Previous Section Index Home Page


State Pensions

Ms Lynne: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if he will publish a table indicating for each of the last 17 years (a) the level of the basic state pension, (b) average weekly earnings and (c) the percentage of average weekly earnings as represented by the basic state pension. [26816]

Mr. Heald: The available information is in the table. The information for April 1996 earnings is not yet available.

Date of upratingRate of basic retirement pension (£pw)Average earnings(10) (£pw)Rate as a percentage of average earnings
November 197923.30100.6223.2
November 198027.15120.2422.6
November 198129.60132.4122.4
November 198232.85142.4223.1
November 198334.05156.7321.7
November 198435.80166.9821.4
November 198538.30178.7121.4
July 198638.70189.1220.5
April 198739.50198.9019.9
April 198841.15218.4018.8
April 198943.60239.7018.2
April 199046.90263.1017.8
April 199152.00284.7018.3
April 199254.15304.6017.8
April 199356.10316.9017.7
April 199457.60325.7017.7
April 199458.85336.3017.5

Note:

(10) Average earnings are for all full-time adult employees.

Source:

The Abstract of Statistics for Social Security and Contributions and Indices of Prices and Earnings, 1995 Edition, and the Employment Gazette.


30 Apr 1996 : Column: 477

Disability Working Allowance

Mr. Bradley: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security, pursuant to his answer of 14 March, Official Report, column 760, what assumptions underlay the answer to the hon. Member for Exeter (Sir J. Hannam) of 5 March 1991, Official Report, columns, 693-94, concerning the impact of using the functional test for disability working allowance for initial claims where no qualifying benefit is in payment. [26365]

Mr. Andrew Mitchell: The written answer to which the hon. Member refers was given before the introduction of disability working allowance and, as stated, the estimates were tentative.

The estimates were based on data from the 1985 Office of Population Censuses and Suveys disability survey, which contains detailed information about individuals' disability and other characteristics. Using these data, it is possible to construct a scale of the severity of individuals' disability. The estimates assume that, in order to qualify for DWA, disabled people had to be above a certain threshold on this disability scale.

The estimates took account of two groups of potential DWA recipients: those currently in work who score above the threshold on the OPCS scale and are not in receipt of a qualifying benefit; and disabled people not currently in work or in receipt of a qualifying benefit who might be

30 Apr 1996 : Column: 478

induced to go back to work. The estimates provided in 1991 also assumed, as did other estimates at the time, that the number induced to go back to work would be substantial in relation to those already in work.

It is not possible to produce revised estimates. The 1985 OPCS disability survey is still the most recent comprehensive survey of disabled peoples' characteristics, but the information about individuals' employment situation, earnings and benefit receipt is out of date and cannot now be used to produce reliable estimates of people who might qualify through a functional test but are not currently in receipt of a qualifying benefit. Any estimate of the size of a behavioural effect is speculative, and depends heavily on the state of the labour market and individuals' personal and other circumstances.

Disabled People (Incapacity for Work)

Mr. Bradley: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many people who (a) were previously claiming invalidity benefit, (b) have claimed incapacity benefit since April 1995, (c) receive severe disablement allowance, (d) receive the income support disability premium on incapacity grounds and (e) receive incapacity credits only, have been treated as incapable of work since April 1995 by virtue of (i) receipt of the highest rate of the disability living allowance care component, (ii) being aged over 58 years on 13 April 1995 and received an incapacity benefit between 1 December 1993 and 12 April 1995, (iii) suffering from a progressive disease, (iv) being registered blind, (v) tetraplegia, (vi) persistent vegetative state, (vii) dementia, (viii) paraplegia (ix) a severe learning disability, (x) a severe and progressive muscle-wasting disease, (xi) an active and progressive form of inflammatory polyarthritis, (xii) a progressive impairment of cardio-respiratory function, (xiii) dense paralysis of upper limb, trunk and lower limb on one side of the body, (xiv) multiple effects of impairment of function of brain or nervous system, (xv) a severe and progressive immune deficiency state and (xvi) a severe mental illness. [26726]

Mr. Burt: The information is not available in the format requested. Such information as is available is in the table.

We estimate that 738,000 people are not subject to the all-work test because they were aged 58 or over on 13 April 1995 and have been continuously in receipt of invalidity benefit since 1 December 1993.

30 Apr 1996 : Column: 477

Exempt categoryIn receipt of incapacity benefit and previously in receipt of invalidity benefit prior to 13 April 1995New incapacity benefit claimants since 13 April 1995In receipt of severe disablement allowanceIn receipt of incapacity benefit with income support(11)In receipt of severe disablement allowance and income supportCredit only(12)
Receipt of higher rate care component of disability living allowance14,3801,5801,1404,880600Nil
Severe condition(13)71,04015,6408,92019,3005,320Nil
Terminally ill20100Nil80Nil140
Terminally ill and in receipt of disability living allowance higher rate care component or severe condition420420Nil200NilNil
In receipt of severe disablement allowance prior to 13 April 1995n/an/a314,560n/a217,340n/a
Total85,86017,740324,62024,460223,260140

Notes:

(11) No data are held on the number of exempt claimants who are in receipt of the disability premium in income support.

(12) Credits-only cases are not in receipt of either incapacity benefit or severe disablement allowance but may be in receipt of other benefits.

(13) No data are available on the nature of the severe condition.

n/a = not applicable.

Source:

5 per cent. scan of the incapacity benefit computer system; all data up to 30 November 1995. Excludes a small number of cases not on the system.


30 Apr 1996 : Column: 479

30 Apr 1996 : Column: 479

Mr. Bradley: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many people have been found incapable of work since April 1995 who (a) had previously claimed incapacity benefit since April 1995, (b) were receiving incapacity benefit and previously received invalidity benefit before April 1995; (c) previously claimed income support with a disability premium, (d) previously claimed severe disablement allowance and (e) received incapacity national insurance credits only. [26728]

Mr. Burt: The available information is in the table.

Numbers found incapable of work
New incapacity benefit claimants since 13 April 199524,340
In receipt of incapacity benefit and previously in receipt of invalidity benefit prior to 13 April 1995113,500
In receipt of incapacity benefit with income support(14)37,940
In receipt of severe disablement allowance7,480
Credits only(15)44,380

Notes:

(14) No information is available on the number found incapable of work who were in receipt of the disability premium in income support.

(15) Credits only cases are not in receipt of incapacity benefit or severe disablement allowance but may be receiving other benefits.

Source:

5 per cent. scan of the incapacity benefit computer system; all data are up to 30 November 1995. Excludes a small number of cases not on the system.


Mr. Bradley: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many people have been (a) found incapable of work since April 1995 and (b) disallowed benefit for failure to return the questionnaire or attend a medical examination; and how many people in both categories

30 Apr 1996 : Column: 480

have (i) signed on as unemployed, (ii) received unemployment benefit, (iii) received income support and (iv) received both. [26727]

Mr. Burt: The information is not available in the format requested. Such information as is available is in the table.

Number
Found capable of work following failure to return the questionnaire7,710
Found capable of work following failure to attend a medical examination2,416
Found incapable of work561,502

Source:

100 per cent. count of cases on the incapacity benefit computer system. Excludes cases where claim related to national insurance credits only and a small number of cases not on the system. Data as at 31 March 1996.



Next Section Index Home Page