Previous Section | Home Page |
Mr. Straw: To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department what was the number and percentage of defendants remanded in custody for either way offences who were dealt with within the 70-day limit laid down by the Prosecution of Offences (Custody Time Limit) Regulations 1987; and what was the number and percentage of defendants remanded in custody for indictable offences who were dealt with within the 70-day limit between first appearance and committal laid down by the regulations for each year since the regulations came into force.
Mr. John M. Taylor: Information about the number and percentage of defendants remanded in custody who were dealt with within the 70 day limit is not collected centrally in the form requested. This information could be obtained only at disproportionate cost and effort.
Mr. Alan W. Williams: To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will list the members of the Medicines Control Agency, their professional employment, and the details of individual entries in their members' register of interests.
Mr. Sackville: The Medicines Control Agency is an executive agency of the Department of Health. Its staff
Column 392
are civil servants and are therefore subject to the civil service requirements in relation to personal interests.Mr. Redmond: To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what action she is taking in respect of the use of Septrin in the United Kingdom;
(2) what plans she has to remove Septrin from the market; and if she will make a statement.
Mr. Sackville: We have no plans to remove Septrin from the market. There is no new safety issue with Septrin and recent data support the view that serious adverse effects associated with it are rare. Changing clinical practice, however, favours single rather than combination antibiotic therapy and the Medicines Control Agency is considering whether the licence for Septrin should reflect this.
Mr. Redmond: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what support she will give to litigants against the Wellcome group in respect of claims for damage caused by Septrin; and if she will make a statement.
Mr. Sackville: It is not the Department's policy to become involved in individual claims for compensation. This is a matter for individuals themselves to pursue with the companies concerned, if necessary through the courts.
Mr. Hinchliffe: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many persons have been identified as blood donor carriers of hepatitis C under current screening methods; and what advice and counselling they receive.
Mr. Sackville: One in 2,000 donors were found to be positive for hepatitis C when screening was introduced in 1991. In the National Blood Service, any donor found to be positive for any infective agent is offered counselling by trained specialist medical staff. In the case of counselling for hepatitis C, national guidelines have been established and are in use at all transfusion centres.
Mr. Bayley: To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will list (a) the consultants, (b) the tasks for which they were employed and (c) the payments made to them from the budget of her Department in (i) 1992 93 and (ii) 1993 94.
Mr. Sackville: The Department spent £18,398,000 for 1992 93 and £15,933,037 for 1993 94 from running costs on consultancy. Information on national health service consultancy expenditure is not available centrally.
Details of the consultants employed by the Department and the tasks performed for 1992 93 were provided to the efficiency unit as part of its scrutiny on the Government's use of external consultants, copies of which will be placed in the Library. For reasons of
confidentiality, and in order to achieve value for money in the future, we are unable to list the specific costs of the consultancies concerned and the amounts paid as this would breach contractual agreements and jeopardise future value for money. Information is not held for 1993 94 and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Column 393
Mr. Macdonald: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what Government funding is being provided and what other steps are being taken by the Government to enable pursuit of the research programme recommended in chapter 17 of the report of the national task force on myalgic encephalomyelitis published in September 1994.
Mr. Sackville: The main agency through which the Government support biomedical and clinical research is the Medical Research Council, which receives its grant in aid from the office of my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster. The MRC has been funding a study at the Institute of Psychiatry, the estimated cost of which is £91,000, to investigate chronic fatigue in general practitioners' attenders. Researchers at the institute are attempting to find ways to help sufferers of chronic fatigue cope with their disease and regain their health.
With a view to securing progress and promoting the development of a professional consensus, the chief medical officer has invited the conference of colleges to consider the national task force's report. The views of the conference of colleges will be of much assistance to the Department in helping to determine the best way forward. It is hoped that a response from the conference will be received by the spring.
Mr. Nicholas Brown: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what has been the prevalence of cigarette smoking among (a) men over 16 years, (b) women over 16 years, (c) boys aged 11 to 15 years and (d) girls aged 11 to 15 years for each of the last 10 years for which figures are available.
Mr. Sackville: The figures in the tables are extracted from the "General Household Survey 1992" and "Smoking Amongst Secondary School Children in 1993", published by the Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. Copies of these reports are available in the Library.
$ Prevalence of cigarette smoking amongst adults aged 16 and over England 1984-1992 Percentages |1984|1986|1988|1990|1992 ------------------------------------ Men |35 |34 |32 |31 |29 Women |32 |31 |30 |28 |27 Source:OPCS General Household Survey
) Prevalence of regular cigarette smoking amongst pupils aged 11 to 15 England 1984-1993 ]Percentages |1984|1986|1988|1990|1992|1993 ----------------------------------------- Boys |13 |7 |7 |9 |9 |8 Girls |13 |12 |9 |11 |10 |11 Source: OPCS Smoking amongst secondary school children
Mrs. Clwyd: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what representations she has received on the subject of regulating cosmetic surgery.
Mr. Sackville: In addition to representations from the hon. Member and from the hon. Member for Gloucester
Column 394
(Mr. French) we have received 17 letters from members of the public on this subject.Mrs. Beckett: To ask the Secretary of State for Health if drugs designed to break up blood clots are available under the NHS to patients aged over 74 years; and if she will make a statement.
Mrs. Beckett: To ask the Secretary of State for Health which hospitals charge diabetics for insulin syringes; and if she will make a statement.
Mr. Cohen: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what plans she has to introduce legislation to allow the wider use of personal information extracted from the registers of births, deaths and marriages; and if she will make a statement.
Mr. Sackville: The Government have no plans to legislate beyond the proposals they published in 1990 in their White Paper "Registration: proposals for change", Cm 939. These proposals include making records of births, deaths and marriages over 75 years old available to public inspection. The Government will introduce a Bill when parliamentary time allows.
Mr. Donohoe: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much her Department spent during 1994 on recruiting staff to her Department and its executive agencies; and how many staff were recruited.
Mr. Sackville: During 1994, the Department and its executive agencies spent £620,870 recruiting 156 staff.
Mr. Flynn: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessments she has made of the effect on health of the use of anabolic agents.
Mr. Sackville: Anabolic steroids are used therapeutically for certain hormonal and blood disorders. Before a medicinal product may be licensed in this country, it is subject to stringent assessments to ensure that it meets acceptable standards of safety, quality and efficacy. Thereafter, the Medicines Control Agency and its advisory committees, such as the committee on safety of medicines, monitor the safety of all licensed medicines.
In addition, the Department of Health and Departments for Scotland and for Wales commissioned a report from the Centre for Research on Drugs and Drug Behaviour in 1993, "Anabolic Steroid Use in Great Britain: An Exploratory Investigation", copies of which are in the Library.
