Previous Section | Home Page |
Mr. Redmond: To ask the Secretary of State for Education how she will prevent the standard assessment task results for 11-year-olds available in June being used by parents for school selection; and if she will make a statement.
Mr. Forth: My right hon. Friend cannot do, and would not want to do, what the hon. Member has suggested. The national curriculum testing and assessment arrangements are intended to raise standards and to promote accountability. My right hon. Friend intends to require schools to publish, in their annual reports and prospectuses, their pupils' aggregate results in the national curriculum assessments and tests for 11-year-olds. This will provide clear and robust information about schools' performance which parents may take in account, alongside other information about schools, when deciding to which school they should apply.
Column 726
My right hon. Friend has, however, made it clear that the results of national curriculum tests and assessments will not be included in national school by school performance tables in 1995.Ms Short: To ask the Secretary of State for Employment how many (a) men and (b) women have entered community action and how many were participating in community action in each month since the start of the programme in each region and for Great Britain; what information he has about the destination of those participants who have left community action; and if he will make a statement.
Miss Widdecombe: Responsibility for the subject of the question has been delegated to the Employment Service agency under its chief executive. I have asked him to arrange for a reply to be given. Letter from M. E. G. Fogden to Ms Clare Short, dated 20 January 1995:
The Secretary of State has asked me to respond to your question about the number of men and women who have participated in Community Action in each month since the programme began and the destination of Community Action leavers.
Since the programme began on 27 July 1993 to 30 December 1994, the latest date for which figures are available, 45,588 men and 11, 647 women have started on Community Action.
The number of men and women who were participating in Community Action in each month since the programme began, in each Employment Service region and for Great Britain are contained in the attached tables. There are separate tables for the 1993/4 and 1994/5 operational years for ease of reference.
Information is gathered on the destination of all Community Action leavers immediately on leaving and also through a postal follow up survey three months after leaving.
From April to the end of December this year 30,010 men and 7,673 women had left the programme. Of these 10 per cent. of men and 13 per cent. of women directly entered employment a further 14 per cent. of men and 16 per cent. of women went directly into training or full time education.
Three month follow up data shows that 15 per cent. of male leavers and 20 per cent. of female leavers are in employment at that stage, and 11 per cent. of male and 13 per cent. of female leavers are in training or full time education. This is at the top end of the target range for positive outcomes from the programme.
I hope this is helpful.
Column 725
Table 1: Male community action participants each month, by region-1993-94 |July |August |September|October |November |December |January |February |March ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Northern |- |- |- |32 |66 |112 |211 |458 |1,317 Yorkshire and Humberside |- |- |- |59 |240 |397 |653 |1,047 |1,464 East Midlands and Eastern |- |- |15 |103 |297 |435 |576 |849 |1,192 London and South East |- |22 |85 |260 |607 |1,095 |2,042 |3,676 |5,507 South West |35 |74 |93 |221 |422 |595 |777 |1,081 |1,482 Wales |- |- |9 |69 |153 |255 |383 |572 |827 West Midlands |- |- |4 |38 |146 |251 |419 |682 |1,707 North West |- |- |39 |212 |421 |571 |842 |1,282 |1,889 Scotland |- |- |12 |84 |216 |350 |496 |1,030 |1,600 Great Britain |35 |96 |257 |1,078 |2,568 |4,061 |6,390 |10,677 |16,985
