Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
Sir Andrew Bowden: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if he will list as a proportion of all pensioners those (a) pensioners, (b) single male pensioners aged under 75 years, (c) single female pensioners aged under 75 years, (d) single pensioners aged under 75 years, (e) pensioner couples aged under 75 years, (f) single male pensioners aged 75 years and over, (g) single female pensioners aged 75 years and over, (h) single pensioners aged 75 years and over and (i) pensioner couples where at least one partner is aged 75 years and over receiving income from savings; and if he will provide figures for the mean and median amount received for the latest year for which figures are available. [36258]
Mr. Heald: The information is in the table.
Proportion with investment income (per cent.) | Mean amount for those in receipt (£ per week) | Median amount for those in receipt (£ per week) | |
---|---|---|---|
All pensioner units | 73 | 37.40 | 8.70 |
Single male pensioners under 75 | 65 | 51.00 | 15.80 |
Single female pensioners under 75 | 70 | 29.40 | 5.90 |
Single pensioners under 75 | 69 | 33.90 | 7.40 |
Pensioner couples with head under 75 | 83 | 52.80 | 15.90 |
Single male pensioners 75 and over | 73 | 38.10 | 6.50 |
Single female pensioners 75 and over | 65 | 18.50 | 3.60 |
Single pensioners 75 and over | 67 | 22.60 | 4.40 |
Pensioner couples with head over 75 | 80 | 42.70 | 11.30 |
Notes:
1. These results are based on a relatively small sample size. Therefore they should be treated with a higher degree of caution than usual.
2. All amounts are in July 1993 prices.
3. Proportions are rounded to the nearest whole percentage, amounts are rounded to the nearest 10p.
4. A pensioner unit is defined as a single pensioner over State Pension Age (SPA) and a couple where the husband, or head, is over SPA. To provide consistency the age of the head has been used to define the age of the couple.
Source:
Information is based on the Family Expenditure Survey 1993.
24 Jul 1996 : Column: 561
Mr. Alan Howarth: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many employers have qualified for exemption from national insurance contributions and how many qualifying employees were previously (a) unemployed, (b) on a training scheme, (c) carers and (d) lone parents. [36902]
Mr. Heald: From 6 April 1996 to 9 July 1996, the Contributions Agency issued 398 national insurance holiday deduction certificates to employers 1 . Of the 398 qualifying employees, 381 were unemployed 2 , three were carers and 14 were lone parents.
Mr. Heald: The estimated effects on national insurance fund revenue for 1997-98 are:
24 Jul 1996 : Column: 562
who are employed earners with earnings below the national insurance lower earnings limit, breaking the figures down by gender; [37594]
Mr. Heald: The information is not available in the format requested. Such information as is available is as follows.
Number | |
---|---|
Men | 111,000 |
Women | 70,000 |
Total | 181,000 |
Source:
One per cent. sample of national insurance records at February 1995. Figures are rounded to the nearest thousand.
Ms Corston: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what would be total contribution income for national insurance for 1995-96, 2000-01, 2010-11, 2020-21 and 2030-31, assuming (a) present contribution rates, (b) upper and lower earnings levels linked with earnings and (c) upper and lower earnings levels linked with earnings and the upper earnings level raised by 200 per cent. of average earnings, relative to current estimates of expenditure on benefits in those years. [38543]
Mr. Heald: The available information is in the tables.
Year | 1994-95 | 2000-01 | 2010-11 | 2020-21 | 2030-31 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Income | 36.4 | 45.1 | 55.1 | 64.0 | 69.6 |
Expenditure | 39.9 | 42.2 | 50.8 | 56.4 | 63.8 |
Income as a percentage of expenditure | 91 | 107 | 109 | 113 | 109 |
Year | 1994-95 | 2000-01 | 2010-11 | 2020-21 | 2030-31 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Income | 36.4 | 45.2 | 54.9 | 64.6 | 71.8 |
Expenditure | 39.9 | 42.2 | 50.8 | 56.4 | 63.8 |
Income as a percentage of expenditure | 91 | 107 | 108 | 114 | 113 |
Year | 1994-95 | 2000-01 | 2010-11 | 2020-21 | 2030-31 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Income | 38.1 | 47.3 | 57.6 | 67.7 | 75.2 |
Expenditure | 39.9 | 42.2 | 50.8 | 56.4 | 63.8 |
Income as a percentage of expenditure | 96 | 112 | 113 | 120 | 118 |
Notes:
1. The information given in the tables has been derived from the Government Actuary's Reports on the Third Quinquennial Review under section 137 of the Social Security Act 1975 (HC 160) and on the Financial Provisions of the Pensions Bill 1994 (CM 2714) by:
adjusting the entries in table E3 and E4 of HC 160 so that the projected contribution income is based on a continuation of the 1994-95 combined Class 1 contribution rate (18.25%). Hence, the tables give information for 1994-95 rather than 1995-96;
adjusting contribution income for the years 2020-21 and 2030-31 to allow for the increased number of contributors expected as a result of the Pensions Act 1995;
adjusting the amounts of contracted-out rebate to allow for the difference between rebate rates assumed in HC 160 and those now expected.
2. For table (c), a further adjustment has been made to allow for the change in primary Class 1 contributions and rebates following from increasing the UEL to twice average earnings.
3. The estimated benefit expenditure information given in all three tables is that consistent with increasing the UEL and LEL in line with prices, even where (in tables (b) and (c)) the contribution income figures are based on increasing those limits in line with earnings, and allows for the effects of the Pensions Act 1995.
Source:
Government Actuary's Department.
24 Jul 1996 : Column: 563
Ms Corston: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what is the Government Actuary's estimate of the excess of national insurance contribution income over outgoings for 1995-96 and for 1994-95, assuming actual rates of unemployment, excluding the Treasury grant and (a) excluding and (b) including the effects of contracted-out rebates, using the methodology set out in Cm 2445. [38542]
Mr. Heald: The information is in the table.
1994-95 | 1995-96 | |
---|---|---|
(a) Excluding contracted-out rebates | ||
Contributions income | 43.3 | 45.7 |
Benefit outgo | 39.3 | 40.6 |
Excess/(shortfall) | 4.0 | 5.1 |
(b) Including contracted-out rebates | ||
Contributions income | 38.3 | 40.4 |
Benefit outgo | 39.3 | 40.6 |
Personal pension rebates | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Excess/(shortfall) | 3.0 | 2.2 |
Source:
Government Actuary's Department.
Mr. Howarth: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what is his estimate of the impact on revenue of an increase in the upper earnings limit for national insurance contributions by average earnings for the years 1995-96 and 1996-97. [39006]
24 Jul 1996 : Column: 564
Mr. Heald: Raising the upper earnings limit for 1995-96 and 1996-97 in line with the movement in average earnings would increase national insurance contribution revenue for each of those years by an estimated £50 million 1 .
Next Section | Index | Home Page |