Home Page

Column 331

Written Answers to Questions

Friday 29 April 1994

LORD CHANCELLOR'S DEPARTMENT

Wessex Regional Health Authority

Mr. Spellar : To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department what were the costs to the public purse of the abandoned case at Winchester Crown court in respect of conspiracy to defraud Wessex regional health authority.

Mr. John M. Taylor : I am not able to state the amount of the costs to the public purse as a re-trial was ordered by the trial judge and accurate figures will not be available until the case has been concluded and the bills of costs determined. In any event, not all these costs will have been wasted, as much of the preparation work by solicitors and counsel will not need repeating.

Hague Conference on Private International Law

Mr. Mudie : To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department if he will list the 1993-94 expenditure on the permanent bureau of the Hague Conference on Private International Law ; and how many staff are employed and paid under this expenditure vote.

Mr. John M. Taylor : The United Kingdom's expenditure on the permanent bureau of the Hague Conference in 1993-94 amounted in total to £55,931.03--Dfl. 158,115.73. This amount was paid as a lump sum contribution in August 1993 and represents the United Kingdom's contribution towards the permanent bureau's total budget of Dfl. 2, 317,418 for 1993-94.

There are currently 12 permanent staff employed by the bureau. The latest available figures show that the total salary bill for the financial year 1 July 1992 to 30 June 1993 was Dfl. 1,452,348.

Juvenile Court Magistrates Panels

Mr. Cox : To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department how many (a) men and (b) women from an ethnic community were members of a juvenile court magistrates' panel for courts covering the Greater London area as of 20 April.

Mr. John M. Taylor : Information is available only in respect of the Inner London Commission area in which there are currently 10 men and nine women from the ethnic minority community sitting as members of the youth court panel, formerly the juvenile court panel.

Civil Enforcement Agencies

Dr. Lynne Jones : To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department what analysis has been reached by his Department of the responses received to the consultation paper on the organisation and management of civil enforcement agents.


Column 332

Mr. John M. Taylor : The response to the public consultation was positive ; the vast majority of consultees were pleased that the issues had been raised and agreed that the law should be simplified and procedural changes made to rule out abuses which might occur under the present system. A wide variety of views were received on the options set out in the consultation paper. The options are still being considered by the Lord Chancellor who will want to discuss his proposals with Government colleagues before making any further announcements.

Legal Aid

Mr. Redmond : To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department if he will introduce a limitation on the amount of legal aid available to persons accused of fraud.

Mr. John M. Taylor : I am examining the provision of criminal legal aid as a whole as part of the fundamental review of my Department's expenditure currently under way. But any changes that may be made will need to take account of the presumption of innocence.

Mr. David Shaw : To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department what are the final expenditure figures for legal aid for 1993-94 ; and if he will make a statement.

Mr. John M. Taylor : Final figures are not yet available. However, provisional outturn figures show that the net cost of legal aid in 1993-94 was £1,210 million compared to a provision of £1,283 million. This represents an increase of £117 million on the previous year. Of the £73 million underspend against provision in 1993-94, £39 million related to criminal legal aid where the number of bills paid fell short of expectations, reflecting the fall in business in the criminal courts. Most of the remaining shortfall, £27 million, related to civil legal aid.

Payments to the legal aid fund, particularly in respect of costs and damages recovered, amounted to £21 million more than anticipated, which we believe is mainly because of speedier settlements resulting from the transfer of business from the High Court to the county court following from the civil justice review. In addition, the number of civil bills paid were some 3 per cent. lower than expected, resulting in a reduction in expenditure of around £6 million. The remainder of the shortfall was due to green form expenditure being some 2 per cent. lower than estimated and the number of assistance by way of representation bills being some 30 per cent. lower than expected, resulting in shortfalls in expenditure of £3 million and £4 million respectively.

Executive Agencies

Mr. David Shaw : To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department what are the key performance targets for Her Majesty's Land Registry and the Public Record Office executive agencies for 1994-95.

Mr. John M. Taylor : The tables set out the key performance targets that the Lord Chancellor has set for Her Majesty's Land Registry and for the Public Record Office.