Table 2: Female community action participants each month-by region-1993-94 |July |August |September|October |November |December |January |February |March ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Northern |- |- |- |2 |4 |10 |22 |66 |210 Yorkshire and Humberside |- |- |- |17 |60 |87 |139 |206 |308 East Midlands and Eastern |- |- |7 |18 |61 |93 |145 |202 |319 London and South East |- |- |4 |59 |145 |246 |500 |972 |1540 South West |1 |9 |12 |29 |64 |100 |160 |221 |304 Wales |- |- |2 |15 |47 |78 |105 |143 |225 West Midlands |- |- |1 |18 |49 |84 |131 |186 |442 North West |- |- |25 |64 |92 |152 |237 |353 Scotland |- |- |10 |29 |51 |80 |119 |275 |394 Great Britain |1 |9 |36 |212 |545 |870 |1,473 |2,508 |4,095
Column 728
Table 3: Male community action participants each month-by region-1994-95 |April |May |June |July |August |September|October |November |December ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Northern |1,667 |1,636 |1,575 |1,458 |1,257 |1,022 |610 |667 |712 Yorkshire and Humberside |1,919 |2,003 |1,860 |1,851 |1,684 |1,604 |1,333 |1,328 |1,296 East Midlands and Eastern |1,553 |1,524 |1,428 |1,423 |1,246 |1,242 |1,174 |1,238 |1,342 London and South East |6,343 |6,002 |5,883 |6,097 |5,809 |5,750 |4,969 |5,140 |5,125 South West |1,724 |1,693 |1,616 |1,593 |1,448 |1,402 |1,271 |1,288 |1,301 Wales |968 |909 |803 |693 |638 |646 |537 |567 |574 West Midlands |2,434 |2,252 |2,000 |1,768 |1,400 |1,348 |997 |1,013 |1,076 North West |2,564 |2,297 |2,341 |2,288 |2,049 |2,038 |1,803 |1,781 |1,764 Scotland |1,992 |1,958 |1,912 |1,748 |1,577 |1,480 |1,272 |1,375 |1,409 Great Britain |21,164 |20,274 |19,418 |18,919 |17,108 |16,532 |13,943 |14,407 |14,599
Table 4: Female community action participants each month-by region-1994-95 |April |May |June |July |August |September|October |November |December ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Northern |277 |277 |271 |251 |237 |174 |129 |128 |135 Yorkshire and Humberside |428 |462 |445 |453 |418 |379 |342 |324 |304 East Midlands and Eastern |383 |385 |372 |364 |335 |336 |322 |342 |378 London and South East |1,865 |1,875 |1,867 |1,940 |1,910 |1,858 |1,622 |1,687 |1,640 South West |368 |382 |381 |389 |377 |360 |332 |343 |353 Wales |274 |267 |217 |206 |183 |207 |174 |169 |160 West Midlands |991 |704 |653 |573 |462 |411 |313 |309 |323 North West |460 |472 |474 |475 |399 |379 |338 |375 |358 Scotland |450 |461 |436 |399 |366 |343 |292 |313 |333 Great Britain |5,196 |5,285 |5,116 |5,050 |4,687 |4,447 |3,864 |3,993 |3,984
Ms Estelle Morris: To ask the Secretary of State for Employment if he will list the name of the organisation which has been awarded the contract for careers services for each local authority.
Mr. Paice: Information on organisations tendering to provide careers services is commercial in confidence. My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State will announce those organisations with which he will contract when negotiations are finalised.
Ms Estelle Morris: To ask the Secretary of State for Employment if he will outline the timetable and the procedures used for the allocation of the careers service contract for the Solihull area.
Column 728
Mr. Paice: All bids were assessed against the criteria published in the careers service prospectus. In Solihull, the Department is negotiating with two bidders to determine which offers the best careers service for Solihull and the best value for money for the taxpayer. Both bidders have until 3 February to respond with revised proposals.
Mr. McCartney: To ask the Secretary of State for Employment if he will place in the Library the full FOCUS business case.
Mr. Oppenheim: The FOCUS business case is a working document prepared by the Health and Safety Executive for internal use to support the introduction of the FOCUS computer system and not for publication.
Column 729
Mr. Rooney: To ask the Secretary of State for Employment what proposals he has to introduce legislation giving effect to the decision of the European Court of Justice regarding trades union rights in respect of collective redundancy and transfer of undertakings.
Mr. Oppenheim: The relevant legislation on all but one of the points covered by the judgments was amended by the Trade Union Reform and Employment Rights Act 1993. The Government are presently considering what action needs to be taken on the remaining issue, concerning consultation with employees' representatives where there are no recognised trade unions.
