Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 220 - 239)

THURSDAY 9 JULY 1998

MR PETER MANDELSON and MISS CLARE PILLMAN

220.  Yes, it is.

(Mr Mandelson) There may be one or two people I would rather were not beside me, I guess. But I have not been stuck there, I have chosen to go on the Underground, I travel on it, I arrive at my destination, I get out and I go to where I am going. What more can I do? But if I do not want to go on it I will find some other way to spend my time, like not go to the thing at all, or not arrive at work, or not go and visit my Mum.

221.  But that is the attitude you are taking towards the Dome, you are just saying, with all respect, you will either do it that way or choose not to do it at all. But the family is impressed by this, they might come, they will say, "I want to go to London, I want to go to the Dome", and you are basically saying, well, we just put up with the transport system. I personally would not like to take my wife and two children on the Underground during the rush hour, it is not a pleasant experience now, and it will not be a pleasant experience then.

(Mr Mandelson) Can I suggest to you, with respect, that you travel at another time during the day, if you want to avoid the morning rush hour. There is no law which says that you have to travel to the Dome on the Underground between 8 and 9 o'clock in the morning.

222.  Yes, but I go back to what you said, your words were - - -

(Mr Mandelson) Not least because it is not open until 10.

223.  But people will come to London early so they can be at the Dome before 10, and if you work that back, with the easiest calculation, to be at the Dome for 10 o'clock, it means that you are going to hit the Underground before ten, and in my book 9 o'clock, or 8 o'clock, comes before 10. People will come early. You have talked about evening out traffic flow of visitors. I do not believe, however humorous you might find this, that the way you have expressed yourself will even out the flow of visitors, there will be undue pressure during the rush hour, which you clearly do not agree with?

(Mr Mandelson) Except that the flow of visitors I was talking about was in relation to the ticketing system, not the operation of London Underground. And if Mrs Fraser wishes to come early into London and perhaps do some shopping on the way, or to stop off and visit friends during the course of the rush hour, before the Dome opens, that, I am afraid, is a decision for her, not for the New Millennium Experience Company.

224.  And that is how you will be presenting it?

(Mr Mandelson) To Mrs Fraser?

Mr Fraser: No, to the public. I hope you will not be presenting anything to my wife, thank you. You will be presenting the Dome package as a day out. This is a very important point, because people have certainly written to me about the question of the Dome. There are eight hours in the day when they can go there, potentially. I believe that people will try to get there as early as possible. You, clearly, do not believe that to be the case. They will want to get there from 10 o'clock, when it opens. I am just not convinced that people are going to come later in the day, to miss the rush hour, because they have got their own interests at heart. That is the only point.

Chairman

225.  Let me add to the point that Mr Fraser is asking, because there is another aspect to this, and that is that a lot of people may go to the Dome without necessarily arranging to go into it, there are refreshment facilities around the Dome area, there is a walk around the Dome area. It may well be that some people, who either would like to go into the Dome will be resigned to the fact that they cannot, because of the advance booking arrangement, there may be others who think that it would be nice to have a day out, travel on the river, take a look at the Dome from outside, take advantage of the refreshment facilities that there will be which are not connected with the ticketing for the Dome, and have a day out in that way. That is not unlikely; indeed, if you have had the opportunity of visiting the Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao, there are large numbers of people who congregate around the Museum without actually going in it, it has become an attractive place on its own. So I think that, while Mr Fraser is concentrating on those who are wanting to go to the Dome in order to go into the Dome, and that obviously will be the overwhelming majority of people, nevertheless, the transport burden might be added to by people who are looking for a day out without going in, by people who might not be able to afford to go in, for example?

(Mr Mandelson) Yes, Chairman, I am sure you are right, but I do not think it will be anything other than a marginal addition to the flow of visitors to the Dome itself; and, secondly, I do not think that marginal addition is necessarily going to be concentrated exclusively in the short period of the early morning rush hour. A further consideration is, of course, that you will not be able to get onto the Dome site without a pre-booked ticket, as you have already been told, so whilst people may want to go on a boat tour, as part of their visit to the Thames, or historic Greenwich, and there will be a strong tourist, visitor connection between historic Greenwich and new Greenwich, if I can refer to the Dome in that way, and they might want to go on a boat trip round the Greenwich peninsular, or whatever, to go onto the Dome site itself will require a ticket. And I think that should serve to avert the sort of scenario that you are understandably worried about.

