Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
Mrs. Roche: To ask the President of the Board of Trade when each business link will come to the end of its three-year pump-priming funding. [5684]
Mr. Page: A list of the dates when three-year pump priming will end or has ended is attached for all business links with an offer. The final payment of DTI grant will be made up to four months after the dates shown. Following the pump-priming period, the DTI will continue to contribute to the cost of business link services.
Area | Date when pump priming offer funding ended or is due to end |
---|---|
Birmingham | 31 March 1996 |
Manchester | 31 March 1996 |
North Cheshire | 31 March 1996 |
South-east Cheshire | 31 March 1996 |
Tyneside | 31 March 1996 |
Leicestershire | 26 September 1996 |
Hereford and Worcester | 9 March 1997 |
CEWTEC/Ellesmere Port | 27 March 1997 |
Gloucestershire | 30 March 1997 |
Barnsley/Doncaster | 31 March 1997 |
Dorest | 31 March 1997 |
Thames Valley | 31 March 1997 |
Wigan | 31 March 1997 |
Shropshire | 5 April 1997 |
Walsall | 11 July 1997 |
Southern Derbyshire | 26 July 1997 |
Lincolnshire | 29 July 1997 |
Dudley | 31 July 1997 |
Wearside | 31 July 1997 |
Cumbria | 30 September 1997 |
Merseyside | 30 September 1997 |
County Durham | 23 March 1998 |
Calderdale and Kirklees | 31 March 1998 |
Central England | 31 March 1998 |
Coventry/Warwickshire | 31 March 1998 |
Devon and Cornwall | 31 March 1998 |
Isle of Wight | 31 March 1998 |
Milton Keynes | 31 March 1998 |
Northumberland | 31 March 1998 |
Rotherham | 31 March 1998 |
Staffordshire | 31 March 1998 |
Teeside | 31 March 1998 |
WESSTTEC (Avon) | 31 March 1998 |
Sandwell | 9 April 1998 |
Bedfordshire | 30 April 1998 |
Rochdale | 30 April 1998 |
St. Helens | 30 April 1998 |
Oldham | 21 May 1998 |
Sheffield | 29 June 1998 |
Somerset | 30 June 1998 |
Bolton/Bury | 31 July 1998 |
North Derbyshire | 10 August 1998 |
Leeds | 17 August 1998 |
Greater Nottingham | 22 August 1998 |
Hertfordshire | 31 August 1998 |
Humberside | 17 September 1998 |
City Partners (London) | 30 September 1998 |
Kent | 30 September 1998 |
Wakefield | 9 October 1998 |
Wiltshire | 13 October 1998 |
East London | 22 October 1998 |
Central London | 23 October 1998 |
South-west London | 24 October 1998 |
West London | 24 October 1998 |
South London | 26 October 1998 |
Northamptonshire | 6 November 1998 |
Essex | 18 December 1998 |
Sussex | 31 December 1998 |
North Nottinghamshire | 17 January 1999 |
LAWTEC (central and west Lancashire) | 25 January 1999 |
Norfolk and Waveney | 31 January 1999 |
North-west London | 31 January 1999 |
Bradford and district | 5 February 1999 |
North London | 19 February 1999 |
Surrey | 25 February 1999 |
Greater Peterborough | 28 February 1999 |
Heart of England | 28 February 1999 |
Wolverhampton | 12 March 1999 |
Central and south Cambridgeshire | 31 March 1999 |
North Yorkshire | 31 March 1999 |
High Peak | 31 March 1999 |
Suffolk | 31 March 1999 |
Hampshire | 31 May 1999 |
Stockport | 11 June 1999 |
28 Nov 1996 : Column: 360
Mr. Llew Smith: To ask the President of the Board of Trade if he will set out those sections of the Export of Goods (Control) Order 1994 which apply in the case of the arms embargo on China. [6069]
Mr. Lang: I refer the hon. Gentlemen to the answer given by the Minister of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs on 31 March 1995, Official Report, columns 842-43. Goods in the categories listed in that answer are entered in part III of schedule 1 to the Export of Goods (Control) Order 1994 as amended.
Mr. Meacher: To ask the President of the Board of Trade what environmental impact assessment has been conducted on the proposed mixed oxide export facility at Sellafield. [5728]
Mr. Page: None. I understand that British Nuclear Fuels plc considers that the proposed mixed oxide export facility would not have any significant environmental effects and would not therefore require such an assessment to be made. The facility would involve only the storage of fuel before it is despatched to the customer, not any additional fuel production.