Mr. Welsh: To ask the Secretary of State for Employment (1) if he will list the average weekly earnings inclusive of gross pay and exclusive of overtime for full-time workers in (a) Scotland, (b) the regions of Scotland including and excluding Grampian and (c) Great Britain for (i) male manual workers, (ii) male non-manual workers, (iii) all male workers, (iv) female manual workers, (v) female non-manual workers, (vi) all female workers and (vii) all workers;
(2) if he will show (a) average weekly earnings, (b) weekly median earnings, (c) the percentage of workers earning below (i) £208.53 per week and (ii) £156.40 per week and (d) the distribution of earnings for those earning (1) under the point below which 10 per cent. of earners fall and (2) the point which 10 per cent. of earners exceed, for Scotland including and excluding Grampian, broken down by (x) manual, (y) non-manual and (z) all workers;
(3) if he will list the percentage of full-time workers earning less than (a) £221.50, (b) £208.53 and (c) £156.40 per week inclusive of gross pay and excluding overtime in (i) Great Britain, (ii) Scotland and (iii) the regions of Scotland excluding and including Grampian for (1) male workers, (2) female workers, (3) male manual workers, (4) male non-manual workers and (5) all workers; (4) if he will list the proportion of full- time workers with hourly earnings inclusive of gross pay but exclusive of overtime below (a) £5.88, (b) £5.53, (c) £4.15 and (d) £3.00 in (i) Great Britain, (ii) Scotland and (iii) the regions of Scotland exclusive and inclusive of Grampian for (1) male workers, (2) female workers, (3) manual workers, (4) non-manual workers and (5) all workers.
Mr. Oppenheim: As the information is contained in a number of tables, I will write to the hon. Member and place a copy in the Library.
Mr. Bernie Grant: To ask the Secretary of State for Employment if he will apply for derogation for Britain in respect of European Commission staff regulations regarding European Commission jobs in the United Kingdom; and if he will make a statement.
Mr. Oppenheim: No. I have no plans to make a statement.
Mr. Bernie Grant: To ask the Secretary of State for Employment (1) what is the precedence between the
Column 730
European Commission's staff regulations and the Race Relations Act 1974 in respect of European Commission jobs in the United Kingdom; and if he will make a statement;(2) what assessment he has made of the consistency of EC staff regulations with the United Kingdom Race Relations Act 1974 in respect of non-EU nationals applying for jobs with the European Commission; and if he will make a statement.
Mr. Oppenheim: The EC staff regulations are directly applicable in all member states, including the UK. I have no plans to make a statement.
Ms Ruddock: To ask the Secretary of State for Employment how much money is owed to training providers in the parliamentary constituency of Lewisham, Deptford and the London borough of Lewisham by the South Thames TEC.
Mr. Paice: This is a matter for the administrative receiver.
Mr. Corbett: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will make it his policy to consult organisations of and representing people with disabilities, over any proposed restrictions on vehicular use of city centre streets in periods of high air pollution.
Mr. Norris: The Department of Transport is in close and regular touch with organisations of and for disabled people through its statutory advisory body, the Disabled Persons Transport Advisory Committee. Members of that committee are consulted as a matter of course on all issues which may affect the interests of disabled people. I fully understand the vital importance of personal mobility to many disabled people and the necessity of ensuring that it is not compromised.
Ms Walley: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport when he expects to introduce the order in respect of the change to a continuous operating licence system for heavy goods vehicles and public service vehicles.
Mr. Norris: I expect the commencement order for the provisions concerning operator licensing contained within the Deregulation and Contracting Out Act 1994 to be made this summer. It is likely that those provisions will be brought into force at the end of the year.
Ms Walley: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many accidents involving heavy goods vehicles there were in each of the last five years for which figures are available by police authority; and how many fatalities and serious injuries there were in each case.