Column 333


Her Majesty's Land Registry Executive Agency                                                                                         

Key performance targets 1994-95                                                                                                      

Indicator                                          |Target                                                                           

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Financial                                                                                                                         

Return on average capital employed:                |6 per cent.                                                                      

                                                                                                                                     

External Financing Limit:                          |0 per cent.                                                                      

                                                                                                                                     

2. Efficiency                                                                                                                        

Progressive reduction in unit costs in real terms: |To achieve at least 2 per cent.                                                  

                                                   |reduction in the year.                                                           

                                                                                                                                     

3. Productivity                                                                                                                      

Progressive increase in output per post:           |To achieve at least 2 per cent. increase                                         

                                                   |in the year.                                                                     

                                                                                                                                     

4. Speed of service                                                                                                                  

Percentage of pre-completion :                     |No less than 98 per cent.                                                        

applications handled in 3 days                                                                                                       

Average handling time for post-                    |Where no requisitions arise,no more                                              

completion applications:                           |than 5 weeks.                                                                    

                                                                                                                                     

5. Quality of service                                                                                                                

Percentage of pre-completion                       |No less than 99.75 per cent.                                                     

applications handled free of error:                                                                                                  

Percentage of post-completion                      |No less than 97.70 per cent.                                                     

applications handled free of error:                                                                                                  

                                                                                                                                     

6. Development of Land Registration                                                                                                  

Number of computerised registers:                  |To increase the number of registered                                             

                                                   |titles in computerised format to 10.50                                           

                                                   |million.                                                                         

Note                                                                                                                                 

Fuller details of the Registry's performance targets are given in its "Business Plan", which is available from Her Majesty's Land    

Registry.                                                                                                                            


Column 333


Public Record Office Executive Agency                                                                                     

Key performance targets 1994-95                                                                                           

Indicator                                 |Target                                                                         

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Efficiency                                                                                                             

Indicator: Unit cost of selecting and     |To decrease the unit cost of selecting                                         

 accessioning records                     | and accessioning records by 3 per                                             

                                          | cent.                                                                         

                                                                                                                          

Indicator: Unit costs of providing record |To reduce the unit cost of providing                                           

storage space, document productions and   |records storage space by 1 per cent.                                           

reader services                                                                                                           

                                                                                                                          

                                          |To decrease the cost per document                                              

                                          |produced to readers by 4 per cent.                                             

                                                                                                                          

                                          |To increase the reader service costs                                           

                                          |per reader visit (Census microfilms)                                           

                                          |by no more than 2 per cent.                                                    

                                                                                                                          

                                          |To decrease the reader service costs                                           

                                          |per reader visit (other records) by 2                                          

                                          |per cent.                                                                      

                                                                                                                          

Backlog of records awaiting review:       |To identify and quantify the backlog                                           

                                          |in two departments.                                                            

                                                                                                                          

                                          |To reduce the known backlog of                                                 

                                          |records over 30 years old which have                                           

                                          |not been processed, by 1,500 feet                                              

                                          |(current known backlog 5,500 feet).                                            

                                                                                                                          

Storage of records:                       |81 per cent. of records to be stored to                                        

                                          |an acceptable standard (standard as                                            

                                          |recommended in BS5454).                                                        

                                                                                                                          

2. Quality of service                                                                                                     

Reader satisfaction:                      |87 per cent. of reader satisfaction                                            

                                          | survey forms returned to have an                                              

                                          |overall assessment of "good", or                                               

                                          |better.                                                                        

                                                                                                                          

Response times for answering              |To send replies to letters requiring a                                         

correspondence:                           |response by stock letter within one                                            

                                          |week.                                                                          

                                                                                                                          

                                          |To send replies to other letters to                                            

                                          |Reader Services and Reprographic,                                              

                                          |Publishing and Publicity Departments                                           

                                          |(including those requiring estimates                                           

                                          |for copies) within three weeks.                                                

                                                                                                                          

Document production times:                |To make documents (excluding                                                   

                                          |documents produced on microform, or                                            

                                          |stored at Hayes, or requiring special                                          

                                          |handling) available to readers within                                          

                                          |the following maximum times:                                                   

                                                                                                                          

                                          |Kew: 35 minutes                                                                

                                          |Chancery Lane: 40 minutes                                                      

Note:                                                                                                                     

Fuller details of the Office's performance targets are given in its "Business Plan", which is available from the Public   

Record Office.                                                                                                            

PRIME MINISTER

D-day Commemoration

Mr. Mandelson : To ask the Prime Minister what was the involvement of the Cabinet Office in the appointment of Lowe Bell Communications as consultants to the D-day Commemoration.

The Prime Minister : None.

Drugs

Mr. Spearing : To ask the Prime Minister, pursuant to his oral answer to the hon. Member for Heywood and Middleton (Mr. Callaghan) of 26 April, at column 101, concerning the actions and plans of Her Majesty's Government to fight drug addiction and related crime, what powers the Government possess to stop and search all cargo or persons wishing to enter the United Kingdom.

The Prime Minister : Her Majesty's Customs and Excise has powers to stop and search persons, vessels, aircraft, vehicles and their cargo, wishing to enter the United Kingdom, in respect of prohibited goods, including drugs and firearms. As a contribution to the fight against drug addiction and related crime, Customs uses these powers to combat the smuggling of prohibited goods.

