| Previous Section | Home Page |
Mr. David Hunt : The components of the formula for the calculation of an authority's entitlement to revenue support grant are as follows :
S= the standard spending assessment for the authority. The method for its calculation is described in appendix 1 of the Welsh Revenue Support Grant Distribution Report (No. 2).
N= the authority's share of the distributable amount from the non-domestic rating account, calculated in accordance with paragraph 12 of schedule 8 to the Local Government Finance Act 1988. P= the population of the authority, calculated according to appendix 2 of the aforementioned distribution report.
C= the authority's community charge for standard spending (CCSS), calculated as described in paragraph 8 of the distribution report. The requested values (rounded to the nearest thousand) are :
Column 114
|Mid Glamorgan |Ogwr Borough
County Council |Council
---------------------------------------------------------------------
S(£ 000) |363,783 |17,218
N(£ 000) |81,758 |4,130
PXC(£ 000) |77,341 |3,882
P |407,936 |103,326
C(£ ) |189.59 |37.57
Revenue support grant
[S-N-(PXC)] (£ 000) |204,684 |9,206
Fishguard Harbour
Mr. Geraint Howells : To ask the Secretary of State for Wales what plans there are for developments of Fishguard, Pembrokeshire harbour within the next five years ; and if he will make a statement.
Mr. David Hunt : Responsibility for developing Fishguard harbour rests with its owners, Sealink (UK) Ltd.
South Glamorgan Health Authority
Mr. Morgan : To ask the Secretary of State for Wales what representations he has received from the chairman of South Glamorgan health authority concerning the construction of new neighbourhood hospitals.
Mr. Nicholas Bennett : Since the authority published its draft strategic plan, no representations have been received from the chairman of the authority.
Mr. Morgan : To ask the Secretary of State for Wales (1) what policy considerations he will apply to his decision on South Glamorgan health authority's proposal to close St. David's, Glanely, and the children's ear, nose and throat hospitals ;
(2) when he expects to make a statement on the proposed hospital closures programme of South Glamorgan health authority.
Mr. Nicholas Bennett : I refer the hon. Gentleman to the answer I gave him on 4 February 1991, column 21 .
NHS Trusts
Mr. Robert Hughes : To ask the Secretary of State for Wales which area health authorities in Wales have employed outside financial consultants to prepare business plans for direct management unit or NHS trust status ; in each case which consultants were employed ; and what was the cost to each area health authority.
Mr. Nicholas Bennett : This information is not available centrally.
South Glamorgan TEC
Mr. Morgan : To ask the Secretary of State for Wales what discussions he has had in the past six months with Mr. Roger Helliwell, chairman of the board of the South Glamorgan TEC.
Column 115
Higher Education
Mr. Morgan : To ask the Secretary of State for Wales if he will increase the funding of Welsh higher education colleges to bring them up to parity with funding provision per student for English and Scottish colleges of higher education.
Sir Wyn Roberts : Following their incorporation on 1 April 1992 the funding of the Welsh institutions of higher education will be determined by my right hon. Friend as part of the annual public expenditure round.
School Visits
Mr. Barry Jones : To ask the Secretary of State for Wales how many (a) high schools, (b) primary schools and (c) infants schools he visited in Wales in 1990.
Sir Wyn Roberts : During 1990 I visited one high school, three county secondary schools, six county primary schools and one special school and my right hon. Friend visited one high school.
HOME DEPARTMENT
Juvenile Detainees
Miss Lestor : To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what deadline has been fixed for the ending of the holding of persons aged 15 or 16 years being held in adult prisons.
Mrs. Rumbold : No deadline has been set. The Government's proposals for reforming the arrangements for the remand of juveniles aged 15 and 16 are set out in the consultation paper which was published on 4 February. Under these proposals, prison custody for juveniles would be ended when sufficient local authority secure accommodation was available. A copy of the consultation document has been placed in the Library.
Abandonment of Animals Act 1960
Mr. Bowis : To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many prosecutions there have been for each of the last five years under the Abandonment of Animals Act 1960.
