Previous Section Home Page

Mr. Janner : To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Science when his Department last conducted a survey of the ethnic origins of its employees ; when it next plans to do so ; and whether he will make a statement.

Mr. Eggar : A survey of the ethnic origins of staff was carried out last summer and the database is now


Column 39

continually updated as now staff join the Department. This Department launched its own programme of action to achieve equality of opportunity for people of ethnic minority origin in June last year. We have already achieved the objective to establish ethnic origin data on98 per cent. of our staff.

Health Education and Physical Education

Mr. Rathbone : To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will make a statement on the position of health education and physical education in the core curriculum and on how they relate to each other.

Mr. Atkins : Health education is a cross-curricular theme within the curriculum as a whole, including physical education. The terms of reference of the national curriculum working group on physical education asked it to consider the contribution which physical education can make to health education. The interim report of the group, published in February 1991, identified ways in which this contribution can be made. A copy of the report has been placed in the Library.

Licensed Teachers

Mr. Cartwright : To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will list those local education authorities who are currently employing licensed teachers indicating (i) the numbers employed by each authority, (ii) how many are graduates and (iii) how many are non-graduates who met the necessary criteria.

Mr. Fallon : On 28 February 439 licensed teachers were employed by local education authorities in England and Wales and, of these, 290 were graduates. The number of licensed teachers employed by individual local education authorities is as follows :



                       |Number       

-------------------------------------

Avon                   |2            

Barking and Dagenham   |2            

Barnet                 |28           

Bedfordshire           |14           

Berkshire              |9            

Bexley                 |16           

Brent                  |22           

Bromley                |1            

Buckinghamshire        |2            

Calderdale             |4            

Cambridgeshire         |4            

City of London         |1            

Cleveland              |3            

Coventry               |4            

Cumbria                |1            

Essex                  |18           

Gloucestershire        |2            

Hackney                |24           

Hammersmith and Fulham |17           

Hampshire              |8            

Havering               |15           

Hereford and Worcester |4            

Hertfordshire          |49           

Hillingdon             |12           

Hounslow               |6            

Islington              |46           

Kent                   |15           

Kingston upon Thames   |9            

Lincolnshire           |5            

Newham                 |17           

Northamptonshire       |14           

Redbridge              |9            

Shropshire             |2            

Staffordshire          |1            

Stockport              |1            

Suffolk                |3            

Surrey                 |6            

Sutton                 |8            

Tower Hamlets          |8            

Waltham Forest         |2            

Wandsworth             |9            

West Sussex            |4            

Westminster            |10           

Wiltshire              |2            

Secondary Schools, Torquay

Mr. Steen : To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Science when he expects to reply to the letter dated 28 July 1990 concerning secondary school placement in Torquay from Mr. I. W. Morton of Kingshurst, Paignton road, Stoke Gabriel, Totnes, Devon TQ9 6SJ.

Mr. Fallon : Mr. Morton's letter, and those of seven other parents on the same subject, raised difficult questions about the Sex Discrimination Act and have required detailed consultation with the local education authority. Two letters have been sent to Mr. Morton advising him of the problem and apologising for the unavoidable delay. We will reply fully to Mr. Morton's inquiries as soon as we are in a position to do so.

National Association of Governors and Managers

Mr. Dunn : To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Science (1) if he will undertake a review of the decision by his Department to grant funds to the National Association of Governors and Managers ; and if he will make a statement.

(2) if he will suspend further payments to the National Association of Governors and Managers.

Mr. Fallon : A grant of up to £40,000 has been agreed for 1991- 92. My right hon. and learned Friend is now considering a further application for funds.

Student Loans

Mr. Andrew Smith : To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will make a statement on the current rate of student take-up of loans from the Student Loans Company ; and what number of loans he estimates will have been taken out by the end of the 1990-91 academic year and 1991-92.

Mr. Alan Howarth : As at 28 February 1991, over 109,000 students have applied for a loan from the Student Loans Company. It is too early to say what the take-up rate will be for the current academic year or, of course, for the academic year 1991-92.