War Widows

Mr. Alfred Morris : To ask the Prime Minister what representations were made to him by the Royal British Legion to receive a deputation of war widows to discuss the Government's decision to reverse a decision of the High Court by amending the Service Pensions Order to restrict the pension entitlement of widows or ex-service men ; what reply he made ; and if he will make a statement.

The Prime Minister [holding answer 28 April 1994] : As far as I am aware, none.

Mr. Alfred Morris : To ask the Prime Minister what direct consultations Ministers had with (a) the Royal British Legion and (b) the Normandy Veterans Association about the Government's decision to reverse a decision of the High Court by amending the Service Pensions Order to


Column 336

restrict the pension entitlement of ex- service personnel and war widows ; and if he will now himself directly consult the two organisations on the Government's decision.

The Prime Minister [holding answer 28 April 1994] : The customary mechanism for consultation on proposed changes to war pensions legislation is through the statutory Central Advisory Committee on War Pensions. The committee includes representatives of several ex-service organisations, including two members each from the Royal British Legion and the Royal British Legion (Scotland).

The Minister with special responsibility for war pensions at the Department of Social Security, my noble Friend, Lord Astor, consulted the committee on the recent proposals to amend legislation following a decision of the High Court which suggested that the law did not clearly reflect long-standing policy. We always consider, as we did on this occasion, any other points made by any individual or organisation.

HOME DEPARTMENT

Parliamentary Boundaries

Mr. Redmond : To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many (a) members of the public and (b) organisations have sought a reference back to the boundary commission's revised proposals for South Yorkshire in respect of the boundaries for Barnsley, East and Mexborough, and Don Valley constituencies ; and on what date he hopes a decision will be announced.

Mr. Peter Lloyd : I understand that the parliamentary boundary commission for England has received representations concerning the revised recommendations for South Yorkshire in respect of the boundaries for Barnsley, East and Mexborough, and Don Valley constituences from 144 members of the public and from 17 organisations. These were evenly divided between representations in support of the commission's revised recommendations and those which objected to them. A further 1,249 signatures were put to petitions relating to the recommendations. A news release announcing a decision in respect of the boundaries of the Barnsley, East and Mexborough, and Don Valley constituencies will be issued in May 1994.


Column 337

EC Fraud Investigations

Mrs. Dunwoody : To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what measures he is taking to ensure that investigations into fraud in the EC are made immediately and publicly and that individuals are brought to account.

Mr. Maclean : I refer the hon. Member to the reply that my right hon. and learned Friend gave on 4 March 1994 to a question from my hon. and learned Friend the Member for Burton (Sir I. Lawrence) at column 934.

Murder

Dr. Lynne Jones : To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, (1) pursuant to his oral answer to the hon. Member for Welwyn Hatfield (Mr. Evans) of 21 April, Official Report, column 1034, if he will list any family relationship of the victims of the first and second murder to the murderer ;

(2) how many convicted murderers released from prison since 1979 killed again ; and if he will list the nature of the second conviction and any family relationship of the victims of the first murder and the second killing to the offender.

Mr. Peter Lloyd : Nine murderers released from prison on life licence since 1979 have been convicted of a further killing. Seven were convicted of murder on the second occasion and two of manslaughter. Another murderer released on life licence committed suicide while awaiting trial for a second murder.

In the cases of the seven double murderers, there were four where none of the victims were related to the offender. In one case, the victims of the first and second murders were members of the offender's family, his wife and sister respectively. In one case, the victim of the first murder was the father of the offender. In the remaining case, the victim of the second murder was the female partner of the offender.

The two released murderers convicted of manslaughter killed people unrelated to them.

Circus Animals

Mr. Alex Carlile : To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will seek a report into the transportation and general treatment of circus animals ; and if he will make a statement.

Mr. Charles Wardle : Circus animals are protected against unnecessary suffering by the Protection of Animals Act 1911, and by the Welfare of Animals During Transport Order 1992 and other legislation governing the importation and transport of animals. Additionally, the Performing Animals (Regulation) Act 1925 provides for the registration of trainers and the inspection of premises by local authorities. I have received no evidence to suggest that these provisions provide inadequate safeguards for circus animals.

Physical Restraints

Mr. Cox : To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list the prisons in England and Wales at which physical restraints have been used on (a) men and (b) women inmates and the number of times such restraints were used in each establishment during 1993.


Column 338

Mr. Peter Lloyd : Responsibility for this matter has been delegated to the Director General of the Prison Service, who has been asked to arrange for a reply to be given.

