Previous Section Home Page

Mr. Atkins [holding answer 29 April 1994] : I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave him on 25 April, Official Report, column 39.

Mr. Tony Banks : To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, pursuant to his answer of 25 April, Official Report, columns 40-1, if he will list those organisations which favoured the changes to the bird registration system he has now proposed.

Mr. Atkins [holding answer 29 April 1994] : The following organisations fully or partly supported the proposed changes : Avian Incubation Research

The Game Conservancy Trust

Brent Lodge Bird and Wildlife Trust

Hertfordshire Environmental Records Centre

Birmingham City Council

Wold Austringers' and Falconry Centre

BCM Environmental Services Ltd

The Hawk Board

TRAFFIC International

British Federation of Bird Importers

New Forest Falconry Club

Hawk and Owl Trust

Bird Aid and Wildlife Rescue

Association of Chief Police Officers

National Association of Private Animal Keepers

Raptor Breeders Association

London Borough of Croydon

Royal County of Berkshire

London Borough of Hounslow

The Borough of Oswestry

International Wild Waterfowl Association

Kilmarnock and Loudon District Council

Reading Borough Council

In earlier consultations, the following organisations had also supported the deregistration proposals :

British School of Falconry

National Council for Aviculture

British Waterfowl Association

Council Tax

Mr. Patchett : To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will make it his policy that council tax at the full rate be levied on all holiday homes.

Mr. Curry : No.

Water Quality

Mr. Jim Cunningham : To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what plans he has to impose a requirement on water companies to improve water quality.

Mr. Atkins : Drinking water in the United Kingdom is of a very high quality. My right hon. Friend has no immediate plans to change the quality standards, which the water companies are required to achieve in advance of the forthcoming revision of the EC drinking water directive.

Correspondence

Mr. Jim Cunningham : To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment when he will reply to the letter of 13 April from the hon. Member for Coventry, South-East and


Column 442

previous correspondence on the exemption of severely mentally impaired people from liability for payment of council tax ; and if he will make a statement regarding the present position.

Mr. Baldry : I wrote to the hon. Member on 27 April informing him that this matter was still under discussion.

City Challenge

Mr. Vaz : To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment how much has been spent by each city challenge committee on administration and other non-regenerative expenses in each year since 1992.

Mr. Baldry : Administrative costs defrayed by each round 1 city challenge partnership in 1992-93 and 1993-94 and each round 2 partnership in 1993-94 are as follows :


Administrative costs                                       

(£000s)                                                    

Partnership            |1992-93    |<1>1993-94             

-----------------------------------------------------------

Round 1                                                    

Middlesbrough          |295        |341                    

Newcastle              |311        |322                    

Manchester             |447        |418                    

Liverpool              |340        |330                    

Wirral                 |330        |250                    

Wolverhampton          |370        |257                    

Nottingham             |179        |262                    

Dearne Valley          |150        |150                    

Bradford               |299        |316                    

Lewisham               |281        |320                    

Tower Hamlets          |336        |418                    

                       |---        |---                    

Total (Round 1)        |3,338      |3,384                  

                                                           

Round 2                                                    

Hartlepool             |-          |316                    

North Tyneside         |-          |300                    

Stockton               |-          |290                    

Sunderland             |-          |300                    

Blackburn              |-          |250                    

Bolton                 |-          |300                    

Wigan                  |-          |246                    

Sefton                 |-          |300                    

Birmingham             |-          |290                    

Sandwell               |-          |355                    

Walsall                |-          |317                    

Derby                  |-          |400                    

Leicester              |-          |300                    

Barnsley               |-          |370                    

Kirklees               |-          |315                    

Hackney                |-          |500                    

Kensington and Chelsea |-          |320                    

Lambeth                |-          |550                    

Newham                 |-          |297                    

Brent                  |-          |445                    

                       |---        |---                    

Total (Round 2)        |-          |6,761                  

                       |---        |---                    

Total (Round 1 and 2)  |3,338      |10,145                 

<1>All figures for administrative costs in 1993-94 are     

provisional. Final figures will not be available until     

after the receipt of local authorities' final audited      

claims.                                                    

Mr. Vaz : To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what was (a) the total budget that central Government have made available and (b) the amount that has been spent by the city challenge committee on regeneration projects for each city challenge area in each year since 1992.