Mr. Andrew Smith : To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Science what number and percentage of applications the Student Loans Company has rejected to date.

Mr. Alan Howarth : The Student Loans Company does not reject any valid applications from students whose institutions have correctly certified them as eligible.

Where the application form is invalid--because it has not been completed correctly--the company may need, in


Column 41

certain circumstance, to invite the student to reapply. I am asking the managing director of the company, which is responsible for the administration of the scheme, to write direct to the hon. Member, giving the number of cases where this has happened.

Mr. Andrew Smith : To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Science what costs he expects the Student Loans Company to face in collecting due loans, separating out (a) collection costs per loan for each year from 1990 to 2027, (b) annual collection costs for each year from 1990 to 2027 and (c) annual loss from loans deemed uncollectable, for the same period.

Mr. Alan Howarth : Information is not available in the form requested. The Student Loans Company expects to collect significant numbers of repayments from April 1992. The company does not yet have an approved budget for the financial year 1992-93. However, the Government have consistently forecast annual operational costs for the next few years within the range of £10 to 20 million. The company will not regard any loans as uncollectable. Where a borrower is granted deferment, he need not make any repayments, although his outstanding loan will continue to be indexed in line with inflation. Where a borrower qualifies for cancellation, the student loans legislation provides for the debt to be cancelled : there is, therefore, nothing to collect. Where a borrower defaults on his repayments, the company will seek recovery of the full sum owed, if necessary by taking him to court.

Mr. Andrew Smith : To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Science what is the latest available figure for the number of student loans outstanding ; and how much is owed.

Mr. Alan Howarth : As at 28 February 1991, the Student Loans Company had made 82,176 loans, to a total value of £31.095 million.

Chief Inspector of Schools (Annual Report)

Mr. Straw : To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Science when the latest annual report of Her Majesty's senior chief inspector of schools was (a) made available to the press, and (b) placed before Parliament ; and in what manner.

Mr. Kenneth Clarke : Copies of the report were made available to the press at 12.00 on 13 February, the day of publication. Copies were dispatched to the Vote Office by first-class post on the day before publication. Opposition spokesmen were sent copies and further copies were placed in the Library on the day of publication.

Mr. Straw : To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Science whether he will make copies of the latest annual report of Her Majesty's senior chief inspector of schools available to hon. and Right hon. Members through the Vote Office.

Mr. Kenneth Clarke : On 12 February 200 copies were sent to the Vote Office.

Mr. Straw : To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Science on what date he first saw a draft of the latest annual report of Her Majesty's senior chief inspector of schools, and whether any amendments to the draft were made at the suggestion of Ministers.


Column 42

Mr. Kenneth Clarke : The senior chief inspector submitted his annual report to me on 4 February and it was published on 13 February.

Ministers made no suggestions of any changes to the report which was published in the form in which it was submitted.

Mr. Straw : To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Science if he will set out in detail the procedures for the forthcoming appointment of a new holder of the office of Her Majesty's senior chief inspector of schools, including the nature of the involvement of Ministers in the appointment.

Mr. Kenneth Clarke : The Civil Service Commission is organising an open competition which is being advertised widely in terms which I approved. Selection will be on merit and those selected for interview will appear before a board, chaired by the first civil service commissioner, on which my Department will be represented by senior officials and which will include a distinguished outside member. The board's recommendation will be made to me in the usual way. Her Majesty's inspectors of schools are appointed by Her Majesty the Queen, on the recommendation of the holder of my office, as required by section 77(2) of the Education Act 1944.

Wavertree Church of England School

Mr. Alton : To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Science what capital works required at Wavertree Church of England school he authorised at the time of its establishment ; when they will be completed ; and if he will make a statement.

Mr. Fallon : Statutory proposals approved on 22 June 1990 provided for the site and buildings of Wavertree Church of England voluntary controlled school to be upgraded and extended as necessary in order to accommodate about 210 pupils, including pupils displaced by the closure of St. Mary's and St. Bridget's CE voluntary controlled primary schools.

In setting Liverpool's annual capital guideline (ACG) for 1991-92 we have taken full account of the authority's plans for this project. It is, however, for local education authorities to decide what capital projects to undertake, and when, taking account of their obligation to implement approved statutory proposals.

