Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
The Second Deputy Chairman: With this, it will be convenient to discuss the following amendments: No. 97, in page 1, line 7, at end insert
'and on the status of Scotland within the United Kingdom'.
No. 204, in page 1, line 10, leave out '1' and insert
No. 72, in schedule 1, page 4, line 5, at end insert 'and alternative'.
No. 73, in page 4, leave out line 7 and insert
No. 74, in page 4, line 8, after 'A', insert 'DEVOLVED'.
No. 75, in page 4, line 9, at end insert
No. 231, in page 4, line 9, at end insert
No. 232, in page 4, line 12, at end insert
No. 76, in page 4, leave out lines 13 to 22.
No. 99, in page 4, line 22, at end add--'Part III--
New schedule 9--Referendum in Scotland (No. 3)--
Amendment No. 77, in title, line 2, leave out 'tax-varying powers' and insert 'constitutional status'.
Mr. Salmond:
The amendment should be considered with amendments Nos. 72 to 77. Their effect is to provide for a multi-option referendum in Scotland, to give people the choice between independence, devolution and the status quo on a preferential voting system to allow people to vote 1, 2, 3. The bottom option would be knocked out, resulting in a clear winner.
My contention is that this is the real referendum, if one is to be held at all. I must make it clear at the outset that if the Government had said that they had a mandate from the general election and therefore intended to proceed with their proposals for a devolved Scottish Parliament, they would have had no argument from me about a multi-option referendum. It is legitimate to say that the general election is a mandate to move ahead with devolution proposals. That, however, is not what the Government have done. Instead, they have taken the position, as was made clear by the Secretary of State two weeks ago, that the general election did not provide a test of the constitutional options. It was not a sufficient test because other issues prevailed during the campaign.
The issue on which the general election campaign in Scotland focused was the substantial urge to remove the Conservative party from every available seat, which the Scottish people were successful in doing in different ways in different constituencies. We all know that that was the key issue of the general election campaign in Scotland. If the Government believe that the general election did not decide the constitutional position and that therefore there must be a test of opinion, it is my position that that test of opinion must be fair and must make available to all the people the real options before the Scottish nation.
I want to discuss three arguments. First, members of all parties in the House have at one time or another supported the concept of a multi-option referendum. Secondly, I shall point to the various international precedents, and the one United Kingdom precedent, for my position. Thirdly, I shall argue that it is such a referendum that has genuine popular assent and is supported by the people of Scotland.
First, there is the argument that members of all parties have supported my position. It was certainly supported by the Secretary of State for Scotland on 23 April 1992, when he said not only that he supported the concept of a multi-option referendum but told the Scottish Trades Union Congress annual congress in Dundee that it should be "shouted from the rooftops".
The Secretary of State has been having some fun with his Tory opposite number--at least, I think that that is what the right hon. Member for Devizes (Mr. Ancram) may become, although he is denying it; time will tell--about the various changes he has made in his position. The Secretary of State owes us an explanation of why the concept was to be "shouted from the rooftops" in 1992 but not even to be whispered in the Lobbies in 1997.
Mr. Ernie Ross (Dundee, West):
We won.
Mr. Salmond:
That is one of the hon. Gentleman's more telling contributions to debates of late. If he had been listening, he would realise that I argued that if the Secretary of State had wanted to take the Labour party's election victory as a mandate to proceed with a devolution plan without further consultation, I would have accepted that as a legitimate position. But that is not the position of the Labour party. Its position is that there has to be a test of opinion. The amendment proposes a democratic and real test of opinion.
Mr. Thomas Graham (West Renfrewshire):
Will the hon. Gentleman give a guarantee that if there was a multi-option referendum in which people could vote for independence, but the people of Scotland rejected that, the Scottish National party would disband and join the other political parties?
Mr. Salmond:
Like the Labour party did after the general elections in 1979, 1983, 1987 and 1992? All democratic parties accept the result of a referendum or election. If they lose, they do not disband. They try to win another referendum in the future. [Hon. Members: "Oh."] Of course. Democratic parties submit their position to the people and if they are defeated they try to find a better method of putting their arguments so that they can be successful in the future. What on earth is wrong with that? What is more interesting is why, in opposition, the Labour party supported the concept of putting independence on the ballot paper, yet in government finds that prospect too frightening.
Mr. Fallon:
Is the hon. Gentleman now telling the Committee that if he is not satisfied with the result of the referendum or the legislation that follows it he will campaign immediately for a further referendum?
Mr. Salmond:
No. The Scottish National party will campaign to win a general election, a referendum or an election to a Scottish Assembly at some point in the
A multi-option referendum was supported by the late John Smith. As leader of the Labour party, he made it clear that the Labour party as a whole was campaigning in support of the concept. So in the past there has been substantial Labour party support for the idea.
The organisation Scotland United was formed and predicated on the basis of a multi-option referendum, which it recognised as the one concept that in recent years had united the forces of constitutional change in Scotland. In its policy document, "What Price Democracy", published in 1992, it argued for a multi-option referendum, noting that
Not only is the concept supported by Labour Members but it was originally a Liberal party idea. In the late 1960s, Lord Steel introduced a Bill proposing a multi-option referendum. Liberal Members are fond of telling us that they have most of the good ideas and that other parties adopt them some time later. I see the hon. Member for Argyll and Bute (Mrs. Michie) nodding her assent. What they tell us less often is that by the time they have convinced the rest of us that they are a good idea, they have deserted the cause and no longer espouse their original policies. I hope that, given the Liberal antecedents of the case, Liberal Members will support the amendment.
'(Referendum in Scotland (No. 3)).
'Note your preferred options in order of preference by marking 1, 2 or 3 by each option. You need not use every option.'.
'OR
I AGREE THAT THERE SHOULD BE AN INDEPENDENT SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT'.
'AS PROPOSED BY THE GOVERNMENT WHITE PAPER.'.
'AS PROPOSED BY THE GOVERNMENT WHITE PAPER'.
Parliament has decided to consult people in Scotland on the status of Scotland within the United Kingdom.
Put a cross (X) in the appropriate box
I AGREE THAT SCOTLAND SHOULD REMAIN AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE UNITED KINGDOM
I DO NOT AGREE THAT SCOTLAND SHOULD REMAIN AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE UNITED KINGDOM'.
FORM OF FIRST BALLOT PAPER
Parliament has decided to consult people in Scotland on the Government's proposals for a Scottish Parliament or independence for Scotland.
Put a cross (X) in the appropriate box:
I AGREE THAT THERE SHOULD BE NO CHANGE TO THE GOVERNMENT OF SCOTLAND
or
I AGREE THAT THERE SHOULD BE A SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT
or
I AGREE THAT SCOTLAND SHOULD LEAVE THE UNITED KINGDOM.'.
"one of the big problems with the 1979 referendum was the absence from the ballot paper of the independence option, which meant that a significant section of the Scottish population was denied the opportunity to vote for their preferred option."
Many members of that organisation are on the Government Benches today.
Next Section
| Index | Home Page |