Previous Section Index Home Page


Information Technology (Euro)

Mrs. Anne Campbell: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what tenders his Department has put out to convert its information technology systems to be euro-compliant; what are the cost and person hours required to convert the systems to handle the euro; and when he expects his Department's systems to be fully economic and monetary union compliant. [9456]

Mr. Burt: This Department and its agencies will need to assess the impact which a single currency, assumed to be starting on 1 January 1999, would have on their information systems, whether or not the United Kingdom decides to participate in the third stage of economic and monetary union.

18 Dec 1996 : Column: 767

Staff

Mr. Hain: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many (a) permanent and (b) non-permanent staff there have been in (i) his Department and (ii) executive agencies of his Department in each year since 1992. [9627]

Mr. Burt: The information is in the tables.

18 Dec 1996 : Column: 768

PermanentNon-permanent
1 April 199278,2772,985
1 April 199384,8254,782
1 April 199487,1345,536
1 April 199589,4964,929
1 April 199691,5364,501

18 Dec 1996 : Column: 767

Benefits agency Contributions agency Child support agency Information technology services agency Resettlement agency War pensions agency
PermanentNon- permanentPermanentNon- permanentPermanentNon- permanentPermanentNon- permanentPermanentNon- permanentPermanentNon- permanent
1 April 199262,7642,4538,307195----4,07221946222----
1 April 199364,0563,5629,3703312,937424,06950135923----
1 April 199463,8973,9229,8212094,7524953,998611276481,495146
1 April 199566,6873,4738,8894915,9742053,54038713351,295263
1 April 199671,6273,0977,4635696,5282771,954361----1,22672

1. Staff on a fixed term appointment are included as permanent staff. 2. Numbers of staff are expressed as full-time equivalents.

3. Child Support Agency was launched on 1 April 1993.

4. War Pensions Agency was launched on 1 April 1994.

5. Resettlement Agency ceased to exist on 31 March 1996.


18 Dec 1996 : Column: 767

Benefits Inquiry Line

Mr. Steinberg: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what proposals he has to reinstate the benefits inquiry line. [8074]

Mr. Roger Evans: This is an operational matter for Peter Mathison, the chief executive of the Benefits Agency. He will write to the hon. Member.

Letter from Peter Mathison to Mr. Gerry Steinberg, dated 16 December 1996:

The Secretary of State for Social Security has asked me to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question asking what proposals he as to re-instate the Benefits Enquiry Line.





Child Benefit

Mr. Frank Field: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security, pursuant to his answer of 2 December, Official Report, column 501, how many new awards there were in each year since 1980 for (a) child benefit and (b) one-parent benefit; and what data are kept by his Department on the number of claims for these benefits which do not result in an award of benefit. [8192]

Mr. Andrew Mitchell [holding answer 10 December 1996]: The information is not available in the format requested. Such information as is available is in the tables.

18 Dec 1996 : Column: 768

New awards of CHB 1980-1995: number of children

Thousands
19801,093
1981968
19821,020
19831,009
19851,003
19861,022
19871,033
19881,041
1989997
19901,062
19911,063
19921,025
19931,000
1994992
1995981

1. Data is not available for 1984 due to industrial action in that year.

2. The figures include claims made on the birth of a child, claims from families entering Great Britain and repeat claims following a period of disentitlement.

3. Figures based on a 4 per cent. sample to and including March 1994, thereafter a 1 per cent. sample.

4. There are no reliable data on the numbers of claims which do not result in award, and no information on the reasons for such disallowances.


New awards of OPB 1988-1995: number of families

Thousands
1988136
1989139
1990155
1991153
1992156
1993152
1994146
1995176

1. Figures based on a 4 per cent. sample to and including March 1994, thereafter a 1 per cent. sample.

2. Data on one-parent benefit awards is not available before 1988.

3. There are no reliable data on the numbers of claims which do not result in an award, and no information on the reasons for such disallowances.


18 Dec 1996 : Column: 769

Income Support Computer System

Mr. Andrew Smith: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security (1) what information is conveyed to claimants about their claim by the income support computer system used by the Benefits Agency; [9036]

Mr. Roger Evans: The administration of income support is a matter for Peter Mathison, the chief executive of the Benefits Agency. He will write to the hon. Member.

Letter from Peter Mathison to Mr. Andrew Smith, dated 16 December 1996:



    The ISCS issues award notifications following an initial claim for benefit and on relevant changes of circumstances. These notifications inform the customer of the Adjudication Officer's decision, explain how the award has been calculated, the method of payment and their right of appeal.

18 Dec 1996 : Column: 770


    The ISCS also notifies a customer when, on behalf of the Secretary of State, Income Support housing costs are to be deducted from the award, for direct payment to the mortgage lender, mortgage interest direct (MID).


    In the event of a MID overpayment of £25.00 or less the amount is recovered from the Lender by adjusting the subsequent MID payments. The ISCS automatically issues notifications to the customer and the lender. The customer notification details how the overpayment has occurred, the amount overpaid and how recovery will be made, example at Annex A. Procedural guidance is available in the Income Support Guide for Housing Costs. I have arranged for a copy to be placed in the Library.


    Overpayments of more than £25.00 are repaid by the lender in a lump sum. In these circumstances clerical notifications are issued to both the customer and the lender. Again, the customer notification details how the overpayment has occurred, the amount overpaid and how recovery will be made, example at Annex B.


    Decisions on whether to commission changes to the BA computer systems are my responsibility and that of my management team. These decisions are based on the business requirement and analysis of alternative solutions within the capacity available. Priority is normally given to enhancements in respect of legislative changes and other unavoidable and essential work.


    The ISCS work programme to the end of 1997 includes enhancements to allow payments of the new Child Maintenance Bonus; to transfer records of unemployed customers to the Jobseeker's Allowance Payment System; to introduce a payment card facility; to improve accounting data and to implement changes to One Parent Benefit and the Lone Parent Premium announced in the recent Budget. All these changes are regarded as essential.


    I hope you find this reply helpful.


Next Section Index Home Page