Select Committee on Agriculture Sixth Report


APPENDIX 5

Memorandum submitted by the Standing Conference on Problems Associated with the Coastline (SCOPAC) (F8)

  The Standing Conference on Problems Associated with the Coastline (SCOPAC) wishes to submit the following evidence to the Agriculture Committee Inquiry into Flood and Coastal Defence.

INTRODUCTION

  The Standing Conference on Problems Associated with the Coastline (SCOPAC) was established in 1986 as the first Regional Coastal Group in the UK following a two day conference on "Problems with the Coastline" held on the Isle of Wight.

  SCOPAC is comprised of representatives from the Coast Protection Authorities, County Planners, the Environment Agency, English Nature and other agencies and covers a 400km length of coastline from Lyme Regis in the west to Hove in the east, including the Isle of Wight.

  SCOPAC operates through a two tier system with a technical "officers' working group" meeting four times a year which reports progress on a range of coastal issues and initiatives to "Full Conference" which also meets four times a year. Full Conference includes both Officers and Elected Member representatives as well as other agencies.

  SCOPAC particularly values Elected Member involvement in terms of collaboration and exchange of views along the central south coast of England.

  The role of SCOPAC is to exchange ideas and information on coastal issues, to ensure that the activities of one Authority do not adversely affect its neighbours and to promote research of a regional and strategic value. Each SCOPAC member contributes to the Research Budget, which has enabled studies to the value of £500,000 to be undertaken over the last few years.

  Since the establishment of SCOPAC Coastal Groups now cover the whole coastline of England and Wales.

CONTENT

  1.  SCOPAC fully supports the evidence submitted by the Local Government Association on behalf of the Regional Coastal Groups and Maritime District Councils/Unitary Authorities.

  2.  SCOPAC welcomes the support it has received from the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food in terms of developing sustainable policies for coastal defence along the central south coast of England.

  3.  SCOPAC believes strongly, based upon its considerable experience of coastal issues, that the coastal defence function can be delivered most effectively by local authorities with their detailed knowledge of local coastal conditions; they are able to assess coastal demands within the context of management of the coastal zone as a whole, taking account of the wide range of inter-connected issues that they currently deal with (eg as coastal landowners, beach and esplanade management, public safety, cliff stability, amenities and recreation, environmental health, maritime archaeology, seaside town regeneration, countryside management and oil spill response).

  4.  SCOPAC strongly supports the need for close collaboration over the development of the full range of coastal plans and strategies (for estuaries, harbours, coastal zone management and coastal defence) in collaboration with other agencies and consultees; for example the Environment Agency and English Nature.

  5.  Constituent Members along the SCOPAC coastline (Lyme Regis to Worthing including the Isle of Wight) are working in partnership with other key agencies, thus seeking to avoid a piecemeal approach to coastal defence. The work of the Coastal Groups and coast protection authorities has been much assisted by coast protection grant aid from the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food enabling the development of shoreline management plans and coastal defence strategies. Enormous progress has been made in terms of the understanding of coastal issues over the last five years with the support of the Ministry, and a major step forward has been achieved within the last two years.

  6.  The development of Coastal Groups and preparation of shoreline management plans has assisted in fostering a partnership approach between coastal protection authorities and the Environment Agency. Such regular meetings have ensured that a holistic approach has been adopted and a "sectoral tendency" is avoided, thereby contributing towards integrated coastal zone management.

  7.  The removal of the coastal defence function from local authorities would greatly diminish their ability to influence the co-ordination of plans for local sustainability, and the loss of responsibility for coast protection would in turn reduce the local authority's contribution (both technical and financial) to a wide range of coastal initiatives.

  8.  SCOPAC believes that the establishment of the Coastal Groups has been a remarkable success over the last decade and if local authorities are deprived of an active role in coastal defence, it is likely that the interests of engineers within the coastal groups and other networks would be diminished with a reduction in their effectiveness and responsiveness to the detriment of Integrated Coastal Zone Management in the UK.

  9.  Recent advice from Department of the Environment, Transport and Regions suggests the need for more local accountability and for a greater local determination of priorities; SCOPAC strongly supports this. This trend is demonstrated by the creation of Regional Development Agencies and the partnering of local authorities to develop a strategic agenda for their areas. SCOPAC is particularly concerned with the proposal to transfer responsibilities to an another body which would remove significant influence from elected members within Maritime Districts, who have particular experience of coastal problems.

  10.  SCOPAC does not believe that its members' interests would be best served by a regional body which cannot benefit from the detailed knowledge that is available locally. The removal of responsibility to a regional agency would, therefore, result in a significant reduction in the quality of knowledge and information that could be input into a debate on priorities for coastal protection works in the future.

  11.  SCOPAC believes that the Environment Agency should continue to administer those functions where it has a particular expertise (eg its current statutory Consultee role with regard to planning and land drainage matters, and river management) and that coastal defence matters should in turn be left to experts within the local authorities and Coastal Groups.

  12.  SCOPAC believes that there is a case for "status quo" as excellent collaboraton exists between SCOPAC members as well as between adjacent Coastal Groups with the aim of contributing towards integrated coastal zone management.

  13.  SCOPAC believes it is essential to involve the Coastal Groups and their constituent authorities, in any new structure proposed for the delivery of the coastal defence function.

SCOPAC believes, with its particular experience, that it can assist the review process and will be pleased to do so.

14 April 1998


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1998
Prepared 5 August 1998