Select Committee on European Legislation Fifth Report


THE STEEL AID CODE

10.   We have given further consideration to the following on the basis of further information from the Government. We maintain our opinion[24] that it raises questions of political importance, but now make no recommendation for its further consideration:--

Department of Trade and Industry

(17111)
6785/96
SEC(96)284
Communication from the Commission concerning a draft Council Decision establishing revised Community rules for aid to the steel industry.
Legal base: Article 95 (ECSC); unanimity.

  Background

    10.1  We reported in April, on the basis of information provided in an Explanatory Memorandum submitted by the then Minister for Industry and Energy (Mr Eggar), on Commission proposals which would amend the Steel Aid Code. The Code, agreed unanimously by the Council in 1991, provides derogation from the general prohibition in Article 4(c) of the European Coal and Steel Community Treaty prohibiting all state aid to this industrial sector. Aid in accordance with the Code can be approved by the Commission.

    10.2  In his Memorandum, the Minister said that the Government had reservations about aspects of the proposal, but he did not specify what they were or say what modifications the Government would be seeking. We therefore asked him to provide further information, and held up clearance of the document in the meantime.

  Further developments

    10.3  In June the Minister wrote to tell us that there had been no substantive discussion of the Commission's proposal at the meeting of the Industry Council on 20 May, only an initial discussion. He volunteered, however, that the Government had already raised concerns about proposals to adopt the Treaty of Rome framework for environmental aid, which would allow aid for investment in replacement plant, and to allow aid for partial closures. The Minister said that the Government also saw scope for procedural changes to improve the way in which the rules operated.

  Political agreement on a revised code

    10.4  We have now received a letter dated 18 November from the present Minister for Industry (Mr Knight) in which he tells us that, following intensive negotiations on the proposed new Code, political agreement was reached at a meeting of the Industry Council on 14 November, subject to scrutiny reserves by the UK and Danish delegations. The new Code would operate from 1 January 1997 until the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on 22 July 2002.

    10.5  In his letter the Minister tells us:

      "I am satisfied that the Code is, overall, as rigorous as the present Code. The agreement has been given a cautious welcome by BISPA[25]. This agreement will avoid the undesirable prospect of a period without a Code, which would have encouraged further requests for support for uncompetitive companies. The provisions are much tougher than those proposed by the Commission in April. As a result of the Government's stance, the original proposals have been significantly modified and now take account of the principal concerns of the UK industry.

      "The decision will amend the provisions relating to aid for research and development (R&D), environmental protection, closure of capacity and procedure for dealing with illegal or unnotified aid, and will modify certain other aspects of the present Code. The main changes from the present Code were described in the Explanatory Memorandum submitted on 22 April. The further modifications which have resulted from discussions which have taken place over recent months, culminating in the agreement reached at the Industry Council, are described below.

  Definition

      "The definition of notifiable aid is extended to cover loan guarantees and asset transfers.

  Aid for Research and Development for Environmental Protection

      "The Community frameworks for aid for R&D and environmental protection of 1996 and 1994 respectively (established under the Treaty of Rome) will apply to the ECSC steel industry -- instead of, as originally proposed, the frameworks in force at the time the aid is granted. The effect of this is that any future changes to the EC frameworks cannot be applied to the ECSC steel industry without the unanimous assent of the Council.

      "Member States will be consulted on cases involving aid for environmental protection, and conditions and safeguards have been agreed to avoid hidden investment aid for new plant or equipment. Environmental aid will not be allowable for a new investment which would have taken place in any event on economic grounds or due to the age of the existing plant. Aid to firms which improve environmental protection beyond the requirements of mandatory standards, or where there are no mandatory standards, will be reduced to take account of any advantages resulting from lower costs of productions. The effect of these changes is to reduce significantly the risk that the new provisions could be used to secure investment aid in the guise of environmental improvements.

  Aid for closure

      "A number of new provisions have been added to the proposal to allow aid for partial closures (ie the closure of steel undertakings which are part of a group including other ECSC steel undertakings). The closed plant must be destroyed. The closed undertaking must have been effectively separate for at least six months before the payment of aid. The accounts of the undertaking will be independently audited to ensure a true and accurate valuation of assets and liabilities. There must be genuine and verifiable reduction in production capacity calculated to produce an appreciable benefit for the industry as a whole. The aid allowable for partial closure will be limited to the average (rather than, as originally proposed, the higher) of the two costings detailed in the Code. Partial closures which have already been agreed under the 'Bresciani' scheme of 1994 will not be eligible for reconsideration. The effect of these changes is to ensure that aid for partial closures (a) results in a real reduction in production capacity, and (b) is not used to subsidise the company's continuing operations.

      "A provision was agreed allowing a small amount of regional investment aid for the Greek steel industry. This is unlikely to have any significant impact on the UK industry."

  The Government's view

    10.6  The Minister reminds us that the Government attaches great importance to the maintenance of strict control of steel aids, as the best means of promoting efficiency in the industry, and of ensuring that the unsubsidised UK industry is not disadvantaged. He tells us:

      "As you know, the Government had some reservations about aspects of the original Commission proposals, notably in respect of the provisions covering aid for environmental protection and aid for partial closures. The changes described above have gone a long way towards meeting these concerns, in particular by incorporating UK suggestions to establish effective safeguards against the risk of abuse. I am in no doubt that the new Steel Aid Code which has been agreed, subject to Parliamentary Scrutiny reserve, is in the best interests of the UK industry."

  Conclusions

    10.7  The Steel Aid Code is politically important. It sets the parameters within which the Commission can agree to the payment of state aid to the steel industry by Member States. It is of particular interest in this country because the steel industry here is not in the public sector, nor does it receive state aid.

    10.8  In an earlier letter, dated 15 October, in which the Minister described the progress of negotiations on the proposed revised Code, he told us that his Department had kept in close touch with the British Iron and Steel Producers Association (BISPA) to ensure that the industry's concerns were taken full account of in the UK negotiating position. He now tells us that the revised proposal has been given a cautious welcome by BISPA.

    10.9  We note the progress which has been made in the course of the negotiations and the changes which have been made to the Code. We see no cause now to recommend a debate, and we clear the document; the Parliamentary Scrutiny Reserve may be lifted.


24.(17111)--; see HC 51-xvii (1995-96), paragraph 6 (24 April 1996). Back

25.The British Iron and Steel Producers Association. Back

 


© Parliamentary copyright 1996
Prepared 10th December 1996