Previous Section | Home Page |
Miss Widdecombe : I understand from Mr. Michael Bichard, the chief executive of the Benefits Agency, that the information is not available and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
Mr. Meacher : To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security (1) what plans he has to monitor the effects of the Income Support (General Amendment) Regulations, S.I., 1991, No. 1559, on new claimants who are not covered by transitional protection and not entitled to family credit ;
(2) how many people he estimates will lose entitlement to income support and not be entitled to family credit as a result of the Income Support (General Amendment) Regulations, S.I., 1991, No. 1559 ;
(3) how many claimants currently receiving income support will need transitional protection as a result of the Income Support (General Amendment) Regulations, S.I., 1991, No. 1559 ; and what he anticipates the total cost of that transitional protection will be ; (4) how much his Department will save on payments of income support as a result of the reduction from 24 to 16 hours in the number of hours claimants can work.
Miss Widdecombe [holding answer 5 November 1991] : The reduction in the remunerative work rule from 24 to 16 hours in the income- related benefits comes into effect from April 1992. It is part of a package of measures which will result in many working families with children being better-off through easier access to family credit. The estimated cost of the change across the benefits is expected to be around £50 million in the first year reducing to about £25 million in the longer term.
Claimants who are working, or whose partners are working, between 16 and 24 hours a week and receiving income support at the point of change will not lose their entitlement to that benefit. Around 30,000 of them are likely to be families with children who will be entitled to more family credit than they would otherwise receive in income support. A similar number, about 30,000, will remain on income support under provisions giving them indefinite protection at an estimated cost of £30 million in the first year. It is expected that a further 35,000 parents, who are already working 16 hours or more and who are not yet on benefit, will come on to family credit in due course after April 1992, and that many more people will be attracted into work and on to family credit in the longer term and so become better off. However, because of likely behavioural changes it is not possible to forecast with any degree of accuracy what the net effect might be on claims
Column 240
for income support made after April 1992. We will be carefully monitoring the effects of the change in the remunerative work rule in all the income-related benefits.Mr. Allen : To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what steps he is taking to reduce the time between his uprating announcement and the first payment of the uprated benefits.
Miss Widdecombe : The uprating date was moved to April in 1986 to align changes in social security benefits as closely as possible with the tax year and the local authority financial year. In order to ensure that the new benefit rates are implemented smoothly and efficiently to all beneficiaries in April, it is still necessary to announce them the previous autumn.
Mr. Allen : To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what proposals he has for meeting mortgage interests costs through housing benefit.
Miss Widdecombe : Help with mortgage interest is currently given through income support. We have no plans to extend these arrangements.
Mr. Allen : To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many questions he has not answered in the last year because of disproportionate costs.
Miss Widdecombe : In the last year 70 questions were not answered because of disproportionate cost.
Mr. Gerald Bowden : To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if he will investigate the case of Mr. Derek Merralls of 48 Worlingham road, London : and if he will review his Department's policy with regard to the payment of unemployment benefit to employees from whom national insurance payments have been deducted by an employer but not paid into the national insurance fund by an employer.
Mr. Jack : The case of Mr. Derek Merralls and the Department's policy on the effect on unemployment benefit of non-payment of national insurance contributions by employers is a matter for Miss Ann Chant, the chief executive of the Contributions Agency. She will write to my right hon. Friend and a copy will be placed in the Library and the Public Information Office.
Mr. Steen : To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how much the Government spend anually on war disability pensions ; and how many staff are employed in his Department on this.
Miss Widdecombe : Net expenditure on war disablement pensions in the financial year 1990-91 was about £570 million. About 1,050 staff are employed on all aspects of war pensions work, including the welfare service.
Mr. Steen : To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what is the cost to his Department of the 90 per
Column 241
cent. rebates paid to local authorities by central Government by way of the standard rebate scheme for those on war disability pensions.Miss Widdecombe : The information requested is not available. Overall figures for the amount of subsidy for housing benefit and community charge benefit are held, but it is not possible to obtain a breakdown within that of subsidy paid in respect of particular groups.
Mr. Steen : To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if he will list the local authorities in the south, south-east and south-west which use their discretionary powers to increase the rebates paid to those on war disability pension to above the 90 per cent. rebate refunded by central Government ; and what is the total cost to the community charge payers of each local authority which uses its discretionary powers in this way.
Miss Widdecombe : In the year 1990-91, 277 of the 370 local authorities in England reported that they excercised their discretionary power to disregard more than the statutory £10 of a war disablement pension. These local authorities are listed in the table. The most up-to- date information held of the total cost to local authorities of operating local schemes in respect of war disablement and war widows' pensions is for the 1989-90 financial year. In that year the costs incurred in respect of rate rebates was in the order of £4.3 million and in the order of £10 million in respect of rent rebates and allowances. It is not possible to break down these figures between war disablement and war widows' pensions.
Authorities in England operating a local scheme for war disablement pensions in 1990-91
Dr. Godman : To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if he will list the organisations which have been invited to comment upon his consultation document "The Proposed Contents of the Child Support Regulations" to be made under the Child Support Act 1991 ; and if he will make a statement.
