Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Minutes of Evidence


Annex D

MILLENNIUM EXPERIENCE
Park and Ride Strategy

INTRODUCTION

1. This Park and Ride Strategy is submitted under Clause 34 of the section 106 Agreement relating to the Millennium Experience planning permission. The paper sets out the role of park and ride in the overall transport strategy for the Experience and the park and ride proposals including the proposed level of provision, the disposition of facilities around London and ticketing arrangements. At this time it is a strategy rather than a detailed blueprint because discussions are ongoing in a number of cases and alternative options are being pursued.

MILLENNIUM EXPERIENCE TRANSPORT STRATEGY

2. Planning permission for MEX was granted by L B Greenwich on the clear understanding that general visitors would not be permitted to park cars at the site so as not to exacerbate existing road congestion in the area. The New Millennium Experience Company Limited (NMEC) has adopted a Transport Strategy for the Millennium Experience (MEX) under which the vast majority of visitors will arrive at the Dome by public transport. This will be achieved by restricting direct access by car and facilitating access by all other modes.

3. No parking for visitors' cars will be provided at the Dome site other than for mobility impaired drivers with orange badges and minimised provision for essential operational staff, VIPs etc. NMEC is funding the establishment and enforcement of a controlled parking zone around the site stretching over two kilometres from the Dome to reinforce the "no car" policy.

4. By the Millennium, there will be a variety of attractive and convenient means of public transport available for travel to the Dome:

5. NMEC recognises that, for some visitors, the first leg of their journey to the Dome will be by car even though the final leg will have to be by some other mode. This park and ride strategy sets out how this car traffic will be managed and the level of car parking provision to be made.

DEMAND

6. Market research and analysis of the tourism market suggests that the number of visitors to the Dome will be around 12 million during Millennium year. The average length of time visitors will spend at the Dome is expected to be about five to six hours. The Dome will be operated on a sessional basis with up to 35,000 visitors on site per session. On some evenings there will be events in the proposed 'Baby Dome' which is expected to have a capacity of up to 6,000. To accommodate peak demand, particularly at weekends, school holidays and Bank Holidays two sessions will operate in a day each of which will have a maximum capacity of 35,000. The precise schedule of peak two session days will be determined so as to accommodate all potential visitors and will be predictable based on patterns of demand experienced during the first quarter of 2000 when it is expected that one session days will operate. NMEC is planning for 140 two-session days.

7. In terms of geographical distribution of visitors there is a correlation with the distance from the Dome in terms of UK day trips ie the number of visitors travelling becomes smaller the further away they live. However, it is expected that a significant proportion of visitors (both from elsewhere in the UK and from overseas) will stay overnight in London. On average, it is expected that over 69% of journeys to the Dome will start from within Greater London. This includes visitors from elsewhere in the UK and from overseas who are staying overnight. With the large variety of routes and modes of travel, journeys from London can probably be accommodated with relatively little impact on London's transport system. 35,000 people represents less than 1% of the total transport demand that London accommodates each weekday morning.

MODE CHOICE

8. The mode of transport used by individual visitors to the Dome will vary according to trip origin, whether they are staying overnight in London, and the influence of the marketing and information campaigns that will precede and accompany the Dome. Visitor numbers have been re-modelled to take account of the park an ride strategy set out in this document for each mode in terms of the capacity needed and routes to cater for peak demand. This has had the effect of reducing the proportion of visitors who are expected to use park and ride facilities. The estimates of the modal split are now as follows:
Main ModeFinal Leg
%
Tube or railJLE`
42
Tube or railCable Car
2
Park and Ride (Car)JLE/Cable Car/Rail
Shuttle Coach
17
Coach
12
Riverboat
10
Taxi/Kiss and Ride
8
Bus
3
North Kent LineMillennium Transit
4
Walk/Cycle
1
CarCar (disabled)
1
100

9. For the estimated 17% of visitors choosing to use the car for the main leg of the journey and assuming an average car occupancy of three, around 2000 spaces are required for a session (17% ´ 35,000 ¸ 3). On peak days, when two sessions operate, up to 20% of spaces could be re-utilised. However, for planning purposes and to maintain maximum flexibility, a requirement of 4,000 spaces (double the requirement for one session) is assumed. It is further estimated that demand for the 2000 spaces required for a session will be distributed around London broadly as follows:

As shown below, there will be ample capacity in the car parks identified for park and ride visitors to the Dome.