Mr. Norris: The information requested is shown in the following table:
Personal injury road accidents involving an HGV, by year, police authority: Great Britain 1989-1993 Accidents Police Authority |1989 |1990 |1991 |1992 |1993 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Metropolitan Police |1,733 |1,684 |1,302 |1,169 |1,195 Cumbria |165 |176 |154 |156 |159 Lancashire |220 |281 |213 |237 |281 Merseyside |255 |292 |283 |286 |281 Greater Manchester |702 |667 |606 |573 |619 Cheshire |475 |403 |364 |339 |418 Northumbria |249 |255 |232 |184 |212 Durham |112 |124 |120 |113 |118 North Yorkshire |403 |347 |351 |312 |292 West Yorkshire |464 |454 |499 |441 |453 South Yorkshire |308 |292 |286 |269 |255 Humberside |219 |232 |214 |261 |230 Cleveland |91 |69 |87 |66 |63 West Midlands |495 |479 |407 |421 |414 Staffordshire |327 |355 |368 |363 |358 West Mercia |382 |366 |329 |290 |257 Warwickshire |247 |225 |176 |172 |191 Derbyshire |316 |303 |277 |280 |256 Nottinghamshire |320 |283 |289 |267 |259 Lincolnshire |278 |287 |219 |245 |246 Leicestershire |311 |315 |294 |269 |281 Northamptonshire |331 |291 |263 |228 |218 Cambridgeshire |376 |327 |281 |272 |264 Norfolk |322 |255 |260 |276 |227 Suffolk |234 |190 |159 |166 |160 Bedfordshire |252 |196 |157 |146 |165 Hertfordshire |317 |268 |233 |210 |287 Essex |621 |471 |427 |418 |456 Thames Valley |624 |517 |528 |508 |529 Hampshire |474 |440 |387 |362 |370 Surrey |320 |306 |233 |224 |224 Kent |477 |456 |375 |436 |429 Sussex |357 |321 |294 |283 |293 City of London<1> |0 |0 |0 |0 |0 Devon and Cornwall |365 |344 |289 |259 |293 Avon and Somerset |319 |290 |265 |266 |254 Gloucestershire |154 |141 |130 |119 |130 Wiltshire |212 |211 |187 |193 |260 Dorset |178 |161 |147 |148 |144 North Wales |210 |196 |212 |182 |159 Gwent |107 |104 |113 |90 |91 South Wales |212 |228 |216 |225 |197 Dyfed-Powys |168 |207 |206 |197 |168 Northern |78 |83 |43 |62 |60 Grampian |121 |135 |145 |126 |114 Tayside |134 |133 |113 |105 |115 Fife |68 |50 |52 |52 |47 Lothian and Borders |216 |175 |154 |141 |140 Central |79 |47 |58 |56 |50 Strathclyde |611 |542 |519 |480 |397 Dumfries and Galloway |98 |89 |100 |73 |94 Total |16,107 |15,063 |13,616 |13,016 |13,173 <1> Incorporated into the Metropolitan police figure.
Casualties in personal injury road accidents involving an HGV, by year, police authority and severity: Great Britain 1989-1993 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 Police Authority |Fatal |Serious |Fatal |Serious |Fatal |Serious |Fatal |Serious |Fatal |Serious ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Metropolitan Police |65 |401 |58 |381 |37 |264 |39 |271 |44 |218 Cumbria |16 |70 |33 |72 |14 |46 |18 |48 |17 |45 Lancashire |14 |42 |23 |82 |8 |44 |11 |49 |11 |104 Merseyside |8 |43 |9 |51 |6 |47 |7 |44 |10 |36 Greater Manchester |26 |100 |23 |109 |24 |94 |24 |91 |22 |76 Cheshire |29 |109 |20 |91 |32 |66 |16 |45 |18 |66 Northumbria |12 |76 |17 |62 |14 |61 |13 |39 |5 |44 Durham |11 |23 |11 |28 |12 |20 |8 |22 |7 |33 North Yorkshire |36 |202 |23 |173 |36 |169 |21 |130 |23 |149 West Yorkshire |27 |133 |25 |106 |24 |122 |16 |120 |25 |85 South Yorkshire |18 |60 |13 |72 |10 |73 |12 |79 |20 |33 Humberside |11 |69 |11 |56 |11 |56 |19 |68 |15 |81 Cleveland |0 |14 |1 |7 |8 |10 |2 |12 |0 |12 West Midlands |21 |142 |35 |125 |14 |102 |23 |102 |12 |91 Staffordshire |20 |80 |18 |72 |12 |58 |12 |52 |8 |33 West Mercia |41 |150 |31 |109 |18 |134 |23 |85 |30 |62 Warwickshire |26 |104 |3 |76 |7 |81 |16 |70 |22 |62 Derbyshire |22 |83 |13 |68 |22 |57 |17 |72 |23 |58 Nottinghamshire |15 |114 |22 |87 |21 |70 |12 |74 |9 |71 Lincolnshire |22 |88 |39 |103 |16 |77 |20 |90 |18 |79 Leicestershire |20 |94 |15 |77 |20 |98 |24 |54 |20 |51 Northamptonshire |28 |160 |24 |136 |23 |88 |11 |80 |12 |76 Cambridgeshire |23 |125 |30 |120 |18 |104 |15 |86 |10 |88 Norfolk |24 |122 |17 |106 |15 |114 |22 |98 |18 |79 Suffolk |21 |86 |9 |65 |6 |64 |9 |61 |10 |66 Bedfordshire |15 |63 |12 |44 |8 |27 |20 |31 |15 |26 Hertfordshire |10 |79 |17 |75 |11 |81 |8 |62 |11 |85 Essex |24 |160 |28 |107 |28 |97 |21 |102 |17 |100 Thames Valley |34 |135 |46 |152 |35 |117 |34 |103 |24 |89 Hampshire |28 |168 |34 |141 |21 |113 |17 |105 |18 |95 Surrey |10 |85 |13 |77 |11 |44 |4 |43 |5 |46 Kent |34 |113 |17 |108 |21 |65 |27 |98 |22 |113 Sussex |24 |97 |17 |83 |12 |57 |16 |66 |14 |70 City of London<1> |0 |0 |0 |0 |0 |0 |0 |0 |0 |0 Devon and Cornwall |20 |145 |11 |111 |11 |100 |13 |83 |17 |77 Avon and Somerset |21 |116 |18 |106 |25 |71 |21 |65 |15 |60 Gloucestershire |16 |52 |17 |37 |12 |40 |10 |34 |4 |24 Wiltshire |16 |50 |14 |70 |15 |48 |18 |54 |14 |73 Dorset |9 |48 |6 |38 |13 |52 |8 |41 |4 |32 North Wales |17 |63 |10 |40 |18 |52 |4 |50 |12 |30 Gwent |2 |41 |3 |18 |2 |31 |6 |17 |1 |25 South Wales |4 |49 |9 |49 |5 |28 |9 |36 |7 |21 Dyfed-Powys |10 |83 |17 |107 |13 |92 |11 |82 |9 |82 Northern |15 |39 |7 |38 |8 |20 |5 |30 |7 |33 Grampian |15 |36 |9 |43 |9 |33 |11 |57 |9 |30 Tayside |29 |71 |7 |70 |13 |69 |11 |48 |9 |60 Fife |5 |28 |5 |18 |2 |15 |2 |16 |4 |8 Lothian and Borders |25 |97 |15 |65 |11 |37 |15 |31 |9 |31 Central |6 |30 |5 |18 |3 |25 |3 |16 |3 |15 Strathclyde |37 |199 |22 |182 |36 |180 |27 |143 |27 |120 Dumfries and Galloway |7 |43 |3 |37 |11 |32 |11 |32 |13 |55 Total |989 |4,780 |885 |4,268 |782 |3,645 |742 |3,387 |699 |3,198 <1> Incorporated into the Metropolitan police figure.
Mr. Cox: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what meetings he (a) has held or (b) proposes to hold with organisations running public or private bus services to improve safety for passengers during late evening and night services; and if he will make a statement.
Mr. Norris: The primary responsibility for the safe operation of bus services rests with bus operators. It is in their commercial interest to ensure that services are safe and attractive for passengers.
