Home Page |
Column 121
Mr. David Shaw : To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the achievements of (a) his policies and (b) his Department in helping small businesses over the last 12 months as against the previous 12 months ; and if he will publish the performance indicators by which his Department monitors those achievements and the statistical results of such monitoring.
Mr. Alan Clark : The Government have continued to place a high priority on helping small businesses, through improvements to the business climate, through deregulation and other measures, and through specific programmes of support and assistance.
To assist in obtaining better value for money through broadening its competitive base, the Ministry of Defence has continued to provide a new suppliers service responsible for encouraging and assisting small firms to compete for defence business. Over the past 12 months the new suppliers service has attended a wide range of seminars and "meet-the-buyer" events and has given advice to about 2, 200 companies on how to sell to the Ministry of Defence. The Ministry of Defence has also continued to produce a fortnightly contracts bulletin, which includes notice of almost all contracts the Department expects to place valued at more than £500,000. Since 1 January 1990 clothing and textile requirements have been included in the bulletin at a lower threshold of £250,000. The bulletin will shortly include details of sub-contract opportunities, which will be of particular value to small companies. The success of these measures to encourage a widening of our supplier base is in part reflected by our having placed 67 per cent. of headquarters contracts by value by competition or otherwise by reference to market forces in 1989-90. Details of payments made by the Ministry of Defence to small firms in 1989-90 are not yet available.
In addition, the small firms research initiative aims to encourage small firms to bid for research work. In 1989-90, 36 research contracts were placed with small firms at a total value of £1.3 million.
Mr. Patrick Thompson : To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the report by the review board on its sixth general review of the profit formula for Government contracts.
Mr. Alan Clark : The main recommendation in the report is for an increase, based on comparability, in the overall target rate of return on non-competitive contracts.
After careful consideration I have concluded that we cannot adopt that recommendation and that the current target rate should remain in force. This decision implies no
Column 122
criticism of the review board. It is based on my assessment in present circumstances that the maintenance of the existing target rate for such contracts will ensure adequate industrial resources to meet our current needs.The report raises a number of other issues relating to the operation of the profit formula and the pricing of non-competitive contracts. My officials will be pursuing these with representatives of the CBI and with the review board, as appropriate.
A copy of the review board's report has been placed in the Library.
Mr. Lawrence : To ask the Attorney-General what assessment he makes of the effect of tape-recorded interviews of suspects upon the speed of trials, the delays in bringing cases to trial and the number of pleas of guilty being entered.
The Attorney-General : The effect of tape-recorded interviews has not been assessed pending the completion of the nationwide introduction of the scheme.
Mr. John D. Taylor : To ask the Attorney-General for what reasons the Union flag is no longer flown on the flagpole on top of the courthouses in Armagh city ; whether the Union flag being flown on a pole at ground level at the courthouse has been damaged ; and if he will make a statement.
The Attorney-General : The flagpole on top of the courthouse at Armagh is no longer used for safety reasons. This position affords little or no protection when raising or lowering the Union flag and staff were in danger of falling. The new flagpole was fixed to the inward side of the perimeter wall. A flag was damaged on barbed wire at the new location. Two strands of barbed wire have been removed, and a new flag supplied. It has been flown subsequently without difficulty.
Mr. Knapman : To ask the Attorney-General, pursuant to his answer to the hon. Member for Southend, East (Mr. Taylor) of 26 June, Official Report, columns 141-42, if he will make a further statement on the juridical implications of Factortame, in the light of the decision of the House of Lords.
The Attorney-General : The Factortame case was reinstated in the House of Lords on 2 July and the hearing concluded on 9 July. It has been indicated that the House of Lords has decided in principle to grant interim relief in favour of the applicants to the effect that the Secretary of State for Transport should not withhold registration in respect of any fishing vessel if the owner is an "original applicant" for interim relief who is disentitled to registration under section 14 of the Merchant Shipping Act 1988 by reason only of a failure to meet the conditions requiring directors and shareholders of owning companies to be resident and domiciled in the United Kingdom. It would be inappropriate to comment further on the House of Lords' decision until it has determined the form of its order and it has given its fully reasoned judgment.
