Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
Mr. John Marshall: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment what is the level of truancy in each London education authority. [20392]
Mr. Robin Squire: Rates of unauthorised absence for maintained primary and secondary schools in each London education authority for the 1994-95 school year up to and including 26 May 1995 are given in the following table:
LEA | Percentage of half days missed | Average number of half days missed per absent pupil |
---|---|---|
Inner London | ||
Corporation of London | 0.6 | 6 |
Camden | 1.5 | 15 |
Greenwich | 1.7 | 16 |
Hackney | 1.6 | 15 |
Hammersmith and Fulham | 1.5 | 15 |
Islington | 0.9 | 11 |
Kensington and Chelsea | 1.1 | 11 |
Lambeth | 1.9 | 14 |
Lewisham | 1.2 | 12 |
Southwark | 1.8 | 15 |
Tower Hamlets | 2.1 | 14 |
Wandsworth | 0.7 | 10 |
Westminster | 1.5 | 14 |
Outer London | ||
Barking and Dagenham | 1.6 | 13 |
Barnet | 0.4 | 10 |
Bexley | 0.3 | 7 |
Brent | 0.8 | 9 |
Bromley | 0.3 | 9 |
Croydon | 0.5 | 9 |
Ealing | 0.5 | 10 |
Enfield | 0.5 | 12 |
Haringey | 1.8 | 15 |
Harrow | 0.4 | 8 |
Havering | 0.2 | 6 |
Hillingdon | 1.1 | 9 |
Hounslow | 0.7 | 10 |
Kingston upon Thames | 0.4 | 9 |
Merton | 0.7 | 11 |
Newham | 2.8 | 17 |
Redbridge | 0.7 | 10 |
Richmond upon Thames | 0.2 | 7 |
Sutton | 0.2 | 9 |
Waltham Forest | 1.1 | 11 |
England average | 0.5 | 10 |
Source:
The National Pupil Absence Tables 1995, DfEE, November 1995.
13 Mar 1996 : Column: 639
LEA | Percentage of half days missed | Average number of half days missed per absent pupil |
---|---|---|
Inner London | ||
Corporation of London | n/a | n/a |
Camden | 2.2 | 26 |
Greenwich | 1.8 | 31 |
Hackney | 3.3 | 28 |
Hammersmith and Fulham | 2.9 | 33 |
Islington | 3.1 | 37 |
Kensington and Chelsea | 2.4 | 19 |
Lambeth | 2.1 | 20 |
Lewisham | 2.1 | 26 |
Southwark | 3.3 | 28 |
Tower Hamlets | 3.6 | 25 |
Wandsworth | 2.1 | 33 |
Westminster | 2.6 | 20 |
Greater London | ||
Barking and Dagenham | 2.8 | 48 |
Barnet | 0.3 | 12 |
Bexley | 0.9 | 34 |
Brent | 1.2 | 21 |
Bromley | 0.5 | 16 |
Croydon | 0.5 | 16 |
Ealing | 1.3 | 29 |
Enfield | 0.4 | 19 |
Haringey | 1.9 | 38 |
Harrow | 0.5 | 27 |
Havering | 0.7 | 14 |
Hillingdon | 1.5 | 24 |
Hounslow | 1.0 | 28 |
Kingston upon Thames | 0.4 | 17 |
Merton | 1.8 | 27 |
Newham | 3.6 | 43 |
Redbridge | 0.4 | 15 |
Richmond upon Thames | 0.8 | 17 |
Sutton | 0.3 | 12 |
Waltham Forest | 1.9 | 22 |
England average | 1.0 | 22 |
Source:
The National Pupil Absence Tables 1995, DfEE, November 1995.
13 Mar 1996 : Column: 640
Mr. Blunkett: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment when the last national survey of the condition of school buildings was undertaken by her Department; and when further such surveys are planned. [20567]
Mrs. Gillan: The last national survey by the Department that included information on the condition of school buildings was undertaken in 1986 and published in 1987 as the "Survey of School Buildings".
There are no plans for another exercise of this type in the immediate future.
Mr. Alfred Morris: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment what representations she has had from St. Wilfrid's school in Northenden, Manchester, in regard to the nursery school voucher scheme; what reply she is sending; what action she is taking; and if she will make a statement. [19074]
Mr. Robin Squire: My right hon. Friend has received one letter from St. Wilfrid's school, Northenden about the nursery voucher scheme. A reply will be sent shortly.
Mr. Clifton-Brown : To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment if she will assist the Purcell school development appeal. [20876]
Mrs. Gillan: We have decided to make a capital grant of £250,000 towards the Purcell school development appeal. This will encourage private donors also to contribute, and will enable the school to secure the larger premises needed to enhance the specialist education it provides for children with exceptional musical talents. Subject to parliamentary approval of the necessary grant regulations, the payment will be made within the existing cash limit for class x vote 1 for 1995-96.