Mr Fraser

226.  Just a last comment. I just do not think we will overcome the problem of people trying to get there early, even if they cannot get onto the site, even if these restrictions are there. It is human nature to get somewhere early if you are going to spend time there. That is my point.

(Mr Mandelson) But nobody is stopping them doing that, if they have a ticket. If they have a ticket and they choose to travel on the Underground during the rush hour, I do not think that will be the end of the world for them or the Underground system, but, above all, it will be their choice, and for them to exercise, and I do not think that is unreasonable.

Ms Ward

227.  You stated, Mr Mandelson, in your opening comments about this journey, and the Select Committee travelling with you on the journey. I think that it is fair to say that some of us did not join the journey at the very beginning and perhaps came on latterly, as we have seen the development of the content. But we are as keen as you that the destination should be worthwhile for this long journey. When we were talking yesterday to Jennie Page and Bob Ayling, they were explaining that the contents of the Dome are still being developed, particularly from those ideas that we saw early in February. Do you think there is a risk that the commercial desires of sponsors in the negotiations that you are continuing to have will affect the overall outcome of the particular Zones that they are sponsoring?

(Mr Mandelson) I do not mind the sponsors affecting the outcome, as long as they do not govern and determine the outcome; in other words, I do not mind having a dialogue and a perfectly good set of discussions over them, I think they will be able to help, they will have something to contribute, and I welcome that. But the editorial control of the contents lies with the Company, the New Millennium Experience Company, and not any of the sponsors.

228.  So the decision on the contents will be taken by whom, by designers, by the Company, or by you?

(Mr Mandelson) It will be taken, ultimately and actually at every stage along the line, by the New Millennium Experience Company.

229.  And what part will you play in that?

(Mr Mandelson) I hope that people will ask for my judgement every now and again, ask me for my views, ask me to contribute, but I am a shareholder and sponsoring Minister, I am not a full-time chief executive, so I am not there every day, although I know that, for the Company, it sometimes feels that way. It is not a series of negotiations we are embarked on, in developing the content. I have recently visited four of the design companies, just to visit, just to get a feel for what they are doing, just to satisfy myself that the right people are thinking along the right lines and are moving to the destination that we want, indeed, I have spent the last two Fridays doing that, and I shall visit most of them, I hope, before the recess, and probably some during the recess too. And what I feel about the design companies is that they are different, all of them, being design companies, by definition, they almost would be different, they are creative people, in scale, background; but I like the feel of them, I like their instincts, I like the intelligent way in which they talk about the creative process they are engaged in. And I think that they are very, very well holding in balance the competing needs of entertaining, of inspiring people, of educating people, but also giving people an easy day out. You had a very interesting discussion yesterday, (Mr Faber) is not here, but about children, I thought the points he raised were spot on, actually, they might have seemed a little perverse, in a sense, but I thought they were spot on, because people will be coming with kids, and they have got to be able to manage a day out which really is fulfilling for everyone but also easy and comfortable for everyone to enjoy during the course of the day. I am not going to sort of trigger another long discussion, as you had yesterday, about what to do with kids in pushchairs, but I think these are really good questions. And I feel about the design companies that they are thinking imaginatively and realistically and sensitively about what they are doing, and they are holding all these things properly in balance.

230.  Perhaps we can focus in on one of the specific Zones that we have seen or heard a little more about, The Spirit Zone. Do you think that Christianity will play an integral part of the Experience, of the visit to the Dome, or is it just incidental to it?

(Mr Mandelson) No, I think that our Christian heritage needs to be, and will be, fully acknowledged in The Spirit Zone. The contribution of Christianity to our history in this country and to our society is important, but it will not be exclusive; there are other faiths, there are other communities, who want to see their role and their beliefs and their activities reflected in the Dome, and I think that is right.

231.  And one question about the National Programme. We have heard, on one of our other visits away from London, about the National Programme of the Millennium Exhibition Company, and we have heard you mention today, and indeed the evidence from Jennie Page yesterday, about the "Our Town" part, where the towns will have an opportunity to display an exhibition in the Dome. Do you think that there is any real enthusiasm, or indeed knowledge, in any other part of the country, about this, apart from Stirling, who obviously know they are going to be the first, and how do you think that we can actually make the Dome and the Millennium Experience something that is felt throughout the country and is a National Programme, rather than just a one-day event for most people in London, at considerable cost?