Barkestone Church of England School

Mr. Latham : To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Science whether he will make a statement on the future of the premises and property of Barkestone Church of England school, Leicestershire.

Mr. Fallon : The future of the premises and property of Barkestone Church of England school will be determined strictly in accordance with the provisions of the proposed Diocese of Leicester (Educational Endowments) Order 1991. The order authorises the Leicester diocesan board of education to sell any of the property of the schools comprised in the order and, until sale, to let or otherwise manage such properties according to the general law applicable to the management of property held on trust for charitable purposes. In the case of Barkestone Church of England school, the diocesan board of education has indicated that it will not sell the former school premises


Column 43

but make them available for local community purposes under a lease. The diocesan board has indicated also that the teacher's house will not be sold for the time being, although there are plans to sell the agricultural land which comprises part of the trust property.

NORTHERN IRELAND

Low-energy Light Bulbs

Mr. Cartwright : To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what steps he is taking to encourage the use of low-energy light bulbs in his Department's offices and other buildings.

Dr. Mawhinney : The use of low-energy lighting is being promoted as part of a major Government effort to increase energy efficiency, with the target of a 15 per cent. reduction in overall energy consumption in Government buildings by 1995. A recent consultative paper on energy efficiency issued by the Department of Economic Development highlighted a wide range of energy conservation measures, including low-energy lighting. Departments have been asked to identify areas where energy efficiency can be improved. Moreover, where necessary, the cost of worthwhile projects will be taken into account when financial allocations are being made.

Royal Mail

Mr. McGrady : To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (1) what discussions he has had with the chairman of the Post Office on the reorganisation of the royal mail service in Northern Ireland ;

(2) what assessment he has made of the effect of the reorganisation of the royal mail service in Northern Ireland on unemployment in the constituency of South Down.

Dr. Mawhinney : None.

Railway Crossings

Mr. Clifford Forsythe : To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland when the enabling legislation authorising Northern Ireland Railways to install automatic half barriers to selected open crossings is to be tabled ; and if he will name the crossings concerned.

Mr. Needham : Orders in relation to the conversion of 13 automatic open crossings to automatic half-barrier level crossings are in preparation and are scheduled to come into operation as follows :


Crossing          |Operation date                     

------------------------------------------------------

Slaght            |2 September 1991                   

Killagan          |16 September 1991                  

Galgorm           |30 September 1991                  

Broughdone        |14 October 1991                    

Glarryford        |28 October 1991                    

Dunloy            |11 November 1991                   

Caldanagh         |25 November 1991                   

Ballyboyland      |9 December 1991                    

Barmouth          |6 January 1992                     

Umbra             |20 January 1992                    

Magilligan        |3 February 1992                    

Bellarena         |17 February 1992                   

Cromore           |2 March 1992                       


Column 44

Residential Homes

Rev. Martin Smyth : To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will publish tables, broken down by area health and social service board showing, for each of the last three years where figures are available, (i) social security expenditure on income support for residents of private and voluntary residential care and nursing homes, broken down by age and client group, and (ii) expenditure on board residential care and other services for elderly people.

Mr. Hanley [holding answer 28 February 1991] : The only readily available information about expenditure on income support relates to the position at 1 October 1990 and is as follows :


Weekly expenditure on income support at 1 October 1990                

                                  |Up to 59   |60 years or            

                                  |years      |over                   

----------------------------------------------------------------------

                                  |£        |£                    

Homes for persons in need                                             

Age and infirmity                 |3,059      |104,824                

Elderly and blind or elderly and                                      

   entitled to the higher rate of                                     

   attendance allowance           |-          |26,060                 

Mental disorder                   |5,313      |10,210                 

Drug or alcohol dependence        |950        |918                    

Mental handicap                   |19,541     |4,198                  

Physical disablement under                                            

   pensionable age                |6,372      |5,095                  

Physical disablement over                                             

   pensionable age                |-          |4,891                  

                                                                      