Mr. Baldry : City challenge partnerships have received a total funding allocation of £7.5 million per annum for


Column 443

five years. Partnerships' expenditure limits were revised as appropriate in order to offset predicted underspends, as they became known, against opportunities to expedite spend elsewhere. These in-year changes do not affect the overall sum allocated to each partnership, which remains at £37.5 million for the five years.


Column 444

Final expenditure limits and outturn, inclusive of administrative costs, against expenditure limits for each round 1 city challenge partnership in 1992-93 and 1993-94 and each round 2 partnership in 1993-94 are as follows :


Column 443


£ thousands                                                                                                 

                   1992-93                             1993-94                                              

Partnership       |Final            |Outturn          |Final            |<1>Outturn                         

                  |expenditure limit                  |expenditure limit                                    

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Round 1                                                                                                     

Middlesbrough     |7,486            |7,492            |8,613            |8,400                              

Newcastle         |7,500            |7,500            |7,675            |7,537                              

Manchester        |7,828            |7,828            |9,376            |9,282                              

Liverpool         |7,500            |7,384            |8,316            |8,304                              

Wirral            |7,500            |7,461            |7,500            |7,500                              

Wolverhampton     |8,250            |8,241            |8,090            |7,396                              

Nottingham        |7,585            |7,574            |8,420            |8,368                              

Dearne Valley     |7,100            |7,101            |7,150            |7,150                              

Bradford          |7,430            |7,420            |6,700            |6,685                              

Lewisham          |7,870            |7,828            |7,824            |7,822                              

Tower Hamlets     |6,451            |6,320            |7,008            |6,938                              

                  |-------          |-------          |-------          |-------                            

(Total) (Round 1) |82,500           |82,149           |86,672           |85,382                             

<1>All figures for outturn in 1993-94 are provisional. Final figures will not be available until after the  

receipt of local authorities' 1993-94 final audited claims.                                                 


1993-94                                                                      

Partnership            |Final            |Expenditure<1>                     

                       |expenditure limit|(£000s)                            

                       |(£000s)                                              

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Round 2                                                                      

Hartlepool             |7,500            |7,413                              

North Tyneside         |7,500            |7,364                              

Stockton               |7,500            |7,500                              

Sunderland             |7,500            |7,499                              

Blackburn              |7,200            |7,192                              

Bolton                 |7,500            |7,499                              

Wigan                  |7,791            |7,733                              

Sefton                 |6,684            |6,448                              

Birmingham             |6,969            |6,679                              

Sandwell               |7,500            |7,319                              

Walsall                |7,500            |7,496                              

Derby                  |7,500            |7,500                              

Leicester              |5,300            |5,300                              

Barnsley               |7,500            |7,495                              

Kirklees               |6,500            |6,445                              

Hackney                |8,384            |8,384                              

Kensington and Chelsea |8,000            |8,050                              

Lambeth                |5,600            |5,592                              

Newham                 |8,400            |8,322                              

Brent                  |7,500            |7,381                              

                       |-------          |-------                            

Total (round 2)        |145,829          |144,611                            

                       |-------          |-------                            

Total (round 1 and 2)  |232,500          |229,993                            

<1> All figures for outturn in 1993-94 are provisional. Final figures will   

not be available until after the receipt of local authorities' 1993-94 final 

audited claims.                                                              

HEALTH

Patient Costs

Ms Primarolo : To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what was the average daily cost per patient for all specialties in directly managed units and national health service trusts for each year since 1988-89 ;


Column 444

(2) what was the average daily cost per patient for surgical specialties in directly managed units and national health service trusts in each year since 1988-89.

Mr. Sackville : Information for the financial years 1991-92 and 1992 -93 is shown in the table. The first wave of national health service trusts was established in April 1991. Comparable data for previous years are not available.


           |1991-92|1992-93        

-----------------------------------

            Surgical Specialties   

NHS Trusts |£227.64|£226.76        

DMUs       |£228.34|£246.74        

            All Specialties        

NHS Trusts |£175.38|£164.33        

DMUs       |£155.61|£167.80        

Source: Annual financial returns   

of regional, district and special  

health authorities and NHS trusts (

1991-92 and 1992-93).              