Mrs. Ann Winterton: To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she has considered the evidence by the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy regarding damage done to
Column 395
patients by unregistered physiotherapists; and what she proposes in response.Mr. Sackville: To practice within the national health service or local authorities, physiotherapists must be registered under the provisions of the Professions Supplementary to Medicine Act 1960. The Government are considering what action may be needed in the light of the profession's concern about the activities of unregistered practitioners.
Dr. David Clark: To ask the Secretary of State for Health if the plague vaccine manufactured in the United States of America by Cutter Laboratories, Miles Inc, has been granted a licence in Britain.
Mr. Sackville: There are no granted licences in Britain for the plague vaccine manufactured in the United States of America by Cutter Laboratories, Miles Inc.
Mr. Coe: To ask the Prime Minister what has been the reduction in average mortgage interest payments since their peak.
The Prime Minister: The average mortgage interest payment has fallen by £140 per month, not per week as I inadvertently stated in my answer to the right hon. Member for Sedgefield (Mr. Blair) on 26 January 1995, Official Report , column 469.
Mr. Thurnham: To ask the President of the Board of Trade what proportion of exports from other European Union countries comes to the United Kingdom (a) as a whole and (b) by each country, in descending order.
Mr. Ian Taylor: The information is given in the table.
Visible exports to the United Kingdom as a share of total visible exports Exports from |Per cent. --------------------------------------------- EU12 less UK |8.6 Ireland |28.7 Portugal |11.4 France |9.2 Netherlands |9.0 Denmark |8.9 Belgium-Luxembourg |8.3 Germany |7.7 Spain |7.5 Italy |6.4 Greece |5.7 Source: Eurostat Comext database (CD-Rom 1/1995).
Sir Thomas Arnold: To ask the President of the Board of Trade if he will list all the legislation governing the activities and regulation of Lloyd's of London.
Column 396
Mr. Jonathan Evans: The principal legislation governing the activities of Lloyd's of London is:
(a) the Lloyd's Act 1982 (together with those provisions of the Lloyd's Acts 1871, 1911 and 1951 which remain in force) and bye-laws made thereunder;
(b) certain provisions of the Insurance Companies Act 1982 (as amended), in particular Part IV (special classes of insurers); (c) the Insurance (Lloyd's) Regulations 1983 (as amended), and some provisions of the Insurance Companies Regulations 1994, the Insurance Companies (Third Insurance Directives) Regulations 1994 and the Insurance Companies (Amendment) Regulations 1994;
(d) Insurance Accounts Directive (Miscellaneous Insurance Undertakings) Regulations 1993.
That legislation gives effect to EC directives on the consolidation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to direct insurance other than life assurance--directive 73/239/EEC, 88/357/EEC and 92/49/EEC--and the corresponding directives relating to direct life assurance--directives 79/267/EEC, 90/619/EEC and 92/96); and the EC directive on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of insurance undertakings 91/674/EEC. Other, more general, legislation also affects those operating in the Lloyd's market in a manner comparable to the way in which it affects other individuals or undertakings, including legislation governing the terms and conditions of contracts of insurance--for example the Marine Insurance Act 1906.
Mr. Spearing: To ask the President of the Board of Trade, pursuant to his answer of 18 January concerning supply of spare parts for domestic gas appliances, what assessment he has made, and by what means, of the consequences of his plans for the dis-aggregation of British Gas on the current availability of spare parts for licensed appliances and on the time such appliances cannot be used by consumers for reasons of public safety.
Mr. Charles Wardle: The servicing of domestic gas appliances is a competitive market, in which British Gas service business competes with some 48,000 registered engineers. This part of British Gas operations is therefore not subject to economic regulation and it is for the management of British Gas to choose the most economical and effective means for the supply and distribution of spare parts in order to meet customers' needs.
Mr. Faber: To ask the President of the Board of Trade when he intends to issue the proposed discussion document on the implementation of the chemical weapons convention in the United Kingdom.
Mr. Ian Taylor: A discussion document on the implications of the chemical weapons convention for industry will be issued on 31 January; copies will be placed in the Library of the House.
Mr. Malcolm Bruce: To ask the President of the Board of Trade what information his Department has in respect of, and in what ways it is supporting, trade missions to Latin American countries in January and February; what is the involvement of such trade missions in the sale or
Column 397
arrangement for sale of items classified under section 5 (1) (b) of the Firearms Act 1968; and if he will list the items which are so classified.Mr. Ian Taylor [holding answer 26 January 1995]: A trade mission organised by the Caribbean trade advisory group of the British Overseas Trade Board will visit Cuba in early February. None of the planned members of the mission is involved in the sale or arrangement for sale of items classified under section 5(1) (b) of the Firearms Act 1968.
Mr. Byers: To ask the President of the Board of Trade how many export licences his Department has issued for the export of non-lethal military equipment to Nigeria since December 1993.
Mr. Ian Taylor [holding answer 20 January 1995]: Thirty export licences have been issued for such military equipment since 1 January 1994.
Mr. Robin Cook: To ask the President of the Board of Trade if he will place in the Library a copy of the licence issued by his Department to United Artists authorising it to lay cable in Livingston, West Lothian.
Mr. Ian Taylor [holding answer 26 January 1995]: Licences issued under section 7 of the Telecommunications Act 1984 are placed in a public register in the Library at the Office of Telecommunications. I have, however, arranged for a copy of the licence for the Falkirk and Livingston cable franchise to be placed in the Library of the House.
Mr. Donohoe: To ask the President of the Board of Trade what guidelines are operated by his Department as regards the use of executive search agencies to fill vacancies within his Department and his Department's executive agencies; and in what circumstances his Department employs executive search agencies instead of relying fully on Departmental resources to fill vacant posts.
Mr. Ian Taylor [holding answer 26 January 1995]: My Department considers using executive search agencies when it is believed that this represents a cost-effective way of extending the field of candidates for key posts.
Mr. Vaz: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list the total spent on each local authority area under (a) the city task forces, (b) the city grant and (c) the housing action trusts programmes in 1993 94.
Mr. Curry: Expenditure by local authority area on each of the programmes in 1993 94 is set out in the table.