Mr. Dalyell: To ask the President of the Board of Trade what action he is taking to promote British exports in relation to (a) components of nuclear power stations and (b) fuel cycle services to Pacific rim countries. [4853]
Mr. Page: My Department offers a range of support and services depending on the nature of specific bids and requests from the nuclear industry. Diplomatic support and export credits are also available. My ministerial colleagues and I take all suitable opportunities to promote the interests of nuclear power station and fuel cycle exporters when meeting our overseas counterparts. My officials' regular contact with representatives of nuclear companies and their trade association includes discussions about their international business.
28 Nov 1996 : Column: 361
Mr. Meacher: To ask the President of the Board of Trade what progress has been made in the clean-up and decontamination of the B38 and B701 buildings and surrounding areas at Sellafield in respect of radioactive leaks and high activity waste; where the contaminated soil has disposed of; and what has been the cost to date of the restoration programme. [5730]
Mr. Page: This is an operational matter for British Nuclear Fuels plc, subject to meeting the appropriate regulatory requirements. All decommissioning and clean-up of sites is, however, carried out in accordance with a predetermined programme approved by the regulatory authorities.
Mr. Battle: To ask the President of the Board of Trade how many applications his Department has received for combined-cycle gas turbine power stations since 1990; and how many are awaiting decision. [6296]
Mr. Page: Forty-three applications for new combined-cycle gas turbine power stations have been received to date. Three of these were received before 1990. Eleven are awaiting decision and five have been withdrawn.
Mr. Battle: To ask the President of the Board of Trade how many combined-cycle gas turbine power stations are currently under construction; and what is the total coal burn equivalent of these stations. [6298]
Mr. Page: The only available data to hand are from the National Grid Company's seven-year statement. This indicates that 2 GW of CCGT capacity, with connection agreements in place, is under construction. The effect of new CCGT generating capacity on other plant will depend on the operating regime adopted at the time.
Mr. Battle: To ask the President of the Board of Trade how many section 36 of the 1989 Electricity Act applications for combined-cycle gas turbine power stations have been granted to date. [6297]
Mr. Page: Twenty-seven applications for new combined-cycle gas turbines power stations have been granted to date.
Mr. Battle: To ask the President of the Board of Trade how many applications for wind farm power generation he has received by region. [6299]
Mr. Page: The competition for contracts under the non-fossil fuel obligation is heavily oversubscribed. For wind energy, there are 167 project proposals, of which 14 are in the licence area of Eastern Group; 34 are in the licence area of Merseyside and North-Western Electricity Board plc; two are in the licence area of Midlands Electricity plc; 30 are in the licence area of North Western Electricity Board plc; 16 are in the licence area of Northern Electric; 16 are in the licence area of South Western Electricity plc; three are in the licence area of Southern Electric plc; 21 are in the licence area of Yorkshire Electricity Group plc; 29 are in the licence area of South Wales Electricity plc; and two are in Scotland.
28 Nov 1996 : Column: 362
Mrs. Clwyd: To ask the President of the Board of Trade if he will extend the provisions of the chemical weapons legislation to make it an offence to develop a chemical weapon or to assist in the development of a chemical weapon by transferring technology to another person or countries. [5884]
Mr. Lang: No. Under the Chemical Weapons Act 1996, it is an offence to develop a chemical weapon and individuals who participate in the development by somebody else of such a weapon by transferring technology would be guilty of the offence. The export of technology for the development of a chemical weapon is prohibited by export control legislation.
Mrs. Clwyd: To ask the President of the Board of Trade if he will extend the provisions of the chemical weapons legislation to other areas of weapons of mass destruction and conventional weapons. [5885]
Mr. Lang: My Department's consultative document, "Strategic Export Controls" (Cm. 3349), presented to Parliament in July, sought views on all aspects of strategic export control procedures and policy, including the possibility of new legislation. Among the specific issues raised was whether the provision in the Chemical Weapons Act 1996 creating the offence of developing a chemical weapon should be applied in relation to other forms of technology relevant to the production of weapons of mass destruction or their means of delivery. The consultation period closed at the end of October and the Department is currently considering the responses and follow-up action to the consultation.
Next Section | Index | Home Page |