Nursing homes                                                         

Mental disorder                   |1,180      |13,165                 

Mental handicap                   |6,967      |4,419                  

Drug or alcohol dependence        |776        |959                    

Physical disablement under                                            

   pensionable age                |29,654     |49,988                 

Physical disablement over                                             

   pensionable age                |-          |29,401                 

Terminal illness                  |8,374      |338,671                

Others                            |693        |71,064                 

Totals                            |82,919     |663,863                

Grand totals                         746,782                          

Expenditure by each health and social services board for the last three years available on residential accommodation for the elderly was :


<

             Year ended 31 March                            

            |1988       |1989       |1990                   

Board       |£ million|£ million|£ million            

------------------------------------------------------------

Northern    |7.0        |7.2        |7.3                    

Southern    |4.2        |4.5        |4.6                    

Eastern     |11.4       |11.8       |12.6                   

Western     |4.1        |4.2        |4.6                    

            |--         |--         |--                     

  Total     |26.7       |27.7       |29.1                   

However, for facilities such as day centres and services such as home help and meals it is not possible to separate expenditure on a specific client group such as the elderly and this expenditure has not been included in the above figures.


Column 45

ENVIRONMENT

Fire Services

Mr. O'Hara : To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment following the decision to transfer funding for the Fire Service College to local fire brigades, what amount has been added to the RSG in respect of this commitment ; where information is available as to the sums allocated to each authority ; who may inspect this information ; what account was taken of these changes indetermining the standard spending assessments for metropolitan fire and civil defence authorities ; and where this information is available.

Mr. Key : In 1990-91 the Fire Service College will receive £7,595, 000 as its share of the revenue support grant total for England. In 1991-92 it will receive £5,630,734. Additionally, for 1991 -92 the total standard spending assessment for the fire and civil defence block takes account of the new arrangements whereby the college recovers part of its costs through charges. This is reflected in the standard spending assessments of individual authorities. However, grant is distributed on the basis of authorities' total SSAs and it is therefore not possible to say what proportion of their grant entitlements relates to any specific task or function.

Local Government Finance

Mr. Battle : To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will consider extending the grounds for exemption from the poll tax to include severe physical handicap as well as severe mental impairment.

Mr. Key : Our review of local government finance is considering all aspects of the community charge. Under the present arrangements people with disabilities may be helped by the community charge benefit disability and severe disability premiums.

Mr. Graham : To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he will make it his policy to exempt from the poll tax wives whose husbands were sole earners and have either absconded or been jailed.

Mr. Key : Our review of local government finance is considering all aspects of the community charge.

Mr. Graham : To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment how many ex-service men who receive a war pension are exempted from paying (a) all and (b) 80 per cent. of the poll tax ; and in how many cases the war pension payable to ex-service men is taken into account in calculating the liability of the pensioner's partner for the poll tax.

Mr. Key : This information is not available. Although entitlement to a war pension does not confer exemption from the personal community charge, local authorities must disregard the first £10 of and have the discretion to disregard the whole or part of the rest of a person's war disablement pension when calculating community charge benefit. If a partner is in prison, the decision whether a community charge benefit claim should be assessed on a joint basis will depend on whether, in the opinion of the local authority, the partners are still members of the same household.


Column 46

Mr. Fraser : To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what is the actual current expenditure of each London borough per poll tax payer.

Mr. Key : The available information is as follows :


Net revenue expenditure per head of  

relevant population                  

-------------------------------------

City of London         |26,186       

Camden                 |1,392        

Greenwich              |1,428        

Hackney                |1,802        

Hammersmith and Fulham |1,460        

Islington              |1,563        

Kensington and Chelsea |1,420        

Lewisham               |1,212        

Southwark              |1,400        

Tower Hamlets          |1,883        

Wandsworth             |1,176        

Westminster            |1,286        

Barking and Dagenham   |914          

Barnet                 |751          

Bexley                 |757          

Brent                  |1,230        

Bromley                |648          

Croydon                |799          

Ealing                 |1,067        

Enfield                |871          

Harrow                 |841          

Havering               |753          

Hillingdon             |885          

Hounslow               |1,037        

Kingston-upon-Thames   |818          

Merton                 |896          

Newham                 |1,340        

Redbridge              |771          

Richmond-upon-Thames   |733          

Sutton                 |819          

Waltham Forest         |1,147        

Lambeth and Haringey have not supplied figures which enable the calculation to be made.