Column 398
Expenditure by Local Authority area in 1993-94 on Task Forces, City Grant and Housing Action Trusts |Task Forces |City Grant |HATs<1> Local Authority |£000s |£000s |£000s --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Barnsley |- |2,970 |- Birmingham |1,448 |1,665 |2,175 Blackburn |- |517 |- Bolton |- |101 |- Bradford |1,187 |2,433 |- Bristol |227 |59 |- Burnley |- |223 |- Coventry |1,172 |404 |- Derby |1,195 |326 |- Dudley |- |4,698 |- Gateshead |- |303 |- Hackney |1,050 |- |- Hammersmith and Fulham |945 |- |- Haringey |385 |- |- Hartlepool |24 |2,717 |- Kingston upon Hull |1,158 |122 |28,142 Kirklees |- |654 |- Knowsley |- |364 |- Lambeth |- |35 |- Langbaurgh on Tees |- |122 |- Leeds |- |121 |- Leicester |- |57 |- Lewisham |1,040 |41 |- Liverpool |1,200 |6,926 |19,236 Manchester |958 |1,322 |- Middlesbrough |221 |521 |- Newcastle upon Tyne |- |2,642 |- North Tyneside |- |145 |- Nottingham |1,102 |2,726 |- Oldham |- |775 |- Plymouth |353 |872 |- Preston |- |151 |- Rochdale |4 |687 |- Rotherham |- |44 |- Salford |- |917 |- Sandwell |- |400 |- Sefton |- |303 |- Sheffield |- |777 |- South Tyneside |1,084 |250 |- Southwark |1,226 |432 |- St. Helens |- |62 |- Stockton on Tees |452 |- |- Sunderland |- |1,093 |- Tower Hamlets |357 |1,511 |8,600 Waltham Forest |- |- |25,600 Wigan |- |356 |- Wirral |1,030 |165 |- Wolverhampton |- |3,679 |- Wrekin |- |20 |- Total |17,818 |44,706 |83,753 <1> Gross expenditure by each Housing Action Trust.
Mr. Gordon Prentice: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if he will list in rank order the first round single regeneration budget bids showing where the local authorities fell in the index of deprivation at (a) local authority level, (b) by census enumeration districts and c) by the average score of the three worst wards.
Mr. Curry: The information is shown in the tables. In addition to the bids included in these tables, there were a further 73 successful and 87 unsuccessful bids which covered more than one local authority area. It is not possible to include these in the rankings.
Table 1: SRB successful bids (bids covering single local authority areas or parts of a single local authority only) Rankings Local authority |Name of bid |(A) |(B) |(C) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Newham |Meeting the needs of Newhams Communities |1 |5 |9 Newham |A regional Role in Tomorrows East London |1 |5 |9 Newham |New Dimensions for Stratford and Temple Mills |1 |5 |9 Southwark |Cross River Partnership |2 |3 |5 Southwark |Peckham Partnership |2 |3 |5 Hackney |Building on our Strengths |3 |1 |4 Birmingham |Birmingham Main Bid |5 |19 |2 Liverpool |Dingle |6 |17 |19 Liverpool |Speke/Garston |6 |17 |19 Liverpool |Social Partnership |6 |17 |19 Tower Hamlets |Stepney Revitalisation Bid |7 |2 |1 Tower Hamlets |Raising Participation: Raising Achievement |7 |2 |1 Lambeth |Riverside South |8 |6 |3 Sandwell |Sandwell Regeneration Partnership |9 |31 |34 Lewisham |Into the Mainstream |11 |12 |8 Lewisham |Silwood Estate: Combatting Racial Harassment |11 |12 |8 Knowsley |Knowsley Industrial Park |12 |14 |28 Manchester |St. Vincents |13 |25 |25 Manchester |Manchester |13 |25 |23 Manchester |Miles Platting and Ancoats Young People Initiative |13 |25 |23 Greenwich |Greenwich Regeneration: Woolwich Revival |14 |15 |20 Newcastle |Grainger Town |17 |22 |26 Newcastle |Education for Regeneration |17 |22 |26 Newcastle |Tyneside Bsus |17 |22 |26 Newcastle |Walker Open and Learning and Fitness Centre |17 |22 |26 Newcastle |Scotswood Regeneration Strategy |17 |22 |26 Newcastle |North Benwell-New Beginnings |17 |22 |26 Barking and Dagenham |Roding Valley Area Regeneration |18 |30 |36 Wandsworth |Wandsworth Partnership |21 |18 |22 South Tyneside |Step |22 |36 |54 Bradford |Training for New Technology |23 |26 |25 Bradford |Royds-Bradford |23 |26 |25 Middlesborough |Middlesborough Pride and Enterprise |24 |79 |79 Westminster |The Bloomsbury Project |26 |10 |12 Salford |The Salford Partnership |28 |41 |21 Brent |Chalkhill Estate: Economic and Physical Regeneration |29 |11 |7 Kingston upon Hull |Hull's First SRB Bid |31 |57 |42 Blackburn |Blackburn SRB Bid |32 |37 |55 Gateshead |Eastgate Development |33 |61 |44 Sunderland |City of Sunderland Partnership |34 |64 |47 Sheffield |Sheffield's Bid to the SRB |36 |35 |18 Ealing |Centre for Manufacturing and Engineering Innovation |38 |24 |31 Oldham |Oldham |39 |58 |48 Brighton |Regenerating Central Brighton |40 |21 |33 Doncaster |Stainforth Estate Action |41 |68 |66 Southampton |Southampton City Centre |42 |27 |32 Bristol |Bristol 2020 |43 |55 |35 Lincoln |City of Lincoln |48 |89 |124 Rochdale |Canalside Rochdale |50 |78 |60 North Tyneside |Meadowell Regeneration |52 |62 |73 Plymouth |Plymouth 2000 Partnership-Turning the Tide |53 |29 |14 Barnsley |Sustainable Regeneration for Barnsley |54 |244 |142 St. Helens |St. Helens Southern Corridor |55 |134 |116 Leeds |Removing Barriers-Creating Opportunity |56 |67 |24 Burnley |Initiative Burnley |57 |65 |86 Easington |East Durham Regeneration |58 |235 |152 Norwich |Norwich Mile Cross |59 |75 |81 Rotherham |Shaping Rotherham's Future |60 |109 |90 Wirral |Hamilton Quarter |61 |87 |59 Langbaurgh on Tees |Grangetown |62 |141 |93 Wansbeck |Wansbeck Initiative |63 |86 |140 Wansbeck |Aiming High |63 |86 |140 Stoke on Trent |Cobridge Community Renewal |64 |138 |103 Tameside |Tame Valley Initiative |65 |112 |128 Derwentshire |Consett Southern Area |66 |320 |173 Hove |Hove Means Business |68 |20 |45 Stockton on Tees |Tilery Project |69 |98 |69 Hastings |The Battle for Hastings-Town Centre |70 |32 |51 Wakefield |SESKU-Wakefield |71 |239 |143 Oxford |Blackbird Leys/Cowley Initiative |72 |43 |57 Sefton |Netherton |73 |52 |63 Sefton |Bootle Village |73 |52 |63 Wigan |Wigan Plc |74 |161 |136 Derby |Investing in Derby People |76 |99 |75 Scunthorpe |Grimsby and Cleethorpes |77 |101 |107 Scunthorpe |Scunthorpe Bid for SRB Resources |77 |101 |107 Thanet |Thanet District Council SRB Bid |81 |39 |53 Sedgefield |Bessember Park |85 |224 |167 Kirklees |Huddersfield Challenge |88 |113 |113 Kirklees |Kirklees-Routeways to Success |88 |113 |113 Hyndburn |The Regeneration of Central Accrington |89 |151 |141 Reading |Hexham Road Estate, Reading |92 |53 |52 Thurrock |The Tilbury Project, Essex |94 |83 |111 Thurrock |George Street Redevelopment |94 |83 |111 Calderdale |West Central Halifax |97 |76 |100 Calderdale |The Elland Initiative |97 |76 |100 Hounslow |The Bid for Brentford |99 |42 |68 Bolsover |Bolsover Diamond |100 |320 |182 Copeland |Renaissance of Whitehaven |101 |219 |160 Torbay |Torbay (Brixham) |107 |49 |76 Rochester Upon Medway |Medway City Estate Management Initiative |109 |72 |65 Rochester Upon Medway |Small Business Village, Luton, Chatham |109 |72 |65 Rochester Upon Medway |Chatham Campus-Business Creation and Technology |109 |72 |65 Lancaster |Morecambe-Turning the Tide |111 |48 |56 Ipswich |Ispwich Wet Dock |114 |135 |119 Carlisle |Carlisle-Raffles Sets the Pace |124 |253 |205 Ellesmere Port and Neston |Ellesmere Port Epicentre Strategy |131 |216 |134 The Wrekin |The Telford Partnership |132 |179 |171 Swale |Swale Regenerating the Isle of Sheppey |133 |118 |122 Eastbourne |Energise Eastbourne-Eastbourne Town Centre |136 |83 |153 Gloucester |Urban Regeneration in Barton and Tredworth |137 |56 |83 Alnwick |Amble Regeneration |140 |320 |234 Dudley |Dudley-Foundation for the Future |142 |103 |99 Cannock Chase |The Gateway Project |143 |320 |164 Northampton |Northampton Partnership |144 |128 |70 Trafford |Old Trafford |146 |126 |84 Weymouth and Portland |The Island and Royal Manor of Portland |166 |117 |130 Eden |Eden (Appleby Training Centre) |172 |320 |309 Dover |Whitecliff Business Park Dover |177 |152 |120 Fenland |Integrated Regeneration Strategy for the Wisbech Area|178 |227 |181 Basildon |The Bonus Project |182 |217 |176 Sutton |The Northern Wards |183 |110 |147 Gillingham |Architecture Centre-North Kent |192 |80 |92 Crewe and Nantwich |All Change at Crewe |194 |156 |161 Chester |Regeneration in West Chester |198 |106 |109 Ashford |South Ashford Urban Renewal Initiative |206 |240 |166 Harrow |Ethnic Minority Business Development |207 |133 |208 West Lindsey |Gainsborough Riverside Regeneration |210 |242 |190 Epping Forest |The Limes Farm Partnership |212 |192 |248 Craven |Craven: Hellifield Station |216 |320 |306 North Bedfordshire |Queens Park Partnership, Bedford |227 |105 |88 Sedgemoor |The Sydenham Estate, Bridgwater, Somerset |233 |194 |219 Leominster |Kington Connected Community |237 |320 |324 Kingswood |Kingswood Revitalisation Project |280 |320 |300 Congelton |Congleton Town and Industry Initiative |284 |320 |331 Selby |The Selby Waterfront Partnership |295 |320 |221 Braintree |The East Braintree Bid |315 |320 |285 Cherwell |Grimsbury Regeneration, Banbury Oxon |350 |160 |216
Table 2: SRB unsuccessful bids (bids covering single local authority areas or parts of a single local authority only) Rankings Local authority |Name of bid |(a) |(b) |(c) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Newham |New Routes to New Jobs, Canning Town |1 |5 |9 Newham |Royals University College Technology Institute |1 |5 |9 Southwark |Raising Achievement (ELAN) |2 |3 |5 Southwark |Bermondsey and Rotherhithe Enterprise Network |2 |3 |5 Hackney |Enhance Employment Prospects, Promote Equality |3 |1 |4 Islington |Destination King's Cross |4 |4 |11 Islington |Investment in Achievement |4 |4 |11 Birmingham |Bangladeshi Youth Forum |5 |19 |2 Birmingham |Afro-Caribbean Resource Centre |5 |19 |2 Birmingham |Small Heath School |5 |19 |2 Birmingham |Camp Lane Working Group |5 |19 |2 Birmingham |Birmingham Consortium of Colleges |5 |19 |2 Liverpool |Parents and Under 8s |6 |17 |19 Liverpool |Liverpool City of Architecture |6 |17 |19 Liverpool |Second Chance |6 |17 |19 Tower Hamlets |Davenant Centre |7 |2 |1 Lambeth |Adding Value in Media and Cultural Sectors |8 |6 |3 Sandwell |Interpretation Services and English Skills |9 |31 |34 Sandwell |Black Country Urban Vinyard |9 |31 |34 Sandwell |English Skills for the Sikh Community |9 |31 |34 Lewisham |Lewisham Literacy 2000 |11 |12 |8 Knowsley |Regeneration Through Partnership |12 |14 |28 Manchester |Greater Monsall Initiative |13 |25 |23 Manchester |Support of Ethnic Minorities |13 |25 |23 Manchester |Advice and Info Strategy |13 |25 |23 Manchester |INCITU |13 |25 |23 Manchester |Moss Side Initiative |13 |25 |23 Manchester |Regional Centres Strategy |13 |25 |23 Manchester |Gorton |13 |25 |23 Manchester |Employment Enterprise and Training |13 |25 |23 Manchester |Visions |13 |25 |23 Greenwich |Raising Employability |14 |15 |20 Greenwich |Increasing Business Competitiveness |14 |15 |20 Hammersmith and Fulham |Enhancing Employment Prospects and EDUC. Achievement |16 |9 |10 Hammersmith and Fulham |North End Road Corridor |16 |9 |10 Hammersmith and Fulham |Partnership Against Crime |16 |9 |10 Newcastle |Newburn Haugh Industrial Development |17 |22 |26 Newcastle |Newcastle Safer Cities |17 |22 |26 Newcastle |Televillage |17 |22 |26 Newcastle |Job Access Programme |17 |22 |26 Kensington and Chelsea |Language Support-ESOL |19 |13 |15 Kensington and Chelsea |From Earls Court to World's End |19 |13 |15 Waltham Forest |SRB Bid for Leyton |20 |16 |6 Wandsworth |Strategy to Prevent Youth Crime |21 |18 |22 Bradford |Manningham/City Centre |23 |26 |25 Bradford |Ethnic Minorities SRB |23 |26 |25 Bradford |Bradford High Technology Partnership |23 |26 |25 Bradford |Keighley SRB |23 |26 |25 Middlesborough |Ethnic Business Initiative |24 |79 |79 Westminster |Integration of Homeless Families and Refugees |26 |10 |12 Westminster |Amberely Estate |26 |10 |12 Westminster |Church Street Neighbourhood |26 |10 |12 Wolverhampton |Wolverhampton's SRB Bid |27 |45 |38 Brent |South Kilburn Family Centre |29 |11 |7 Brent |Brent Language Service |29 |11 |7 Brent |Crime Reduction, Employment and Training Programme |29 |11 |7 Brent |Brent Adult and Community Education |29 |11 |7 Blackpool |Blackpool Strategy for Regeneration |30 |23 |17 Gateshead |The Bede Centre |33 |61 |44 Gateshead |Team Valley Crime Prevention Initiative |33 |61 |44 Gateshead |Top Team |33 |61 |44 Hartlepool |Hartlepool Youth Strategy |35 |130 |91 Sheffield |Childcare Partnership Programme |36 |35 |18 Leicester |The Leicester Mosque Trust |37 |70 |41 Oldham |Oldham Telecite |39 |58 |48 