10. For Baby Dome evening events the audience will usually include Dome visitors already on site for a one session day but is otherwise likely to be predominantly London and South East based. Most such events will be pre-booked, enabling use of Park and Ride car parks. Use of LUL related car parking will be encouraged. Car traffic generated by Baby Dome evenings, therefore, is not expected to be significant enough to require special provision.

NMEC'S APPROACH TO PARK AND RIDE

11. The park and ride strategy described in this document reflects a different approach from relying on large purpose built car parks serving the Dome as originally envisaged. There are a number of reasons for the way the park and ride strategy has developed. It was originally conceived (and the requirements reflected in the S.106 Agreement) when the Dome was expected to be an all day event attracting up to 100,000 visitors a day. The planning applications submitted for potential purpose built car parks were a legacy of that approach. However, there are difficult logistical problems in operating large car parks with dedicated shuttle bus or shuttle boat services such that an efficient and reliable service can be provided for visitors at all times. The traffic that would be directed to each car park has been of concern to local residents, although good road links was a key criterion in selecting car park locations. There is also a general concern in having a transport strategy aimed at maximising public transport use and at the same time drawing traffic further into London than is desirable. It is not necessary for car drivers to park close to the Dome when there are more convenient and efficient ways to travel.

12. Rail and underground trains are much more efficient people movers. The Park and Ride strategy submitted for approval therefore relies to a large extent on utilising available spaces at existing car parks at or close to rail and underground stations all over London with convenient links by rail and/or underground to the Dome i.e. involving no more than one change of mode or line. This has the advantage of dispersing traffic in numbers that can be absorbed into daily traffic flows with minimum impact and is more in tune with the integrated transport approach. A mix of those station car parks that have spare capacity and other existing car parks (where possible) is proposed to take account of high commuter use of station car parks on weekdays. Peak Dome days will invariably coincide with days when commuter parking is at its lowest. In addition there are car parks at two locations—University of Greenwich and University of East London—where additional capacity could be available for NMEC during the vacations which, again, will coincide with expected periods of highest demand for the Dome. Overall, capacity well in excess of estimated requirements (2000 spaces and 4000 spaces for one and two session days respectively) is potentially available at all times.

13. The way the park and ride strategy has evolved to that which is submitted here is not the consequence of there having been no park and sail bids in the recent tender exercise. Park and sail, which had been proposed from sites at Barking and Royal Arsenal, Woolwich, was never envisaged as an end in itself. It was a means of achieving the then park and ride strategy. Park and sail is not required to meet NMEC's park and ride objectives. The option of developing a car park at Woolwich is included in the revised strategy but with fewer spaces than originally applied for (see below). Although the Council has requested NMEC to re-tender for park and sail river services from Woolwich, it is not the current intention so to do.

14. The S.106 agreement between NMEC and LB Greenwich requires not only that the park and ride strategy be submitted to the Council for approval but that provision for 8,400 vehicles is provided and retained. The number of vehicles may be changed with the approval of the Council. In submitting this strategy, NMEC is seeking the Council's approval to a reduction in the number of vehicles for which provision is required under the S.106 agreement to 2,000 on one session days and 4,000 on two session days, in line with estimated requirements. In practice, the provision proposed will significantly exceed estimated requirements, as shown below.

DISTRIBUTION OF PARK AND RIDE CAR PARK SPACES

15. Existing railway and underground station car parks situated on lines directly linked to North Greenwich or entailing only one change en route and with a minimum of fifty spaces available are shown on figure 1 and listed in Table 1. These provide over 1700 spaces on weekdays and potentially over 7500 at weekends/holidays throughout the year. At this stage, the list of stations and available spaces is indicative. By year 2000 it is possible that additional spaces will be available at some locations and a reduced number at others but the broad spread is expected to be of a similar magnitude. Discussions are continuing with LUL and the rail companies on the arrangements for facilitating the use of these spaces.

