| |
| Notification |
Requests for Director to consider conduct. |
21. - (1) Sections 22 and 23 provide for conduct of a person which that person thinks may infringe the Chapter II prohibition to be considered by the Director on the application of that person. |
|
(2) Schedule 6 provides for the procedure to be followed- |
|
(a) by any person making an application, and |
|
(b) by the Director, in considering an application. |
Notification for guidance. |
22. - (1) A person who applies for conduct to be considered under this section must- |
|
(a) notify the Director of it; and |
|
(b) apply to him for guidance. |
|
(2) On an application under this section, the Director may give the applicant guidance as to whether or not, in his view, the conduct is likely to infringe the Chapter II prohibition. |
Notification for a decision. |
23. - (1) A person who applies for conduct to be considered under this section must- |
|
(a) notify the Director of it; and |
|
(b) apply to him for a decision. |
|
(2) On an application under this section, the Director may make a decision as to- |
|
(a) whether the Chapter II prohibition has been infringed; and |
|
(b) if it has not been infringed, whether that is because of the effect of an exclusion. |
Effect of guidance. |
24. - (1) This section applies to conduct if the Director has determined an application under section 22 by giving guidance that the conduct is unlikely to infringe the Chapter II prohibition. |
|
(2) The Director is to take no further action under this Part with respect to the conduct to which this section applies, unless- |
|
(a) he has reasonable grounds for believing that there has been a material change of circumstance since he gave his guidance; |
|
(b) he has a reasonable suspicion that the information on which he based his guidance was incomplete, false or misleading in a material particular; or |
|
(c) a complaint about the conduct has been made to him. |
|
(3) No penalty may be imposed under this Part in respect of any infringement of the Chapter II prohibition by conduct to which this section applies. |
|
(4) But the Director may remove the immunity given by subsection (3) if- |
|
(a) he takes action under this Part with respect to the conduct in one of the circumstances mentioned in subsection (2); |
|
(b) he considers that it is likely that the conduct will infringe the prohibition; and |
|
(c) he gives notice in writing to the undertaking on whose application the guidance was given that he is removing the immunity as from the date specified in his notice. |
|
(5) If the Director has a reasonable suspicion that information- |
|
(a) on which he based his guidance, and |
|
(b) which was provided to him by an undertaking engaging in the conduct, |
|
was incomplete, false or misleading in a material particular, the date specified in a notice under subsection (4)(c) may be earlier than the date on which the notice is given. |
Effect of a decision that the Chapter II prohibition is not infringed. |
25. - (1) This section applies to conduct if the Director has determined an application under section 23 by making a decision that the conduct does not infringe the Chapter II prohibition. |
|
(2) The Director is to take no further action under this Part with respect to the conduct unless- |
|
(a) he has reasonable grounds for believing that there has been a material change of circumstance since he gave his decision; or |
|
(b) he has a reasonable suspicion that the information on which he based his decision was incomplete, false or misleading in a material particular. |
|
(3) No penalty may be imposed under this Part in respect of any infringement of the Chapter II prohibition by conduct to which this section applies. |
|
(4) But the Director may remove the immunity given by subsection (3) if- |
|
(a) he takes action under this Part with respect to the conduct in one of the circumstances mentioned in subsection (2); |
|
(b) he considers that it is likely that the conduct will infringe the prohibition; and |
|
(c) he gives notice in writing to the undertaking on whose application the decision was made that he is removing the immunity as from the date specified in his notice. |
|
(5) If the Director has a reasonable suspicion that information- |
|
(a) on which he based his decision, and |
|
(b) which was provided to him by an undertaking engaging in the conduct, |
|
was incomplete, false or misleading in a material particular, the date specified in a notice under subsection (4)(c) may be earlier than the date on which the notice is given. |