Previous Section | Home Page |
Social Security expenditure: |1990-91 |1991-92 |1992-93 |1993-94 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash terms |£59,713 million|£69,878 million|£79,342 million|£86,896 million Real terms (93-94 prices) |£68,012 million|£74,884 million|£81,770 million|£86,896 million As percentage of GDP |11 per cent. |12 per cent. |13 per cent. |14 per cent. The figures have been taken from the 1995 Social Security Departmental Report and include administrative costs as well as additional local authority expenditure on housing and community charge\council tax benefits.
Mr. Milburn: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security, pursuant to his answer of 6 July, Official Report , column 359, what information on severe hardship claims and awards is available other than national figures. [33937]
Mr. Roger Evans: Information is available from 1988 by Department of Social Security region, monthly on a national basis, broken down into successful and unsuccessful applications. A monthly breakdown by Benefits Agency territory is available from 1992. Since April 1993 information has been collected monthly by district offices in the categories new, repeat or continuous application; and whether successful or unsuccessful.
Mr. Milburn: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how much his Department and its agencies have spent on computer consultancy in each of the last five years; and what is the expected expenditure over the next five years. [33859]
Mr. Burt: The information requested is not available.
Mr. Milburn: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security which firms have won computer consultancy contracts from his Department and its agencies over the last five years; and what is the number of contracts per firm. [33890]
Mr. Burt: The information is not readily available and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
Mr. Milburn: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security which firms of consultants employed by his Department over the last year have been paid more than £1,000 per day. [33878]
Mr. Burt: The information requested is not available.
Mr. Corbyn: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what is the cost of administration of the habitual residence test and of the appeal system; and what proportion of the money saved by non-payment is spent on administration. [33799]
Mr. Roger Evans: The cost of administering the habitual residence test for 1995 96 is estimated at £3.3 million. The allocation to the Independent Tribunal Service for administering the appeal system as a whole in 1995 96 is £48.6 million. It is not possible to apportion the costs of appeals against the habitual residence test. The estimated saving from introducing the habitual residence test is £30 million annually.
Column 622
Mr. Corbyn: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many claimants have been refused benefit, per month, since the introduction of the habitual residence test; of these, how many have appealed; and how many appeals have been upheld. [33803]
Mr. Roger Evans: I refer the hon. Member to the replies that I gave to the hon. Member for Newham, North-East (Mr. Timms) on 18 April, Official Report , column 43 , on 21 April, Official Report , column 314 , on 1 May, Official Report , column 7 and on 10 July, Official Report , columns 449 50 .
Numbers of claimants who have been refused housing benefit and council tax benefit because of the habitual residence test are being recorded from the 1995 96 tax year and will be available in December 1996.
Mr. Corbyn: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what representations he has received concerning the future of the habitual residence test; and what plans he has to make changes in its operation. [33805]
Mr. Roger Evans: I have received a number of letters from Members of Parliament and the public. I have no current plans to change the test.
Mr. Spearing: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if he will estimate the cumulative sums saved by the Exchequer and his Department by the departure and domicile of those qualified for United Kingdom old age pensions, by virtue of their exemption from uprating, for the decade 1985 95, in (a) Australia, (b) Canada, (c) New Zealand and (d) South Africa, stating for each the increased sums in sterling to which each as a basic pension would receive for a pension first paid in 1985. [33047]
Mr. Heald: It is estimated that the cumulative cost to the Social Security budget of paying all upratings of retirement pension from November 1985 to April 1994 to UK pensioners in the countries specified would have been (a) Australia £500 million, (b) Canada £275 million, (c) New Zealand £175 million, (d) South Africa £100 million.
The rate of basic pension payable to any individual depends on that person's national insurance contribution record. In November 1985, the rate payable to a person who fully satisfied the contribution conditions for a basic pension was £38.30. It is currently £58.85. Where the contribution conditions are not fully satisfied, a reduced pro rata pension is payable at rates varying from 98 per cent. to 25 per cent. of the full basic rate.
Note:
The cost figures are estimates rounded to the nearest £25 million.
The estimated cost of paying the April 1995 uprating to pensioners in countries where UK pensions are not uprated is not yet available.
Mr. Denham: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security, pursuant to the answer of 3 July, Official Report , column 79 , if he will estimate the percentage of pensioners retiring on an income between 75 per cent. and 100 per cent. of average earnings; and what figure has been used as average earnings. [33710]
Column 623
Mr. Heald: It is estimated that 12 per cent. of recently retired pensioner units have an income between 75 and 100 per cent. of average earnings. The average earnings figure used for the reply is £304.60 per week.
Source:
Family Expenditure Survey 1992.
Employment Gazette , February 1995.
Notes:
1. Average earnings are based on full time employees on adult rate in all industries and services for 1992.
2. Recently retired pensioner units are defined as single pensioner units and married couples where the individual or head of the household is less than five years over state pension age.
Mr. Denham: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security, pursuant to the answer of 3 July, Official Report , column 79 , if he will estimate the expenditure on rebates to members of contracted out money purchase schemes in (a) 2010, (b) 2020 and (c) 2030; and what estimate he has made of the number of members of (i) APPS and (ii) COMPS in each of those three years. [33711]
Mr. Heald: The estimated expenditure on the rebate for contracted- out money purchase schemes and the estimated numbers of members of appropriate personal pensions and COMPS are shown in the table. The level of the rebate will be reviewed regularly under the terms of the Pensions Bill 1995.
<