Previous Section Index Home Page


Hong Kong (Contracts)

Mr. Byers: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will list those major contracts which will straddle the transition in Hong Kong which have been considered by the Sino-British joint liaison group, the date of their award, the successful contractor and the approximate value of the contract. [9607]

Mr. Hanley: The Sino-British joint liaison group has discussed a large number of contracts and franchises which will straddle the transition. These include contracts on infrastructure development such as for the new airport, and the provision of power and transport services. I will write to the hon. Member with a full list of the contracts, and, where known, the dates of their award, the name of the successful contractors, and the value of each contract. A copy of the letter will be placed in the Libraries of the House.

NATIONAL HERITAGE

National Lottery (Northern Ireland)

Ms Mowlam: To ask the Secretary of State for National Heritage if she will list (a) the number of projects in Northern Ireland which have been given funding by the Millennium Commission and (b) the number of projects from Northern Ireland which are currently under consideration by the Millennium Commission. [3841]

Mrs. Virginia Bottomley: This is a matter for the Millennium Commission. I shall write to the hon. Member in my capacity as chairman of the commission and place copies of my reply in the Libraries of the House.

"New Labour's Public Expenditure Plans"

Mr. Derek Foster: To ask the Secretary of State for National Heritage what costs quoted in the document, "New Labour's Public Expenditure Plans", were prepared in his Department; what detailed assumptions and interpretations were provided to officials in his

17 Dec 1996 : Column: 492

Department to enable preparation of each cost; and what was the total cost to public funds of preparing each estimate. [6344]

Mrs. Virginia Bottomley: The Department of National Heritage, in conjunction with the Treasury, prepared factual material relating to costings published in "New Labour's Public Expenditure Plans" numbered 54 and 55. The detailed assumptions and interpretations that were provided to officials are set out in my right hon. Friend the Chief Secretary's reply to the hon. Member of today. It is not the normal working practice to keep a record of the time spent in providing factual information to Ministers.

DUCHY OF LANCASTER

Web Site

Mr. Gordon Prentice: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what plans he has to open his own web site. [9438]

The Deputy Prime Minister: The matter is under consideration.

Legislation

Mrs. Roche: To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster how many items of legislation relating to his Department have been repealed since January 1994; how many statutory instruments were introduced during the same period; and how many of the latter were (a) deregulatory and (b) fee orders. [9374]

Mr. Bates: An analysis of new regulations introduced by all Departments during 1994 and 1995 is given in the table. By the end of 1996 the total number of deregulatory orders will have risen to 1,000. Comprehensive information about the number of other regulations is only gathered after the end of the year. A fuller analysis of regulations made during 1996 will be carried out as soon as the necessary information is available from HMSO and will be provided to the hon. Member.

19941995
Deregulatory measures218151
NHS Trusts269176
Fees and local provisions 188152
EU and international obligations151140
Other (possible impact on business)14193
Other (no impact on business)500692
Commencement orders, Orders in Council and others not subject to Parliamentary procedures1,8671,963

A list of regulations repealed or amended since 1993 under the Government's deregulation initiative as at April 1996 was placed in the House Libraries in May. A revised list of the 1,000 regulations repealed or amended by the end of December will be published early in the new year.

No. 2 Marsham Street

Mr. Harry Greenway: To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster if he will make a progress report on the future of No. 2 Marsham street. [8126]

17 Dec 1996 : Column: 493

Mr. Freeman: Responsibility for the use of No. 2 Marsham street has been delegated under the terms of its framework document to the Property Advisers to the Civil Estate under its chief executive, Mr. Neil Borrett. The agency is therefore responding to the question.

Letter from N. E. Borrett to Mr. Harry Greenaway, dated 13 December 1996:

The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster has asked me to write to you in response to your Parliamentary Question regarding the future of 2 Marsham Street.




