Previous Section Index Home Page


Metropolitan District Staff

Sir Irvine Patnick: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment how many full-time equivalent employees there are (a) in total and (b) per head of population in the service of each metropolitan district.[15483]

Mr. Curry: The information is given in the table.

The levels of employment in individual authorities are not directly comparable because of variations in population structure, social characteristics, hours worked by part-time staff, and the extent to which they use private firms and contractors or act as agents for other authorities.

Joint staffing watch--whole time equivalents at June 1996 Metropolitan Districts

Staff per
AuthorityWhole time equivalentsThousand of population
Barnsley7,92635.0
Birmingham35,36635.1
Bolton(5)--(5)--
Bradford16,34733.9
Bury5,30629.1
Calderdale5,58728.9
Coventry11,16436.9
Doncaster9,98334.1
Dudley8,86028.4
Gateshead8,13140.2
Kirklees12,11931.3
Knowsley5,38935.0
Leeds23,83932.9
Liverpool18,64239.3
Manchester19,87746.1
Newcastle upon Tyne11,51940.6
North Tyneside6,66934.4
Oldham7,57834.4
Rochdale6,83533.0
Rotherham8,69933.9
Salford9,45241.0
Sandwell10,30935.1
Sefton7,71726.4
Sheffield17,25232.5
Solihull5,39126.7
South Tyneside5,65436.1
St. Helens5,87232.4
Stockport7,70326.4
Sunderland10,97736.9
Tameside7,02131.7
Trafford5,68326.1
Wakefield11,59136.5
Walsall8,61132.6
Wigan8,28726.7
Wirral9,61828.9
Wolverhampton8,98536.7
Total staff/Average staff per thousand population for metropolitan districts369,95933.9

Note:

(5) Data not available.

Source:

Joint Staffing Watch, June 1966.

Figures are for staff in general services--that is, excluding law and order services.


13 Feb 1997 : Column: 261

Birds of Prey

Mr. Gordon Prentice: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what assessment he has made of the incidence of the destruction of (a) eggs, (b) nests and (c) breeding habitats of (i) hen harriers and (ii) other birds of prey on privately owned grouse moors. [15643]

Mr. Clappison: None. Birds of prey, their eggs and nests are protected by the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. Offences against wild birds under this Act are not notifiable.

Building Research Establishment

Mr. Raynsford: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) what were the terms of reference for the BRE Future Group established in December 1995; and how many of its participants are members of the Foundation for the Built Environment; [15613]

Mr. Robert B. Jones: The terms of reference of the BRE Futures Group, set up in December 1995, were to support the BRE management board in considering the measures to be taken to improve the efficiency and value for money of the establishment, and the continuing management of change within BRE. The group has not met since the competitive sale of BRE was announced.

13 Feb 1997 : Column: 262

None of the members of the group are members of the Foundation for the Built Environment. No documentation relating to the group was made available to any bidder.

Mr. Raynsford: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment (1) on what grounds he decided that new legislation was not required to authorise the privatisation of the Building Research Establishment; [15615]

Mr. Jones: The Building Research Establishment is not a statutory body and has no statutory functions. No statutory powers are therefore required to transfer it to the private sector. The transfer can be effected by way of an ordinary contract of sale.

Mr. Raynsford: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment on what date the first results of their 1997-98 bids, in respect of projects under the partners in technology scheme, were made available to the Building Research Establishment executive agency. [15617]

Mr. Jones: My Department wrote to BRE on 14 January listing the partners in technology projects that it is prepared to support subject to contract.

Mr. Raynsford: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if minutes and working papers of the management board meetings of the Building Research Establishment were made available to both the shortlisted bidders for the Building Research Establishment. [15619]

Mr. Jones: Relevant working papers of the management board were made available to both short-listed bidders for BRE. In addition, once the competitive sale of BRE was announced, the Department was required to be represented at all meetings at which decisions might be taken which would materially affect the conduct of the business, including meetings of the BRE management board. In some cases, where the discussion warranted it, a supplementary note was put in the data room for the information of bidders.

Mr. Raynsford: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment who will bear the legal liability, or any share of that liability, for claims arising from work carried out or advice given by the Building Research Establishment before its privatisation. [15622]

Mr. Jones: Legal liability remains the subject of negotiation between the Department and the preferred purchaser of BRE.

Mr. Raynsford: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment when his Department decided to privatise the Building Research Establishment. [15614]

13 Feb 1997 : Column: 263

Mr. Jones: My right hon. Friend announced on 7 November 1995 his decision to move the BRE to the private sector and his intention to commission a study of the options for transfer. This decision was confirmed in his announcement on 2 April 1996 of his preferred way forward for effecting the transfer.