Mr. Fraser : To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what is the standard spending assessment for each London borough expressed in terms of spending per poll tax payer.

Mr. Key : The standard spending assessments for each London borough for 1991-92 in pounds per charge payer are listed in the table :



                       |1991-92                

                       |SSA                    

                       |(£/adult)            

-----------------------------------------------

City of London         |11,762                 

Camden                 |1,403                  

Greenwich              |1,191                  

Hackney                |1,920                  

Hammersmith and Fulham |1,335                  

Islington              |1,551                  

Kensington and Chelsea |1,178                  

Lambeth                |1,718                  

Lewisham               |1,295                  

Southwark              |1,455                  

Tower Hamlets          |1,872                  

Wandsworth             |1,262                  

Westminster            |1,548                  

Barking and Dagenham   |976                    

Barnet                 |882                    

Bexley                 |847                    

Brent                  |1,339                  

Bromley                |754                    

Croydon                |950                    

Ealing                 |1,187                  

Enfield                |966                    

Haringey               |1,345                  

Harrow                 |906                    

Havering               |795                    

Hillingdon             |881                    

Hounslow               |1,011                  

Kingston upon Thames   |885                    

Merton                 |865                    

Newham                 |1,519                  

Redbridge              |914                    

Richmond upon Thames   |740                    

Sutton                 |846                    

Waltham Forest         |1,210                  

Mr. Blair : To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment how many students were estimated to be in Cambridge for the purposes of calculating the community charge ; what factors have led to the increase in charge levels for 1991-92 ; and if he will make a statement.

Mr. Key : The number of students notified to the Department of the Environment by Cambridge city council and used for the purposes of calculating revenue support grant was 15,020. The community charge set by each district council is a matter for it to decide.

Mr. Pawsey : To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment how much assistance a couple living in a property of (a) half and (b) three quarters average rateable value in Rugby and Kenilworth will receive under the community charge reduction scheme in 1991-92.

Mr. Key : If Rugby borough council sets its community charge next year at or above £332, a couple who have not moved since 31 March 1990 living in a property of half average rateable value could look forward to a reduction of £272 between them and for a couple living in a property of threequarters average rateable value, £128 between them. If Warwick council sets its community charge next year at or above £344, the reduction for a couple living in that area who have not moved since 31 March 1990 would be (a) £248 between them and (b) £80 between them.

Mr. Norris : To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment how many households in Hackney were in receipt of transitional protection in 1990-91.

Mr. Key : No information is available on the numbers of households in each authority area in receipt of transitional relief. Relief grant claim forms from the local authority indicate that 19,000 charge payers in Hackney have benefited from transitional relief this financial year.

Mr. Latham : To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he will set out in tabular form details of the exact effects on community charge payers in (a) Charnwood borough, (b) Melton borough and (c) Rutland district councils of the community charge reduction scheme ; and how many charge payers are likely to benefit in each case.

Mr. Key : No information is yet available on the numbers of people in each charging authority area who will benefit from a reduction. The figures in the table show the benefit of the community charge reduction scheme in


Column 48

Charnwood, Melton and Rutland for couples who have not moved since 31 March 1990 living in properties of (a) three quarters average rateable value and (b) half average rateable value for the area if the authorities concerned set a community charge in 1991-92 which is at or above their scheme charge.


.

Benefit for couples from 1991-92 community    

charge reduction                              

scheme                                        

                  |Scheme|(a)   |(b)          

                  |charge                     

                  |£   |£   |£          

----------------------------------------------

Charnwood borough |342   |202   |328          

Melton borough    |339   |220   |338          

Rutland district  |340   |173   |307          

Mr. Latham : To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment whether he will list the district councils within Leicestershire which have increased their levels of community charge in 1991-92 by more than the benefit which their charge-payers have received from central funding of the safety net ; to what factors he attributes these increases ; and how they will be affected by the community charge reduction scheme.