Doncaster |Doncaster Regeneration Partnership |41 |68 |66 Walsall |Walsall for Tomorrow |44 |59 |64 Preston |Ribble Link Navigation |47 |71 |37 Preston |Preston Inner East |47 |71 |37 Bolton |Community Arts and Sports Centre |49 |88 |62 Bolton |Bolton Renaissance |49 |88 |62 Rochdale |Blackstone Edge Outdoor Pursuits and Residential Centre|50 |78 |60 Halton |Building Capacity and Competitive Strength |51 |93 |117 North Tyneside |Safer Communities Initiatives |52 |62 |73 Barnsley |Royston Comprehensive School |53 |244 |142 Barnsley |Rain Project |54 |244 |142 St Helens |Newton le Willows |54 |134 |116 Barnsley |Barnsley SRB |54 |244 |142 Leeds |Jamaica Society |56 |67 |24 Leeds |Industry/Education |56 |67 |24 Wirral |Tranmere |61 |87 |59 Wirral |Business Care Pilot |61 |87 |59 Wirral |Wirral Green Alliance LEAC |61 |87 |59 Wirral |Cammel Laird |61 |87 |59 Wirral |Bidstone/M53 Corridor/Cross Lane |61 |87 |59 Derby |Derby City Partnership |76 |99 |75 Corby |Corby Town Centre Regeneration |78 |146 |172 Blyth Valley |Blyth Renaissance |80 |320 |169 Thanet |St Peter's Parochial Church Council |81 |39 |53 Darlington |Darlington SRB |82 |126 |115 Great Yarmouth |North Quay Refurbishment |86 |40 |39 Kirklees |Personal Development and Regeneration |88 |113 |113 Barrow in Furness |Heart of Barrow |93 |112 |126 Slough |Slough Foyer |95 |85 |125 Enfield |Interkids Project |96 |38 |46 Hounslow |Ivybridge South Isleworth |99 |42 |68 Pendle |Meeting the Challenge to Manufacturing |103 |181 |127 Merton |Community Enterprise on Phipps Bridge |104 |46 |61 Merton |Merton Tramlink |104 |46 |61 Merton |A New View of Pollards Hill |104 |46 |61 Merton |Wandle Strategy: Partnership for Skills |104 |46 |61 Merton |Designing Out Crime-Rear Alleyways |104 |46 |61 Southend |Pierhead Development |110 |73 |80 Southend |CC-TV Surveillance |110 |73 |80 Peterborough |The Welland Action Project |112 |142 |85 West Lancashire |Midstream |116 |320 |175 Exeter |Exeter Homes Committee |118 |81 |123 Exeter |Community Safety |118 |81 |123 Gravesham |The High Street-Gravesend |121 |97 |133 Gravesham |North East Gravesend |121 |97 |133 Croydon |Basic Skills for Regeneration in Croydon |125 |54 |40 Allerdale |Maryport Job-Builder |126 |246 |165 Chester le Street |Chester le Street Town Centre |128 |320 |195 Chester le Street |Plawsworth Direct Access Centre |128 |320 |195 Chester le Street |Chester le Street Riverside |128 |320 |195 Restormel |St Austell Town Regeneration Strategy |129 |119 |210 Shepway |Regeneration of East Folkestone |130 |50 |58 Bassetlaw |Destination Bassetlaw Ltd |138 |153 |112 Barnet |Cricklewood Partnership |139 |51 |77 Barnet |Graham Park Area Partnership |139 |51 |77 Dudley |Cable Technology |142 |103 |99 Trafford |Longford Park |146 |126 |84 Ryedale |Writers Workshop |146 |63 |89 Dartford |Business Innovation Centre |149 |213 |157 Dartford |Holy Trinity Church |149 |213 |157 North Cornwall |The Kinsman Estate, Bodmin |151 |320 |271 Chorley |Chorley Open Learning Centre |152 |320 |246 North Devon |The Ilfracombe Partnership |153 |167 |148 North Devon |North Devon Food Village |153 |167 |148 Cheltenham |Cheltenham Millenium |155 |150 |110 Havering |Harold Hill Regeneration |158 |129 |74 Bury |Bridge Hall Area Consolidation |161 |108 |138 Bury |Building a Quality Learning Community Together |161 |108 |138 East Staffordshire |Burton Regeneration Programme |165 |167 |129 Tendring |Clacton Tourism Development Project |168 |100 |102 Kingston upon Thames |Charter Quay-The Missing Link |169 |107 |155 Kingston upon Thames |Kingston Country Court Lay Advocacy Scheme |169 |107 |155 Richmond upon Thames |Boat Project |173 |164 |232 Richmond upon Thames |Butt Farm Initiative |173 |164 |232 Warrington |North West International Business Centre |174 |155 |105 Bexley |Erith and Belvedere Partnership |181 |96 |101 Bexley |Skills, Training and Enterprise in Thamesmead |181 |96 |101 Bexley |Whitehall Centre |181 |96 |101 Bexley |Building Craft Workshops |181 |96 |101 Sutton |Releasing Local Potential |183 |110 |147 Newcastle under Lyme |Greater Chesterton Community Programme |184 |256 |184 Oswestry |Victoria Ward |185 |320 |263 Wyre |Silicon Fylde Enterprise Stimulation |187 |126 |137 Canterbury |Whitstable Harbour Ward Regeneration |188 |115 |87 Waveney |Roman Hill Partnership, Lowestoft |191 |121 |94 Gillingham |Gillingham District Centre |192 |80 |92 Teesdale |Evenwood and Barony Parish |204 |320 |243 Boothferry |Economic and Social Opportunities in Goole |205 |210 |198 Amber Valley |Langley Mill |209 |255 |235 Stockport |Project Youth Stockport |213 |131 |98 Craven |Craven SRB |216 |320 |306 High Peak |High Peak Partnership, The Glossop Project |218 |180 |202 Staffordshire Moorlands |Leek SRB Bid |224 |320 |241 South Derbyshire |Made in Swadlincote Partnership |225 |218 |328 Rother |Rye Habour |241 |234 |159 Thamesdown |Swindon Foyer |245 |193 |131 Maidstone |Maidstone Town Centre Community Initiative |246 |116 |132 Arun |Lineside Industrial Estate/Wickbourne Estate |256 |126 |106 Arun |Investing in the Community-Bognor Regis |256 |126 |106 Derbyshire Dales |The Bakewell Project |257 |320 |358 Ribble Valley |Ribble Valley |262 |320 |352 Macclesfield |Community Link |274 |223 |274 Milton Keynes |Tackling Disadvantage in a New Town |279 |197 |170 Woking |Sheerwater, Central and Maybury Regeneration |291 |143 |180 Poole |Hamworthy SRB Bid |293 |145 |242 Guildford |North Guildford Quality in Education |304 |199 |312 Lewes |Newhaven Town Centre |308 |229 |215 Kennet |Tidworth Community Regeneration Bid |311 |320 |308 Cotswold |Northleach Regeneration Scheme |316 |252 |304 Harrogate |Regeneration of Ripon |318 |272 |224 Charnwood |Loughborough Bid |331 |320 |186 Woodspring |Developing Individuals |333 |132 |96 Mendip |Morlands Industrial Site, Glastonbury |334 |191 |291 West Wiltshire |West Wiltshire DC Sports Facilities |339 |320 |283 Wealden |Herstmonceux Science Centre |342 |266 |258 Chelmsford |The Boarded Barns Estate |361 |320 |289
Mr. Gordon Prentice: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment when he expects to publish his guidance for the second round of bidding on the single regeneration budget.