Mrs. Rumbold : The information requested is given in the table.
Prosecutions under
the Abandonment of
Animals Act 1960
|Number
---------------------
1985 |83
1986 |59
1987 |62
1988 |44
1989 |51
Queensferry Fire Station
Mr. Barry Jones : To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will visit Queensferry fire station.
Mr. John Patten : My right hon. Friend has no present plans to do so.
Column 116
Community Charge
Mr. Cohen : To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) whether he has advised electoral registration officers on the practice of inspecting the community charge register and making copies of information contained in a community charge register ; and if he will make a statement ;
(2) whether he has advised electoral registration officers as to whether (a) they can carry out independent processing of community charge data held by a community charge registration officer or (b) they can request community charge registration officers to carry out such processing ; and if he will make a statement.
Mrs. Rumbold : Guidance to electoral registration officers on the effective use of their statutory right of access to the community charges register was included in a Home Office circular issued on 10 August 1990 (RPA 347), a copy of which is in the Library. The guidance included advice on the processing of data and the provisions of the Data Protection Act 1984. Electoral registration officers have no power to request a copy of the community charges register, or to ask community charge registration officers to process data on their behalf.
Mr. Cohen : To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what considerations underlay the setting of penalties for non-completion of (a) electoral registration forms and (b) community charge registration forms ; and if he will make a statement.
Mrs. Rumbold : The penalty for failing to comply with a request from an electoral registration officer for information required in connection with his duties was first established under the Representation of the People Act 1918. Parliament considered that the information was of such importance to the electoral process that refusal to provide it should be treated as a criminal offence. Community charge legislation is the responsibility of my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for the Environment, but I understand that the purpose of empowering community charge registration officers to impose penalties is to give them a sanction with which to enforce the legal requirement on individuals to support information for registration purposes.
Nationality Office, Liverpool
Mr. Vaz : To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) when the direct line for hon. Members' inquiries is to be established at the Liverpool nationality office ;
(2) what plans he has to establish a direct line at the Liverpool nationality office for hon. Members' inquiries.
Mr. Peter Lloyd : The provision of telephone facilities in the nationality office in Liverpool is under review. Inquiries may continue to be pursued through the telephone number in Lunar house already announced.
Asylum
Mr. Kirkwood : To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he will provide a breakdown of statistics on the granting of asylum to persons in relation to gender, age, family structure and residence.
Column 117
Mr. Peter Lloyd [holding answer 31 January 1991] : The available information for 1989 is given in the following table. Reliable information for 1990 is not yet available.
Persons<1> recognised as refugees<2> in the United Kingdom in 1989, by
age of principal applicant and associated dependants
|Principal |Associated
applicants |dependants<3>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Age of principal applicant (years)
0-14 |10 |*
15-19 |185 |5
20-24 |525 |55
25-29 |615 |210
30-34 |345 |250
35-39 |235 |275
40-44 |110 |150
45-49 |65 |90
50-54 |35 |20
55-59 |30 |25
60-64 |15 |5
65 and over |15 |*
Information not available |20 |15
|--- |---
Total |2,210 |1,100
<1>Provisional figures, rounded to nearest 5, with `*' = less than 3.
<2>Figures exclude South East Asian refugees.
<3>Tabulated by age of the principal applicant. Figures include dependants
who applied with the principal applicant, and those who arrived subsequently
but before the principal application was decided.
NATIONAL FINANCE
PAYE
Mr. Wells : To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much it costs to send out (a) the pay-as-you-earn annual notice of coding, form P2(T), in January of each year for the following year and (b) the subsequent form after the budget where there are changes in personal allowances.
Mr. Maude : The last year for which figures are available is 1990. The cost of sending out the annual coding notices in January 1990 was £1,218,745 and the cost of sending out revised notices following the 1990 budget was £672,382.
Export Guarantees Committee
Mr. Cousins : To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is the current membership of the Export Guarantees Committee.