Mr. Key : As far as I am aware, no district council in Leicestershire has yet decided upon its community charge for 1991-92.

A list of the authorities in Leicestershire which are contributing to the safety net, together with the amount of their contributions, is given in the table. Contributions will not be required in 1991-92.


                      |£                

------------------------------------------

Blaby                 |881,265            

Charnwood             |3,208,998          

Harborough            |1,444,158          

Hinckley and Bosworth |505,101            

Oakby and Wigston     |502,287            

Rutland               |684,308            

Entitlement to reductions under the community charge reduction scheme will be based on the scheme listed in the Community Charge Reduction Scheme Report (England), laid before Parliament on 18 February, or the local authority's set charge in 1991-92, whichever is the lower.

Mr. Blunkett : To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) what is his estimate of the number of local authorities who will receive special grant payments for income forgone because of exempting Gulf personnel from the poll tax ;

(2) if he intends to publish any further details on the operation of the scheme to compensate local authorities for income forgone due to exempting Gulf personnel from the poll tax ; and if he will make a statement.

Mr. Portillo : The number of authorities which will benefit from the scheme is not yet known. Further details of the operation of the scheme will be issued shortly, following discussions between my Department and the local authority associations.

Mr. Blunkett : To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish the information available, including forecasts, from the capital monitoring returns from local authorities on the likely level of (a) housing capital receipts, (b) non-housing capital receipts and (c)


Column 49

all capital receipts generated in 1990-91 in (i) England and (ii) in each class of authority ; and what is the amount that will have to be set aside as provision for credit liabilities.

Mr. Portillo : The quarterly capital payments return (CPR2) submitted by local authorities covers outturn data for April to September 1990-91 and provides a forecast for the whole of 1990-91. The returns made by local authorities together with estimates for non-response suggest the likely level of all capital receipts generated in 1990-91 to be as follows :


                           |£ million            

---------------------------------------------------

County councils            |284                    

Metropolitan districts     |697                    

London boroughs            |873                    

Non-Metropolitan districts |1,558                  

Other authorities          |218                    

All England                |3,629                  

Local authorities report that of the £3,629 million they expect to receive in 1990-91, £1,195 million will be usable capital receipts, hence the reserved part will be £2,434 million which must be set aside as provision for credit liabilities.

Local authorities are not required to provide separate forecasts for housing and non-housing capital receipts.

Mr. Blunkett : To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish details of the information sent to local authorities during February on the treatment of service men in the Gulf regarding poll tax liability.

Mr. Portillo : My Department has not issued any such advice to local authorities during February. On 19 February my right hon. Friend the Member for Henley explained to the House that it was the Government's intention that soldiers and associated civilians posted to the Gulf should not pay the charge for the duration of their posting. In the light of the recent High Court judgment in the case of Bradford MBC v. Anderton we are currently considering what steps need to be taken to realise this objective.

Mr. Dunn : To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment how much assistance a couple living in a property of half average rateable value in Sevenoaks will receive under the community charge reduction scheme in 1992.

Mr. Key : If Sevenoaks council sets its community charge next year at or above £281, a couple who have not moved since 31 March 1990 living in a property of half average rateable value could look forward to a reduction of £221 between them.

Mr. Blunkett : To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will publish a table showing for (a) each local authority, (b) each class of authority and (c) England as a whole the capital receipts accumulated by 31 March 1990 and his best estimates of the amount set aside as provision for credit liabilities in 1990-91 from (i) housing capital receipts, (ii) non-housing capital receipts and (iii) all capital receipts.

Mr. Portillo : I have today arranged for the available information to be placed in the Library of the House.

Mr. Simon Hughes : To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what has been the cost of implementing and


Column 50

administering the community charge in each of the 32 London boroughs and in the City of London (i) during 1989-90 and (ii) during 1990-91, (a) funded by the Government and (b) in fact incurred ; and what is the estimate of the cost of the same activity for each of the same local authorities for the financial year 1991-92.

