Previous Section Index Home Page


TREASURY

Bowel Cancer

Sir Julian Critchley: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many new cases of bowel cancer were diagnosed on average in each of the last 10 years; and how many people died of carcinoma of the bowel in 1995. [10833]

Mrs. Angela Knight: The number of deaths that occurred in England and Wales in 1995, together with aged standardised rates per 100,000 population, and the data on new cases of bowel cancer are given in the following tables:

The numbers of deaths that occurred in England and Wales in 1995 (together with age standardised rate per 100,000)

MalesFemales
NumbersRate(8)NumbersRate(8)
Malignant neoplasm of small intestine, including duodenum (ICD(9) 152)1160.4980.3
Malignant neoplasm of colon (ICD(9) 153)5,17818.15,63613
Malignant neoplasm of rectum, rectosigmoid junction and anus (ICD(9) 154)2,8139.92,1224.9
Bowel cancer (ICD(9) 152-154)8,10728.58,10728.5

(8) The male and female rates have been directly standardised against the (same) European Standard Population so that the mortality for males can be compared with that for females.

(9) International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision.


21 Jan 1997 : Column: 538

Incidence of bowel cancer (ICD9 152, 153 and 154), numbers and rates per 100,000(10), England and Wales, 1982-91: males and females ((10)directly age standardised using European standard population)

Male Female
YearNumbersRateNumbersRate
Malignant neoplasm of small intestine including duodenum (ICD9 152)
19821540.61450.4
19831820.71570.5
19841780.71670.5
19852050.81710.5
19861680.71750.5
19871890.81750.5
19881810.71960.5
19891770.71930.6
19901780.71910.5
19912160.81850.5
Malignant neoplasm of colon (ICD9 153)
19826,83727.38,63323.7
19836,95527.88,70923.6
19847,02027.58,65123.0
19857,39928.79,06624.1
19867,16327.69,01623.9
19877,67929.39,32323.8
19887,71429.19,41324.1
19897,80229.19,10223.0
19908,02429.89,31623.5
19918,06929.59,40323.7

MaleFemale
YearNumbersRateNumbersRate
Malignant neoplasm of rectum, rectosigmoid junction and anus (ICD9 154)
19825,36421.44,54112.7
19835,54321.94,64112.9
19845,56421.94,54912.4
19856,02823.34,69312.7
19865,65921.74,55412.3
19875,64421.64,55312.1
19885,84922.24,58712.3
19895,69021.44,56512.0
19905,89822.14,47411.9
19915,82621.64,44111.8
Bowel cancer (ICD9 152-4)
198212,35449.413,31936.8
198312,68150.413,50637.0
198412,76350.113,36735.9
198513,63252.813,93137.3
198612,99049.913,74636.7
198713,51251.714,05136.5
198813,74552.114,19636.9
198913,66951.213,86035.6
199014,10052.613,98135.9
199114,11152.014,02935.9

(10) The male and female rates have been directly standardised against the (same) European Standard Population so that the mortality for males can be compared with that for females.


Landfill Tax

Sir David Steel: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what plans he has to permit a temporary exemption to landfill tax for those local authorities which are forced to dispose of unsold paper for recycling, which was collected to meet the Government's target for recycling waste by 2000. [11165]

Mr. Oppenheim: I have no plans to do so.

21 Jan 1997 : Column: 539

Bathability Services

Sir Cranley Onslow: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what representations have been received by HM Customs and Excise about the application of VAT to bathability services; and if he will make a statement. [11585]

Mr. Oppenheim: Supplies of bathing services in the home when provided by a public body as a welfare provision otherwise than for profit are not liable to VAT. One representation has been received by HM Customs and Excise.

Inland Revenue Office, Salisbury

Mr. Key: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make a statement about the future of the inland revenue local office in Salisbury. [11008]

Mr. Jack [holding answer 20 January 1997]: The board of Inland Revenue is currently considering reorganisation proposals from its network controllers which include the creation of a new-style office in Salisbury.

Insurance Premium Tax (Holiday Insurance)

Sir Peter Fry: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what estimate he has made of the revenue forecast from the imposition of a rate of insurance premium tax of 17.5 per cent. on holiday insurance sold by travel agents; and what account it takes of switching of the purchase of holiday insurance from travel agents to insurance brokers in order to incur the lower rate of insurance premium tax. [11451]

Mr. Oppenheim [holding answer 20 January 1997]: Around £70 million of the estimated £235 million revenue yield in 1998-99--published in the 1997-98 "Financial Statement and Budget Report"--is from charging the higher rate of insurance premium tax on travel insurance; the remaining £165 million is from charging the higher rate of insurance premium tax on mechanical breakdown insurance of various types and insurance sold with TV and car hire. The travel insurance costing incorporates assumptions about changes in behaviour in response to the increased rate of IPT and this includes the option to buy travel insurance direct from insurers or through insurance brokers.

Sir Peter Fry: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what submissions or correspondence he has received from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in respect of holiday makers going abroad uninsured as a result of the proposed 17.5 per cent. rate of insurance premium tax on holiday insurance sold by travel agents; and if he will place copies of such submissions or correspondence in the Library. [11452]

Mr. Oppenheim [holding answer 20 January 1997]: No such submissions or correspondence have been received.

Sir Peter Fry: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what is his estimate of the VAT currently lost to the Exchequer as a result of travel agents selling higher margin insurance with a high holiday discount instead of a low holiday discount and a lower insurance margin. [11453]

21 Jan 1997 : Column: 540

Mr. Oppenheim [holding answer 20 January 1997]: VAT lost to the Exchequer is not dependent on the practice of holiday price discounting by travel agents. The usual pricing structure of the industry is that low margins are applied to holidays and high margins are applied to the associated sales of VAT exempt insurance.

Sir Peter Fry: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what assessment has been made by his Department of the commercial impact on travel agents of the proposed imposition of a higher rate of insurance premium tax on holiday insurance sold by travel agents than on similar insurance sold by insurance brokers and agents. [11679]

Mr. Oppenheim [holding answer 20 January 1997]: Current pricing differentials and marketing practices in this sector, coupled with the fact that insurance provided free by travel agents will not be subject to the higher rate of insurance premium tax, suggest that the proposed tax differential in favour of other insurance agents and brokers is unlikely to have a significant effect on purchasing behaviour.

Work Force (Barrow)

Mr. Hutton: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what was the size of the work force in the Barrow travel-to-work area in (a) 1990 and (b) 1996. [11022]

Mrs. Angela Knight [holding answer 16 January 1997]: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the chief executive of the Office for National Statistics. I have asked him to arrange for a reply to be given.

Letter from Tim Holt to Mr. John Hutton, dated 21 January 1997:



Barrow in Furness travel-to-work area (at September)

EmployeesClaimant unemployed
198942,7002,452
199136,1003,749
199332,5004,921

Source:

ONS.

1995 information for travel-to-work areas is expected shortly, and I will write to you when it is available.



Next Section Index Home Page