Letter from A. J. Butler to Mr. Tom Cox, dated 29 April 1994 : The Home Secretary has asked me, in the absence of the Director General from the office, to reply to your recent Question asking if he will list the prisons in England and Wales at which physical restraints have been used on (a) men and (b) women inmates and the number of times such restraints were used in each establishment during 1993.

The number of applications of restraints under Rule 46 of the Prison Rules 1964 and Rule 49 of the Young Offender Institution Rules 1988 are given in the attached table.

The figures do not cover the use of restraints whilst prisoners are being escorted between Prison Service establishments, or between cells or to the governor's office within an establishment.


Restraints<1> applied to violent or refractory inmates of Prison Service           

establishments in England and Wales                                                

By establishment, 1993<2>                                                          

                              Number of                                            

                              applications                                         

Establishment and            |Male             |Female                             

type                                                                               

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Local prisons/remand centres                                                       

Bristol                      |4                |-                                  

Dorchester                   |1                |-                                  

Highdown                     |3                |-                                  

Holme House                  |1                |-                                  

Hull                         |6                |-                                  

Lincoln                      |3                |-                                  

Liverpool                    |13               |-                                  

Pentonville                  |10               |-                                  

Portland                     |6                |-                                  

Preston                      |1                |-                                  

Reading                      |1                |-                                  

Rochester                    |2                |-                                  

Shrewsbury                   |2                |-                                  

Swansea                      |1                |-                                  

Woodhill                     |6                |-                                  

Wormwood Scrubs              |5                |-                                  

                                                                                   

Training prisons                                                                   

Acklington                   |4                |-                                  

Camp Hill                    |1                |-                                  

Cookham Wood                 |-                |1                                  

Downview                     |1                |-                                  

Elmley                       |2                |-                                  

Featherstone                 |2                |-                                  

Full Sutton                  |4                |-                                  

Garth                        |1                |-                                  

Highpoint                    |2                |-                                  

Long Lartin                  |2                |-                                  

Maidstone                    |4                |-                                  

Norwich                      |2                |-                                  

Nottingham                   |1                |-                                  

Risley                       |1                |-                                  

Shepton Mallet               |1                |-                                  

Swaleside                    |5                |-                                  

Wakefield                    |1                |-                                  

Wayland                      |2                |-                                  

Whitemoor                    |3                |-                                  

Winchester                   |3                |-                                  

                                                                                   

Closed YOI                                                                         

Feltham                      |2                |-                                  

Wetherby                     |1                |-                                  

                                                                                   

Total                        |110              |1                                  

<1>Loose canvas jacket, body belt, handcuffs, ankle straps and leather wrist       

straps.                                                                            

<2>Provisional figures.                                                            


Column 339

Prison Deaths

Mr. Cohen : To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list all deaths that have occurred in 1992 and, if available, in 1993, of persons detained in prison department establishments, stating in each case the age and sex of the inmates and cause of death, the inquest verdict, whether the inmate was sentenced or on remand, the establishment where the inmate was detained, whether death occurred there or in an outside hospital and, where the death occurred within the prison, whether the inmate was segregated either in the hospital wing or in the punishment block.

Mr. Peter Lloyd : Responsibility for this matter has been delegated to the Director General of the Prison Service, who has been asked to arrange for a reply to be given.

Letter from A. J. Butler to Mr. Harry Cohen, dated 29 April 1994 :

The Home Secretary has asked me, in the absence of the Director General from the office, to reply to your recent Question about deaths in Prison Service custody in England and Wales.

Some of the information which you have requested is not held centrally and could not be obtained except at a disproportionate cost. The information that is available on self inflicted deaths in 1992 and 1993 is set out in the table. In each case the cause of death was hanging. We are also gathering together information on other deaths, including those from natural causes. I shall let you have this information as soon as it is available and also arrange for it to be published in the Official Report.


