Previous Section Index Home Page


Road Accidents

Mr. Callaghan: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many road accidents involving under-age drivers occurred (a) in the Greater Manchester area and (b) nationally during each of the past three years; and how many fatalities resulted from such accidents. [36265]

10 Jul 1996 : Column: 205

Mr. Norris: The information is shown in the following tables.

Accidents involving an under-aged(7) car driver in the Greater Manchester area: 1993 to 1995
Accidents

Severity199319941995
Fatal000
Serious446
Slight232020
All severities272426

(7) Car drivers aged 0-16 years old.


Accidents involving an under-aged(8) car driver GB: 1993 to 1995
Accidents

Severity199319941995
Fatal7119
Serious116103119
Slight394376383
All severities517490511

(8) Car drivers aged 0-16 years old.


Casualties in accidents involving an under-aged(9) car driver in the Greater Manchester area: 1993 to 1995
Casualties

Severities199319941995
Final000
Serious649
Slight392744
All severities453153

(9) Car drivers aged 0-16 years old.


Casualties in accidents involving under-aged(10) car drivers GB: 1993-1995
Casualties

Severity199319941995
Fatal81911
Serious139150173
Slight684649662
All severities831818846

(10) Car drivers age 0-16 years old.


Trunk Roads

Sir Robert Hicks: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what is his policy on the control of development adjacent to trunk roads; and if he will make a statement. [37120]

Mr. Watts: Good communications are vital to the economy. It is therefore important that trunk roads continue to meet their prime function of catering for long distance through traffic. We will ensure that they do so by maintaining strict control of new accesses to them. This applies particularly to motorways--where we will continue to consider new access only for motorway service areas, maintenance compounds and major transport centres such as airports--and to high standard rural trunk roads of strategic importance.

10 Jul 1996 : Column: 206

Where new or modified accesses from trunk roads to new development are allowed, or where the traffic demands on a trunk road would materially increase as a result of new development, we will also continue to ensure that those responsible for the development pay for any highway works needed to cater for the resulting extra traffic.

I am nevertheless concerned that the additional costs imposed on developers under this policy have sometimes been excessive. In some cases, this has led to much-needed investment being lost altogether. I have therefore today issued new guidelines on the principles which the Highways Agency will adopt when considering development proposals affecting trunk roads. Copies have been placed in the Libraries of both Houses. Of particular importance is that developers will in future be expected to pay only for improvements necessary to ensure that conditions on the trunk road are, as far as possible, no worse than if the development had not taken place. Other changes affect the design life of developer-funded highway works; and introduce greater flexibility to take account of environmental concerns and existing constraints on the network, and the potential to increase the use of public transport, cycling and walking.

I am confident that the new guidelines will significantly reduce burdens on intending developers and encourage sustainable development while maintaining effective protection for the most important trunk roads.

Wheel Loss

Mr. Chris Davies: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport on what occasions in the past five years his Department has issued advice intended to reduce the danger of road traffic accidents attributable to lost wheels to (a) manufacturers and (b) operators of heavy commercial vehicles. [35241]

Mr. Norris: At the Institute of Road Transport Engineers conference in May 1991, my Department launched a pamphlet dealing with the subject of wheel loss and giving advice to operators.

We are in constant contact with manufacturers and operator's trade associations on this problem through my Department's representation on the British Standards Institution committee for wheels and tyres and other forums.

Dartford-Thurrock Crossings

Mr. Campbell-Savours: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what has been the impact on the public sector borrowing requirement of the Dartford-Thurrock river crossings in each year since 1988. [35830]

Mr. Watts [holding answer 8 July 1996]: I have asked the chief executive of the Highways Agency to write to the hon. Member.

Letter from Lawrie Haynes to Mr. D. N. Campbell-Savours, dated 10 July 1996:


10 Jul 1996 : Column: 207


    The impact on the PSBR of the Dartford-Thurrock river crossings can be shown by the net expenditure incurred by the Department of Transport/Highways Agency since 1988 and is as follows.

    £000s
    1988-891,105.7
    1989-903,717.3
    1990-9122,804.5
    1991-9220,486.6
    1992-936,327.7
    1993-944,051.2
    1994-954,993.8
    1995-962,502.6
    1996-97(11)116.8
    Total66,106.2

    (11) To the end of June.

    These are net totals as some expenditure incurred by the Department of Transport has been offset by contributions by Dartford River Crossing Ltd.

    The above totals not only include works costs on the three river crossings but also on related project work such as traffic control systems, toll booths and works on the approach roads.


Mobile Homes

Mr. Chidgey: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will introduce the regulations to apply section 20A of the Planning and Compensation Act 1991, covering compensation to mobile home owners. [36326]

Mr. Watts: I refer the hon. Member to the reply I gave the hon. Member for Cheadle (Mr. Day) on 25 April, Official Report, column 248.

Central Railway plc

Sir Keith Speed: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many representations he had received by 1 July about the Central Railway plc proposal to build a new railway; and how many were (a) in favour and (b) against. [36479]

10 Jul 1996 : Column: 208

Mr. Watts: Some 13,650 representations have been received, of which about 200 support the proposal and 13,450 are opposed. These figures include representations which, having regard to the postal dispute or certain other considerations, have been accepted as valid although they were received after 1 July.

Rail Franchising

Mr. Sheerman: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will commission a survey of the wages of catering staff in privatised rail franchises. [36170]

Mr. Watts: No.

Merchant Navy Statistics

Mr. Allen: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to his answer to the hon. Member for Stoke-on-Trent, Central (Mr. Fisher), of 17 June, Official Report, column 342, what statistical information relating to Merchant Navy seafarers was discontinued; when his Department decided to discontinue the collection and publication of these statistics and for what reasons; if the decision was announced to Parliament; and if he will make a statement. [36356]

Mr. Norris: The statistics no longer published were based on the Merchant Navy Establishment, a register, maintained by the General Council of British Shipping. The register was a list of seafarers available for employment under National Maritime Board agreements. The Merchant Navy Establishment was discontinued in September 1990, following six months' consultation between the General Council of British Shipping and the trade unions. As the statistics were a by-product of a register held outside Government for non-statistical reasons, no announcement was made to Parliament.

Statistics of seafarers employed on vessels entered with the Chamber of Shipping continue to be available from the chamber's fleet and manpower inquiry and are published by the Department in merchant fleet statistics.

10 Jul 1996 : Column: 207

10 Jul 1996 : Column: 209


Next Section Index Home Page