The Department chairs a standing panel of representatives of bus operators, trade unions, the police and interested Government Departments, which meets to consider trends in assaults on bus crews and passengers and to recommend preventive measures. The Department is also commissioning a national review of transport-related crime, perceptions of safety and current preventive initiatives. This will include public and private bus companies.
Column 734
Mr. Chris Smith: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what assessment he has made of the impact of privatisation on British Rail's subsidiary, British Rail Telecom, and on the optic fibre it has already laid.
Mr. Watts: I have assessed the future of British Rail Telecommunications Ltd. in conjunction with the British Railways Board. Privatisation will best secure for the future the high-quality telecommunications links necessary for railway operations and will also provide opportunities for the company to exploit its significant cable, including optic fibre, network.
Mr. Meacher: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what information he has as to what caused the Heathrow tunnel collapse in October; what part was played in this by the new Austrian tunnelling method; and what changes in plans for tunnelling at Heathrow and the new Jubilee line he is making as a result.
Mr. Norris: I understand from the British Airports Authority and the Health and Safety Executive that their
Column 735
respective investigations into the Heathrow tunnel collapse in October are continuing. I have received no information on the specific causes of the collapse or the part played by the new Austrian tunnelling method. The HSE's eventual report will be published in due course.Plans for carrying out tunnelling are primarily a matter for those carrying out the work. I understand that the HSE has published a discussion document to inform those proposing to restart NATM and has established a procedure for assessing any such proposals. London Underground is considering its construction plans for the Jubilee line extension, in the light of the HSE's recent decision that use of NATM can be recommenced for some of the project's tunnels. BAA is also considering its construction plans at Heathrow.
Mr. Cohen: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many disused Underground stations there are in London; if he will list them; and if he will make a statement about the arrangements for the safety of the public in respect of each of them.
Mr. Norris: The 22 disused Underground stations are as follows: London Underground: Disused Stations
Aldwych
Blake Hall
British Museum
Brompton Road
Bull and Bush
Chancery Lane (old Central line station)
City Road
Down Street
Highgate (high level)
King William Street
King's Cross (old Metropolitan line station)
Lords
Mark Lane
Marlborough Road
North Weald
Ongar
Osterley (old Piccadilly line station)
South Kentish Town
St Mary's
Swiss Cottage (Metropolitan line station)
Wood Lane
York Road
I understand that London Underground has a variety of arrangements in place to ensure the safety of the public.
Mr. Cox: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what meetings he (a) has held or (b) proposes to hold with organisations running public transport systems in the United Kingdom to make the service more user- friendly.
Mr. Norris: My right hon. Friend and I regularly meet the chairman of London Transport and the British Railways Board to discuss a wide range of issues including measures to improve services for passengers. For bus services outside London, I have reconstituted the bus working group, which will include representatives from the Confederation of Passenger Transport, local authority associations and the National Federation of Bus Users to see what further measures can be taken to improve services within the deregulated framework.
Column 736
Mr. Malcolm Bruce: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what is his estimate of the total costs to date of preparations for privatising the British Rail system; and what is his estimate of such costs over each of the next four years, including any cost of regulation.
Mr. Watts: Total costs of rail privatisation to date of the Department, the Office of Passenger Rail Franchising, and the Office of the Rail Regulator, are £48 million.
The costs of BR and Railtrack are primarily a matter for the industries themselves. However, we understand that their total costs to date are around £160 million.
Forward plans of expenditure by the Department, Opraf, and Orr for 1995 96 to 1997 98 will be published in the Transport Report 1995. Projected expenditure by BR and Railtrack is a matter for them.
Mr. Redmond: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport when he last assessed the road traffic needs of Doncaster; and if he will make a statement.
Mr. Watts: The review of the road programme announced on 30 March 1994 was the most recent review of the needs of the trunk road and motorway network, including that around Doncaster. The needs of the local road network are reviewed annually by Doncaster metropolitan borough council in its transport policies and programmes and the Secretary of State's decisions on that were announced on 15 December 1994.
Ms Walley: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what assessment he has made of the additional demands made on the fire service by ships in United Kingdom coastal waters and ports (a) registered under the British flag and (b) registered under a flag of convenience; and if he will make a statement.
