Previous Section Index Home Page


Casino Deregulation

Mr. Hargreaves: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement on casino deregulation. [20446]

Mr. Kirkhope: The information is as follows: The Deregulation (Casinos Order) 1997 I am pleased to report implementation of the first deregulation changes to the casino regime since the 1968 Act.

Following approval by Parliament on 6 March, I made the Deregulation (Casinos) Order, which comes into force on 3 April.

This will allow casinos in England and Wales to provide alcohol after midnight, until 3 am in London, and 2 am elsewhere.

In casinos in Great Britain, it also reduces from 48 to 24 hours the waiting period before new members may take part in the gaming. The Deregulation (Debit Cards) Order 1997 The order has now been cleared by the Deregulation Committees and awaits parliamentary approval. It would allow acceptance of payment by debit cards. The Second Casino Consultation Advertising, group and postal membership and slot machines:

Following initial consultation earlier in 1996, we went out to consultation on 12 November on a package of measures to relax certain other controls on the operation of casinos. The proposals were as follows:







13 Mar 1997 : Column: 277

There was broad support for the advertising proposals. A few organisations were against any relaxation in the controls. However, this is a very modest relaxation, allowing casinos merely to give out information about themselves. I do not believe that necessary protection for the public would be removed by this measure.

Most respondents also supported the proposals for group membership and postal applications. A few were opposed but most were content with the detailed safeguards proposed.

We will prepare draft proposals in the form of a deregulation order.

I am still considering the more extensive proposals for slot machines in casinos. Some concerns have been expressed about the nature of such machines. However, they are common in casinos throughout the world, usually in substantially greater numbers than we propose. But I consider that such machines must be strictly regulated. More detailed work would be required on the technical specification, monitoring and other arrangements before we could introduce legislation. We will continue our discussions with the Gaming Board and the industry.

Permitted areas

We proposed to allow casinos in 21 new locations, including London docklands and a special category of seven conference towns.

Outside London, most of the proposed new areas attracted support or neutrality from their local councils and reasonable support from other local interests. I propose to remove Peterborough from the list; its council remained opposed and there was also significant other local opposition.

In the London area, most local authorities have welcomed our proposals. Slough is considering its position. I am in further contact with Croydon council, which has recently sought more information about the implications of permitted area status and its role in the regulatory regime for casinos.

I have taken account of representations in favour of greater casino provision in east London. In addition to Dartford and Redbridge, I intend to designate a permitted area within docklands, which will put it on a par with other urban development areas within Great Britain.

On the basis of up-to-date information provided by the British Association of Conference Destinations, I propose to add Milton Keynes and Weston-super-Mare to the category of conference towns to be designated as permitted areas.

I also propose to redefine existing permitted areas to reflect local authority boundary changes.

The changes that I wish to make could be implemented by secondary legislation. Before any new areas are introduced, however, I will need to address the resource, timing and other practical implications.

Asylum Seekers

Mr. Gerrard: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many of the asylum seekers currently held in detention (a) are awaiting a decision on

13 Mar 1997 : Column: 278

their asylum application, (b) are awaiting an appeal following a refusal of their asylum application and (c) have had an appeal rejected. [19561]

Mr. Kirkhope: The available information is given in the table.

Number of people recorded as being detained(1)(2) on 31 January 1997(3) who had sought asylum at some stage, by stage of application and immigration status

Stage of application PortIllegal entrantSubject to deportation actionTotal
Awaiting an initial decision1035715175
Awaiting result of an appeal20314429376
Awaiting removal after refusal8614417217
Total39231561768

(1) Persons detained solely under powers contained in Schedule 2 or 3 to the Immigration Act 1971.

(2) These figures include people who have been in detention for less than one month. Because of the delay in recording receptions into, and releases from, detention and the large number of persons detained for a short period of time, the figures should be used with caution.

(3) Illegal entrants and persons subject to deportation action are as at 31 January, port cases are as at 3 February 1997.


Sexual Orientation (Police Database)

Mr. Michael Brown: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to his answer of 3 March, Official Report, column 463, (1) if he will make it his policy to ensure that any references to individuals' sexuality are deleted from the police national computer; [19434]

Mr. Maclean: There is no specific data field on the police national computer for recording sexual orientation. This might be inferred from the details of the convictions history and offending pattern. Information recorded on the PNC must be relevant to the purposes for which it is held in order to comply with the data protection principles of the Data Protection Act 1984. Data on sexual orientation would not be relevant for these purposes and would be removed if found to have been improperly recorded.

Records are not kept of how many occasions an individual's sexual orientation may have been improperly recorded on the PNC.

Prisoners (London)

Mr. Cox: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many prison inmates there were in each London prison on 1 March. [19492]

Miss Widdecombe: Responsibility for this matter has been delegated to the Director General of the Prison Service, who has been asked to arrange for a reply to be given.

13 Mar 1997 : Column: 279

Letter from A. J. Pearson to Mr. Tom Cox, dated 13 March 1997:



Population in London Prison Service establishments on 28 February 1997

Prison Service establishmentPopulation on 28 February 1997(4)
Belmarsh868
Brixton617
Downview289
Feltham866
Highdown689
Holloway508
Latchmere House174
Pentonville908
Wandsworth852
Wormwood Scrubs1,213

(4) Provisional figures.


Burglaries

Mr. Callaghan: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what percentage of burglaries in each of the last five years was committed by people aged under 21 years. [19687]

Mr. Maclean: Information available is given in the table.

Percentage of persons cautioned and convicted at all courts for burglary offences who were aged under 21 years, 1990 to 1995
England and Wales

199019911992199319941995
Percentage64.860.958.957.858.458.3

Youth Crime

Mr. George: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what has been the percentage change in the number of crimes committed by youths in the past 10 years. [19822]

Mr. Maclean: Information available is given in the table.

Number and percentage change of known offenders (those cautioned or convicted at all courts) aged 10 to under 18 by type of offence, 1985 and 1995
England and Wales Thousands

Type of offence19851995Percentage change
Indictable213.3132.8-38
Summary (excluding motoring)50.046.2-9
All offences (excluding summary motoring)256.2179.1-32


Next Section Index Home Page