Self inflicted deaths 1992-93                                                                   

Age             |Sex            |Verdict        |Sentence       |Establishment                  

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1992                                                                                            

30              |Male           |Killed self    |Sentenced      |Hull                           

40              |Male           |Suicide        |Remand         |Bristol                        

34              |Male           |Open           |Sentenced      |Dorchester                     

21              |Male           |Suicide        |Remand         |Durham                         

18              |Male           |Open           |Remand         |Feltham                        

20              |Male           |Suicide        |Remand         |Glen Parva                     

36              |Male           |Open           |Remand         |Pentonville                    

20              |Male           |Suicide        |Remand         |Feltham                        

25              |Male           |Killed self    |Remand         |Pentonville                    

24              |Male           |Killed self    |Sentenced      |Norwich                        

23              |Male           |Open           |Sentenced      |Stafford                       

38              |Male           |Killed self    |Sentenced      |Wakefield                      

16              |Male           |Suicide        |Sentenced      |Deerbolt                       

22              |Male           |Suicide        |Remand         |Liverpool                      

33              |Male           |Suicide        |Remand         |Pentonville                    

23              |Male           |Killed self    |Remand         |Hull                           

21              |Male           |Accident       |Remand         |Leeds                          

23              |Male           |Misadventure   |Remand         |Lewes                          

30              |Male           |Misadventure   |Sentenced      |Swaleside                      

20              |Female         |Misadventure   |Sentenced      |Styal                          

24              |Male           |Killed self    |Remand         |Birmingham                     

19              |Male           |Open           |Remand         |Brinsford                      

47              |Male           |Suicide        |Sentenced      |Wellingboro'                   

21              |Male           |Suicide        |Sentenced      |Ashwell                        

18              |Male           |Suicide        |Sentenced      |Hindley                        

40              |Male           |Suicide        |Remand         |Elmley                         

30              |Female         |Misadventure   |Sentenced      |Holloway                       

21              |Male           |Misadventure   |Remand         |Pentonville                    

37              |Male           |Suicide        |Sentenced      |Maidstone                      

32              |Male           |Suicide        |Sentenced      |Norwich                        

25              |Male           |Suicide        |Convicted but  |Durham                         

                                                |unsentenced                                    

51              |Male           |Suicide        |Sentenced      |Gartree                        

43              |Male           |Open           |Sentenced      |Parkhurst                      

30              |Male           |Suicide        |Sentenced      |Ashwell                        

25              |Male           |Suicide        |Sentenced      |Long Lartin                    

22              |Male           |Killed self    |Remand         |Leeds                          

28              |Male           |Suicide        |Remand         |Leicester                      

27              |Male           |Suicide        |Remand         |Brixton                        

21              |Male           |Open           |Sentenced      |Littlehey                      

41              |Male           |Open           |Remand         |Wormwood Scrubs                

28              |Male           |Suicide        |Remand         |Bullingdon                     

                                                                                                

