Previous Section Index Home Page


Special Educational Needs

Mr. Loughton: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment how many schoolchildren were designated as having special educational needs in each of the last 10 years; if he will provide a breakdown as to their acuteness; and what proportion of those children have been educated at exclusively special educational needs schools in each of those years. [18146]

Ms Estelle Morris: The following table shows the number of children with statements of SEN in January of the years 1991 to 1996 and expresses the number of children in maintained and non-maintained special schools at each January as a percentage of all children with statements. Information on the numbers of pupils with statements was collected from special schools for the first time in January 1991. Information on the full range of children with SEN, including those with less severe, needs who do not have a statement, is available only for January 1996, when the total number of children identified by schools as having SEN (including those with statements) was 1.2 million.

Pupils with statements of Special Educational Need in England: 1991 to 1996
Position in January each year

All schools(12)Special schools(13)Per cent.(14)
1997234,62992,35639
1996227,32493,26841
1995211,30790,93243
1994194,54188,51145
1993178,02987,89249
1992160,75984,13252
1991153,22885,63256

(12) Includes pupils in nursery, primary, secondary, special and independent schools. Pupil Referral units and City Technology Colleges.

(13) Includes pupils in maintained and non-maintained special schools but excludes pupils in Independent Special schools.

(14) The number of pupils with statements in maintained and non-maintained special schools expressed as a proportion of the number of pupils with statements in all schools.


5 Dec 1997 : Column: 392

Higher Education Teachers

Dr. Naysmith: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment for what reasons the United Kingdom Government reserved its position on section 9 of the UNESCO Recommendation on the status of Higher Education Teaching Personnel; and if he will make a statement on the alterations to that recommendation sought by Her Majesty's Government. [18485]

Dr. Howells: The UNESCO General Conference adopted the Recommendation with UK support, but with the following reservation expressed by the United Kingdom and supported by Australia, New Zealand, Spain and France:


On the advice of the UNESCO Secretariat, the UK Government did not seek alterations to the text of the Recommendation.

Education Expenditure

Mr. Hopkins: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment what guidance he has given to local authorities to ensure that the extra money announced in the budget for 1998-99 for education is spent on schools. [18407]

Mr. Byers: The Secretary of State has written to the Leaders of the local authorities that are responsible for education, to emphasise that the £1,017 million increase in recurrent resources announced by the Chancellor in his Budget has been made available for the people's priority of raising standards in our schools. Officials have also discussed with representatives of the Churches and Local Government organisations the principles and criteria for the allocation of the first two phases of capital funding under the New Deal for Schools. The Government wishes to work in partnership with local authorities, and these increases in funding demonstrate that.

Teachers' Holidays

Mr. Willis: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment what plans the Government has to reduce teachers' holiday entitlements; and what assessment he has made of the effect of those plans on his programme for recruiting new teachers. [19181]

Mr. Byers: Any such proposal would have had to be referred to the School Teachers' Review Body, which would have had to consider it and make recommendations in its report which is due in February next year. No such proposal was referred to the Review Body.

Class Sizes

Mr. Jack: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment what were the average class sizes in each of the schools listed in the 1997 GCSE league tables. [18332]

5 Dec 1997 : Column: 393

Mr. Byers: Information on class sizes for individual schools is not published centrally.

Teacher Training

Mr. Don Foster: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment how many (a) postgraduate and (b) undergraduate ITT places were unfilled in (i) 1996 and (ii) 1997. [18554]

Ms Estelle Morris [holding answer 1 December 1997]: The information requested is shown in the following tables.

Table 1: Recruitment to ITT in 1996

UGPG
Primary
Targets allocated to providers by TTA7,0184,492
New entrants7,6194,862
Number of unfilled places00
Secondary
Targets allocated to providers by TTA3,08115,689
New entrants2,49213,556
Number of unfilled places5892,133

Table 2: Recruitment to ITT in 1997

UGPG
Primary
Targets allocated to providers by TTA6,6374,386
New entrants7,0724,677
Number of unfilled places00
Secondary
Targets allocated to providers by TTA3,33515,834
New entrants2,54313,423
Number of unfilled places7922,411

Data for 1997 are provisional.


Mr. Don Foster: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment if he will list the unfilled places on school-centred initial teacher training courses as a percentage of all places in each subject in (a) 1996 and (b) 1997. [18553]

Ms Estelle Morris [holding answer 1 December 1997]: The information requested is shown in the following table.

1996

SCITT
TargetEntrantsPercentage under recruitment
Primary1651700
Maths813853.09
English635512.70
Science917517.58
Modern languages332524.24
Technology1034160.19
History18190
Geography282028.57
PE44490
Art7528.57
Music12650.00
RE492744.90
Other880
Total Secondary53736831.47

5 Dec 1997 : Column: 394

Pupil Grades

Mr. Don Foster: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment if he will list the percentage of schools in each local education authority where both the proportion of pupils achieving five A*-C and five A*-G grades was lower in 1997 than in 1994. [18552]

Mr. Byers [holding answer 1 December 1997]: The following list gives the percentage of schools in each local education authority where both the proportion of 15-year-old pupils achieving five A*-C and five A*-G grades at GCSE was lower in 1997 than in 1994.

Per cent.
Camden7
Greenwich5
Hackney14
Hammersmith and Fulham8
Islington7
Kensington and Chelsea0
Lambeth0
Lewisham17
Southwark6
Tower Hamlets0
Wandsworth0
Westminster0
Barking and Dagenham11
Barnet22
Bexley15
Brent6
Bromley10
Croydon4
Ealing6
Enfield14
Harringey14
Harrow8
Havering0
Hillingdon28
Hounslow0
Kingston upon Thames8
Merton17
Newham0
Redbridge5
Richmond upon Thames30
Sutton18
Waltham Forest9
Birmingham6
Coventry12
Dudley17
Sandwell21
Solihull11
Walsall20
Wolverhampton17
Knowsley0
Liverpool8
St. Helens0
Sefton29
Wirral14
Bolton28
Bury6
Manchester5
Oldham10
Rochdale5
Salford14
Stockport11
Tameside14
Trafford10
Wigan10
Barnsley18
Doncaster25
Rotherham9
Sheffield15
Bradford18
Calderdale19
Kirklees16
Leeds17
Wakefield9
Gateshead18
Newcastle upon Tyne6
North Tyneside13
South Tyneside6
Sunderland0
Isles of Scilly0
Berkshire17
Cambridgeshire23
Cheshire11
Cornwall26
Cumbria26
Devon15
Essex15
Gloucestershire11
Hereford and Worcester25
Hertfordshire12
Isle of Wight0
Kent12
Lancashire10
Lincolnshire14
Norfolk8
Northamptonshire18
Northumberland13
Nottinghamshire17
Oxfordshire15
Shropshire19
Somerset11
Suffolk9
Surrey19
Warwickshire6
West Sussex27

5 Dec 1997 : Column: 396


Next Section Index Home Page