Nr. Donohoe: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment how much his Department spent during 1994 on recruiting staff to his Department and its executive agencies; and how many staff were recruited.
Sir Paul Beresford: During 1994 my Department spent £451,905 on recruiting staff to the Department and its executive agencies: 122 staff were recruited.
Mr. Gordon Prentice: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment when he will come to a decision on the Local Government Commission's final recommendations for Lancashire.
Column 408
Mr. Robert B. Jones: We are still considering the Local Government Commission's recommendations about the future structure of local government in Lancashire, and will announce a decision as soon as possible.
Mrs. Maddock: To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster how many employees for which his Department is responsible were women (a) in 1991, (b) in 1992, (c) in 1993 and (d) in 1994; and, of these, how many were (i) at grade 7 level, (ii) at grade 3 level, (iii) at executive officer level, (iv) at administrative officer level and (v) at administrative assistant level.
Mr. Robert G. Hughes: The Department and agencies for which my right hon. Friend is responsible did not exist in any comparable form before the 1992 election. The figures for 1993 and 1994 for these and other areas which fall within the Cabinet Office vote are as follows:
CO/OPSS CCTA CS COLLEGECCC |1993|1994|1993|1994|1993|1994|1993|1994 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Grade 7 |26 |27 |5 |7 |21 |19 |1 |1 Grade 3 |0 |2 |0 |0 |1 |0 |0 |0 Executive officer level |115 |120 |23 |20 |28 |30 |50 |50 Administrative officer level |153 |165 |31 |40 |57 |61 |108 |92 Administrative assistant level |122 |116 |3 |4 |4 |2 |49 |44 Total women in department |493 |507 |124 |135 |111 |112 |261 |237 Total staff in department |874 |906 |412 |378 |268 |273 |486 |447
OHS RAS COI HMSO |1993 |1994 |1993 |1994 |1993 |1994 |1993 |1994 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Grade 7 |3 |3 |6 |6 |7 |8 |5 |5 Grade 3 |0 |1 |0 |0 |0 |0 |0 |0 Executive Officer level |18 |16 |19 |16 |22 |26 |149 |158 Administrative Officer level |41 |39 |41 |39 |59 |50 |422 |397 Administrative assistant level |8 |7 |28 |25 |7 |5 |142 |122 Total women in department |112 |109 |94 |86 |95 |89 |971 |936 Total staff in department |131 |126 |197 |151 |579 |515 |3,157|3,117
Mr. Battle: To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster when the panel reports of the technology foresight exercise will be published; and if he will make a statement.
Mr. Robert G. Hughes: The foresight sector panel reports will be published in the spring. These reports will provide a sectoral focus. An overarching report from the technology foresight steering group will be published. This will draw together the main themes arising from the exercise.
Mr. Chidgey: To ask the Attorney-General what was the absenteeism rate for (a) the Government Property Lawyers and (b) the Law Officer's departments in each year since 1991.
The Attorney-General: The information available for absences through sickness is:
|Numbers of|Numbers of |staff |days |employed |absences -------------------------------------------------------------------------- a) Government Property Lawyers 1992<1> |- |- 1993 |127 |1,021.0 1994 |128 |1,225.0 b) Crown Prosecution Service 1992 |6,221 |48,213.0 1993 |6,500 |53,495.0 1994 |6,686 |57,284.0 c) Treasury Solicitor's Department 1992<2> |473 |6,344.5 1993 |357 |6,233.5 1994 |377 |6,274.0 d) Serious Fraud Office 1992 |168 |1,519.0 1993 |199 |1,398.0 1994 |163 |1,590.0 e) Legal Secretariat to the Law Officers 1992 |26 |47.5 1993 |27 |46.0 1994 |27 |32.0 <1> Government Property Lawyers Agency was created on 1st April 1993. <2> The figures for 1992 include staff of what is now Government Property Lawyers.
Mr. Kaufman: To ask the Attorney-General if he will set out for each of the next steps agencies in his Department, whether they have acquired their own headquarters buildings and, if so, at what purchase cost or annual rental; how many support staff they have required which were not required when their operations were within his Department; how many of them published periodical journals and at what annual cost; how many have fleets of executive cars or single executive cars and at what annual cost; how many have specially designed logos and at what cost; how many have corporate clothing and at what cost; and what is the cost of specially designed and printed corporate stationery.
The Attorney-General: The chief executive of the Government Property Lawyers has provided the following information. Of the matters raised by the hon. Member, only the following have resulted from the establishment of the agency:
|£ -------------------------------------------------------------- Cost of specially designed logo |1,586 Cost of specially designed and printed stationery |464
Mr. Pawsey: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, pursuant to her answer of 19 January, Official Report , columns 641-42 , on what date information requested by the hon. Member for Rugby and Kenilworth on the balances held by schools in England was due in to her Department; what steps are being taken to obtain the information where it is late; and what requirement is made of local education authorities to give reasons if the information is late.
Mr. Robin Squire: Regulations made under section 42 of the Education Reform Act 1988 require local education authorities to publish their local management of schools outturn statements before 1 November following the end of the financial year to which the statement relates. In relation to statements for the year 1993 94, a letter was sent by the Department to all LEAs in October 1994 reminding them of the imminence of this deadline. In cases of significant delay, the LEAs in question have been further reminded as appropriate, and explanations obtained from them. The attention of LEAs has also been drawn to the powers of the Secretary of State under section 99 of the Education Act 1944.