Column 123
Mr. David Shaw : To ask the Attorney-General if he will make a statement on the achievements of the Lord Chancellor's Department in helping small businesses over the last 12 months as against the previous 12 months ; and if he will publish the performance indicators by which his Department monitors these achievements and the statistical results of such monitoring.
The Attorney-General : The Government have continued to place a high priority on helping small businesses through improvements to the business climate, through deregulation and other measures, and through specific programmes of support and assistance.
The Lord Chancellor has implemented a number of policies designed to ensure that all litigants enjoy the greatest possible quality and speed of service from the civil courts. However, as these policies are not specifically targeted on small businesses, no performance indicators are kept in this regard.
The Lord Chancellor's Department has continued to encourage the use of small businesses as suppliers in line with the Government purchasing initiative. Within the last 12 months guidance issued by the Department of Employment--Central Unit on Purchasing has been circulated to all purchasing and supply staff, and there has
Column 124
been participation in a "meet the buyer" event. The Department's estimated total expenditure with small firms--fewer than 200 employees--in 1989-90 was £14 million.Mr. Faulds : To ask the Minister for the Arts if he will specify the allocations made to public institutions in the United Kingdom during the half year ended 30 June of individual works of art and museum objects pre- eminent for national, scientific, historical or artistic interest which have been accepted in satisfaction of inheritance tax or capital transfer tax, together with information, where applicable, as to conditions or wishes expressed by testators or executors in the matter of allocation ; whether he will list the works of art and museum objects which are still awaiting allocation, with the respective dates of their acceptance in satisfaction of inheritance tax or capital transfer tax ; and whether a press notice will be issued from his Department covering the information given in his reply.
Mr. Mellor [holding answer 23 July 1990] : The information the hon. Gentleman requests is as follows :
Column 123
@ Items awaiting allocation ---------------------------------------------------------------- "Farm Cart with Horse in Harness" by Harpsichord "Richmond pres Londres" by Corot Portrait by Beechey Painting by Lucas de Heere Two portraits by Gainsborough, one by Rubens and a landscape by Seghers
@ Items awaiting allocation ---------------------------------------------------------------- "Farm Cart with Horse in Harness" by Harpsichord "Richmond pres Londres" by Corot Portrait by Beechey Painting by Lucas de Heere Two portraits by Gainsborough, one by Rubens and a landscape by Seghers
Mr. Nicholas Brown : To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is the latest estimate of the amount of revenue that would accrue to the Government from fiscal drag if the tax system were simply indexed in the 1991 Budget.
Mr. Ryder : Chapter 2 of the 1990-91 "Financial Statement and Budget Report" shows total taxes and national insurance contributions, including the community charge, rising from £206 billion in 1990-91 to £216 billion in 1991-92, on the assumption that the tax system is indexed in the 1991 Budget. This allows for the effects of real fiscal drag, and also for the build-up of effects of the 1990 Budget and earlier Budgets, including independent taxation for husbands and wives.
Column 124
Mr. Nicholas Brown : To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is his estimate of the effect of not indexing excise duties in the 1991 Budget, by product, on (a) inflation and (b) revenues in 1991-92 and a full year.
Mr. Ryder : The effects of revalorising excise duties on the revenue yield and the retail prices index in 1991-92 and 1992-93 will be published in the autumn statement. The information requested will not be readily available before then.
Mr. William Powell : To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is his estimate of the amount of income tax the Exchequer would forgo in 1990- 91 (a) if all income from savings were exempted from the tax and (b) if income tax were chargeable only to higher rate taxpayers on such income.
Mr. Ryder : The direct revenue cost of exempting from income tax the investment income received by individual savers, including interest received on bank and building society accounts, national savings and dividends received from companies, is estimated to be about £10.5 billion. If the income from savings of higher rate taxpayers remained chargeable to income tax, at their marginal rate of tax, the cost would be reduced to about £5 billion.
Column 125
Mr. Meacher : To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will give (a) the gross incomes before tax and (b) the net incomes after tax of each income decile for each year since 1978-79 and also for the top 1 per cent. and the top 5 per cent. of the income distribution, the income level which is the dividing line between the deciles for the top 1 per cent. and 5 per cent. in each case for each year and the average income for each group during each year.