Mr. Raynsford: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment what arrangements were put in place to ensure a separation of the roles of members of the management bid team at the Building Research Establishment as bidders for the Building Research Establishment and as members of the Building Research Establishment management; when these arrangements were put into effect; and what steps were taken to monitor their effectiveness. [15618]

Mr. Jones: The Department issued guidance to the management and BRE staff when permission was given for the management bid team to express an interest in purchasing BRE. This guidance has been updated as necessary as the sale process has progressed. Its operation is overseen by the team of officials establishment by the Department to transfer BRE to the private sector.

13 Feb 1997 : Column: 264

Mr. Raynsford: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment if progress reports on the efficiency review of the Building Research Establishment's library service were made available to both shortlisted bidders for the Building Research Establishment. [15620]

Mr. Jones: Yes.

EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT

Section 2 Awards

Mr. Bryan Davies: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment if she will list for the last three years for which figures are available (a) the total number and (b) the total value in current prices, of section 2 discretionary awards made to (i) post-graduate students, (ii) students aged 16 to 18 years undertaking further education and (iii) students aged 19 years and over undertaking further education, in each Government region. [15447]

Mr. Forth: The information requested is given in the following tables.

13 Feb 1997 : Column: 263

1. Section 2 discretionary awards to post-graduate students
Academic years 1992-93 to 1994-95 by Government Office Region in England and in Wales(6)

Number of awards (000s)Total expenditure £ million(7)
1992-931993-941994-951992-931993-941994-95
North East0.20.10.10.90.50.3
North West0.20.20.30.60.61.1
Merseyside0.20.10.10.70.40.3
Yorkshire and Humberside0.40.10.10.70.20.2
East Midlands0.10.20.00.50.40.1
West Midlands0.50.10.11.60.40.3
South West0.30.20.10.60.50.2
Eastern0.30.00.01.70.00.0
London0.30.20.21.10.40.5
South East0.30.30.30.90.50.6
Wales0.20.00.00.80.10.1

(6) Made by local education authorities in each region to students normally domiciled in their area.

(7) In 1996-97 prices using the GDP deflator for each year for fee expenditure and the RPI (excluding mortgage interest payments) of September of each year for maintenance expenditure.


13 Feb 1997 : Column: 263

2. Section 2 discretionary awards to further education students aged 16 to 18 years(8)
Academic years 1992-93 to 1994-95 by Government Office Region in England and in Wales(9)

Number of awards (000s) Total expenditure £ million(10)
1992-931993-941994-951992-931993-941994-95
North East2.97.07.11.44.43.3
North West11.920.820.64.89.88.6
Merseyside4.13.33.71.81.91.3
Yorkshire and Humberside17.013.213.15.35.04.9
East Midlands11.96.05.94.23.82.8
West Midlands6.37.18.62.62.22.6
South West9.411.510.76.16.65.8
Eastern8.77.17.86.25.05.2
London9.212.512.74.25.05.3
South East11.622.222.44.38.78.8
Wales13.914.013.57.03.94.0

(8) Data on awards to 16 to 18 year olds were collected only for awards made at less than 50 per cent. of the mandatory rate in 1992-93; Table 3 may include some awards made at more than 50 per cent. of the mandatory rate to 16 to 18 year olds although, in general, full value awards (made at 50 to 100 per cent. of the mandatory rate) are made to students over 19 years old.

(9) Made by local education authorities in each region to students normally domiciled in their area.

(10) In 1992-97 prices using the GDP deflator for each year for fee expenditure and the RPI (excluding mortgage interest payments) of September of each year for maintenance expenditure.


13 Feb 1997 : Column: 263

3. Section 2 discretionary awards to further education students aged 19 years and over(11)
Academic years 1992-93 to 1994-95 by Government Office Region in England and in Wales(12)

Number of awards (000s) Total expenditure £ million(13)
1992-931993-941994-951992-931993-941994-95
North East4.14.43.67.75.74.1
North West16.910.57.418.813.79.3
Merseyside2.52.41.85.23.92.8
Yorkshire and Humberside12.711.15.921.213.49.0
East Midlands11.315.04.316.510.25.8
West Midlands3.54.13.45.94.53.2
South West11.99.64.323.011.16.3
Eastern6.16.76.012.18.37.2
London3.22.92.26.44.53.9
South East9.610.310.116.816.214.0
Wales6.75.24.48.06.33.7

(11) Data on awards to 16 to 18 year olds were collected only for awards made at less than 50 per cent. of the mandatory rate in 1992-93; Table 3 may include some awards made at more than 50 per cent. of the mandatory rate to 16 to 18 year olds although, in general, full value awards (made at 50 to 100 per cent. of the mandatory rate) are made to students over 19 years old.

(12) Made by local education authorities in each region to students normally domiciled in their area.

(13) In 1996-97 prices using the GDP deflator for each year for fee expenditure and the RPI (excluding mortgage interest payments) of September of each year for maintenance expenditure.


13 Feb 1997 : Column: 265

13 Feb 1997 : Column: 265


Next Section Index Home Page