to hear that the Royal College of Nursing is fast recruiting people from other unions.
| Next Section (Debates)
| Home Page |