Mr. Maples : The committee is chaired by the Treasury with representatives from the Export Credit Guarantees Department, Bank of England, Department of Trade and Industry, Ministry of Defence, Foreign Office and the Overseas Development Administration.
Mr. Cousins : To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what was the number of occasions for each year since 1980 when the Export Guarantees Committee was asked to consider extra cover because community limits on cover had been reached.
Mr. Maples : The information requested is as follows :
|Number
---------------------
1981 |8
1982 |14
1983 |14
1984 |14
1985 |11
1986 |5
1987 |7
1988 |5
1989 |4
1990 |1
Misdeclaration Penalties
Mr. Squire : To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will supply for each of the last three years the breakdown in penalties for serious misdeclaration penalties under value added tax regulations in the following table (a) under £5,000, (b) under £10,000, (c) under £20,000, (d) under £50,000, (e) under £100, 000, (f) under £500,000, (g) under £1 million and (h) over£1 million and in each band the total sum thus levied.
Mrs. Gillian Shephard [holding answer 4 February 1991] : Serious misdeclaration penalty has been in force only since 1 April 1990 and information on penalties imposed will be published after the end of the financial year, when more data will be available.
Mr. Squire : To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many serious misdeclaration penalties under value added tax regulations have related to the profits or turnover of the business concerned in each of the last three years ; and what percentage that was of the total of such cases.
Mrs. Gillian Shephard [holding answer 4 February 1991] : Liability to serious misdeclaration penalty can arise where large misdeclarations are made on VAT returns. Such misdeclarations encompass a range of accounting errors and information is not available to identify how many of the penalties imposed have related to the profits or turnover of the business concerned.
The Gulf (Cash Contributions)
Mr. Teddy Taylor : To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make a statement on the cash commitments pledged by the Governments of Germany, Belgium, Spain, Portugal, the Republic of Ireland, Denmark and Holland respectively towards the Gulf conflict.
Mr. Douglas Hogg : I have been asked to reply.
We are not aware of all cash commitments being made by our European partners to help offset the costs of the Gulf conflict, but notable among them is a German contribution of DM 15.6 billion (which includes DM 800 million, or approximately £275 million, to the United Kingdom).
Mr. Teddy Taylor : To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will set out the cash commitments pledged by the Government of Japan towards the cost of the Gulf conflict, expressed in pounds sterling ; and if he will make a statement.
Mr. Douglas Hogg : I have been asked to reply.
We much appreciate the Japanese Government's contributions to the international effort to achieve the liberation of Kuwait. These amount to $11 billion for the
Column 119
multinational forces, $2 billion for economic assistance to Jordan, Egypt and Turkey, and $22 million for humanitarian assistance. In sterling (£1=$1.90), these figures are £5.79 billion, £1.05 billion, and £11.58 million respectively.HOUSE OF COMMONS
Statues
Mr. Bellotti : To ask the Lord President of the Council if he will make a statement on the process whereby decisions are made as to the persons to be honoured by the erection of statues on plinths in the Members' Lobby.
Mr. MacGregor : The forum for considering such matters is the Advisory Committee on Works of Art in the House of Commons. Its terms of reference are
"to advise Mr. Speaker and the Secretary of State for the Environment on matters relating to Works of Art in the House of Commons area of the Palace of Westminster".
The Committee receives proposals from a wide range of sources, including hon. Members.
Film Makers
Mr. Tony Banks : To ask the Lord President of the Council what facilities are made available to film makers in the House.
Mr. MacGregor : The Serjeant at Arms advises and assists applicants within the regulations for photography and filming as approved by the Services Committee ; if the hon. Member has a specific matter to raise, he may wish to write to me.
Tuna
Mr. Morley : To ask the Lord President of the Council whether he has taken any steps to ensure tuna served in House of Commons restaurants has been caught by methods that are not harmful to dolphins and other marine life.
Mr. MacGregor : The Refreshment Department purchases only canned tuna fish products which derive from skipjack tuna which, it is understood, do not swim with dolphins, and which are caught in a manner unlikely to endanger other marine life. The Refreshment Department is also keeping itself informed of developments in the marketing of "dolphin-safe" canned tuna fish. Its buying policy makes it impracticable to purchase foodstuffs other than from a wholesaler.
