Previous Section | Home Page |
Column 1279
Griffiths, Peter (Portsmouth N)Ground, Patrick
Gummer, Rt Hon John Selwyn
Hague, William
Hampson, Dr Keith
Hanley, Jeremy
Hargreaves, Ken (Hyndburn)
Harris, David
Hayward, Robert
Heathcoat-Amory, David
Hind, Kenneth
Holt, Richard
Howarth, Alan (Strat'd-on-A)
Howarth, G. (Cannock & B'wd)
Howe, Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey
Hughes, Robert G. (Harrow W)
Irvine, Michael
Jack, Michael
Jackson, Robert
Janman, Tim
Kilfedder, James
King, Roger (B'ham N'thfield)
Knapman, Roger
Knight, Greg (Derby North)
Lawrence, Ivan
Leigh, Edward (Gainsbor'gh)
Lester, Jim (Broxtowe)
Lightbown, David
Lilley, Peter
Lloyd, Peter (Fareham)
Lyell, Sir Nicholas
MacKay, Andrew (E Berkshire)
Maclean, David
McLoughlin, Patrick
Mans, Keith
Martin, David (Portsmouth S)
Miller, Sir Hal
Mitchell, Andrew (Gedling)
Mitchell, Sir David
Moate, Roger
Moss, Malcolm
Neubert, Michael
Nicholson, David (Taunton)
Paice, James
Patnick, Irvine
Pattie, Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey
Porter, David (Waveney)
Portillo, Michael
Redwood, John
Renton, Tim
Rowe, Andrew
Ryder, Richard
Shaw, David (Dover)
Shepherd, Colin (Hereford)
Sims, Roger
Soames, Hon Nicholas
Stanbrook, Ivor
Stern, Michael
Stevens, Lewis
Stewart, Allan (Eastwood)
Sumberg, David
Summerson, Hugo
Taylor, Ian (Esher)
Taylor, John M (Solihull)
Thorne, Neil
Viggers, Peter
Wallace, James
Wheeler, John
Widdecombe, Ann
Wolfson, Mark
Wood, Timothy
Tellers for the Ayes :
Mr. Michael Colvin and
Mr. Jacques Arnold.
NOES
Barnes, Harry (Derbyshire NE)
Bennett, A. F. (D'nt'n & R'dish)
Boyes, Roland
Cryer, Bob
Dixon, Don
Haynes, Frank
Hughes, John (Coventry NE)
McFall, John
McKay, Allen (Barnsley West)
Meale, Alan
Nellist, Dave
Prescott, John
Shore, Rt Hon Peter
Skinner, Dennis
Welsh Michael (Doncaster N)
Tellers for the Noes :
Mr. Martin Redmond and
Mr. John Cummings.
Question accordingly agreed to.
Motion made, and Question proposed, That this House doth agree with the Lords in the said amendments.-- [The Chairman of Ways and Means.]
Mr. Andrew F. Bennett : On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker. Could you tell us how you intend to deal with this? Is there to be a debate on the first amendment, followed by our proceeding to a vote if we wish ; or do you intend us to debate several amendments together, followed by votes on each?
Mr. Deputy Speaker (Sir Paul Dean) : It would be more convenient for the House and in accordance with our normal custom if we had a general debate on all the Lords amendments. We could consider later how to reach a decision on the amendments.
Mr. Bennett : Further to that point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker. When I look at the amendments I have difficulty understanding whether all the amendments hang together and deal with one issue or whether they cover a wide range of issues. Can you give guidance on whether they all hang together? Unfortunately, I could not find a selection list in the Noes Lobby.
Column 1280
Mr. Deputy Speaker I think that it would be for the convenience of the House if we proceeded in the way that I have suggested rather than tried to split them up artificially.1 am
Next Section
| Home Page |