Notes:                             

1. Surgical specialties include    

general surgery, urology, trauma   

and orthopaedics, ENT,             

ophthalmology, gynaecology, dental 

specialties, neurosurgery, plastic 

surgery, cardiothoracic surgery    

and paediatric surgery.            

2. Figures are based on            

in-patients and day cases.         

3. Figures include overheads and   

capital charges.                   

Ms Storrs

Mr. Mudie : To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether the NHS executive has received legal advice in the matter of the £78,000 paid to Ms Storrs by the Wessex regional health authority ; and what steps are being taken to recover this payment.

Dr. Mawhinney : Legal advice has been obtained by the regional health authority and we are discussing with them whether recovery action would be cost-effective.


Column 445

Health Literature Line

Ms Primarolo : To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will list the titles of leaflets sent out by the health literature line since April 1993 and the numbers of each distributed.

Mr. Sackville : Information on leaflet titles and numbers ordered have been placed in the Library. Copies of the publications that are currently available will be placed in the Library.

Computer Reimbursement

Ms Primarolo : To ask the Secretary of State for Health what amount was spent in primary care on computer reimbursement in each of the last five years.

Mr. Sackville : The information is shown in the table based on quarterly returns from family health services authorities. The amount reimbursed in 1990-91, when the scheme was introduced, includes claims for the years 1989-90 and 1990-91.


Year      |£ million          

------------------------------

1990-91   |17.5               

1991-92   |34.0               

1992-93   |40.2               

1993-94   |<1>36.5            

<1>Provisional figure.        

Data Protection

Ms Primarolo : To ask the Secretary of State for Health who holds the copyright on data in primary care (a) in written notes and (b) on computers ; and what statute, regulations or guidance govern this matter.

Mr. Sackville : The physical records on which data about patients is recorded by general practitioners are owned by the family health services authority. The equitable copyright of that data is also vested in the FHSA under common law because the author of the record compiles it pursuant to an obligation to maintain records, his remuneration in part is based on his doing so and he does so in circumstances whereby he owes a duty of good faith and fidelity to the FHSA. The principles apply equally to manual and computerised records.

Advertising

Mr. Allen : To ask the Secretary of State for Health what television advertisements her Department has paid for to promote Her Majesty's Government's health policy over the last two years ; if she will consider running advertisements to educate the public about not calling out general practitioners unnecessarily at night ; if she will examine the results of similar campaigns in Canada ; and if she will make a statement.

Mr. Sackville : Television advertising campaigns for drug and solvent misuse and for organ donation have been carried out in each of the last two years at a total estimated cost of £5,509,156. We are, jointly with the medical profession, working on an extension of the "Help Us to Help You" campaign to inform patients about making best, and appropriate, use of general practitioner out-of-hours services. We have no plans to use television advertising in this campaign.


Column 446

Sex Education

Mr. Alan Howarth : To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what plans she has to ensure that health professionals receive training in good educational practice for the delivery of sex education in schools ;

(2) what plans she has to ensure that health professionals will be fully cognisant of their legal responsibilities in the delivery of sex education in schools ;

(3) what steps she is taking to ensure that the skills of health education professionals in her Department are co-ordinated with those of Department for Education professionals teaching sex education in schools.

Mr. Sackville : Arrangements to meet any sex education training needs of health professionals are a matter for local determination by health authorities.

Mr. Alan Howarth : To ask the Secretary of State for Health what plans she has to set up an inter-departmental working group to share, develop and co-ordinate good practice in the delivery of sex education in schools.

Mr. Sackville : None. The Department for Education's forthcoming circular on the provision of sex education in schools will give advice to education authorities on links with health authorities and the role of health professionals in providing sex education.

Family Health Centres (North of England)

Mr. Redmond : To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many family health centres per 1,000 population there are in (a) Doncaster, (b) Barnsley, (c) Rotherham and (d) Sheffield.

Dr. Mawhinney : The information is shown in the table.