Parliamentary Pensions
Mr. Alfred Morris : To ask the Lord President of the Council, pursuant to the debate of 31 January, whether he is yet in a position to publish the final text of his reference to the Top Salaries Review Body concerning hon. Members' pensions and the resettlement grant.
Mr. MacGregor : I have now written to the chairman of the Top Salaries Review Body as follows : "At the conclusion of the debate on Parliamentary Pensions held on 17 January 1990 my predecessor said that he would examine what Hon. Members had said with a view to framing a future reference to the TSRB on Parliamentary pensions. He subsequently held discussions with the Trustees
Column 120
of the Parliamentary Pension Scheme and others on both the current shape of the scheme and the implementation of the recommendations made in the review body's last report (the 26th). You will have seen that I introduced a Bill to enact those recommendations and other matters this session and the Second Reading took place on 31 January. Because of acute Parliamentary concern about the state of the Fund, we have taken the unusual step of making some changes to the Parliamentary Contributory Pension Fund (PCPF), particularly on widows' benefit, without consulting you. Nonetheless, a number of issues remain on which we would welcome your guidance.As debates in the House have made clear, the principal issue on which we need your advice is the question of the so called "balance of contributions", that is the balance between the Exchequer and Member contributions.
The PCPF is a final salary scheme with the Member contribution determined on the basis necessary to fund benefits over the long term, leaving aside surpluses and deficits. Under section 3 of the Parliamentary and other Pensions Act 1987, the Government Actuary's Department (GAD), on the basis of the cost of known benefits, estimates the total contributions necessary to fund it in the long term (the total standard contribution). Since the Member contribution is fixed this yields the Exchequer contribution as a residual. Taking account of the performance of the Fund, the GAD then adjusts the Exchequer contribution to produce the rate actually paid. The effect is that the Exchequer funds deficits but, where there is a surplus, enjoys a contributions holiday. The financing system is in other words symmetrical.
The Trustees of the PCPF, amongst others, take the view that the character of the scheme in which the Exchequer makes contributions in this way-- taking the benefit of surpluses and making good any deficits--should be changed. Their preference would be for a system which held a fixed relationship between the Exchequer and Member contribution-say in the ratio of 5:3 or 60:40. To match the current system, such a system would need to be symmetrical with regard to both surpluses and deficits, implying that the Member and Exchequer contributions would move up or down together according to the state of the Fund.
We would therefore welcome your views on the short and long term financing arrangements of the scheme and in particular what role the GAD should play. I intend that your report be debated and that the eventual government decisions on it should establish a definitive position on this issue for some considerable time to come. On scheme benefits, as I have mentioned, we have decided to improve widows' and widowers' pensions from half rate to h rate in response to the Trustees' request for an increase to ds, in the light of the debate in the House on 17 January 1990. In consultation with the Trustees the Government concluded that this was the appropriate response to Members' immediate concerns over the surplus in the Fund and the level of Exchequer contributions. This should not influence you in determining the Government's policy towards the financing of the Fund nor to what we consider the proper use of surpluses, generally. It was a specific action to meet a specific need. The Trustees have accepted this although they have made clear that a two thirds widows pension remains their objective. I have made it clear that--at any rate on the present system for financing the Scheme--when there is no longer any surplus in the Fund Members' contributions would have to rise to meet the cost of this new level of benefit and any other improvements in benefits which might subsequently be recommended and accepted.
During the debates on 17 January 1990 and 31 January 1991 Members also raised the question of the accrual rate. You last looked at this in 1983 when you recommended an improvement in the accrual rate from 1/60ths to 1/50ths. I would be grateful for your views on whether a further improvement is justified and if so on the implications for contributions.
I ought also to record some feeling among the Trustees and other Members that you should take account of experience in other Parliamentary schemes, both Commonwealth and European. Given the timescale, I made clear to the House on 31 January that full coverage of this aspect might well need to await a separate, subsequent Report.
