Select Committee on Agriculture Sixth Report


APPENDIX 12

Memorandum submitted by the National Coasts and Estuaries Advisory Group (NCEAG) (F18)

INTRODUCTION

  The National Coasts and Estuaries Advisory Group, a consortium of local and regional authorities, was set up in 1991 to help arrest the continuing decline in the quality of the British coast and to promote positive action among maritime and estuarine counties, districts and unitary authorities.

  NCEAG is comprised mainly of local authority officers whose responsibilities include spatial planning, environmental protection, coastal defence, wildlife conservation, economic development, and recreation and countryside management.

  The aims of the advisory group are to:

    —  Further the development of partnerships in coastal management between the government, advisory, business and voluntary sectors.

    —  Gather information on coastal and estuarine studies, plans, strategies and actions.

    —  Initiate, animate and promote best practice in coastal planning and management.

    —  Liaise with similar organisations within the European Community to exchange experience in coastal issues and management.

CONTENT
  (I)  NCEAG supports the evidence submitted by the Local Government Association on behalf of the Regional Coastal Groups and Maritime District Councils/Unitary Authorities.

  (II)  NCEAG welcomes the support the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food has given to local authorities encouraging the development of shoreline management plans and sustainable coastal defence strategies.

  (III)  NCEAG strongly believes that the coastal defence function can be delivered most effectively by local authorities with their detailed knowledge of local conditions. Local authorities have the ability to understand and take account of a wide range of inter-connected issues that are dealt with daily through the holistic management of our coastal zones. These issues include land-use planning and development control, beach and esplanade management, public safety, amenities and recreation, environmental health, maritime archaeology, seaside town regeneration, countryside management, liaison with private landowners, and oil spill response.

  (IV)  NCEAG strongly supports the need for close collaboration over the development of the full range of coastal plans and strategies (for coastal zone management, harbours, coastal defence and estuaries) with other agencies and consultees; for example the Environment Agency and English Nature.

  (V)  NCEAG supports collaboration between coastal and estuarine local authorities working in partnership with other key agencies, thus seeking to avoid a fragmentary approach to coastal defence. NCEAG recognises that there has been significant progress in terms of understanding coastal processes and issues, with the support of the Ministry, particularly over the last five years.

 
  (VI)  The development of Coastal Groups and the preparation of shoreline management plans has aided in encouraging a partnership approach between coast protection authorities and the Environment Agency. Such regular meetings have ensured that a "sectoral tendency" is now no longer an issue with both the Environment Agency and local government understanding the benefits of a holistic approach to integrated coastal zone management. This approach is supported by close links between NCEAG and TAG (Technical Advisory Group Coastal Committee).

  (VII)  The removal of the coastal defence function from the local authorities would greatly reduce their ability to influence the co-ordination of plans for local sustainability. The loss of responsibility for coast protection would result in the reduction of the local authority's contribution, both financial and technical, to a wide range of coastal initiatives and programmes. The establishment of the Coastal Groups has been a remarkable success over the last decade and if local authorities are deprived of an active role in coastal defence, it is likely that the interests of the engineers within the coastal groups would also be diminished. This would result in a reduction in their effectiveness and responsiveness, to the detriment of Integrated Coastal Zone Management in Britain.

  (VIII)  Recent advice from the Department of Environment, Transport and Regions suggests the need for more local accountability and for a greater local determination of priorities; NCEAG strongly supports this view, and the principles of subsidiarity. This trend is demonstrated by the creation of Regional Development Agencies and the partnering of local authorities to develop a strategic agenda for their areas. This would not be assisted by transferring responsibility for coast protection to the Environment Agency or another agency which is less accountable for its decisions than our local authorities.

  (IX)  NCEAG does not believe that coastal interests would be served better by a regional body who could not benefit from the detailed knowledge that is available locally. The removal of responsibility to a regional agency would, therefore, result in a significant reduction in the quality of knowledge and information that could be input into a debate on priorities for coast protection works in the future.

  (X)  NCEAG believes that the Environment Agency should continue to administer those functions where it has particular expertise, ie flood defence, river management and land drainage matters, and that coastal protection matters should in turn be left to the experts within the local authorities.

  (XI)  NCEAG believes it is essential to involve the Coastal Groups and their constituent authorities in any new structure proposed for the delivery of coastal defence functions. NCEAG believes that with its particular expertise it can assist the review process and will be pleased to do so.

15 April 1998


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1998
Prepared 5 August 1998