Previous Section Index Home Page


Lone Parents

33. Mr. Day: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security by how much he estimates lone parents will be better off in work than on benefits following reform of their benefit entitlement. [23084]

Mr. Keith Bradley: The latest independent research by the Policy Studies Institute suggest that the average additional income for lone parents already in work and on Family Credit is over £50 a week above the estimate of their out-of-work income. No estimate is currently available for the likely impact on this figure of the changes to the Family Premium in the income-related benefits; changes to Child Benefit for lone parents; or the increase in the help available through the Childcare Disregard in the in-work benefits.

34. Mr. Chisholm: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security what assessment she has made of the effect of lone-parent benefit reductions on the New Deal for Lone Parents. [23085]

Mr. Keith Bradley: The evaluation of the New Deal for Lone Parents will identify any points which have affected the programme's success. We need to keep these benefit changes in perspective.

Research suggests that lone parents in work and on Family Credit are better off than those on Income Support. To emphasise reductions in lone parent benefits is to underestimate the boost in morale, as well as the financial

26 Jan 1998 : Column: 105

gain, which the New Deal for Lone Parents can provide. The Government do not believe that the benefit changes will stop lone parents from moving into work.

The changes will apply only to lone parents making new benefit claims. In order to preserve work incentives for most current claimants, lone parents who are receiving Income Support or Jobseeker's Allowance with the lone parent rate of family premium will be able to claim the lone parent rate of Child Benefit when they move into work.

We are addressing the real barriers to work with the New Deal for Lone Parents and the National Childcare Strategy.

Mr. Rooney: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if the lone parent premium of an income support claimant will be protected if the claimant participates in a waged option of the New Deal for 18 to 24-year-olds and then returns to benefit at the end of the option. [25556]

Mr. Keith Bradley: Lone parents can choose whether to claim Income Support or Jobseeker's Allowance. Those claiming Jobseeker's Allowance will have access to the New Deal for 18 to 24-year-olds. No specific protection has been built in to address these particular circumstances.

Mrs. Ballard: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if she will list the numbers claiming lone parent benefits by (a) constituency and (b) benefit agency district office. [23525]

Mr. Keith Bradley: The administration of Social Security benefits is a matter for Peter Mathison, Chief Executive of the Benefits Agency. He will write to the hon. Member.

Letter from Peter Mathison to Mrs. Jackie Ballard, dated 23 January 1998:






Number of customers in receipt of the lone parent rate of the family premium by Benefit Agency districts

November 1997
Barking and Havering7,892
Cambridgeshire7,789
City East5,698
Essex South East6,398
Essex South West10,335
Hackney and Islington11,234
Lea Roding10,613
Leaside13,439
Newham9,899
North Essex5,766
Norwich7,377
Suffolk7,784
Barnet6,140
Bedfordshire8,545
Buckinghamshire7,831
Ealing11,147
Euston12,130
Harrow and Hillingdon7,040
Neasden8,393
North and East Hertfordshire5,410
Northamptonshire9,083
Oxfordshire5564
Thames Valley15,661
West Hertfordshire4,667
Bankside5,680
East Kent9,385
East Sussex5,712
Hampshire North5,981
London Central1,311
North and West Kent18,059
Palace13,123
Solent and New Forest9,117
South Circular12,313
Central Sussex5,400
South-East Hants and Isle of Wight8,832
South West Thames9,752
Surrey21,479
Thameside10,678
West Sussex7,746
Bristol Severnside5,714
Bristol Brunel8,449
Cornwall6,107
Dorset8,176
Devonia6,892
Gloucestershire6,450
South Devon8,948
Somerset6,909
Wiltshire7,277
Central Staffordshire4,811
Chesterfield and Worksop4,984
North Nottinghamshire4,848
North Staffordshire7,091
Nottingham Trentside12,349
Derwent and Trent9,536
Leicestershire11,880
Mercia Operations East9,337
Mercia Operations West7,499
Birmingham Chamberlain12,167
Birmingham Tame Valley11,786
Birmingham South East5,393
Coventry6,566
Hereford and Worcester6,624
North Worcestershire5,481
Sandwell6,473
Shropshire5,712
Walsall4,793
Warwickshire5,033
Wolverhampton5,815
Cardiff and Vales8,911
South Wales Valleys14,807
Gwent Borders6,243
Gwyneddigion and Maldwyn4,239
South West Wales11,501
Wrexham and North West Coast7,266
Blackpool4,998
Knowsley6,677
Lancaster and South Cumbria4,350
Liverpool Mersey9,733
Liverpool North5,697
North Cheshire6,458
North Cumbria4,332
Preston5,292
Sefton5,612
South West Lancashire5,565
Wirral7,933
South Cheshire6,339
Greater Manchester Lancashire9,475
Greater Manchester Centre15,236
Greater Manchester West15,821
Greater Manchester South East12,837
Greater Manchester Pennine13,653
Barnsley3,659
Bradford8,303
Doncaster5,115
East Yorkshire3,612
Hull8,809
Kirklees6,225
Leeds12,765
North Yorkshire5,108
Rother and Dearne6,431
Sheffield East5,724
Sheffield West3,228
Wakefield5,620
Yorkshire Pennine5,233
Newcastle6,977
Durham9,968
Northumberland6,678
Tees13,769
South Tyneside7,685
Wearside6,777
Glasgow East5,799
Glasgow South10,243
Glasgow West, Lomond and Argyle6,345
Clyde Coast and Renfrew6,727
South West Scotland9,363
Highlands and Islands4,336
Glasgow North7,100
Clyde Valley4,733
Coatbridge3,032
East Edinburgh and Borders8,503
Fife5,475
Forth Valley4,372
Grampian and Shetland4,697
Lothian West4,823
Tayside6,842

A live load figure is a snapshot in time count.


26 Jan 1998 : Column: 107

Mr. Cousins: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if she will estimate the percentage of the savings achieved by abolishing lone parent premium and one parent benefit borne by each decile of the income distribution in 1999-2000. [24678]

Mr. Keith Bradley: The information is not available in the form requested as it is not possible to forecast the position in a future income distribution of new claimants to Lone Parent Premium and One Parent Benefit. Such information as is available is set out in the tables:

Proportion of group in sections of income distribution for lone parents recipients of income support
Percentage

Before housing costsAfter housing costs
Bottom 10 per cent.1013
Next 10 per cent.3047
Next 10 per cent.2822
Next 20 per cent.2111
Top 50 per cent.107

Proportion of group in sections of income distribution non income support recipients of one parent benefit
Percentage

Before housing costsAfter housing costs
Bottom 30 per cent.2625
Next 20 per cent.3438
Top 50 per cent.4038

Notes:

1. The data comes from the Department's Households Below Average Income (HBAI) series, based on the Family Resources Survey (FRS) for the 1995-96 financial year and covering Great Britain. The FRS data was used to achieve a large enough sample size to provide more robust information. All results are subject to sampling error.

2. The income measure used in the answer is weekly net (disposable) equivalised household income. The definition of income used follows that in the published HBAI series for FRS based results; figures are given both before and after housing costs in line with usual HBAI practice.

3. The measure of income used covers household income. A household can include more than one benefit unit, for example, a household containing a pensioner and their grown-up child or two single unrelated people sharing a household. The estimates assume that all of the people within a household have the same standard of living.

4. Percentage figures may not add to 100 per cent. due to rounding.


26 Jan 1998 : Column: 108


Next Section Index Home Page