Column 121
Finally, as you will see from the debate on 31 January, there is a considerable strength of feeling in the House that the arrangements for the Resettlement Grant and in particular the cut off at age 65, should be looked at again. I recognise, of course, that you examined this matter in your 26th Report, but the Government must obviously take very seriously an expression of such widespread concern from all sides of the House that the arguments should be re-examined. A particular point highlighted in the debate on 31 January is the unique circumstances which determine the precise timing of the end of a Parliament and therefore, for some Members, the end of a Parliamentary career. The Trustees have asked that the TSRB examine this matter seriously, with an open mind and in a way which ensures that the arguments can be put before you clearly and to the satisfaction of all concerned. I have assured them, and the House, that the Government will seek your views on that basis.In view of the extent of concern in the House on this matter, I would be most grateful if you could report on it separately by the middle of April, so that the Government's response can be equally prompt.
As to the balance of contributions and other matters, I would like to consider and debate your report as soon as is practically possible so that any necessary changes can be implemented speedily. (As you will see, the Bill includes a power to make such changes by secondary legislation). So it would be of great assistance if you could report on these matters as soon as possible after your separate report on the Resettlement Grant.
I would like to conclude by thanking the Review Body for its last report under the chairmanship of Lord Plowden and thank you in advance for agreeing to examine these complex matters. The Trustees of the Parliamentary Pensions Scheme will join me, I am sure, when I say that we are fortunate to being able to call on the Review Body's objectivity in assisting our consideration of these difficult issues."
AGRICULTURE, FISHERIES AND FOOD
Calves
Mr. Crowther : To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food if he will introduce a marking requirement in order to ensure that the ban on selling calves more than twice in any 28-day period, coming into force on 1 March, can be properly enforced.
Mr. Maclean : The order in question includes a requirement to retain records of identification numbers, which are already required to be marked on calves under separate legislation. I believe that this system, which follows recommendations from the Farm Animal Welfare Council, will prove a satisfactory means of enforcement.
HOUSE OF COMMONS COMMISSION
Members' Insurance
Mr. Kirkwood : To ask the hon. Member for Berwick-upon-Tweed, representing the House of Commons Commission, what changes have been made to the insurance arrangements for hon. Members.
Mr. Beith : The cover afforded by the Members Group Personal Accident Insurance Policy in respect of certain of its provisions is directly related to Members' salary. Generally, these items are death benefit for Members, and permanent total disablement benefit for all persons insured under the terms of the policy. With effect from 1 January 1991 the cover for these items is £145,000. All other provisions set out in the memorandum dated November 1990 and circulated to all Members remain unchanged.
Column 122
EDUCATION AND SCIENCE
Religious Education
Mr. Frank Field : To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Science, pursuant to his answer of 22 January, Official Report , column 123 , to the hon. Member for Hexham (Mr. Amos) on religious education, if he will also publish a copy of the letter in the Official Report .
Mr. Eggar : When I write, copies of the letter will be placed in the Library of the House.
Schools
Mr. Norris : To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Science what is (a) the percentage of pupils in each local education authority who receives education in schools maintained or formerly maintained by another local education authority and (b) the number and percentage of pupils educated in schools maintained or formerly maintained by each local education authority whose place or residence is within another local education authority ; and if he will list in rank order the difference between (a) and (b) for metropolitan and London authorities.
Mr. Fallon : The percentages and pupil numbers as at January 1990 for each local education authority are listed in the tables. The local education authorities to which pupils were deemed to belong were determined in accordance with The Education (Areas to which Pupils and Students Belong) Regulations 1989 as amended by The Education (Areas to which Pupils and Students Belong) (Amendment) Regulations 1990.