Column 411
In the table included in the answer given on 19 January to the hon. Member, the following figures should be substituted for those previously given:LEA |Balance |£000 -------------------------------- Avon |12,093 Buckinghamshire |8,116 Dorset |7,200
Mrs. Gorman: To ask the Secretary of State for Education what is (a) the number of places, (b) the
Column 412
number of pupils and (c) the percentage excess or shortage of places in (i) local education authority maintained and (ii) grant-maintained secondary schools in each local education authority in England.Mr. Robin Squire: The information is given in the table. Data on surplus places in the 286 grant-maintained schools in stage 1 authorities are not available. I refer my hon. Friend to the reply that I gave the Member for St. Ives (Mr. Harris) on Friday 9 December 1994, Official Report , columns 410-14 which gave for each local education authority the total number of unfilled places in schools where the number of places is greater than the number of pupils.
Net surplus places in secondary schools by local authority area (excluding GM schools in stage 1 authorities-see note 1) January 1994 LEA maintained Self governing schools (GM) schools (see note 2) |Percentage |Percentage |excess (see note|Number of |excess (see note| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEA Avon<1> |63,459 |52,708 |17 |- |- |- Barking |9,390 |9,756 |-4 |- |- |- Barnet |9,917 |8,885 |10 |10,351 |9,905 |4 Barnsley |15,280 |12,730 |17 |- |- |- Bedfordshire |43,641 |35,859 |18 |9,493 |8,852 |7 Berkshire |45,556 |39,596 |13 |8,653 |7,409 |14 Bexley |12,522 |10,860 |13 |3,691 |3,655 |1 Birmingham |58,380 |49,551 |15 |16,521 |15,177 |8 Bolton |14,931 |14,228 |5 |3,036 |2,803 |8 Bradford |46,291 |40,988 |11 |5,005 |5,286 |-6 Brent |3,329 |2,983 |10 |11,664 |9,705 |17 Bromley |5,610 |5,584 |0 |11,957 |11,553 |3 Buckinghamshire |28,608 |26,989 |6 |10,218 |10,174 |0 Bury |10,687 |10,333 |3 |- |- |- Calderdale |8,449 |6,846 |19 |7,124 |6,543 |8 Cambridgeshire |27,112 |25,630 |5 |16,055 |15,274 |5 Camden |8,810 |8,276 |6 |2,309 |2,381 |-3 Cheshire<1> |67,671 |61,091 |10 |- |- |- Cleveland |44,670 |36,437 |18 |- |- |- Cornwall |30,810 |28,977 |6 |- |- |- Corporation of London |0 |0 |- |- |- |- Coventry |23,232 |19,013 |18 |- |- |- Croydon |9,654 |9,002 |7 |6,320 |5,907 |7 Cumbria |23,982 |20,311 |15 |13,042 |10,873 |17 Derbyshire |50,432 |42,062 |17 |16,348 |15,485 |5 Devon<1> |57,357 |54,127 |6 |- |- |- Doncaster |28,134 |21,869 |22 |- |- |- Dorset |32,932 |31,294 |5 |10,554 |9,947 |6 Dudley |15,274 |13,456 |12 |4,846 |4,669 |4 Durham |45,675 |37,708 |17 |- |- |- Ealing |8,081 |7,368 |9 |6,228 |6,111 |2 East Sussex |37,232 |34,348 |8 |- |- |- Enfield |13,616 |12,214 |10 |5,891 |5,634 |4 Essex |35,532 |28,787 |19 |77,500 |67,108 |13 Gateshead |14,223 |11,751 |17 |- |- |- Gloucestershire |12,463 |11,239 |10 |23,285 |22,150 |5 Greenwich |16,730 |13,980 |16 |- |- |- Hackney |9,408 |7,445 |21 |- |- |- Hammersmith |7,248 |4,648 |36 |1,178 |1,237 |-5 Hampshire |70,357 |62,950 |11 |16,692 |16,249 |3 Haringey |10,718 |9,222 |14 |- |- |- Harrow<1> |7,650 |7,792 |-2 |- |- |- Havering |13,280 |11,015 |17 |3,642 |3,880 |-7 Hereford and Worcester<1> |51,305 |43,833 |15 |- |- |- Hertfordshire |57,405 |47,368 |17 |23,557 |20,979 |11 Hillingdon |2,596 |2,127 |18 |12,369 |11,988 |3 Hounslow |12,011 |12,403 |-3 |2,108 |2,123 |-1 Humberside |66,592 |56,111 |16 |- |- |- Isle of Wight |11,168 |10,498 |6 |- |- |- Isles of Scilly |345 |122 |65 |- |- |- Islington |8,855 |7,215 |19 |- |- |- Kensington |3,253 |2,541 |22 |614 |621 |-1 Kent |60,419 |50,126 |17 |58,380 |52,118 |11 Kingston upon Thames |5,094 |4,886 |4 |3,214 |2,901 |10 Kirklees<1> |26,642 |23,608 |11 |- |- |- Knowsley<1> |9,986 |8,365 |16 |- |- |- Lambeth |5,464 |2,998 |45 |3,984 |3,308 |17 Lancashire<1> |87,983 |77,417 |12 |- |- |- Leeds<1> |48,110 |42,450 |12 |- |- |- Leicestershire<1> |65,946 |56,693 |14 |- |- |- Lewisham |11,924 |10,888 |9 |- |- |- Lincolnshire |23,892 |21,206 |11 |17,736 |16,635 |6 Liverpool<1> |35,422 |28,190 |20 |- |- |- Manchester |33,733 |21,685 |36 |- |- |- Merton |8,674 |7,313 |16 |- |- |- Newcastle upon Tyne |21,301 |16,898 |21 |- |- |- Newham<1> |16,144 |13,485 |16 |- |- |- Norfolk |35,198 |32,032 |9 |9,067 |8,802 |3 North Tyneside<1> |17,204 |14,122 |18 |- |- |- North Yorkshire |49,566 |44,040 |11 |- |- |- Northamptonshire |38,639 |35,524 |8 |10,134 |9,386 |7 Northumberland<1> |31,320 |28,769 |8 |- |- |- Nottinghamshire<1> |81,573 |61,931 |24 |- |- |- Oldham |17,200 |16,330 |5 |- |- |- Oxfordshire |41,833 |35,144 |16 |- |- |- Redbridge<1> |14,057 |14,237 |-1 |- |- |- Richmond upon Thames |7,710 |7,622 |1 |- |- |- Rochdale<1> |14,105 |11,854 |16 |- |- |- Rotherham |20,884 |18,187 |13 |- |- |- Salford<1> |14,509 |11,209 |23 |- |- |- Sandwell<1> |20,988 |17,765 |15 |- |- |- Sefton |22,335 |19,030 |15 |- Sheffield<1> |30,348 |25,045 |17 |- |- |- Shropshire |26,102 |21,522 |18 |3,703 |3,701 |0 Solihull |13,948 |13,506 |3 |- |- |- Somerset<1> |30,803 |27,654 |10 |- |- |- South