23 Jul 1996 : Column: 127

Written Answers to Questions

Tuesday 23 July 1996

LORD CHANCELLOR'S DEPARTMENT

Youth Courts

Mr. Michael: To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department what was the average time an indictable offence took (a) from offence to charge or summons, (b) from charge or summons to first listing,

23 Jul 1996 : Column: 128

(c) from first listing to completion and (d) from offence to completion for cases proceeding through youth courts for (i) England and Wales and (ii) each region in England and Wales in 1984 and 1994. [38798]

Mr. Streeter: The information requested for 1994 is contained in the accompanying table; however, similar data were not collected in 1984. The table includes information on all indictable offences--both indictable only and triable either way. The source of the figures is the magistrates courts time intervals survey. This survey collects information on all defendants in indictable cases in one sample week of February, June and October each year.

Caution needs to be exercised when comparing figures from different areas because sampling error in the figures could make any conclusions invalid. This is especially true for areas where the sample size was less than 100.

23 Jul 1996 : Column: 127

Average time taken for indictable offences heard in the youth court by stage of proceedings and by standard region, 1994, England and Wales

Average number of daysOffence to charge or summonsCharge or summons to first listingFirst listing to completionOffence to completion
England and Wales392667132
English regions and Wales
North England352467125
North West England342358115
Yorkshire and Humberside322373128
East Midlands382581144
West Midlands352571131
East Anglia422657125Sample size less than 100
Greater London383076144
South East (except London)632857148
South West352664125
Wales412659127

Figures for the constituent intervals may not sum exactly to average offence to completion time due to rounding.


23 Jul 1996 : Column: 127

Public Record Office

Mr. Lidington: To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department what conclusions were drawn in the evaluation of performance carried out for the Public Record Office following its establishment as a next steps executive agency. [39678]

Mr. Streeter: An evaluation of the performance of the Public Record Office during its first three years as an executive agency was carried out by the Public Record Office in conjunction with the Lord Chancellor's Department and a report was completed in June 1996.

The report concluded that the office had benefited considerably from its move to agency status which had led it to re-evaluate and to clarify its aims and objectives within its statutory role, and to focus on improving its performance and on meeting the needs of its users. The office has made notable advances in planning and managing its work and resources and has achieved efficiency gains and service improvements in a period in which its work load was increasing and in which it also successfully undertook a major building programme at its Kew site.

Copies of the evaluation report will be laid in the Libraries of both Houses.

23 Jul 1996 : Column: 128

NATIONAL HERITAGE

National Lottery

Mrs. Dunwoody: To ask the Secretary of State for National Heritage if she will list the total income received from lottery ticket sales in Cheshire since the start of the national lottery. [36383]

Mr. Sproat: This is a matter for the Director General of the National Lottery. I have therefore asked the director general to write to the hon. Member, placing copies of his letter in the Libraries of the House.

Mr. Pike: To ask the Secretary of State for National Heritage if she will list by county the percentage of lottery tickets purchased in each and the percentage of lottery awards funding received by each since the creation of the national lottery. [37696]

Mr. Sproat: Sales figure are an operational matter for the Director General of the National Lottery who is responsible for regulating the operation of the lottery and I have therefore asked him to write to the hon. Member, placing copies of his letter in the Library of the House. The new awards database currently being tested by my Department will soon be able to show the percentage of lottery awards received by each county and I will write to the hon. Member with this information when it is available.

23 Jul 1996 : Column: 129

Mr. David Nicholson: To ask the Secretary of State for National Heritage what steps she is taking to co-ordinate with other authorities measures to prevent the illegal purchase of national lottery tickets by minors. [38953]

Mr. Sproat: The Secretary of State has directed the director general not to licence games, which, in his opinion, do not have sufficient controls to prevent the participation of young people under the age of 16. In the director general's annual report, laid before the House on 17 July, he details measures he has taken to deal with this issue.

The sale of lottery tickets to minors is illegal. Camelot, as promoter of all lotteries forming part of the national lottery, is responsible for ensuring compliance with the law. My Department has taken part in co-ordination meetings with the other relevant authorities--the Association of Chief Police Officers, the Crown Prosecution Service and trading standards organisations--with an enforcement interest in this matter.

Tourist Information Centres

Mr. Robert Banks: To ask the Secretary of State for National Heritage what is the present total number of tourist information centres in the United Kingdom; and what arrangements are planned to centralise information. [38423]

Mr. Sproat: There are 831 tourist information centres in the UK. This includes 562 in England, 160 in Scotland, 84 in Wales and 25 in Northern Ireland. In England, these are largely operated by local authorities with the English tourist board supporting common standards, staff training and national branding. Network TICs have to be prepared to offer information on destinations other than those in their local areas.

The ETB has a number of initiatives under way to improve the collection and provision of information. It co-ordinates the collection of data on attractions, events and accommodation into its tourism resource information processing systems--TRIPS--database. ETB has launched a Network 2000 project to determine how services might be enhanced by greater use of information technology and the internet. This includes a pilot project to make the TRIPS information available on-line to TICs.

British Academy of Sport

Mr. Pendry: To ask the Secretary of State for National Heritage what assessment he has made of the specific roles for (a) the United Kingdom Sports Council, (b) the British Olympic Association and (c) the private sector has in the proposed British academy of sport. [39104]

Mr. Sproat: Details of the Government's proposals for the British academy of sport, including the roles of the United Kingdom Sports Council, the home country sports councils and other sporting organisations, will be set out in the prospectus which will be published shortly.

Executive Agencies

Mr. Elletson: To ask the Secretary of State for National Heritage what targets she has set for the executive agencies in her Department. [39637]

23 Jul 1996 : Column: 130

Mr. Sproat: The following targets have been set for 1996-97:



Next Section Index Home Page