Mr. Ryder : The latest available analyses of the distributions of before and after tax incomes relate to the years 1978-79, 1981-82 and 1984- 85 and were published in the November 1987 issue of "Economic Trends", No. 409, a copy of which is available in the Library. The additional details and data for other years requested by the hon. Member could be produced only at disproportionate cost.
Mrs. Beckett : To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will publish an updated version of table 6.7 in the "Financial Statement and Budget Report 1990-91".
Mr. Norman Lamont : The latest outturn figures for 1988-89 and 1989- 90 are shown in the table. These outturn figures are subject to revision as more information becomes available. It is not the normal practice to publish forecasts other than at Budget time.
|1988-89 |outturn |outturn |£ billion|£ billion ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Receipts Domestic rates and community charge |8.5 |9.5 Non-domestic rates |10.4 |11.2 Current grants from central government |23.8 |24.7 Capital grants from central government |0.8 |2.6 Other |5.6 |5.9 ----- |----- |----- Total receipts |49.2 |53.9 ----- |----- |----- Expenditure Current expenditure on goods and services |36.4 |39.1 Current grants and subsidies |5.8 |6.3 Interest |4.6 |4.8 Capital expenditure and net lending |2.6 |4.9 ----- |----- |----- Total expenditure |49.5 |55.2
Mrs. Beckett : To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is the latest estimate of the number of taxpayers divided into basic rate and top rate and by sex.
Mr. Ryder : Estimates for 1990-91 are as follows :
Millions |Basic rate |Higher rate |Total |(but not |higher rate) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Males |15.0 |1.4 |16.4 Females |9.5 |0.3 |9.8 |----- |----- |----- Total |24.5 |1.7 |26.2
The estimates are based on a projection of the 1987-88 survey of personal incomes and are provisional.
Column 126
Mr. Dewar : To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will publish in the Official Report a table showing the expenditure by programme in England to which (a) Scottish block expenditure, and (b) Welsh block expenditure are held to be comparable for the purposes of the territorial allocation formula ; and if he will place in the Library a document explaining the implications for the operation of this formula of the introduction of the new planning total.
Mr. Norman Lamont : The annual public expenditure White Paper shows the individual programme elements of both the Scottish block and the Welsh block--table 15.1 of Cm. 1015 and table 16.1 of Cm. 1016 : housing and education. It is the corresponding English programmes which are held to be comparable. The introduction of the new planning total affects the programmes within the Scottish and Welsh blocks in the same way as it affects the corresponding English programmes.
Mr. Nicholas Brown : To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what effects the Treasury model currently incorporates concerning the impact on the non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment of the differences in regional levels of unemployment ; and what is the scale of these effects.
Mr. Norman Lamont : In common with other macroeconomic models of the United Kingdom economy, the Treasury model is not disaggregated to a regional level.
Mr. Hanley : To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he will make a statement about the recent report of the Retail Prices Index Advisory Committee.
Mr. Major : As I told my hon. Friend the Member for Carshalton and Wallington (Mr. Forman) on 4 July, at column 577, the report examines how the price of holidays might be incorporated into the retail prices index and recommends that the Central Statistical Office should begin to collect relevant data and examine a new methodology which the committee has developed. However, there is no recommendation to include holiday prices in the retail prices index for the moment. I am asking the Central Statistical Office to put in hand the data collection and further work necessary to determine whether it will be possible to overcome the methodological problems associated with incorporating a holiday price index into the retail prices index in due course.
The report also examines the way financial services are taken into account in the retail prices index. On this it recommends that the annual fees which are being introduced for the holders of certain credit cards should not be covered by the retail prices index, and that any supplements which retailers might charge to customers using credit cards should also be ignored in constructing the index, at least for the present. It is also recommended that charges for personal banking services and transaction charges incurred by households buying and selling investments should be excluded from the index, but that the coverage of insurance should be extended to include personal accident and "protection-only" life insurance. I have decided to accept these recommendations.
Column 127
The full report is being published today as Cm. 1156 and copies are available in the Vote Office.Mr. Nicholas Brown : To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, further to his answer of 5 July, Official Report, column 699, when he will be able to provide up-to-date figures on the same basis as those provided to the hon. Member for Newcastle upon Tyne, East in his answer of 8 January, Official Report, columns 559-64, revising his figures to include an estimate of the effects of the introduction of the community charge ; and what estimate he has made to date of the effect on the tax burden of the introduction of the community charge.
