14 May 1997 : Column 33

House of Commons

Wednesday 14 May 1997

The House met at twenty-five minutes past Eleven o'clock

PRAYERS

[Madam Speaker in the Chair]

Message to attend Her Majesty:

The House went; and having returned:

The sitting was suspended until fifteen minutes past Two o'clock, and then resumed.

Members Sworn

The following Members took and subscribed the Oath, or made and subscribed the Affirmation required by Law:

John Robert Greenway, esquire, Ryedale

Tam Dalyell, esquire, Linlithgow

Kenneth Maginnis, esquire, Fermanagh and South Tyrone

Robert Law McCartney, esquire, QC, North Down

Nicholas Barton Harvey, esquire, North Devon

Douglas John Henderson, esquire, Newcastle upon Tyne, North

Calum Alasdair Macdonald, esquire, Western Isles

James Mackay Cousins, esquire, Newcastle upon Tyne, Central

Austin Vernon Mitchell, esquire, Great Grimsby

Alan John Simpson, esquire, Nottingham, South

Sylvia Lloyd, Mrs. Heal, Halesowen and Rowley Regis

Michael O'Brien, esquire, North Warwickshire

Lorna Fitzsimons, Rochdale

Dr. John Douglas Naysmith, Bristol, North-West

Dan Norris, esquire, Wansdyke

2.22 pm

Sitting suspended.

2.30 pm

On resuming--

SESSIONAL ORDERS

Elections

Ordered,


14 May 1997 : Column 34

Resolved,


    That no Peer of the Realm, except a Peer of Ireland, hath any right to give his vote in the Election of any Member to serve in Parliament.

Resolved,


    That if it shall appear that any person hath been elected or returned a Member of this House, or endeavoured so to be, by Bribery or any other corrupt practices, this House will proceed with the utmost severity against all such persons as shall have been wilfully concerned in such Bribery or other corrupt practices.

Witnesses

Resolved,


Resolved,


    That if it shall appear that any person hath given false evidence in any case before this House, or any Committee thereof, this House will proceed with the utmost severity against such offender.

Metropolitan Police

Ordered,


Ordered,


    That the Votes and Proceedings of this House be printed, being first perused by Madam Speaker; and that she do appoint the printing thereof; and that no person but such as she shall appoint do presume to print the same.

    Outlawries


    Bill for the more effectual preventing Clandestine Outlawries; read the First time; to be read a Second time.

Journal

Ordered,


Ordered,


    That the said Journal and Index be printed by the appointment and under the direction of Donald William Limon, Esq, CB, the Clerk of this House.

Ordered,


    That the said Journal and Index be printed by such person as shall be licensed by Madam Speaker, and that no other person do presume to print the same.

14 May 1997 : Column 35

Madam Speaker's Statement

Madam Speaker: I wish to make a statement about the availability of services in the House for those who do not take their seats after being returned here as Members.

This House has traditionally accommodated great extremes of opinion. I am sure therefore that the House would not wish to put any unnecessary obstacle in the way of Members wishing to fulfil their democratic mandate by attending, speaking and voting in this House. Equally, I feel certain that those who choose not to take their seats should not have access to the many benefits and facilities that are now available in the House without also taking up their responsibilities as Members.

The present position is that, under the terms of the Parliamentary Oaths Act 1866, any Member who fails to take the oath or to make the affirmation that is required by law and who then votes or sits during any debate after the election of the Speaker is subject to a penalty of £500 on each occasion and his or her seat is automatically vacated. In 1924, one of my predecessors ruled that any such Member could not receive a salary, and this regulation also applies to allowances.

In the interests of the House, and making use of the power vested in the office of the Speaker to control the accommodation and services in the Commons parts of the Palace of Westminster and the precincts, I have decided to extend these restrictions. As from the date of the end of the debate on the Queen's Speech, the services that are available to all other Members from the six Departments of the House and beyond will not be open for use by Members who have not taken their seats by swearing or by affirmation.

For the avoidance of doubt, a schedule listing these various services will be appended to this statement in the Official Report. One of the purposes of this will, of course, be to enable officers and servants of the House and others to administer these new regulations with clarity and precision.

Of course, I accept that there may be occasional cases where an elected Member, for reasons of health or for other good reasons, cannot attend to take his or her seat immediately after election, but, nevertheless, desires to do so at the earliest possible moment. Provided such a Member sends me a letter informing me of his or her

14 May 1997 : Column 36

inability to attend and signifying his or her intention to attend to swear or affirm at the earliest possible time, I will give instructions that these new regulations should not be applied. This should be done not later than the date of the end of the debate on the Queen's Speech or, in the case of a by-election, after 10 sitting days.

The House will have noted that the date which I have set for the introduction of these regulations is the end of the debate on the Queen's Speech. That is not an ideal date, but the House needs notice of these changes. In a future Parliament, the effective date both for the cessation of services and for the deadline for the sending of the letter requesting excusal will be the date of the Queen's Speech itself.

The services to which the new regulations apply include:



    Services in the Members' post offices


    Travel services

14 May 1997 : Column 37

Points of Order

2.38 pm

Mr. Alan Clark (Kensington and Chelsea): On a point of order, Madam Speaker. To what extent have you assented to, or been consulted about, the edict, issuing apparently from the Prime Minister's office, that curtails the length, content, duration and timing of Prime Minister's Question Time? Already, the Table Office is refusing to take questions except for once a week on Wednesdays. Surely this matter should be debated in the Chamber. It jeopardises the rights of Back Benchers on both sides of the Chamber and affects the accountability of the Executive to the electorate as a whole. Furthermore, it is exactly the kind of encroachment on the rights of Members by Governments to which we look to you for protection.


Next Section

IndexHome Page