1993                                                                                            

27              |Male           |Open           |Remand         |Highdown                       

26              |Male           |Suicide        |Remand         |Leicester                      

36              |Male           |Suicide        |Remand         |Canterbury                     

37              |Male           |Suicide        |Sentenced      |Durham                         

20              |Male           |Suicide        |Sentenced      |Wetherby                       

41              |Male           |Suicide        |Sentenced      |Hull                           

26              |Male           |Open           |Convicted but  |Winchester                     

                                                |unsentenced                                    

27              |Male           |Open           |Convicted but  |Brixton                        

                                                |unsentenced                                    

19              |Male           |Open           |Sentenced      |Hindley                        

23              |Male           |Suicide        |Remand         |Manchester                     

26              |Male           |Suicide        |Remand         |Leicester                      

43              |Male           |Suicide        |Remand         |Leeds                          

24              |Male           |Suicide        |Convicted but  |Lindholme                      

                                                |unsentenced                                    

37              |Male           |Suicide        |Sentenced      |Bristol                        

48              |Male           |Suicide        |Remand         |Wakefield                      

29              |Male           |Misadventure   |Sentenced      |Exeter                         

25              |Male           |Suicide        |Remand         |Belmarsh                       

25              |Male           |Suicide        |Sentenced      |Leicester                      

23              |Male           |Suicide        |Convicted but  |Leeds                          

                                                |unsentenced                                    

36              |Male           |Inquest verdict|Sentenced      |Full Sutton                    

                                |pending                                                        

26              |Male           |Open           |Sentenced      |Parkhurst                      

24              |Male           |Suicide        |Sentenced      |Wakefield                      

56              |Male           |Suicide        |Remand         |Lincoln                        

26              |Male           |Suicide        |Remand         |Liverpool                      

51              |Male           |Suicide        |Sentenced      |Lincoln                        

34              |Male           |Suicide        |Remand         |Lincoln                        

39              |Male           |Inquest verdict|Remand         |Manchester                     

                                |pending                                                        

44              |Female         |Inquest verdict|Remand         |Holloway                       

                                |pending                                                        

37              |Male           |Suicide        |Sentenced      |Shepton Mallet                 

17              |Male           |Open           |Remand         |Exeter                         

41              |Male           |Suicide        |Remand         |Exeter                         

33              |Male           |Suicide        |Remand         |Woodhill                       

38              |Male           |Suicide        |Sentenced      |Nottingham                     

43              |Male           |Inquest verdict|Sentenced      |Wakefield                      

                                |pending                                                        

23              |Male           |Suicide        |Sentenced      |Long Lartin                    

25              |Male           |Inquest verdict|Sentenced      |Holme House                    

                                |pending                                                        

22              |Male           |Suicide        |Remand         |Exeter                         

26              |Male           |Suicide        |Remand         |Norwich                        

29              |Male           |Open           |Remand         |Bristol                        

33              |Male           |Suicide        |Remand         |Norwich                        

25              |Male           |Suicide        |Convicted but  |Wandsworth                     

                                                |unsentenced                                    

28              |Male           |Suicide        |Sentenced      |Wandsworth                     

31              |Male           |Suicide        |Sentenced      |Dartmoor                       

34              |Male           |Inquest verdict|Remand         |Liverpool                      

                                |pending                                                        

37              |Male           |Suicide        |Remand         |Lewes                          

28              |Male           |Inquest verdict|Sentenced      |Holme House                    

                                |pending                                                        

21              |Male           |Inquest verdict|Remand         |Wolds                          

                                |pending                                                        

1992 total - 41                                                                                 

1993 total - 47                                                                                 

Firearm Certificates

Mr. Maclennan : To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what plans he has to raise the fee for firearms and shotgun certificates.

Mr. Charles Wardle : The fees for the grant and renewal of firearm and shotgun certificates are currently under review. In reviewing fee levels we are taking into account the 1991 report of the Home Office working group


Column 341

on the administration of the firearms licensing system. This identified models of best practice for police forces in administering the licensing system. The result of the subsequent costing exercise, undertaken by the consultants Ernst and Young, will also be taken into account.

An announcement will be made as soon as possible.

Mr. Maclennan : To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will construct a table showing the cost in each police force area of issuing a firearms or shotgun certificate.

Mr. Charles Wardle : This information is not available.

Detainees

Mr. Hardy : To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what action he is taking to ensure that the treatment of detainees is not in breach of any convention which has been ratified by the United Kingdom.


Column 342

Mr. Charles Wardle : The Government are committed to their obligations under the 1951 United Nations convention relating to the status of refugees, and the protocol to that convention, and are satisfied that United Kingdom legislation and practice do not breach these or other relevant international obligations.

Asylum Seekers

Mr. Hardy : To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what was the number of applicants for asylum in each month of 1993 ; and what proportion was refused in each case.

Mr. Charles Wardle : Information for 1993 on the number of applications received for asylum in the United Kingdom and decisions made, is given in the table.


Column 341


Applications<1> received for asylum in the United Kingdom, excluding dependants, and decisions<1><2> 1993                                                                           

Number of principal applicants and proportion of decisions (Per cent.)                                                                                                              

                                     Decisions                                                                                                                                      

                  |Applications     |Total            |Recognised       |Per cent.        |Not recognised   |Per cent.        |Refused          |Per cent.                          

                  |for asylum       |decisions        |as a refugee                       |as a refugee                       |asylum and                                           

                                                      |and granted                        |but granted                        |exceptional                                          

                                                      |asylum<3>                          |exceptional leave                  |leave<4>                                             

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1993                                                                                                                                                                                

January           |1,960            |3,760            |90               |2                |2,250            |60               |1,420            |38                                 

February          |2,180            |5,240            |225              |4                |3,420            |65               |1,595            |30                                 

March             |1,765            |3,085            |420              |14               |1,615            |52               |1,050            |34                                 

April             |1,820            |2,305            |290              |13               |1,150            |50               |860              |37                                 

May               |1,865            |2,045            |145              |7                |1,150            |56               |750              |37                                 

June              |1,850            |1,150            |105              |9                |490              |43               |550              |48                                 

July              |1,995            |1,065            |65               |6                |260              |24               |745              |70                                 

August            |1,295            |685              |40               |6                |130              |19               |520              |76                                 

September         |1,990            |905              |55               |7                |145              |18               |605              |75                                 

October           |1,600            |885              |50               |6                |190              |21               |650              |73                                 

November          |1,805            |1,245            |55               |5                |210              |17               |975              |78                                 

December          |2,245            |1,125            |45               |4                |120              |11               |965              |86                                 

<1> Figures are rounded to the nearest 5.                                                                                                                                           

<2> Decisions do not necessarily relate to applications made in the same period.                                                                                                    

<3> Excludes South East Asian refugees.                                                                                                                                             

<4> Figures comprise: those refused after full consideration, those refused on safe third country grounds, and those refused under para. 180F (para 101 prior to 26 July 1993) of   

the Immigration Rules for failure to provide evidence to support the asylum claim within a reasonable period, including failure to respond to invitation to interview to establish  

identity.                                                                                                                                                                           

Police Cells, Manchester

Mr. Bennett : To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list total numbers of convicted and remand prisoners held in police cells in Greater Manchester since 1 January ; and how much they have cost.