(Mr Mandelson) I think it is terribly important to do that, and that, as you know, was one of the original five conditions set by the Government a year ago, when we decided to go ahead with it, making it a truly national event that reached out to people of all ages and backgrounds and every part of the United Kingdom was terribly, terribly important. Now what the Dome does is provide a unique national focus for the celebrations that are taking place across the country. The National Programme itself will consist of three things, the Learning Experience, all the educational activities that will go on associated with the millennium celebration and the Dome, and I am very pleased to say that the interest being shown by schools and by teachers has been really very strong indeed. I know, from my own post-bag, how much is going on, particularly in primary school classes, all over the country, because I am on the receiving end of many people's ideas, albums, scrap-books, self-made domes, using various materials, and they all find their way through the Cabinet Office post-room and land in my room, and I see them all. And, I think, in the case of Stephen Timms's constituency, they having come to me, I am going to visit one of the schools who have shown a lot of interest so far. And I am very encouraged by the fact that the New Millennium Experience Company, having recently surveyed a thousand teachers in different schools across the country, have found that 60 per cent of those surveyed would come with their kids to visit the Dome if the price was right, 85 per cent want to receive resource packs on the construction and design of the Dome, so that they can start undertaking classroom-based activity before they come to the Dome, 96 per cent want to be kept in touch with development through a newsletter. But it is not just the Learning Experience, the educational programme, there is also the Millennium Challenge, which you are familiar with, things like SchoolNet 2000, Children's Promise, the musical competition, the Millennium Voices, which will be boosting musical education and activity throughout the country. But the third element to it, as you know also, is the Festival itself, the £100 million Festival. So the Learning Experience, the Challenge, and the Festival, taking place between now and the year 2000, and then, in the case of the Festival, during the year 2000 itself, will generate a thousand flowers and more, blooming in different ways, consisting of different sorts of activity, of educational, cultural, heritage, sporting activity, in different parts of the country, to celebrate the millennium in each and every way that local communities and towns and schools wish to. And what that will all lead to, I hope, will be not only a sense of great national involvement and enjoyment of the millennium celebration but also, of course, a desire to visit the Dome itself. So one needs to see the Dome in a very much broader context that the national celebrations take in their different manifestations, but also that huge time-frame now, which will really properly get under way towards the end of this year, carry on during 1999 and throughout 2000 itself. There is a lot happening.

Chairman

232.  Before I call Mr Keen, I would like to come back to the question of transport, which has particularly preoccupied me throughout these inquiries. The Underground station, the North Greenwich Underground station, was not designed or planned as a way of getting to the Dome, it was planned before it was ever known that there was going to be a Dome, and it was planned as part of the extension of the Jubilee Line, of particular advantage to the people of Greenwich. Therefore, that line is going to be used not only by visitors to the Dome, it is going to be used as part of the normal transport arrangements on the Jubilee Line to North Greenwich. That being so, there will be very, very substantial numbers of people travelling on that who will not be going to the Dome, people who are going home to North Greenwich, or going away to work in the morning. There will be people also who will be coming who will not have tickets but who will want to take a look at the Dome and who will take advantage of what I guess is going to be a very substantial fringe industry, including a fringe catering, souvenir and merchandising industry, possibly unofficial, which will spring up around the Dome, because, if you walk out of that station, you are there, you see it instantly. Has that factor been built in to dealing with the possibilities of congestion?

(Mr Mandelson) I do not think that the numbers, to begin with, will be huge, it may grow as the Millennium Village takes off and gets under way; there is not a huge local population in the immediate vicinity of that Underground station. Now it will grow. I can think of various future uses for the Millennium Dome after the year 2000 that would generate a great deal of traffic, traffic of people, and, of course, once the Millennium Village is fully inhabited that will generate use too. But, I think, in the first instance, the travellers using that station will be visitors to the Millennium Dome itself, and they, of course, will not be arriving at the site unless they have a ticket, because they simply will not get onto the site. But it is a huge station, it is the biggest Underground station of anywhere in Europe, it is spectacular. You have been there, I think.

Mr Maxton

233.  Yes, we have been there.

(Mr Mandelson) It is beautiful, as well as being very, very practical in its design. It is state of the art, not so state of the art that it will not work but, nonetheless, right up to the mark. I am absolutely confident that it will be able to handle the numbers of people travelling through it.

Chairman

234.  I suggest to you, Minister, that, since there are going to be around nine months, assuming everything goes on schedule, between the opening of the station and the opening of the Dome, it would be a very good idea to monitor and take censuses of the traffic, so as to see what use is going to be made of that station, before the Dome opens, by people who are not going to the Dome?