16.These existing car parks provide a reasonable geographic spread except in the South East where there is o underground network and rail stations entailing only one change en route with car parks where more than 50 spaces are regularly available. To deal with the shortfall of capacity currently identified on weekdays, particularly in the SE, and having in mind the visitor travelling from outside London who may be less familiar with the area, it is proposed to utilise other existing car parks or provide new capacity in each area which will be operated by or on behalf of NMEC and to which visitors from outside London will be directed.

17. In the North West, NMEC is discussing the provision of up to 700 spaces at the existing Wembley Stadium car park, which will not be required for use in 2000 as the stadium will be undergoing redevelopment. The stadium is close to Wembley Park Jubilee Line Station. In addition, NMEC is exploring other possible options in the area.

18. In the North East, NMEC is currently pursuing a number of options any of which would provide at least 600 spaces an which are located close to rail or underground stations. Should these proposed arrangements not come to fruition, the Limmo site at Canning Town for which NMEC has planning permission would be developed. In addition, 200 spaces would be available at weekends with a further 200 spaces at all times during vacations, which will coincide with periods of peak demand at the Dome, at the University of East London site in the Royal Docks close to the DLR.

19. In the South West, 500 spaces are proposed on an existing car park at Kempton Park race course from which visitors will travel to MEX from the adjacent Kempton Park railway station via Waterloo.

20. In the South East, in the absence currently of an alternative existing car park located at or close to the rail network, NMEC intends to develop 1000 spaces at Royal Arsenal, Woolwich from which it is proposed that visitors will be transported by shuttle bus to the Dome. In addition, NMEC is in discussions with University of Greenwich about the use of campus car parks, which could potentially provide up to 200 spaces throughout the year with an additional 300 spaces during vacations, which will co-incide with periods of peak demand at the Dome. Dartford railway station would be utilised for the onward link to the Dome. These discussions have not yet concluded and these figures are, therefore, tentative. However, NMEC has been contacted very recently about two other potential sites in the South East. It is too early to give details of these but either is potentially an attractive option which could in due course be substituted for capacity currently proposed in the South East without reducing the number of spaces.

21. In total the number of spaces potentially regularly available—over 4,500 on weekdays and almost 11,000 at weekends, with additional spaces in vacations—far exceeds forecast demand at all times of the year. The distribution of sites is such as to give good coverage throughout London, with satisfactory provision for visitors in each sector. At least one NMEC operated site will be provided in each sector to ensure that visitors travelling from every direction are able to pre-book a convenient parking space. The strategy set out above is robust and has built-in flexibility but the evaluation of other car parks that might become available will be ongoing. Depending on the outcome of the various discussions that are taking place other sites might be added or substituted for those listed at Table 1 should these prove more advantageous or if necessary.

EXISTING PLANNING APPLICATIONS

22. NMEC submitted five planning applications for temporary purpose built car parks. NMEC is keen to keep its options open until the arrangements for the strategy described above are in place. However, mindful of the concerns previously expressed when the application for Falconwood was submitted and despite its ideal location for the South East, NMEC proposes to withdraw that planning application. It is not now the intention to develop either of the Barking or Thamesmead car parks and those planning applications will be withdrawn once it is clear that the arrangements described above can be put in place. The resolutions to grant planning permission received for car parks at Royal Arsenal and Limmo will continue to be pursued within the context of this strategy.

TICKETING AND OPERATION

23. All tickets for the Dome will be pre-booked. Visitors will have the opportunity to make their mode choice and travel plans when the Dome ticket is purchased. Spaces in NMEC car parks, travel and the Dome ticket will be available as a pre-booked package. Visitors from outside London will be directed to pre-booked spaces in car parks controlled by NMEC in the most convenient location. Pre-booked spaces will also be available in these car parks to visitors from within London although such visitors will be encouraged to use their local underground or rail stations. NMEC will discuss the scope for pre-booked packages with LUL and the rail companies in respect of the use of rail or underground station car parks.

SIGNING AND TRAVEL INFORMATION

24. A signing strategy for the park and ride sites will be submitted to LB Greenwich for approval in accordance with Clause 23(a) of the Millennium Experience section 106 Agreement. The strategy will address the signing of routes to car parks. It will be formulated following discussions with relevant highway authorities on the optimum routes and positioning of signs. In addition, comprehensive travel and route information will be available, relevant to the area in which the ticket is bought, at the time of purchase.

29 May 1998


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1998
Prepared 12 August 1998