If the Bill is committed to a Committee of the whole House, further proceedings on the Bill shall stand postponed, and, as soon as the proceedings on any resolution come to by the House on Landmines Bill [Money] have been concluded, this House will immediately resolve itself into a Committee on the Bill (Order of 3rd July).
||LANDMINES BILL [MONEY]: Queen's Recommendation signified. [No debate]|
| ||Dawn Primarolo
That, for the purpose of any Act resulting from the Landmines Bill, it is expedient to authorise--
(1) the payment out of money provided by Parliament of any expenses of the Secretary of State incurred in consequence of the Act;
(2) the payment into the Consolidated Fund of sums received by the Secretary of State in consequence of the Act.
|To be decided without debate (Standing Order No. 52(1)(a)).|
|Written Questions tabled on Thursday 9th July for answer today++|
|Mr Paul Marsden (Shrewsbury and Atcham): To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Lord Chancellor's Department, what responses have been received to the consultation paper, Unification of the Stipendiary Bench, published on 1st April.|
|Mr Martin Salter (Reading West): To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, if she has come to a decision on any of the proposals in the White Paper, Partnership for Equality, on which views were invited.|
|Mr John Heppell (Nottingham East): To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if he will publish the results of the review of asylum and immigration appeals.|
|Dr Stephen Ladyman (South Thanet): To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, if, following the recent Indian and Pakistan nuclear tests, there has been a change of policy on nuclear-related exports to India and Pakistan, and on contacts between British nuclear industry officials and their Indian and Pakistani counterparts.|
|Mr Alan Johnson (Kingston upon Hull West and Hessle): To ask the President of the Board of Trade, if she will make a statement about the future of the science and engineering base.|