Select Committee on Trade and Industry Second Report



  SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS

1.  We recommend that the Director General should propose higher limits for cost recovery only if convincing evidence is provided that higher costs have been incurred as a direct consequence of the development and operation of competition services, and that such costs are reasonable. (Para Error! Reference source not found.)

2.  We recommend that the Director General oblige all suppliers to ensure that prepayment meter surcharges are no higher than can be justified by the greater costs of supply to prepayment customers. We further recommend that he consider the need for specific and continuing price regulation for prepayment meter tariffs. (Para Error! Reference source not found.)

3.  In 1995, we said that we wished to see competition extended in the electricity supply industry "provided that it can be achieved at reasonable cost in relation to the benefits". This remains our recommendation. (Para Error! Reference source not found.)

4.  We recommend that the Government commission and publish an independent cost-benefit analysis of liberalisation, including a breakdown of the costs and benefits for different types of consumer, especially low-income consumers, in different regions. This must now be treated as a matter of urgency. (Para Error! Reference source not found.)

5.  We recommend that the Director General continue to do all in his power to lead and co-ordinate the liberalisation and re-affirm his statement of August 1995 that OFFER will take a pro-active role. (Para Error! Reference source not found.)

6.  We recommend that the Director General conduct urgently a consultation exercise with the industry and consumer groups on the Pool's profiling proposals to ensure that all the potential consequences of profiling have been identified and accounted for; and that he publish his findings. (Para Error! Reference source not found.)

7.  We recommend that the Director General proceed as fast as practicable to implement a licence condition enabling him to impose the CIDA's decisions. (Para 54)

8.  We recommend that the CIDA develop system specifications necessary to facilitate successful systems integration as a matter of urgency and that the whole industry agree speedily to implement its proposals. We further recommend that new system specifications should be limited to those essential for successful delivery of systems in April 1998. (Para Error! Reference source not found.)

9.  We recommend that the CIDA immediately seek to establish how many PESs are unlikely to meet even the latest entry deadline for end-to-end testing and draw up contingency plans. We further recommend that OFFER consider the imposition of financial penalties on those PESs who do not meet the deadline for end-to-end testing. (Para Error! Reference source not found.)

10.  We recommend that the Director General establish and publish benchmarks of performance for each phase of the controlled market start-up. (Para Error! Reference source not found.)

11.  We urge PESs, in the absence of a voluntary agreement, to accept proposed licence condition 7D. (Para Error! Reference source not found.)

12.  We recommend that the Director General seek agreement on licence conditions regarding customer protection with some urgency. (Para 64)

13.  We recommend that the Director General should proceed with the establishment of price controls on consumption between 8,000 and 20,000 kWh per annum for the period immediately following 1st April 1998 for a minimum of two years. (Para 66)

14.  We recommend that the Director General give further consideration to the need to restrain prices for contract customers who have the same consumption levels as those on protected tariffs. (Para Error! Reference source not found.)

15.  We recommend that the Director General, in determining the level of price restraints, seeks to strike an appropriate balance between the need to protect consumers and the need to provide adequate incentives to new entrants. (Para Error! Reference source not found.)

16.  We recommend that the Director General ask the Office of Fair Trading, in consultation with the Electricity Association, to consider ways in which sanctions could be imposed upon those suppliers who breach the Code of Practice on Marketing - whether full members of the Electricity Association or not. (Para Error! Reference source not found.)

17.  We recommend that the Director General amend the Competitive Supply Code so that the provision relating to persons entering customers' premises include consideration of criminal records. (Para Error! Reference source not found.)

18.  We recommend that the Director General does not continue the Standards of Performance levy beyond 1998. We further recommend, as we have done before, that the Government accept responsibility for determining and imposing any levies on consumers that may be necessary to fund energy efficiency measures. (Para Error! Reference source not found.)

19.  We reiterate our previous recommendation that the Government consider ways in which suppliers could be encouraged to offer energy efficiency services if these do not emerge quickly in the liberalised market. (Para Error! Reference source not found.)

20.  We recommend that the Director General should impose non-discrimination licence obligations on first and second tier suppliers as currently set out in the draft licences. (Para Error! Reference source not found.)

21.  We recommend that the Director General regularly review the non-discrimination licence conditions of all suppliers as competition in supply in the under 100 kW market develops. (Para Error! Reference source not found.)

22.  We recommend that OFFER conduct a thorough consumer education programme prior to April 1998 to ensure that customers know what opportunities the liberalised market will offer them and how they can change supplier. (Para Error! Reference source not found.)

23.  We recommend that the Government should consider granting the Director General statutory authority to direct reform of the Pool designed to ensure that consumers receive the maximum potential benefits of competition and that the Director General keep the development of competition in generation under active review. (Para Error! Reference source not found.)

24.  We recommend that the Director General produce agreed and workable contingency plans to come into operation in the event that one or more of the PESs fail to have its systems ready on time. (Para Error! Reference source not found.)

25.  We recommend that the Director General should continue to monitor all parties' progress towards liberalisation and publish regular reports. He should not hesitate to announce a short postponement should he judge it necessary. (Para Error! Reference source not found.)


 
previous page contents next page
House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1997
Prepared 20 March 1997