Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
Mr. Rooney: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment if a benefit sanction may be applied for failure to follow up the vacancy where a claimant identifies a vacancy himself and requests an in-work benefit calculation from an Employment Service adviser. [17865]
Mr. Forth: Responsibility for the subject of the question has been delegated to the Employment Service under its chief executive. I have asked him to arrange for a reply to be given.
Letter from Leigh Lewis to Mr. Terry Rooney, dated 27 February 1997:
27 Feb 1997 : Column: 338
The Secretary of State has asked me to reply to your question about whether a benefit sanction may be applied for failure to follow up the vacancy where a claimant identifies a vacancy himself and requests an in-work benefit calculation from an employment service
adviser. This falls within my responsibility as Chief Executive of the Employment Service (ES).
Where the jobseeker identifies a vacancy themselves and discusses it with an ES adviser, it is considered to be notified to the jobseeker. Provided the jobseeker's suitability for the job has been established, if they do not apply for the job, or do not attend for the interview, or refuse the job, the case may be referred to the Sector Adjudication Officer (SAO). If the SAO decides the job, the case may be referred to the Sector Adjudication Officer (SAO). If the SAO decides the jobseeker has acted without good cause, a sanction of up to 26 weeks could be imposed.
For these, as with all vacancies notified to the jobseeker, an in-work benefit calculation can be done by an ES adviser.
I hope this is helpful.
Mr. Rooney: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment in what circumstances an Employment Service adviser may use an in-work benefit calculation to encourage a jobseeker to lower his minimum wage as indicated in question 16 of the ES2 form. [17864]
Mr. Forth: Responsibility for the subject of the question has been delegated to the Employment Service under its chief executive. I have asked him to arrange for a reply to be given.
Letter from Robert Horne to Mr. Terry Rooney, dated 27 February 1997:
The Secretary of State has asked me, in the absence of the Chief Executive, to reply to your question about the circumstances when an Employment Service Adviser may use an in-work benefit calculation to encourage a jobseeker to lower their minimum wage.
All Employment Service (ES) offices provide a structured and coherent advisory and information service which is aimed at helping jobseekers back into work as soon as possible.
As part of this service, our advisers provide information about in-work benefits, either at the request of the jobseeker or, where appropriate, as part of New Jobseeker Interviews and Restart Interviews. In relevant circumstances, Advisers also provide jobseekers with personal in-work benefit calculations to show how they can be better off in work, either for a particular job or for a range of wages.
The "Helping You Back To Work" (ES2) form is generally used when the jobseeker initially makes a claim for Jobseeker's Allowance (JSA). In discussing question 16, the adviser determines whether the jobseeker's salary expectation is realistic in the light of opportunities in the labour market. If the expected salary appears unrealistic, then the adviser will make the jobseeker aware of in-work benefits they may be able to claim if they accept a job with a lower wage.
I hope this clarifies the position.
Mr. Byers: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment if she will list for each training and enterprise council (a) the number of modern apprentices and (b) the number in each occupational sector. [17919]
Mr. Paice: The information requested is given in the table.
Notes:
1. As the information on the sector breakdown is from the MA Database, it is only possible to give percentages, not actual numbers.
2. "--" = less than 0.5 per cent.
Source:
MA Database; TEC Management Information.
27 Feb 1997 : Column: 339
Notes:
1. As the information on the sector breakdown is from the MA Database, it is only possible to give percentages, not actual numbers.
2. "--" = less than 0.5 per cent.
Source:
MA Database; TEC Management Information.
27 Feb 1997 : Column: 341
Notes:
1. As the information on the sector breakdown is from the MA Database, it is only possible to give percentages, not actual numbers.
2. "--" = less than 0.5 per cent.
Source:
MA Database; TEC Management Information.
27 Feb 1997 : Column: 343
Notes:
1. As the information on the sector breakdown is from the MA Database, it is only possible to give percentages, not actual numbers.
2. "--" = less than 0.5 per cent.
Source:
MA Database; TEC Management Information.
27 Feb 1997 : Column: 345
Notes:
1. As the information on the sector breakdown is from the MA Database, it is only possible to give percentages, not actual numbers.
2. "--" = less than 0.5 per cent.
Source:
MA Database; TEC Management Information.
27 Feb 1997 : Column: 347
Notes:
1. As the information on the sector breakdown is from the MA Database, it is only possible to give percentages, not actual numbers.
2. "--" = less than 0.5 per cent.
Source:
MA Database; TEC Management Information.
27 Feb 1997 : Column: 349
Notes:
1. As the information on the sector breakdown is from the MA Database, it is only possible to give percentages, not actual numbers.
2. "--" = less than 0.5 per cent.
Source:
MA Database; TEC Management Information.
27 Feb 1997 : Column: 351
Notes:
1. As the information on the sector breakdown is from the MA Database, it is only possible to give percentages, not actual numbers.
2. "--" = less than 0.5 per cent.
Source:
MA Database; TEC Management Information.
27 Feb 1997 : Column: 353
Notes:
1. As the information on the sector breakdown is from the MA Database, it is only possible to give percentages, not actual numbers.
2. "--" = less than 0.5 per cent.
Source:
MA Database; TEC Management Information.
27 Feb 1997 : Column: 355
Notes:
1. As the information on the sector breakdown is from the MA Database, it is only possible to give percentages, not actual numbers.
2. "--" = less than 0.5 per cent.
Source:
MA Database; TEC Management Information.
27 Feb 1997 : Column: 357
Notes:
1. As the information on the sector breakdown is from the MA Database, it is only possible to give percentages, not actual numbers.
2. "--" = less than 0.5 per cent.
Source:
MA Database; TEC Management Information.
27 Feb 1997 : Column: 359
Notes:
1. As the information on the sector breakdown is from the MA Database, it is only possible to give percentages, not actual numbers.
2. "--" = less than 0.5 per cent.
Source:
MA Database; TEC Management Information.
27 Feb 1997 : Column: 361
Notes:
1. As the information on the sector breakdown is from the MA Database, it is only possible to give percentages, not actual numbers.
2. "--" = less than 0.5 per cent.
Source:
MA Database; TEC Management Information.
27 Feb 1997 : Column: 363
Notes:
1. As the information on the sector breakdown is from the MA Database, it is only possible to give percentages, not actual numbers.
2. "--" = less than 0.5 per cent.
Source:
MA Database; TEC Management Information.
27 Feb 1997 : Column: 365
Notes:
1. As the information on the sector breakdown is from the MA Database, it is only possible to give percentages, not actual numbers.
2. "--" = less than 0.5 per cent.
Source:
MA Database; TEC Management Information.
27 Feb 1997 : Column: 369
Next Section | Index | Home Page |