(Mr Mandelson) You do put your finger on something which had not occurred to me, it may have occurred to the Company and to London Underground, and that is the sort of sheer fascination that people are going to have for the Dome before it opens and before the ticket system even gets going. I think that is a rather interesting point that we might just draw to the attention of London Underground and the Millennium Company.

Chairman: Because, in addition to that, of course, and I agree with you about that, there are lots of other things to see in Greenwich, and people go to Greenwich, and have been going to Greenwich, quite apart from the Dome.

Mr Keen

235.  Mr Chairman, just a few questions of simple detail really. First of all, triggered off from what Claire Ward was asking, the design companies, obviously the content is not completed yet; it must be a difficult job, must it not, dealing with the designers, as to how much they are going to be paid, because if the designs are being altered and looked at and changed, as we go along, is it not difficult to keep within the budget, when there are changes, week by week, presumably, and I understand the reason, if they develop from ideas as they go along? How are they paid?

(Mr Mandelson) I think you can rely on Jennie Page to keep a pretty tight handle on the costs, and the Finance Director, Steve Brown, they are both pretty hard-nosed individuals. I do not want such a bearing down on costs to be at the expense of quality and the character of the content, but then nor do I want our budget to be exceeded, and it will not be.

236.  On pricing, it is commonsense not to set the price until the last moment when it is necessary, but is it likely that there will be concessionary prices, for older people, for instance, and also is it likely to be different prices for different times of the year and different days of the week, in order to encourage people not to come only on Saturdays and Sundays?

(Mr Mandelson) I am not sure that the discounts will operate between days of the week, in particular seasons, but the principle of discounting is important and, as I think you discussed in some detail yesterday, will be operated by the Company and with the transport operators, and certainly there will be discounts for children, for students, for families and groups, and for old-age pensioners.

237.  We have talked a number of times this morning about the contributions made by individual towns and the children, mainly, in those towns; has the programme been decided completely yet, or should schools who want to take part, in various places in the country, apply: how is it being decided?

(Mr Mandelson) The education programme, the Learning Experience, which is associated, is going to be rolled out shortly to local education authorities, and I would, incidentally, at this stage, Chairman, like to record my appreciation of and thanks to the Department for Education and Employment and its Secretary of State, David Blunkett, who has taken a very strong, personal interest in this dimension of the Experience, of our millennium celebrations. There are local educational managers in place, in every region of the country, and their job will be to roll out the different ways in which schools can engage in the Millennium Experience, and liaise with LEAs and individual schools to make sure that the full educational benefit of the Experience is gained. I am very excited about the educational dimension to it. I think it is going to generate a lot of interest and a lot of excitement amongst young people, and result in a lot of people coming to the Dome itself, obviously. But we also have, of course, as you know, the NMEC Junior Boards, there are 13 in all, 12 around the country, in different regions, and one national Board, of school-children, who will be making their input to the design and development of the Dome's contents. So it is another way of engaging young people in it.

238.  I was very pleased with the answer you gave me when you first appeared before us, when I said would the Dome give us a chance to look at ourselves as human beings and what we are and where we are going, and you said yes and that will be a major part of it, or a large part of it. But, as one who has an aversion to history but regrets that I will not live through the next century, where I am sure there is going to be space travel and possibly some sort of time travel, as the scientists develop that, is that going to be a major part of at least one of the sections, space?

(Mr Mandelson) I think, in a number of Zones, it is. The Zones that come to mind are one that is concerned with mobility, how we move, how we travel, how we get from one place to another and how those destinations are going to be extended in the future; there is also the Global Zone, how we live and travel across the planet, and that is conveniently part sponsored by British Airways, so I think there will be a travel dimension in that. But also in the Zone concerning the Mind, science, creativity, what we do with our brains, what we can invent and how we innovate. So I think that there should be, in each of those Zones and others, enough to interest you and to satisfy you. I personally do not feel that that should be at the expense of or to the exclusion of events of the past. I think our history is very important, it shapes us, it makes us what we are. We are a very proud nation, we like our traditions, we like the institutions and the values and the ways of living that have grown in our country over many centuries, and I think that those should be reflected, they make our national identity, as much as anything else. So, whilst the future is important, I do not think it should be an exclusive interest or emphasis in the Dome.

Mr Wyatt

239.  Mr Chairman, I am sorry I was late, and, Minister, I may have missed this, but have you agreed that the Experience can only happen for one year, is that a decision now?

(Mr Mandelson) It is the existing policy of the Company to have the Experience run for a year, yes.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 1998
Prepared 12 August 1998