Mr. Peter Lloyd : Responsibility for this matter has been delegated to the Director General of the Prison Service, who has been asked to arrange for a reply to be given.

Letter from A. J. Butler to Mr. Andrew Bennett, dated 29 April 1994.

The Home Secretary has asked me, in the absence of the Director General from the office, to reply to your recent Question about the numbers of prisoners held in police cells in Greater Manchester since 1 January and the costs involved.

A sub-division into convicted and remands is not available centrally for the earlier part of the period from 1 January 1994. However, the total numbers of prisoners held in police cells in the Greater Manchester police area on each date from 1 January 1994 to 26 April 1994 are available and are set out in the attached table.


Column 342

A total of £21,633 has been paid to Greater Manchester Police Authority. Further invoices, totalling some £488,000, have recently been received and are under consideration.


Date                  |Number       

------------------------------------

 1 January 1994       |0            

 2 January 1994       |0            

 3 January 1994       |3            

 4 to 23 January 1994 |0            

24 January 1994       |2            

25 January 1994       |0            

26 January 1994       |0            

27 January 1994       |2            

28 January 1994       |0            

29 January 1994       |0            

30 January 1994       |0            

31 January 1994       |9            

 1 February 1994      |37           

 2 February 1994      |27           

 3 February 1994      |37           

 4 February 1994      |35           

 5 February 1994      |38           

 6 February 1994      |38           

 7 February 1994      |39           

 8 February 1994      |69           

 9 February 1994      |61           

10 February 1994      |76           

11 February 1994      |92           

12 February 1994      |92           

13 February 1994      |92           

14 February 1994      |108          

15 February 1994      |134          

16 February 1994      |174          

17 February 1994      |179          

18 February 1994      |202          

19 February 1994      |208          

20 February 1994      |154          

21 February 1994      |185          

22 February 1994      |195          

23 February 1994      |185          

24 February 1994      |195          

25 February 1994      |182          

26 February 1994      |194          

27 February 1994      |166          

28 February 1994      |171          

 1 March 1994         |196          

 2 March 1994         |207          

 3 March 1994         |225          

 4 March 1994         |203          

 5 March 1994         |197          

 6 March 1994         |196          

 7 March 1994         |180          

 8 March 1994         |169          

 9 March 1994         |165          

10 March 1994         |189          

11 March 1994         |175          

12 March 1994         |188          

13 March 1994         |188          

14 March 1994         |190          

15 March 1994         |225          

16 March 1994         |221          

17 March 1994         |248          

18 March 1994         |226          

19 March 1994         |233          

20 March 1994         |233          

21 March 1994         |197          

22 March 1994         |201          

23 March 1994         |197          

24 March 1994         |199          

25 March 1994         |183          

26 March 1994         |187          

27 March 1994         |187          

28 March 1994         |180          

29 March 1994         |184          

30 March 1994         |170          

31 March 1994         |166          

 1 April 1994         |166          

 2 April 1994         |159          

 3 April 1994         |159          

 4 April 1994         |197          

 5 April 1994         |177          

 6 April 1994         |155          

 7 April 1994         |163          

 8 April 1994         |163          

 9 April 1994         |165          

10 April 1994         |165          

11 April 1994         |198          

12 April 1994         |204          

13 April 1994         |185          

14 April 1994         |168          

15 April 1994         |139          

16 April 1994         |139          

17 April 1994         |140          

18 April 1994         |123          

19 April 1994         |129          

20 April 1994         |121          

21 April 1994         |109          

22 April 1994         |110          

23 April 1994         |119          

24 April 1994         |119          

25 April 1994         |141          

26 April 1994         |134          


Column 344

Iraqi Business Men

Mr. Cohen : To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many visas have been granted to Iraqi business men in each month since the conclusion of the Gulf war.

Mr. Lennox-Boyd : I have been asked to reply.

I regret that the information requested is not readily available and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.

Statistics of visas granted are recorded on the basis of the categories of visas issued at each post and not by the nationality of the applicant. In addition, visiting business men are granted a "visit" visa. There are no sub-divisions within this category.

Diver Mist

Mr. Cohen : To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department to what extent the principle of police primacy was maintained throughout exercise Diver Mist.

Mr. Hanley : I have been asked to reply.

The principle that the police co-ordinate the activities of all those responding at and around the scene, as described in the Home Office publication "Dealing with Disaster", was maintained in full throughout exercise Diver Mist.

TRADE AND INDUSTRY

Plugs and Sockets

Mrs. Helen Jackson : To ask the President of the Board of Trade when he will be discussing with his European partners the implications of the EC proposals to harmonise the plugs and sockets of electrical appliances throughout the EC.

