Previous Section Index Home Page


EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT

School Sport

Mr. Pawsey: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment what estimate he has made of the number of secondary schools which play regularly organised (a) cricket, (b) football and (c) rugby football. [27267]

Mr. Paice [holding answer 26 April 1996]: This information is not collected centrally. The national curriculum requires that all pupils aged 11 to 16 should pursue games as part of their physical education. Precisely which games are taught is a matter for schools themselves to decide.

Evidence from the Office for Standards in Education inspections shows that the overwhelming majority of secondary schools offer traditional team games to their pupils, both within curriculum time and as extra-curricular activity.

Left-handed Children

Mr. Luff: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment (1) what assessment she has made of the number of left-handed children of school age; [27864]

7 May 1996 : Column: 100

Mrs. Gillan: Left-handedness is not recognised as a special educational need within the meaning of the Education Acts. Provisions relating to pupils with special educational needs apply equally to left-handed and right-handed pupils. The Department does not collect information on the number of left-handed pupils, and has no plans to conduct a study on the special educational needs of such pupils. If my hon. Friend wishes to write to me with details of any case causing him concern, I shall gladly look into it.

Mr. Luff: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment (1) what plans she has to help teachers respond appropriately to the special requirements of left-handed pupils, with particular reference to assisting them in avoiding discomfort in writing; [27866]

Mr. Robin Squire: Teaching methods and arrangements for the induction and inservice training of teachers are not centrally prescribed. It is for schools and teachers to determine the most effective way to ensure they meet the needs of all their pupils, using the resources available to them. The Secretary of State specifies broad criteria for courses of initial teacher training, including the need for new teachers to be able to respond to relevant

7 May 1996 : Column: 101

individual differences between pupils. Institutions accredited to provide such courses are responsible for meeting these criteria. All schools and courses of initial teacher training are subject to independent inspection followed by published reports.

Training and Enterprise Councils

Mr. Etherington: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment what plans she has to harmonise the rates and rules governing TEC-funded training programmes with Further Education Funding Council funding for colleges; when she expects the research funded by her Department from the Further Education Funding Council on the inequalities in the funding mechanism to be finalised and published; and if she will make a statement. [27776]

Mr. Paice: The Government are committed to raising participation and attainment by young people in education and training and promoting fair competition between providers. In support of this agenda, they are investigating whether there is a case for encouraging a more consistent approach to funding methodologies across school sixth forms, further education sector colleges and work-based training for young people, and to funding levels for similar qualifications in the different sectors.

We have already published for discussion an initial analysis of the comparative public funding cost per qualification achieved by 16 to 19-year-olds in each of the three sectors and placed a copy in the Library.

We are refining this initial analysis and considering the scope for convergence of funding methodologies across 16 to 19 provision in consultation with the Further Education Funding Council, the Training and Enterprise Council national council, local authority associations and others.

Mr. Redmond: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment what sums have been provided in (a) 1995-96 and (b) 1996-97 to fund the range of advice and information centres and other schemes run directly or indirectly by Barnsley and Doncaster TEC; and what assessment she has made of the cost-effectiveness of transferring these funds in future years to careers services. [27634]

Mr. Paice: In 1995-96, training and enterprise councils had flexibility to use up to 2.7 per cent. of the training for work budget provided by the Department to fund local adult advice and guidance services. Barnsley and Doncaster TEC exercised this flexibility to devote £336,280 towards the funding of the advice and information centre--"Skillshops"--run directly by the TEC. The TEC also received £41,000 for an access to assessment project and £28,331 for a gateway to learning project.

In 1996-97, TECs have flexibility to use up to 1 per cent. of their training for work budget to fund local adult advice and guidance services. It will be for Barnsley and Doncaster TEC to decide whether to exercise this flexibility and, if so, how the services might be delivered.

In 1996-96, Barnsley and Doncaster TEC also received funding in respect of advice and information services for young people, comprising £377,044 for careers guidance delivered by careers services to pupils in years 9 and 10;

7 May 1996 : Column: 102

and £14,748 to enhance careers libraries in schools and colleges. For 1996-97, all funding for careers advice and guidance for young people in Barnsley and Doncaster is being routed through Lifetime Careers (Barnsley, Doncaster and Rotherham) Ltd., the company which is contracted to provide careers services in Barnsley and Doncaster.

Access to Work Scheme

Mr. Tom Clarke: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment what arrangements she intends to introduce to restore the eligibility of self-employed disabled people to apply for support under the access to work scheme. [27623]

Mr. Paice: As my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State said in her announcement on 26 March, Official Report, columns 489-91, we are considering this issue further.

Office for Standards in Education

Miss Emma Nicholson: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment what mechanisms of accountability are available to measure performance and ensure value for money for Ofsted. [27632]

Mr. Robin Squire: These are matters for the Office for Standards in Education. I have asked Mr. Chris Woodhead, Her Majesty's chief inspector of schools, to write to the hon. Member.