Mr. Jack : The organisations which have so far been sent a copy of the consultation document are as follows :
Action of Churches Together in Scotland (Law Department) Association for Payment & Clearing Services
Association of British Chambers of Commerce
Association of County Councils
Association of Directors of Social Services
Association of District Judges
Association of District Councils
Association of London Authorities
Association of Magisterial Officers
Association of Metropolitan Authorities
Association of Scottish Chambers of Commerce
Barnardos
British Agencies for Adoption & Fostering
British Bankers Association
British Computer Society
Building Societies Association
Campaign for Justice in Divorce
Campaign for Work
Centre for Policy Studies
Chief Adjudication Officer (Chief Child Support Officer
Designate)
Child Poverty Action Group
Child Support Agency (Chief Executive Designate)
Childrens Legal Centre
Childrens Society
Church Action on Poverty
Citizens Advice, Scotland
Commission for Racial Equality
Committee of Scottish Clearing Bankers
Confederation of British Industry
Confederation of British Industry (Scottish Region)
Convention of Scottish Local Authorities
Council of Her Majesty's Circuit Judges
Council on Tribunals
Derbyshire County Council
Disability Alliance
Equal Opportunities Commission
Faculty of Advocates
Families Need Fathers
Family Law Association of Scotland
Family Law Bar Association
Family Law Commission
Family Policies Studies Centre
Family Welfare Association
General Bar Council of England and Wales
Gingerbread
Gingerbread Scotland
Column 244
Independent Tribunal ServiceInner London Magistrates' Courts Service
Justices' Clerks' Society
Law Society
Law Society of Scotland
Legal Action Group
London Boroughs Association
Lord President of the Court of Session
Magistrates' Association
Magistrates' Court Committee, Archway Road
Magistrates' Court Committee, Ashton-under-Lyme
Magistrates' Court Committee, Aylesbury
Magistrates' Court Committee, Barking
Magistrates' Court Committee, Barnet
Magistrates' Court Committee, Barnsley
Magistrates' Court Committee, Bedford
Magistrates' Court Committee, Bexleyheath
Magistrates' Court Committee, Birkenhead
Magistrates' Court Committee, Birmingham
Magistrates' Court Committee, Bishopsgate
Magistrates' Court Committee, Blackpool
Magistrates' Court Committee, Bolton
Magistrates' Court Committee, Bootle
Magistrates' Court Committee, Bradford
Magistrates' Court Committee, Bridgend
Magistrates' Court Committee, Bridgwater
Magistrates' Court Committee, Bristol
Magistrates' Court Committee, Bromley
Magistrates' Court Committee, Bury
Magistrates' Court Committee, Caernarvon
Magistrates' Court Committee, Cambridge
Magistrates' Court Committee, Cardiff
Magistrates' Court Committee, Carlisle
Magistrates' Court Committee, Chelmsford
Magistrates' Court Committee, Cheshire
Magistrates' Court Committee, Chesterfield
Magistrates' Court Committee, Church End
Magistrates' Court Committee, Coventry
Magistrates' Court Committee, Croydon
Magistrates' Court Committee, Doncaster
Magistrates' Court Committee, Dudley
Magistrates' Court Committee, Durham
Magistrates' Court Committee, Ealing
Magistrates' Court Committee, Esher
Magistrates' Court Committee, Exeter
Magistrates' Court Committee, Gateshead
Magistrates' Court Committee, Gloucester
Magistrates' Court Committee, Great Eastern Road
Magistrates' Court Committee, Gwent
Magistrates' Court Committee, Halifax
Magistrates' Court Committee, Harrow
Magistrates' Court Committee, Hastings
Magistrates' Court Committee, Havant
Magistrates' Court Committee, Haverford West
Magistrates' Court Committee, Hebburn (Tyne & Wear)
Magistrates' Court Committee, Herefordshire
Magistrates' Court Committee, Hertford
Magistrates' Court Committee, Huddersfield
Magistrates' Court Committee, Huyton
Magistrates' Court Committee, Ilford
Magistrates' Court Committee, Isle of Wight
Magistrates' Court Committee, Kingston upon Thames
Magistrates' Court Committee, Leeds
Magistrates' Court Committee, Leek
Magistrates' Court Committee, Leicester
Magistrates' Court Committee, Lincoln
Magistrates' Court Committee, Liverpool
Magistrates' Court Committee, Maidstone
Magistrates' Court Committee, Manchester
Magistrates' Court Committee, Middlesbrough
Magistrates' Court Committee, Middlesex
Magistrates' Court Committee, Mold
Magistrates' Court Committee, Morpeth
Magistrates' Court Committee, Newcastle upon Tyne
Magistrates' Court Committee, Newtown (Powys)
Magistrates' Court Committee, Northampton
Magistrates' Court Committee, North Humberside
Magistrates' Court Committee, North Shields
Magistrates' Court Committee, Nottingham
Magistrates' Court Committee, Oldham
Next Section
| Home Page |