Mr. Heseltine : There is no such proposal. If one were to be put forward we would consider it.

Mrs. Helen Jackson : To ask the President of the Board of Trade what assessment he has made of the dangers there are for United Kingdom consumers in any transitional period from the harmonisation of electric plugs and sockets ; and what steps he is taking to ensure that the safety of consumers in the United Kingdom is not compromised.

Mr. Heseltine : CENELEC--the European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardisation--the relevant standards-making body, has not published a standard for a harmonised European plug and socket system against which an accurate assessment could be made. In considering whether any change to our present standards might be desirable at some future date, full account will be taken of consumer safety issues. There is no EC proposal for harmonisation.

Industry Council Meeting

Mr. Amess : To ask the President of the Board of Trade if he will make a statement on the outcome of the meeting of the EC Industry Council held in Luxembourg on22 April.

Mr. Jenkin : To ask the President of the Board of Trade if he will make a statement on the Industry Council meeting in Luxembourg held on Friday 22 April.


Column 345

Mr. Sainsbury : The main item on the agenda of the Industry Council held on 22 April was steel. Commissioner Van Miert gave an interim report, in advance of the full report expected on 1 May, on monitoring of the conditions attaching to the six state aid cases agreed by the Council last December--Ilva, Ekostahl, Freital, Siderurgia Nacional, CSI and Sidenor. I was supported by several other member states in underlining the importance the United Kingdom attaches to rigorous monitoring to ensure that the conditions agreed by the December Council are met.

Commissioner Bangemann gave a report on progress towards restructuring of the EC steel industry. There was agreement to prolong until the autumn the support measures--which include enhanced European Coal and Steel Community social aid, market monitoring, a more liberal approach to mergers and joint ventures, and external measures--agreed in February last year. I suggested additional references in the conclusions agreed by the Council to the importance of monitoring of the steel state aid cases and these were accepted. The Council reached a satisfactory agreement to reduce steadily ECSC lending activities in the run-up to the expiry of the treaty of Paris in 2002. Importantly, it also ensures progress towards phasing out of the ECSC levy before 2002. The agreement by the Council allowed certain loan applications, which have been blocked pending resolution of this issue, to be approved.

There was a wide-ranging debate on industrial competitiveness in the context of the follow-up to the Delors White Paper on growth, competitiveness and employment published last December. I underlined the importance of increased labour market flexibility and reduced labour costs as a means of improving competitiveness, as well as the need to minimise the burden of regulation on business.

The Council agreed conclusions on the textile and clothing industries and a resolution on the automobile industry.

Commissioner Vanni d'Archirafi presented an outline of an integrated programme for small and medium-sized enterprises which sets out areas for joint action with member states and a two-pronged Community contribution relating to improving the environment for SMEs, and some support measures. I reminded the Commission that the main responsibility for SME policy lies with member states but I undertook to consider the proposals when they are spelt out in greater detail. I was able to welcome the importance the Commission was now attaching to deregulation.

To end the Council there was a brief discussion of the Commission's annual report on competition. No votes were taken.

Laboratories

Mr. Cousins : To ask the President of the Board of Trade whether operational budgets and targets have been agreed for (a) AEA Technology, (b) the national environmental technology centre, (c) the national physical laboratory, (d) the Laboratory of the Government Chemist and (e) the national engineering laboratory for 1994-95 ; and how those budgets and targets have changed from those for 1993-94.

Mr. Heseltine : AEA Technology and the national environmental technology centre are part of the United


Column 346

Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority : they are not set separate budgets and targets by my Department. The UKAEA has been set a negative external financing limit of £8.8 million for 1994-95. Other financial targets have yet to be set. In 1993-94, the UKAEA was set a negative external financing limit of £2.1 million ; it was also set a 12.1 per cent. average annual return on net assets employed. Its internal budgets are commercially sensitive and are not published. In the light of the restructuring of the national physical laboratory, the Laboratory of the Government Chemist and the national engineering laboratory to match the downturn in forecast work load, the laboratories' budgets and targets for 1994-95 are still being finalised. A comparison with the budgets and targets that were set for 1993-94 cannot therefore be provided.

Mr. Cousins : To ask the President of the Board of Trade whether he proposes to implement his consultants' recommendation that an overall steering committee and project manager should be appointed for the DTI laboratories.

Mr. Heseltine : Yes.

Government Chemist

Mr. Meacher : To ask the President of the Board of Trade whether primary legislation would be required to fully privatise the laboratory of the Government Chemist ; and in what form the post of the Government Chemist would survive after privatisation.

Mr. Heseltine : No primary legislation is required to privatise LGC. The post of Government Chemist will continue.


Next Section

  Home Page