Family Health |Number of    |Population in|Health                     

Services                                                              

Authority     |Health       |thousands    |Centres                    

              |Centres                    |per 1,000                  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Doncaster     |12           |293          |0.04                       

Barnsley      |16           |225          |0.07                       

Rotherham     |11           |255          |0.04                       

Sheffield     |10           |531          |0.02                       

Notes:                                                                

The number of Health Centres is as at 1 October 1993.                 

The Population data for family health services authorities comes from 

Office of Population Censuses and Surveys mid 1992 estimates from the 

1991 Census.                                                          

Child Mortality Rate

Mr. Redmond : To ask the Secretary of State for Health what is the national child mortality rate ; and what are the rates in (a) Doncaster, (b) Barnsley, (c) Rotherham and (d) Sheffield.

Mr. Sackville : The information is shown in the table :


Child mortality<1> rates in England    

and Wales, Doncaster, Barnsley,        

Rotherham and Sheffield County         

Districts for the combined years of    

1990-1992.                             

                   1990-1992 rate<2>   

                  |Male  |Female       

---------------------------------------

England and Wales |83    |64           

Doncaster         |90    |64           

Barnsley          |90    |67           

Rotherham         |92    |62           

Sheffield         |85    |78           

<1> 0-14 years of age                  

<2> Rate per 100,000 population        

Note:                                  

The combined years of 1990-92 have     

been used to overcome the random       

fluctuations due to the small number   

of events in these areas.              

Good Hope Hospital, Birmingham

Mr. Mike O'Brien : To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) if she will call for a report on the availability of the speech and language therapy facility at Good Hope hospital in Birmingham between 31 March and 1 July and explanations for the deficiencies in provision ;

(2) if she will call for a report on the procedures adopted for allocating the contract for speech and language therapy at Good Hope hospital up to 31 March.

Mr. Sackville : The hon. Member may wish to contact Mr. Doug Ellis, chairman of the trust, for details.

DNase

Mr. Redmond : To ask the Secretary of State for Health with which regional health authorities her Department has had discussions relating to the use of the drug DNase ; if she has recommended its use to regional health authorities ; and if she will make a statement.

Mr. Sackville : The Department has been contacted by Bristol and District health authority about DNase, initially via the South West regional health authority. The


Column 448

Department advises health authorities to purchase health care on the basis of the best available information about the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions : it has issued no specific advice about DNase.

Community Health Councils

Mr. Redmond : To ask the Secretary of State for Health on what dates and where she has held discussions with officers of community health councils in the last five years.

Dr. Mawhinney : Health Ministers have had a number of discussions with individual community health councils and their representative organisations. My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State met the chief officer and vice chair of West Surrey and North East Hampshire CHC in January of last year. My hon. Friend the Under-Secretary of State the Member for Bolton, West (Mr. Sackville) and I spoke at the Association of Community Health Councils for England and Wales annual conferences in 1992 and 1993 respectively.

Infant Mortality

Dr. Lynne Jones : To ask the Secretary of State for Health what was the level of infant mortality in each of the past 10 years in each district health authority in Birmingham.

Mr. Sackville : The information is shown in the table.


Column 447


Infant Mortality (Numbers and Rates<2>) for Birmingham DHAs 1983-92          

DHA                   |1983|1984|1985|1986|1987|1988|1989|1990|1991|1992     

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Numbers                                                                      

East Birmingham       |35  |50  |33  |31  |37  |32  |30  |48  |36  |28       

North Birmingham      |23  |20  |21  |20  |17  |24  |15  |23  |19  |18       

West Birmingham       |46  |45  |49  |39  |33  |48  |39  |51  |49  |38       

South Birmingham      |32  |43  |38  |44  |35  |45  |41  |40  |65  |74       

Central Birmingham<1> |37  |41  |35  |34  |27  |45  |36  |43  |-   |-        

                                                                             

Rates                                                                        

East Birmingham       |10.8|15.4|9.7 |9.1 |10.8|9.3 |8.3 |12.7|9.7 |7.5      

North Birmingham      |12.6|10.2|10.7|9.9 |8.0 |11.3|7.4 |10.9|9.0 |9.0      

West Birmingham       |11.4|11.3|12.1|10.0|8.3 |12.3|9.9 |12.8|11.9|9.9      

South Birmingham      |9.6 |12.1|10.6|12.3|9.5 |12.4|11.1|10.7|9.4 |11.5     

Central Birmingham<1> |12.8|14.2|11.9|11.3|9.0 |15.0|12.6|14.2|-   |-        

<1>From 1991 Central Birmingham DHA and South Birmingham DHA merged,         

retaining the name South Birmingham.                                         

<2>Rate per 1,000 live births.                                               

Data based on place of usual residence at death.                             