Mr. John D. Taylor: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many people have been employed within the Northern Ireland Prison Service; and if he will provide a breakdown (a) for (i) uniformed and (ii) civilian employees and (b) for each institution in each of the last five years. [19509]
13 Mar 1996 : Column: 641
Sir John Wheeler: Responsibility for the subject in question has been delegated to the Prison Service under its chief executive, Mr. Alan Shannon. I have asked him to arrange for a reply to be given.
Letter from A. D. Shannon to Mr. John D. Taylor, dated 13 March 1996:
13 Mar 1996 : Column: 642
The Secretary of State has asked me to reply to your question about the number of staff within the Northern Ireland Prison Service. The figures are based on staff in post at 1st March in each of the last 5 years.
Year Discipline staff Governors Specialists Civilians
1992 2,463 105 582 345
1993 2,494 100 582 331
1994 2,507 94 589 325
1995 2,552 91 519 396
1996 2,532 86 445 430
Year Discipline staff Governors Specialists Civilian
HM prison, Belfast
1992 556 20 119 17
1993 609 22 120 20
1994 611 20 120 20
1995 335 16 111 32
1996 315 13 85 32
HM prison, Maze 1992 849 24 178 57
1993 823 24 174 47
1994 843 23 174 47
1995 1,153 23 131 68
1996 1,117 25 126 67
HM prison, Maghaberry 1992 478 16 128 38
1993 478 16 129 36
1994 481 15 133 34
1995 497 14 126 42
1996 515 15 103 46
HM prison, Magilligan 1992 397 12 85 19
1993 395 12 87 18
1994 395 11 88 19
1995 377 11 82 31
1996 377 10 71 37
HM Young offenders centre, Hydebank 1992 168 8 54 12
1993 174 9 54 11
1994 162 8 58 11
1995 174 8 52 20
1996 186 8 43 23
HM prison service college 1992 15 11 14 18
1993 15 4 13 18
1994 15 4 13 18
1995 16 4 8 13
1996 17 4 7.5 16
Prison service headquarters 1992 0 14 0 184
1993 0 13 0 184
1994 0 13 0 181
1995 0 15 0 190
1996 5 11 4 209
Mr. Worthington: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will publish class sizes in Northern Ireland primary schools over the past 10 years; and list how many and what percentage were up to 20, 21 to 25, 26 to 30, 31 to 35, 36 to 40 and over 40. [20286]
Mr. Ancram: The information requested is as follows:
13 Mar 1996 : Column: 641
Up to 20 | 21-25 | 26-30 | 31-35 | 36-40 | Over 40 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | Number | Per- centage | Number | Per- centage | Number | Per- centage | Number | Per- centage | Number | Per- centage | Number | Per- centage |
1986-87 | 1,039 | 15.1 | 1,831 | 26.6 | 2,453 | 35.6 | 1,346 | 19.6 | 204 | 3.0 | 8 | 0.1 |
1987-88 | 1,036 | 15.0 | 1,881 | 27.2 | 2,520 | 36.4 | 1,312 | 19.0 | 168 | 2.4 | 5 | 0.1 |
1988-89 | 1,048 | 15.0 | 1,857 | 26.6 | 2,521 | 36.2 | 1,348 | 19.3 | 175 | 2.5 | 20 | 0.3 |
1989-90 | 1,060 | 15.0 | 1,892 | 26.8 | 2,602 | 36.9 | 1,345 | 10.1 | 143 | 2.0 | 7 | 0.1 |
1990-91 | 1,136 | 16.0 | 1,979 | 27.9 | 2,565 | 36.1 | 1,266 | 17.8 | 152 | 2.1 | 7 | 0.1 |
1991-92 | 1,221 | 16.9 | 2,122 | 29.4 | 2,614 | 36.2 | 1,157 | 16.0 | 90 | 1.2 | 15 | 0.2 |
1992-93 | 1,404 | 19.2 | 2,193 | 30.0 | 2,710 | 37.1 | 954 | 13.0 | 51 | 0.7 | 1 | 0 |
1993-94 | 1,755 | 22.8 | 2,473 | 32.2 | 2,628 | 34.2 | 793 | 10.3 | 36 | 0.5 | 1 | 0 |
1994-95 | 1,828 | 23.6 | 2,601 | 33.7 | 2,552 | 33.0 | 716 | 9.3 | 32 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 |
1995-96 | 1,810 | 23.9 | 2,472 | 32.6 | 2,634 | 34.7 | 647 | 8.5 | 18 | 0.2 | 0 | 0 |
13 Mar 1996 : Column: 641
Next Section | Index | Home Page |