Select Committee on Agriculture Sixth Report


APPENDIX 37

Memorandum submitted by Mr Campbell Voullaire (F62)

  This is sent on behalf of a Group of residents of Porlock, Somerset (perhaps 750 in number) who believe that coastal protection should not be justified only by the market value of property without considering the uniqueness of an environment, or of natural beauty, or a site of distinctive character.

  Let me give an example from this area. There is a shingle ridge which, like that of Chesil in Dorset, is reputed to be some 6,000 years old. The sea has rolled it backwards and forwards, and it has preserved a 500 acre marsh which receives eight fresh water streams from the surrounding hills and which, in turn, sustain two small saline lakes.

  Then, many years ago, man interfered when, during and after the War, every acre of dry land was needed and the natural rolling shingle beach was "improved" in various places.

  In recent years, the sea has pounded these parts of the ridge which, unable to roll, have given way along a 50 yard breech. We have asked Environment Agency repeatedly to consider some re-formation of the ridge. This has been refused on the grounds that MAFF policy denies use of public funds because there are no houses, shops or roads to defend.

  This area, unique in the southwest of England, has provided vegetation and reed beds for uncommon birds; it had a mile of the coastal path of South West England running beside it; it has the historic interest of fields which have had the same mediaeval patterns for some 500 years; it had some 200 acres of grazing fields. It was classed as SSSI some 20 years ago.

  Perhaps a minor matter—it carries a Memorial stone to American airmen who crashed during the War. No unit value, so no protection.

  We have employed, at our expense, distinguished marine engineers, Ove Arop Partners, and they have shown that the ridge can be re-formed without undue expense.

  It would be easy for me to compose something on the lines of the late Mark Antony's speech, praising the benefits of modern bureaucratic control and comparing with mild irony the former discredited system which allowed local communities, farmers and owners to preserve their countryside.

  We ask your Select Committee to recommend that greater discretion should be allowed to those who decide cases for coastal defence.

29 June 1998


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1998
Prepared 5 August 1998