Bioethics

Sir Gerard Vaughan : To ask the Secretary of State for Health how she proposes to respond to the report of the Nuffield Council on Bioethics "Genetic Screening : Ethical Issues", and if she will make a statement.

Mr. Sackville : I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave the hon. Member for Linlithgow (Mr. Dalyell) on 22 February, Official Report, column 203.

NHS Estate

Mr. Spellar : To ask the Secretary of State for Health what action she has taken to implement the Audit Commission report on NHS estate management and property maintenance ; what further action she proposes to take to implement the report ; and what additional funds have been allocated for property maintenance.


Column 448

Mr. Sackville : The Audit Commission's report, which was published in 1991, has stimulated the following activities :

(a) all provider units are required to produce estate management and development strategies including projections for auditors in backlog maintenance.

(b) plans for the five year period to March 1997 indicate an intention to reduce backlog maintenance by 37 per cent. or £1.43 billion.

(c) revised guidance on estate maintenance and property utilisation was issued to the National Health Service in October 1993. No separate funds are allocated for property maintenance. These are treated as normal revenue costs which provider units include in their prices.


Column 449

Asthma

Mr. Llwyd : To ask the Secretary of State for Health what research is being conducted into the rate of increase in the incidence of asthma ; and if she will make a statement.

Mr. Sackville : I refer the hon. Member to the replies I gave the hon. Member for Islington, North (Mr. Corbyn) on 14 February, Official Report, column 627, and my hon. Friend the Member for Chislehurst (Mr. Sims) on 29 March, Official Report, column 684.

Brighton Health Trust

Mr. Redmond : To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will ensure the dismissal of the chairman and chief executive of the Brighton health trust in relation to their policy statement on the treatment of people above a certain age.

Dr. Mawhinney : No.

Security

Mr. Donohoe : To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will make a statement on the use of private detective agencies and security companies by her Department.


Column 450

Mr. Sackville : The Department does not use private detective agencies but does use security companies to guard official premises where this provides best value for money.

NHS Estates Agency

Mr. Peter Ainsworth : To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will make a statement on the plans for 1994-95 for the NHS Estates executive agency.

Mr. Sackville : I am pleased to report that the national health services estates management and health building agency--NHS Estates--has had a successful year as an executive agency of this Department. I have agreed the agency's 1994-95 annual business plan, and have placed in the Library copies of its key tasks and targets for 1994-95.

Civil Servants (Business Appointments)

Mr. Milburn : To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many civil servants in her Department and its predecessor department applied in each year since 1986 through the business opportunities system to take up an outside appointment (a) as an independent consultant, (b) with a firm of consultants and (c) in other employment ; how many were referred to the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments ; and how many were granted.

Mr. Sackville : The available information from 1989 is shown in the table.


Column 449


Department of Health-Business appointment applications                   

                                      |1989|1990|1991|1992|1993|1994     

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Number of applicants                  |11  |11  |10  |6   |13  |5        

Independent consultants               |1   |2   |3   |1   |5   |0        

Unconditional approval                |0   |1   |1   |1   |5   |0        

Conditional approval                  |1   |1   |2   |0   |0   |0        

Consultant firm                       |0   |0   |0   |0   |0   |1        

Unconditional approval                |0   |0   |0   |0   |0   |1        

Conditional approval                  |0   |0   |0   |0   |0   |0        

Other                                 |10  |9   |7   |5   |8   |4        

Unconditional approval                |9   |9   |6   |5   |8   |4        

Conditional approval                  |1   |0   |1   |0   |0   |0        

Number referred to advisory committee |0   |1   |0   |0   |1   |0        

Granted                               |0   |1   |0   |0   |1   |0        


Next Section

  Home Page