TREASURY

"New Labour's Public Expenditure Plans"

Mr. Derek Foster: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what interpretations or assumptions were made in costing the spending commitments described as having been made by the Labour party in the document, "New Labour's Public Expenditure Plans"; and if the same interpretations and assumptions were adopted by each Government Department. [6338]

Mr. Waldegrave: The interpretations and assumptions identified by Ministers, assisted by their special advisers, are set out for each costing. These interpretations and assumptions were used by all Government Departments. In addition, general guidance was provided as set out in my separate written answer of today. Final responsibility for the judgments made in the document "New Labour's Public Expenditure Plans" rests with Treasury Ministers.















17 Dec 1996 : Column: 494










































17 Dec 1996 : Column: 495






































17 Dec 1996 : Column: 496
































17 Dec 1996 : Column: 497



































17 Dec 1996 : Column: 498











































17 Dec 1996 : Column: 499









































17 Dec 1996 : Column: 500








Mr. Foster: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what guidance was given to civil servants in respect of assembling the factual material to facilitate the costings of the public expenditure commitments described as having been made by the Labour party in terms of territorial bases, price level and first or four-year commitment, including possible overlaps and other similar costings. [6339]

Mr. Waldegrave: The costings were conducted in accordance with the guidance on costing Opposition policy which was published as a memorandum submitted by the Cabinet Secretary to the Treasury and Civil Service Select Committee in March 1990, reproduced in "Guidance on Guidance: An index of Useful Documents" issued in February 1996 and available in the Library of the House. In addition, Ministers provided the following general framework to civil servants in respect of assembling the factual material.













17 Dec 1996 : Column: 501


















Mr. Foster: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what was (a) the cost to his Department and (b) the overall cost of the exercise to cost the spending commitments described as having been made by the Labour party in the document "New Labour's Public Expenditure Plans", published on 20 November. [6336]

Mr. Waldegrave: It is not the normal working practice to keep a record of the time spent in providing factual information to Ministers and it is not therefore possible to offer a reliable estimate of the costs involved.

Mr. Foster: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what scrutiny over the exercise to cost what were termed Labour party public expenditure commitments was carried out by the Treasury; and what criteria were used when checking consistency with other available estimates of the costs. [6340]

Mr. Waldegrave: The exercise was carried out in accordance with the published guidance on the procedure for costing policies of opposition parties. Treasury

17 Dec 1996 : Column: 502

Ministers, assisted by their special advisers, in conjunction with Ministers and special advisers from other Departments, were responsible for identifying the text of commitments together with any further interpretations or assumptions necessary to allow the commitments to be costed. Treasury officials, in conjunction with officials from other Departments, were responsible for providing factual material. Final responsibility for the judgments made in the document "New Labour's Public Expenditure Plans" rests with Treasury Ministers.

Mr. Foster: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if (a) Ministers, (b) their special advisers and (c) civil servants, identified the text of spending commitments described as having been made by the Labour party in the document "New Labour's Public Expenditure Plans", published on 20 November. [6337]

Mr. Waldegrave: In accordance with the guidance, Ministers and their special advisers identified the text of commitments. To the best of my knowledge, civil servants other than special advisers did not identify the text of the commitments.

Mr. Foster: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer to what extent the factual material provided by civil servants for preparation of the document "New Labour's Public Expenditure Plans" was altered by Ministers or special advisers; and what guidance was given about reconciling differences in costings. [6341]

Mr. Waldegrave: The costings published in "New Labour's Public Expenditure Plans" are consistent with the factual material provided by civil servants on the basis of assumptions made by Ministers.

In one case--the cost of establishing the Welsh Assembly--the estimate was made by the Secretary of State for Wales. In two cases--the cost of reducing benefit tapers and the introduction of a maintenance disregard against income support--the figures were calculated in cash terms rather than in real terms. Consequently these figures should have been slightly lower than quoted in the document. The figure for benefit tapers should have been £1.8 billion rather than £2.0 billion and the figure for the maintenance disregard against income support should have been £180 million rather than £200 million. In another case, namely the cost of an increase in funding on trans-European networks, the figure was calculated in ecus rather than in pounds. The annual cost should therefore have been £20 million rather than £27 million.


Next Section Index Home Page