Mr. Norris: None. Incidents at sea requiring attendance or advice from the fire service are rare, although suitable arrangements are in place should this be necessary. There is no evidence of any relationship between the demand on the fire service caused by vessels on fire in UK waters and the vessels' flag state.
Mr. Skinner: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what is the time scale for making public the result of his internal reviewing respect of M1 widening schemes of (a) junctions 24 to 28 and (b) junctions 28 to 31.
Mr. Watts [holding answer 19 January 1995]: There is no special review of these schemes. All schemes in the road programme are subject to appraisal at key stages in their development. The results of public consultations on the schemes for junctions 23A to 25 and 25 to 28 will be announced in due course. Options to put to the public are still being considered for the scheme for junctions 28 to 31.
Column 737
Mr. Spellar: To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what action he proposes to take following the fines levied by the European Commission on countries for allowing farmers to collect subsidies to which they were not entitled.
Mr. Jack: The financial penalties, or disallowances, imposed by the Commission's decision on the 1991 clearance of accounts will be collected from the member states concerned by automatic deductions from the monthly reimbursements of common agricultural policy expenditure. The UK has fared well, with disallowance of some £2 million compared to a total disallowance of £1.2 billion for all member states. It is important to note that disallowances are penalties imposed on member states for the failure to implement properly legislation relating to CAP scheme rules and controls. While these deficiencies may result in farmers, or other recipients, being paid subsidies for which they are not eligible, this is by no means always the case. Some two thirds of the 1991 disallowance is on Italy and Spain for failure to implement milk quotas and exceeds the amounts received by those member states in respect of milk support. Where farmers are found to have overclaimed, it is the member state's responsibility to recover the money due and apply the appropriate penalties. Failure to do so would render them liable to disallowance.
We are keeping our own procedures under constant review. With regard to other member states, we are committed to ensuring that proper controls are in place, and that appropriate penalties are applied where this is not the case. We fully support a proposal currently on the table which, among other things, seeks to speed up the clearance of accounts process and improve the financial management of the CAP.
Mr. Austin Mitchell: To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what assessment he has made of the impact of the increase in Spanish vessels authorised by the Fisheries Councils on the existing balance stocks of fishing fleets to fish as required by section 1 sub- paragraph (ii) of the Fisheries Council statement.
Mr. Jack: Under the agreement reached at the December Fisheries Council, it is for each member state to inform the Commission, by the end of March this year, of the reference list of its named vessels which may have access to the various fisheries covered by the agreement, of the fishing effort assessed by the member state to be necessary to enable it to take up fully its fishing possibilities for total allowable catch and non- TAC species and, where the potential effort corresponding to free access for vessels in the reference list exceeds the assessed effort, the arrangements envisaged by the member state to regulate fishing effort. The Commission will make this information available to the other member states, and will then make a report and proposal to the Council, by 1 May, for the regulation of fishing effort. The Council shall decide on that proposal by 30 June. The agreement makes it clear that existing balances in
Column 738
exploitation by fishery and by zone are not to be disturbed.Mr. Austin Mitchell: To ask the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food what is the effect of the swaps of haddock and cod agreed in the Fisheries Board agreement in Spain between (a) Spain and Belgium and (b) Spain and France on (i) establishing a Spanish track record and entitlement for areas where Spain has not fished before and (ii) the principle of relative stability in those areas.
Mr. Jack: Article 9 of the basic Council Regulation of the Common Fisheries Policy, 3760/92 provides that member states may, after notifying the Commission, exchange all or part of the fishing availabilities allocated to them. Such quota swaps are a regular part of the management of the CFP and are valuable in permitting the best use of fishing opportunities. The United Kingdom makes such swaps in the interest of and with the support of our fishing industry. Such swaps do not affect the relative stability shares on which the Council agrees quotas each year.
The swaps of haddock and cod apply in areas where Spain already fishes. Thus, they have no impact on track record or entitlement for areas where Spain has not fished before.
Next Section
| Home Page |