Mr. Ryder [holding answer 12 July 1990] : It will be possible to provide estimates of the effects of the introduction of the community charge on the basis requested when relevant data from the family expenditure survey for 1990, the first year of the charge's operation in England and Wales, are available.
Mr. William Ross : To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) if he will publish a table in the Official Report to show for each stamp duty office in the United Kingdom the income for stamp duty, the number of transactions, the other functions and the other income, for each of the last three years ;
(2) if he will publish a table in the Official Report to show for each stamp duty office in the United Kingdom the sums of stamp duty raised on share transfers in each of the last three years and the number of such transactions in each of those years ;
(3) if he will publish his estimate of the sums saved, in cash and percentage terms, in (a) the sums raised and (b) the number of transactions in each stamp duty office in the United Kingdom when those offices move to a system of paperless transactions in 1992 ; (4) what is the anticipated cost of retraining staff in the Edinburgh stamp duty centre to comply with Northern Ireland stamp duty legislation ;
(5) if he will publish a table in the Official Report to show the functions common to all stamp duty centres in the United Kingdom and indicate any other functions which are carried out in each of the others which are not common, with particular reference to the Belfast office ;
(6) what is his estimate of the number of staff required to handle Northern Ireland stamp duty centre transactions in (a) 1991, (b) 1992 and (c) 1993 ;
(7) if he will publish a table in the Official Report to show the numbers of staff employed in each of the stamp duty centres in the United Kingdom at present and the total salaries of such staff in the current and past two years ;
(8) which of the functions of the Belfast stamp office he proposes to transfer to Edinburgh ;
(9) if he will publish a table in the Official Report to show how the anticipated saving of £160,000 by the transfer of functions of the Belfast stamp office to Edinburgh arises ; whether the calculations take account of (a) extra training, (b) increased postage and (c) the cost of increased liaison between the stamp duty office in Edinburgh and Northern Ireland Government Departments ; and if he will show the sums estimated for
Column 128
each of the three above headings and for each Northern Ireland Government Department for the three years after his proposed transfer of functions ;(10) how urgent cases, requiring immediate registration to secure priority under section 4 of the Registration of Deeds Act (Northern Ireland) 1970, will be dealt with after transfer of the functions of the Northern Ireland stamp duty office in Belfast to Edinburgh ; (11) what estimate he has made of the increased costs to (a) the legal profession and (b) the general public if the proposed transfer of functions of the Belfast stamp office goes ahead.
Mr. Ryder [holding answer 17 July 1990] : More time is needed to collect the necessary information and I shall write to the hon. Member when it is available and place a copy in the Library.
Mr. Gerald Howarth : To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will estimate (a) the number of individual shareholders in the United Kingdom and (b) the number who are direct shareholders in privatised companies.
Mr. Norman Lamont [holding answer 23 July 1990] : There are now nearly 11 million individual shareholders in the United Kingdom and over 5 million who are direct shareholders in privatised companies.
Mr. Gerald Howarth : To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will estimate the amount of corporation tax received from privatised companies in 1989-90.
Mr. Ryder [holding answer 23 July 1990] : The companies privatised since 1979 paid about £1illion in corporation tax in 1989- 90.
Mr. Hardy : To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer by how much gross domestic product per capita in south Yorkshire falls below (a) the Community average and (b) the United Kingdom average.
Mr. Norman Lamont [holding answer 23 July 1990] : In 1987, the latest year for which county figures are available, and taking the Economic Community average as 100, the figures are, based on purchasing power parities
|Average ----------------------------------- Economic Community |100 United Kingdom |107 South Yorkshire |87
Community figures are based on estimates published by the statistical office of the European Communities.
Mr. Nicholas Brown : To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much tax relief goes on mortgage tax relief (a) at basic rate and (b) in excess of the basic rate in 1989-90 and 1990-91.
Mr. Ryder [holding answer 23 July 1990] : Provisional estimates are given in the table ; 1990-91 estimates are based on the assumption that interest rates remain at their current levels.
Column 129
<