Select Committee on Agriculture Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the Director of Political Campaigns, Consumers for Health Choice (E25)

  Our Director, Sue Croft, is writing to you with a detailed formal submission to your inquiry, but there are a number of aspects about the Government's proposals in relation to the retail of vitamin B6 which have also been raised separately with the Government's own Better Regulation Task Force.

    In this specific context I enclose for your information:

    (a)  a copy of the letter which was sent to Mr Christopher Haskins, the Chairman of the Better Regulation Task Force on 16th February (See Annex), and

    (b)  a leaflet produced by that Task Force that sets out the principles which good regulation should follow (not printed.)

  In addition to considering the scientific arguments set out in the letter which you will shortly receive from Sue Croft we hope that your Committee may also take time to consider the enclosures and, in particular, to assess the extent to which the Minister's proposals conform to the principles for regulations set out in the enclosed leaflet, namely:

    (1)  that "their fairness and effectiveness and the public support they command are critical to public confidence in a Government";

    (2)  "good regulations and their enforcement should be measured against five principles: transparency, accountability, targeting, consistency, and proportionality";

    (3)  policy objectives which justify regulation should "protect and enhance the rights and liberty of all citizens";

    (4)  formal alternatives to state intervention include "voluntary self-regulation"; and

    (5)  tests of good regulation are that it "Must have broad public support", "Must be enforceable", "Must be easy to understand", "Must be balanced and avoid impetuous knee-jerk reaction", "Must avoid unintended consequences", "Must balance risk, cost and practical benefit", "Must have accountability" and "Must be relevant".

  We believe, and think that you will agree, that the Minister's proposals in relation to the retail sale of vitamin B6 are found wanting when measured against all these principles espoused by its own Task Force.

14 April 1998


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1998
Prepared 23 June 1998