Local education authority |Per cent.<1> |Numbers |Per cent.<1>
|exports |imports |imports
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of London |94.3 |169 |137.4
Camden |22.9 |6,290 |41.4
Greenwich |8.2 |3,560 |12.4
Hackney |22.4 |2,358 |10.1
Hammersmith and
Fulham |20.7 |4,062 |34.1
Islington |23.2 |4,369 |24.0
Kensington and Chelsea |32.9 |3,642 |50.3
Lambeth |30.1 |2,841 |10.6
Lewisham |15.4 |3,715 |13.6
Southwark |15.8 |4,279 |17.1
Tower Hamlets |11.0 |1,834 |6.9
Wandsworth |17.0 |4,463 |19.5
Westminster |25.4 |6,130 |56.6
Barking and Dagenham |4.9 |1,480 |7.6
Barnet |7.0 |5,023 |15.1
Bexley |5.4 |1,538 |5.2
Brent |19.1 |1,454 |4.5
Bromley |4.8 |1,627 |5.0
Croydon |7.6 |2,559 |6.8
Ealing |9.3 |1,530 |4.5
Enfield |6.0 |2,013 |5.9
Haringey |15.4 |2,337 |10.3
Harrow |9.5 |1,982 |8.4
Havering |3.1 |1,491 |4.7
Hillingdon |4.5 |934 |3.2
Hounslow |8.8 |2,934 |11.2
Kingston upon Thames |8.7 |1,643 |11.1
Merton |11.1 |2,003 |11.5
Newham |3.4 |1,438 |4.6
Redbridge |6.8 |1,624 |5.6
Richmond upon Thames |8.6 |3,159 |24.3
Sutton |9.0 |2,180 |10.6
Waltham Forest |5.5 |994 |3.6
Birmingham |2.4 |2,369 |1.6
Coventry |0.8 |598 |1.5
Dudley |2.8 |1,352 |3.3
Sandwell |3.2 |1,661 |4.0
Solihull |2.9 |2,095 |7.6
Walsall |2.0 |1,728 |4.5
Wolverhampton |3.4 |892 |2.5
Knowsley |10.8 |1,027 |4.1
Liverpool |2.0 |2,147 |3.2
St. Helens |5.2 |1,206 |4.5
Sefton |1.2 |1,237 |3.1
Wirral |0.6 |79 |0.2
Bolton |2.4 |973 |2.6
Bury |6.6 |1,136 |4.8
Manchester |5.2 |3,482 |5.9
Oldham |2.3 |1,663 |5.1
Rochdale |3.9 |536 |1.7
Salford |3.5 |1,461 |4.9
Stockport |2.3 |919 |2.4
Tameside |2.9 |1,137 |3.7
Trafford |5.3 |793 |2.8
Wigan |3.1 |2,716 |6.2
Barnsley |2.0 |287 |0.9
Doncaster |1.0 |338 |0.8
Rotherham |0.7 |969 |2.6
Sheffield |1.2 |373 |0.6
Bradford |3.1 |590 |0.8
Calderdale |2.0 |457 |1.6
Kirklees |1.3 |622 |1.1
Leeds |1.0 |1,357 |1.5
Wakefield |0.7 |660 |1.6
Gateshead |2.3 |436 |1.7
Newcastle upon Tyne |3.1 |1,200 |3.6
North Tyneside |3.0 |718 |2.7
South Tyneside |1.1 |484 |2.4
Sunderland |1.0 |520 |1.2
Isles of Scilly |1.6 |1 |0.4
Avon |0.6 |1,029 |0.9
Bedfordshire |1.2 |1,277 |1.7
Berkshire |2.3 |2,657 |2.7
Buckinghamshire |5.0 |1,061 |1.2
Cambridgeshire |1.4 |688 |0.8
Cheshire |0.9 |2,106 |1.6
Cleveland |0.2 |416 |0.5
Cornwall |0.6 |305 |0.5
Cumbria |0.2 |350 |0.5
Derbyshire |1.2 |1,469 |1.2
Devon |0.6 |552 |0.4
Dorset |0.4 |1,925 |2.6
Durham |1.0 |343 |0.4
East Sussex |1.7 |992 |1.3
Essex |1.7 |1,199 |0.6
Gloucestershire |0.7 |1,021 |1.5
Hampshire |1.3 |1,759 |0.9
Hereford and Worcester |2.4 |1,295 |1.4
Hertfordshire |1.0 |4,701 |3.6
Humberside |0.5 |1,563 |1.3
Isle of Wight |0.1 |15 |0.1
Kent |0.5 |1,305 |0.6
Lancashire |1.4 |1,074 |0.6
Leicester |0.5 |635 |0.5
Lincolnshire |2.4 |730 |0.9
Norfolk |1.1 |660 |0.7
North Yorkshire |1.5 |2,070 |2.3
Northamptonshire |0.5 |792 |1.0
Northumberland |1.1 |592 |1.4
Nottinghamshire |0.8 |721 |0.5
Oxfordshire |0.8 |1,929 |2.9
Shropshire |1.0 |678 |1.2
Somerset |1.8 |475 |0.8
Staffordshire |1.5 |1,195 |0.8
Suffolk |0.7 |1,306 |1.6
Surrey |4.0 |3,536 |3.2
Warwickshire |2.0 |1,280 |2.0
West Sussex |1.4 |1,869 |2.2
Wiltshire |1.7 |552 |0.8
Exports = Pupils belonging to each LEA attending maintained, including maintained special, schools in another LEA.