Tyneside |11,504 |9,570 |17 |- |- |- Southwark |8,505 |6,598 |22 |3,175 |2,786 |12 St. Helens |13,880 |11,759 |15 |- |- |- Staffordshire<1> |67,215 |65,023 |3 |- |- |- Stockport |17,812 |16,020 |10 |- |- |- Suffolk |53,590 |48,024 |10 |- |- |- Sunderland |21,729 |19,436 |11 |- |- |- Surrey |35,138 |34,015 |3 |12,529 |11,390 |9 Sutton |4,443 |4,660 |-5 |6,705 |6,699 |0 Tameside |12,346 |11,001 |11 |2,171 |2,371 |-9 Tower Hamlets<1> |13,080 |10,985 |16 |- |- |- Trafford |10,272 |8,864 |14 |3,402 |3,083 |9 Wakefield |24,623 |20,077 |18 |- |- |- Walsall |16,297 |13,738 |16 |6,567 |5,768 |12 Waltham Forest |11,097 |9,407 |15 |2,078 |2,099 |-1 Wandsworth |3,464 |2,335 |33 |7,785 |6,606 |15 Warwickshire |25,580 |20,304 |21 |5,993 |4,483 |20 West Sussex |45,558 |39,952 |12 |- |- |- Westminster |7,911 |7,464 |6 |- |- |- Wigan |21,604 |19,523 |10 |- |- |- Wiltshire |24,811 |20,787 |16 |15,353 |13,700 |11 Wirral<1> |22,818 |19,052 |17 |- |- |- Wolverhampton |16,640 |13,597 |18 |2,747 |2,404 |12 <1> Stage 1 LEAs which have one or more GM secondary schools 1. Stage 1 = less than 10% of pupils in the GM sector 2. The GM columns include schools which became grant-maintained on or before 1 April 1994. 3. A negative figure indicates a net shortage of places.
Dr. Hampson: To ask the Secretary of State for Education how much per pupil was spent by each local education authority on books and equipment in 1993 94 prices in (a) 1979 80 and (b) 1993 94.
Column 414
Mr. Robin Squire: The table sets out per-pupil expenditure in 1993- 94 prices by LEAs in England on books and equipment at LEA-maintained nursery, primary and secondary schools in 1979 80 and 1992 93, the latest year for which figures are available. Equivalent information is not available for grant-maintained schools.
Column 415
|Nursery |Nursery Expenditure on books |primary and |primary and and equipment per pupil in 1979-80 |secondary |secondary and 1992-93 by LEA (in 1993-94 |1979-80 |1992-93 prices) |£ |£ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ILEA |126 |- Corporation of London |- |114 Camden |- |81 Greenwich |- |45 Hackney |- |34 Hammersmith |- |61 Islington |- |56 Kensington and Chelsea |- |82 Lambeth |- |14 Lewisham |- |197 Southwark |- |64 Tower Hamlets |- |127 Wandsworth |- |56 Westminster |- |261 Barking |40 |111 Barnet |55 |102 Bexley |63 |55 Brent |75 |66 Bromley |53 |71 Croydon |50 |69 Ealing |56 |48 Enfield |50 |31 Haringey |66 |13 Harrow |67 |105 Havering |51 |85 Hillingdon |56 |92 Hounslow |53 |93 Kingston upon Thames |46 |71 Merton |51 |102 Newham |66 |82 Redbridge |54 |102 Richmond upon Thames |50 |74 Sutton |55 |54 Waltham Forest |71 |63 Birmingham |37 |76 Coventry |48 |65 Dudley |29 |51 Sandwell |45 |56 Solihull |38 |97 Walsall |45 |80 Wolverhampton |47 |51 Knowsley |47 |76 Liverpool |47 |48 St Helens |34 |84 Sefton |44 |71 Wirral |44 |59 Bolton |46 |96 Bury |52 |68 Manchester |69 |71 Oldham |48 |82 Rochdale |51 |49 Salford |48 |12 Stockport |46 |98 Tameside |44 |73 Trafford |36 |69 Wigan |45 |84 Barnsley |48 |91 Doncaster |52 |0 Rotherham |35 |63 Sheffield |52 |67 Bradford |42 |55 Calderdale |38 |77 Kirklees |35 |96 Leeds |36 |57 Wakefield |39 |67 Gateshead |50 |87 Newcastle upon Tyne |58 |64 North Tyneside |50 |1 South Tyneside |69 |74 Sunderland |50 |81 Isles of Scilly |40 |18 Avon |39 |109 Bedfordshire |57 |86 Berkshire |46 |101 Buckinghamshire |49 |85 Cambridgeshire |47 |91 Cheshire |39 |62 Cleveland |49 |67 Cornwall |47 |80 Cumbria |40 |64 Derbyshire |45 |66 Devon |43 |93 Dorset |46 |72 Durham |36 |51 East Sussex |58 |93 Essex |46 |77 Gloucestershire |37 |79 Hampshire |36 |97 Hereford and Worcester |44 |83 Hertfordshire |49 |19 Humberside |47 |86 Isle of Wight |57 |82 Kent |51 |46 Lancashire |39 |100 Leicestershire |44 |116 Lincolnshire |40 |101 Norfolk |49 |60 North Yorkshire |48 |102 Northamptonshire |48 |86 Northumberland |55 |61 Nottinghamshire |46 |81 Oxfordshire |58 |89 Shropshire |40 |17 Somerset |44 |70 Staffordshire |54 |73 Suffolk |45 |189 Surrey |32 |53 Warwickshire |36 |92 West Sussex |55 |109 Wiltshire |45 |88 Total |49 |77
Mr. Don Foster: To ask the Secretary of State for Education what is the estimated number of pupils in 1995 96 aged (a) five to 10 years and (b) 11 to 15 years in each local education authority and in total.
Mr. Robin Squire: The projected numbers for England for January 1996 are as follows:
K Age (at 31 August 1995) |Five to 10<1>|11 to 15 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Maintained primary and secondary schools<2> |3,583,000 |2,691,000 Maintained special schools<2> |33,000 |48,000 <1> Excluding rising fives, ie pupils whose fifth birthday falls between 1 September 1995 and 31 December 1995. <2> Including grant maintained schools.
Projections at local education authority level are not available.
Column 417
Mr. Donohoe: To ask the Secretary of State for Education how much her Department spent during 1994 on recruiting staff to her Department and its executive agencies; and how many staff were recruited.
Next Section
| Home Page |