Select Committee on Agriculture Minutes of Evidence



Examination of witnesses (Questions 420 - 425)

TUESDAY 3 NOVEMBER

RT HON THE BARONESS YOUNG OF OLD SCONE and MS SUE COLLINS

  420. I was going to come on to that, actually; but whichever way round you think is most useful?
  (Baroness Young of Old Scone) We are quite excited about the regulation proposing regionally-based plans, because this is clearly a good way forward in terms of having a planned approach, and one that is more devolved, we hope; though one questions what the definition of `regional' is. Obviously, in the European context it is very different from the one that we are currently wrestling with here, and that, certainly, having a national framework of objectives is really important for all of these schemes, even if work-up of the detail and particular flavours of them is done on a regional basis, or even more locally than that. So I think the important thing is that we are clear about the objectives we need to achieve, and in biodiversity terms they are very clearly laid out by things like the Biodiversity Action Plan and by the Species and Habitats Directive, as well as, we need to be clear about that national framework of objectives as well as having innovative and involving ways of developing schemes locally. And I think both Bodmin and Forest of Bowland and some of the Countryside Commission Land Management Initiative schemes demonstrate the kind of combination of top-down and bottom-up that is needed to be able to produce good innovative schemes that actually involve real people. Sue, you may want to talk about it more, particularly the Cumbria Farm Link process, which I think is a very useful example.
  (Ms Collins) I think the uplands pilots are only just beginning, so we are not able to evaluate them, but we very much like the approach of bringing together the Objective 5b elements and the agri-environment elements and trying to deliver them together. We have actually advised the Ministry, before they set up those pilots, to widen the scope to include the full gamut of rural development regulation type measures, including forestry, and so on, so that we do favour more broadly-based experiments. And we have worked with the Regional Service Centres of MAFF and with the voluntary organisations, and so on, at regional level, in the agri-environment fora, that have already been set up in the UK, to try to share the vision about what needs to be done and to make sure that schemes are targeted towards that. Those kind of fora, involving more local representatives, could be expanded to embrace a discourse about rural development plans, and I think that would be a helpful development. It would link with sustainability and Local Agenda 21 and really start broadening out the debate so that we can find some win/win solutions, instead of everything being compartmentalised.

  421. Should rural development plans operate at the administrative level of Bodmin Moor and the Forest of Bowland, or should they operate at a larger level, how should communities integrate into these, because, even then, in these examples, there have been criticisms that the Bodmin Moor and the Bowland examples have been too much "top-down" and not enough "community-led"?
  (Ms Collins) I think the regional level for a kind of strategic overview is a good one, provided it is linked to national objectives.

  422. You mean the Government regions; you would be quite happy with that?
  (Ms Collins) Yes, it could be the Government regional boundaries, they are slightly different from the MAFF regional boundaries; thereby hangs another tale, of course.

Chairman

  423. The Minister reminded us that MAFF have service centres, and they are of a very different concept from the Regional Offices, when he gave evidence last week?
  (Ms Collins) They do actually have Regional Directors, who do take an interest in implementation; they do not make policy but they do spend money and spending money is a very powerful way of implementing policy. So we have, as you know, our Natural Areas Initiative, which I think we have spoken of to you before, which sets out objectives for the environment at the scale of England divided by about a hundred. And we are producing for the new Rural Development Agencies, in the spring, overviews at regional level for those environmental objectives, because it is not manageable to actually have a discourse that is very detailed about local things. We also advise at the scheme level, so the Forest of Bowland's prescriptions are very, very important in terms of what they deliver. And there is need for dialogue, for involving local, interested people in a debate; there is no mechanism at the moment. LEAPS, the Environment Agency's Local Environmental Action Plans do involve discussion with the public, and then iteration and a reformulation of the plan; there is no such discourse around rural land use, and I think it would be a helpful development over the next few years if that were to come about. And, as I say, these Regional Agri-environment Fora are sort of a step to openness from the Ministry of Agriculture that could be built upon.
  (Baroness Young of Old Scone) Could I come in on the Bodmin and Bowland little local difficulties. I think, they have not been smooth in implementation, because there is still a discussion to be had with local people that has not yet been resolved, and I think there are lessons there for future schemes, in terms of how you take national and regional frameworks and develop them at a local level. Perhaps I could just point you to one that I think has worked well, and that is on the North York Moors, the Objective 5b project there, which we have been very deeply involved in, and, I must confess, I have walked a number of the farms involved in that project. And there you have got some very marginal farmers, not making a lot of money, having quite a tough time, if they were sticking to traditional agriculture, but now seeing a way forward by being able to do a bit of diversification on their farm, some habitat management, some diversification into other on-farm businesses, and very, very positive about this Objective 5b project. So I think there are good examples as well as poor ones.

Mr George

  424. The role of English Nature, in future rural development plans, could it be to undertake environmental appraisals of the rural development plans themselves; but there remains concern that some statutory agencies are getting too involved in the project planning and not perhaps standing back and giving, if you like, objective appraisal, advice, at the broader level?
  (Baroness Young of Old Scone) I think our role would be at all levels. We clearly have an important role in setting the national framework, we clearly would want to be involved in frameworks being developed at regional level, not just in terms of individual programmes but also in terms of general guidance being given to various bodies at regional level in the development of rural development plans and regional development plans. And also we would want to be involved at individual scheme level, because, quite often, the wildlife benefit of these schemes and some of the enthusiasm that people generate around them is very particular to the schemes, and our staff, in our local offices, on the ground, do work very closely with individual landowners on schemes, to make sure that (a) they do deliver clear environmental objectives, and (b) that the sense of excitement that we get from seeing this stuff going well is something that is shared with farmers and landowners.

Chairman

  425. That would have been a very neat link to the next set of questions I wanted to ask you, but, I am afraid, I think we are out of time. If I may, I will put those questions in writing to you, I do not want to keep our friends from the UK Objective 5b Partnership waiting any longer than they have already waited. But can I express, on behalf of the Committee, our deep gratitude to you, as a Scot, for your vigorous defence of the English landscape and nature, and thank you very much for the evidence you have given to us.
  (Baroness Young of Old Scone) Thank you for the opportunity to give evidence.

  Chairman: Thank you.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1998
Prepared 9 November 1998