Imports = Pupils belonging to another LEA attending maintained, including maintained special, schools in each LEA.
<1> All percentages rounded to one decimal place.
London Authorities |Percentage of |Rank
|imports less
|percentage of
|exports<1>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of London |43.1 |1
Westminster |31.2 |2
Camden |18.5 |3
Kensington and Chelsea |17.5 |4
Richmond upon Thames |15.8 |5
Hammersmith and Fulham |13.4 |6
Barnet |8.1 |7
Greenwich |4.2 |8
Barking and Dagenham |2.7 |9
Wandsworth |2.5 |10
Kingston upon Thames |2.5 |11
Hounslow |2.4 |12
Havering |1.6 |13
Sutton |1.5 |14
Southwark |1.3 |15
Newham |1.2 |16
Islington |0.8 |17
Merton |0.4 |18
Bromley |0.1 |19
Enfield |0.0 |20
Bexley |-.2 |21
Croydon |-.8 |22
Redbridge |-1.1 |23
Harrow |-1.2 |24
Hillingdon |-1.3 |25
Lewisham |-1.8 |26
Waltham Forest |-1.9 |27
Tower Hamlets |-4.1 |28
Ealing |-4.9 |29
Haringey |-5.2 |30
Hackney |-12.2 |31
Brent |-14.5 |32
Lambeth |-19.5 |33
Exports=pupils belonging to each LEA attending maintained,
including maintained special, schools in another LEA.
Imports=pupils belonging to another LEA attending maintained,
including maintained special, schools in each LEA.
<1>All percentages rounded to one decimal place.
City of London 43.1 1
Westminster 31.2 2
Camden 18.5 3
Kensington and Chelsea 17.5 4
Richmond upon Thames 15.8 5
Hammersmith and Fulham 13.4 6
Barnet 8.1 7
Greenwich 4.2 8
Barking and Dagenham 2.7 9
Wandsworth 2.5 10
Kingston upon Thames 2.5 11
Hounslow 2.4 12
Havering 1.6 13
Sutton 1.5 14
Southwark 1.3 15
Newham 1.2 16
Islington 0.8 17
Merton 0.4 18
Bromley 0.1 19
Enfield 0.0 20
Bexley .2 21
Croydon .8 22
Redbridge 1.1 23
Harrow 1.2 24
Hillingdon 1.3 25
Lewisham 1.8 26
Waltham Forest 1.9 27
Tower Hamlets 4.1 28
Ealing 4.9 29
Haringey 5.2 30
Hackney 12.2 31
Brent 14.5 32
Lambeth 19.5 33
Exports= puplis belonging to each LEA attending maintained, including maintained special, schools in another LEA.
Imports= pupils belonging to another LEA attending maintained, including maintained special, schools in each LEA.
All percentages rounded to one decimal place.
| Next Section
| Home Page |