Standard Spending Assessment Calculations

Miss Emma Nicholson: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment to what extent, and for what reasons, standard spending assessment calculations for local authority education budgets differentiate between spending per pupil in (a) primary schools and (b) secondary schools. [27630]

Mr. Robin Squire: The main determinant of the differential between the primary and secondary allowances per pupil in the education standard spending assessment calculations is the differential in the national pattern of local education authorities--LEA--reported spending between the sectors. The standard spending assessment allocations are not hypothecated: LEAs can and do deploy the resources available to them on a different basis.

Teachers (Early Retirement)

Mr. Don Foster: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment what is (a) the total number and (b) the number in each LEA of (i) head teachers, (ii) deputy head teachers and (iii) teachers who have taken early retirement on the ground of ill health in each year since 1991; and if she will make a statement. [27832]

Mr. Robin Squire [holding answer 2 May 1996]: The table shows the retirements on ill health grounds for England and each local education authority--LEA--area, from the maintained nursery, primary, secondary and special education sector, including grant-maintained schools, for the financial years 1991-92 to 1994-95, the most recent year for which this information is available.

7 May 1996 : Column: 103

Separate figures are provided for head teachers, deputy head teachers and classroom teachers. The table is restricted to members of the teachers' superannuation

7 May 1996 : Column: 104

scheme in full-time, part-time or occasional service at 31 March immediately before the financial year in which they retired.

Ill health retirements from the maintained nursery, primary, secondary and special education sector

1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95
Financial year of awardHeadsDeputy headsOtherHeadsDeputy headsOtherHeadsDeputy headsOtherHeadsDeputy headsOther
Corporation of London000000000000
Camden20730710103116
Greenwich001003102092015
Hackney1171150160014
Hammersmith0250352092120
Islington11700121042013
Kensington and Chelsea004005005004
Lambeth15700811181110
Lewisham0215201000140113
Southwark0111011331161111
Tower Hamlets00711820121014
Wandsworth018031011142414
Westminster001002100061110
Barking21600820150012
Barnet21721112081219
Bexley00702143392211
Brent009106007019
Bromley31711731111011
Croydon2113011511210321
Ealing00150013216008
Enfield10111060251114
Haringey0050151041112
Harrow10812821103218
Havering0116011932131214
Hillingdon22180113005017
Hounslow218101200135016
Kingston upon Thames001003006106
Merton1031040110106
Newham0051081081114
Redbridge218104107129
Richmond upon Thames014103208017
Sutton2030130140010
Waltham Forest10822732182012
Birmingham91067567858815789
Coventry1333122304341135
Dudley0112231622121217
Sandwell3218032022333535
Solihull0213211601135217
Walsall0018252102214423
Wolverhampton5315624136226621
Knowsley3117011322170115
Liverpool2444443883516336
St. Helens1014322811303225
Sefton1422422873337024
Wirral3426311534224024
Bolton2321422423283331
Bury018111121152218
Manchester4628534354433143
Oldham0114011610270318
Rochdale4317301344244321
Salford0118031628201218
Stockport2131142852370538
Tameside4110151211195421
Trafford129031641230419
Wigan4017031361333318
Barnsley4214311602245324
Doncaster3315301831262422
Rotherham0316001830210322
Sheffield3328342554384326
Bradford7442433658453439
Calderdale4214211560173226
Kirklees2325224086515442
Leeds2439424147693467
Wakefield7237333724412433
Gateshead0110021810181119
Newcastle upon Tyne5235031634145016
North Tyneside0215201521153013
South Tyneside1112241423142312
Sunderland2326373063322436
Isles of Scilly000000000000
Avon55497539876215855
Bedfordshire5428613063288531
Berkshire86396531374810443
Buckinghamshire8721432283349246
Cambridgeshire8522462763224549
Cheshire7358954912764111574
Cleveland33554774613689667
Cornwall8631523782264332
Cumbria5436542254347131
Derbyshire106593154935216947
Devon85646867141170151188
Dorset5530654333314645
Durham59381853655113960
East Sussex47314541564611454
Essex41181612791216103169121
Gloucestershire3124542055315328
Hampshire1011971591101013140168151
Hereford and Worcester8104712750111158141078
Hertfordshire466312345555214973
Humberside26515562334615788
Isle of Wight007013233227
Kent1515921917107178111167143
Lancashire1418112161210924131562419146
Leicestershire84575245765110758
Lincolnshire1194910629126464658
Norfolk9105297431385615742
North Yorkshire63446426994014856
Northamptonshire42355434846114451
Northumberland4218461564246418
Nottinghamshire12574139795127313382
Oxfordshire52254629622810436
Shropshire5228313163446530
Somerset95411123982439838
Staffordshire126791214731598119995
Suffolk24236133654211548
Surrey11104563537115810852
Warwickshire1328382034304541
West Sussex1334533653337537
Wiltshire1353284281310357351
England3773392,8593683312,9274713773,4555593843,743

7 May 1996 : Column: 105

7 May 1996 : Column: 105


Next Section Index Home Page