Mr. Key [holding answer 1 March 1991] : I will write to the hon. Member.

Mr. Simon Hughes : To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what has been the cost to his Department of (a) implementing and (b) monitoring the community charge in England in the financial years (i) 1989- 90 and(ii) 1990-91 ; and what is his estimate of the cost for 1991-92.

Mr. Key [holding answer, 1 March 1991] : The information is not available in the form requested. The outturn costs for 1989-90 and 1990 -91 and estimated costs for 1991-92, excluding accommodation, publicity and publications, of the local government finance policy directorate in my department, which deal with all aspects of local government finance, including the community charge, are as follows :


£ 000s |Total            

---------------------------

1989-90  |2,591            

1990-91  |2,705            

1991-92  |2,983            

Mrs. Currie : To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list for every year since 1975 the total spent by local authorities in cash and real terms, and the proportions of funds from Government, from business and from households or individuals with an estimate for 1990-91.

Mr. Key [holding answer 26 February 1991] : The available information is as follows :


Local authority net expenditure financed from relevant                  

grants, rates and balances                                              

             Cash                    At 1990-91 prices                  

                                                                        

            |England    |England    |England    |England                

            |and Wales              |and Wales                          

            |£ million|£ million|£ million|£ million            

------------------------------------------------------------------------

<1>1975-76  |10,102     |-          |36,534     |-                      

1976-77     |11,293     |-          |35,972     |-                      

1977-78     |12,195     |-          |34,169     |-                      

1978-79     |13,631     |-          |34,445     |-                      

1979-80     |15,956     |-          |34,556     |-                      

1980-81     |19,307     |-          |35,336     |-                      

1981-82     |21,314     |20,106     |35,574     |33,558                 

1982-83     |-          |21,952     |-          |34,209                 

1983-84     |-          |23,263     |-          |34,650                 

1984-85     |-          |24,119     |-          |34,188                 

<2>1985-86  |-          |24,284     |-          |32,644                 

1986-87     |-          |26,629     |-          |34,614                 

1987-88     |-          |28,943     |-          |35,678                 

1988-89     |-          |31,334     |-          |35,998                 

<3>1989-90  |-          |33,403     |-          |36,075                 

                                                                        

<4>1990-91  |-          |36,434     |-          |36,434                 

<1> Figures for 1975-76 are estimates                                   

<2> London Regional Transport excluded from 1985-86                     

<3> Polytechnics excluded from 1989-90                                  

<4> Revenue expenditure to compare with TSS                             



Column 51


Proportions met by relevant grants and rates                          

              |Government   |Non-domestic |Domestic                   

              |grants<1> as |rates<2> as  |rates/                     

              |percentage   |percentage   |community                  

              |of local     |of local     |charges<3> as              

              |authority    |authority    |percentage                 

              |expenditure  |expenditure  |of local                   

                                          |authority                  

                                          |expenditure                

----------------------------------------------------------------------

<4>1975-76    |67           |23           |14                         

<4>1976-77    |66           |22           |14                         

<4>1977-78    |63           |23           |17                         

<4>1978-79    |61           |22           |16                         

<4>1979-80    |60           |22           |17                         

<4>1980-81    |59           |23           |17                         

1981-82       |56           |25           |20                         

1982-83       |53           |26           |21                         

1983-84       |54           |26           |19                         

1984-85       |54           |26           |20                         

1985-86       |54           |28           |21                         

1986-87       |50           |28           |22                         

1987-88       |49           |28           |23                         

1988-89       |46           |28           |24                         

1989-90       |44           |28           |25                         

                                                                      

1990-91       |42           |29           |28                         

<1> For the years 1975-76 to 1989-90 Government grants comprise       

aggregate Exchequer grant and rate rebate grants. For 1990-91         

Government grants are made up of revenue support grant, special       

grants, specific grants, aggregate external finance, community charge 

benefits and transitional relief grants.                              

<2> Net of rate rebates.                                              

<3> Net of rate rebates for the years 1979-80 to 1989-90. Net of      

community charge benefits and transitional relief in 1990-91.         

<4> England and Wales.                                                


Next Section

  Home Page